• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
doublesuited77

Handicap Percentiles

43 posts in this topic

10% are single digits handicaps. that seems very high.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

10% are single digits handicaps. that seems very high.

You can be a 9 and still put up some big numbers. I'm going from memory here, but I believe it's something like that. Either way, there are a much higher percentage of single-digit handicappers on this forum (and virtually every other golf site) than exist in the real world.

I'd actually like to find that chart sometime... it showed the handicaps and the percentiles. I swear the USGA had it in their handicapping section somewhere, but the last time I saw it was about 10 years ago.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

You can be a 9 and still put up some big numbers. I'm going from memory here, but I believe it's something like that. Either way, there are a much higher percentage of single-digit handicappers on this forum (and virtually every other golf site) than exist in the real world.

i'd believe that 10% of people WITH HANDICAPS are single digits. but 75% of golfers don't have handicaps.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd believe that 10% of people WITH HANDICAPS are single digits. but 75% of golfers don't have handicaps.

I doubt even that 10 percent of people with handicaps have single-digit caps. There's plenty of long-suffering duffers out there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt even that 10 percent of people with handicaps have single-digit caps. There's plenty of long-suffering duffers out there.

According to the USGA, you're wrong:

http://www.usga.org/playing/handicap..._handicap.html In fact, 20% of golfers with handicaps have single-digit handicaps. Obviously, it's safe to guess that the USGA chart is only talking about people with handicaps.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

yeah I could have guessed that simply because most people don't get an official handicap until they're pretty good
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt even that 10 percent of people with handicaps have single-digit caps. There's plenty of long-suffering duffers out there.

yeah I could have guessed that simply because most people don't get an official handicap until they're pretty good

Agreed 100% on both postings.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed 100% on both postings.

You can't agree with both. The one below is false. The chart clearly says about 20%.

I doubt even that 10 percent of people with handicaps have single-digit caps. There's plenty of long-suffering duffers out there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

You can't agree with both. The one below is false. The chart clearly says about 20%.

Sure I can, it's the internet. Maybe you haven't heard but I can hit 320 yd bombs all day long & i'm a scratch player

BTW, Lamebums stated he didnt believe that even 10% of the folks with handicaps had single digits...the study claims 20% so he is basically stating the study is claiming at least twice as many single digit handicappers as he blieves there to be. Wow that got kind of wordy. Anyhoo, I agree 102.5% with what he stated.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW, Lamebums stated he didnt believe that even 10% of the folks with handicaps had single digits...the study claims 20% so he is basically stating the study is claiming at least twice as many single digit handicappers as he blieves there to be.

If you're incapable of discerning fact from opinion and want to argue about it, please go elsewhere. The USGA knows what percentage of people with handicaps have what handicap. It's fact. "lamebums" is guessing. What he believes is irrelevant - it's not correct.

So again, he's wrong, and you can't "agree" with something that's been proven incorrect. It's not a matter of "agree" or "disagree" - it's right versus wrong. He's wrong.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

According to the USGA, you're wrong:

Ugh... I've been playing for 2 years, have ~$2,000 worth of equipment, have taken ~$500 worth of lessons, and have a worse handicap than 98.66% of the handicap-keeping golf population.

I've just lost all my will to play.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the USGA, you're wrong:

Consider this, then - and if figures into what Dyna is saying - what about those of us who keep track of our handicaps, but don't feel like forking over the $25 to get an official USGA handicap (and thus aren't on the USGA's page)? The majority of us aren't going to enter into any official events, anyway, even if we care enough about the game to get a handicap.

The problem citing the USGA, as good as an organization as it is, it still doesn't represent 100 percent of all golfers.
Ugh... I've been playing for 2 years, have ~$2,000 worth of equipment, have taken ~$500 worth of lessons, and have a worse handicap than 98.66% of the handicap-keeping golf population.

Don't worry about it. I hacked it up really badly until about this March (couldn't break 150), and I started getting it together.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the percentage of ALL golfers who actually have a USGA score? My guess since I think it's impossible to even know how many golfers there actually are is that the number is a very low percentage of all golfers.

Just throwing out some example numbers, say 10% of all golfers have an official USGA handicap....& I feel 10% is way too high, & if only 20% of those have single digits that would mean the actual number of single digit players in relation to ALL golfers is minuscule.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's an interesting article on popeofslope.com that I read recently. Among other things, it mentioned that the USGA says that only about 4.5 million of the nations 26.4 million golfers have "official" indexes. That's about 17%.

Also said the average handicap for men is 16.1 (I always knew I was just "average"), 28.9 for women.

Here's the article, not sure when it was written:

http://www.popeofslope.com/courserating/numbers.html
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of the reason it seems fewer golfers would be single digit than are is because we tend to automatically add handicapt to the course rating and expect a golfer to shoot that score. Only the low ten out of 20 are counted at 96%. If you are playing a course with a higher slope, than your home course, playing to your handicap is rare. I was posting a lot of high 80s low 90s rounds last year carrying a16+ and had a hot week on vacation when I played several days in a row, with two scores in the low 80s. I didn't break 85 for 2 months after that but my handicap stayed at 14.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, so I'll confess--I don't have an "official" USGA handicap, but recently logged on to one of those internet sites and put in my scores.

I have always considered myself a "bogey" golfer, but the scores I put in had a couple in the 80's and one 78. It calculated 8.7, so I put down 9 when I signed up on this site. Maybe there are others like me whose handicap isn't "official".

I really haven't kept up with a handicap before(redneck golf doesn't require it, and I really haven't played enough to maintain it), but getting back into the game a little more lately, I am developing interest in some tournaments where you need a handicap. So I will probably fork over the $ to a USGA affiliated service and try to get "legit". The public course where I play has the service for about $30/year.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, so I'll confess--I don't have an "official" USGA handicap, but recently logged on to one of those internet sites and put in my scores.

Unofficial handicap indexes are useless, and I'd never bet someone who didn't have a real index because there is no way to verify it. I'd hazard to guess that people who don't play in events where ALL the rules are followed don't know half of the rules and don't really shoot what they think they shoot because they are unknowingly shaving stokes by not understanding what are penalties and how you should play your next shot after a penalty, not to mention rampant gimmie putts of 4'+.

I've never understood why someone would pay 1k+ in equipment every other year and not want to pay $25/year for a USGA handicap.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I agree. With me it's never been the 25 bucks but the availability of the service. Plus for the last 10 years, I haven't played enough golf anyway to keep a handicap current, much less play to it.

In my former life, I played mostly at a small private club where everyone knew everyone. We played "2 low" Wed, Thur, Sat, and Sun afternoons, no handicaps used. The club did not provide handicapping and I doubt if a single member had a USGA handicap. If you played someone else one to one, it was a level match.

Currently, I play only occasionally with friends or business associates, and while it is friendly competitive, we are about the same ability so no handicap is needed.

This year though, I have been getting interested in getting back into the game. I want to learn more about the rules and get a legitimate handicap and possibly compete in some events that require one. You know, "real golf".
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • 14- way Carry Bags?
      I had an ogio 14 way carry bag and hated it after one frustrating round I gave it away. 
    • XE1 Wedge: Have you tried it?
      It may be great but at what cost?  Not willing to lose my dignity to possibly save a shot or two.  Plus I love my jaws wedges with the md grooves. Straight ?. 
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Well said Mr.  Desmond the funny thing in all this is that somehow poor people support Trump against their own best interest. And call bernie a communist despite not really knowing what that or socialism is or the difference between the two. 
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Bernie says the system is rigged - stats since the 1980's prove that a great amount of wealth has shifted towards a very small percentage of people. Does that not concern you?  Walmart employs people with such small wages that their people are on welfare, so the argument goes that Walmart is a huge beneficiary of living off the government tit. As to Bernie's war against financial institutions, can you doubt that Wall St helped out the 2007 Depression? Completely irresponsible behavior based on greed. Hedge fund managers get capital gains rate on their compensation? Ridiculous. How many people do you know make over $10M on ordinary income? That is where he proposes a 52% tax that become 73% when one adds SS and Single Payer taxes, and then you have the state income tax, so it would get high. And it is too high, but he would not get that through Congress unless we truly had a revolution and all the Dems came out to vote for the revolution. If all Dems vote, Pubs lose except in areas so gerryrmandered that the one party it favors will always win. Bernie on guns? He won't take away guns, it's not in his record. Bernie is not snake oil -- Bernie and Trump are here because of the last 30 years of growing inequity, political correctness and divisiveness. If we do not address it with traditional politics, then eventually people will wake up and vote their interests, which would be Sanders  or a similar politician. It is time for change, the last 30 years have been tough on all levels of the lower and middle classes while the upper class have the "let them eat cake" attitude. That only takes one so far before people vote for big change. I asked a 20 something the other night who she likes, Trump, Cruz, Sanders, Clinton - I said Clinton would work with the other side, Bernie wants a pipedream - she said "I want Bernie." I just said if you want Bernie, you better get out the vote because it will take a lot of young people to do it. Before I am "labeled" again, I don't think any candidates in either party are to my liking. But I think we do need incremental change ... now to reverse some of the last 30 years and renew the American Dream -- it should be for all, not 1%.
    • Anyone enjoying the drink tonight?
      Hopslam last night, just released by Bells.  Best beer in a can, which used to only be in a bottle.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries