Jump to content
IGNORED

TaylorMade Prepping to produce Non-Conforming Clubs


Note: This thread is 3934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I also can't see how TM can benefit from making non conforming clubs.  Not sure what type of market is there for it.  I mean, if they create a driver that can hit 30 yds longer because of a hot face, then yes, but we all know that's not going to happen.  The advantage is marginal at best.  You can only make the faces so thin before it caves in.  And even now, TM isn't known for having the most durable products out there.

500cc, even 600cc did exist for a time right before they imposed the 460cc limit.  And even during then, not too many people were interested.  It just got so big where it actually became harder to swing it and yes, to a point where aerodynamics came into play.  It was no longer confidence inspiring thinking on how to swing a stick with a balloon on the end.

So really not sure why TM would even suggest such an idea cause they know very well there is a high chance it flopping.  Like one of the posters said, sounds more like an ego thing.

Acer XF Ti 10.5 / GDI G60
Mizuno JPX 825 Hybrids 16* and 19* / Steel Fiber HLS75
Mizuno MP H4 (4-PW) / Steel Fiber i95 cw
Titleist Vokey 50,54,58
Odyssey ProType Tour #7

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I also can't see how TM can benefit from making non conforming clubs.  Not sure what type of market is there for it.  I mean, if they create a driver that can hit 30 yds longer because of a hot face, then yes, but we all know that's not going to happen.  The advantage is marginal at best.  You can only make the faces so thin before it caves in.  And even now, TM isn't known for having the most durable products out there.  500cc, even 600cc did exist for a time right before they imposed the 460cc limit.  And even during then, not too many people were interested.  It just got so big where it actually became harder to swing it and yes, to a point where aerodynamics came into play.  It was no longer confidence inspiring thinking on how to swing a stick with a balloon on the end.  So really not sure why TM would even suggest such an idea cause they know very well there is a high chance it flopping.  Like one of the posters said, sounds more like an ego thing.

Lol I remember those, I could actually feel the air pushing against the club face...

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Stuffs

I also can't see how TM can benefit from making non conforming clubs.  Not sure what type of market is there for it.  I mean, if they create a driver that can hit 30 yds longer because of a hot face, then yes, but we all know that's not going to happen.  The advantage is marginal at best.  You can only make the faces so thin before it caves in.  And even now, TM isn't known for having the most durable products out there.

500cc, even 600cc did exist for a time right before they imposed the 460cc limit.  And even during then, not too many people were interested.  It just got so big where it actually became harder to swing it and yes, to a point where aerodynamics came into play.  It was no longer confidence inspiring thinking on how to swing a stick with a balloon on the end.

So really not sure why TM would even suggest such an idea cause they know very well there is a high chance it flopping.  Like one of the posters said, sounds more like an ego thing.

I don't think their target market for these product would be serious golfers who maintain a handicap.  I think they would target friends and family of serious golfers, casual golfers who want to increase their enjoyment of the game and don't care about submitting a score for handicap.

I could see my son wanting a driver that allows him to hit the ball further or some other club that makes the game easier given he only plays a few times a year.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Let's not forget that until clubs are actually released, it could just be Mark King throwing a hissy fit and/or saying stupid things. It might never happen.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Can anyone give me a definition of "bunny slope" as it relates to golf. The closest this thread comes to it is suggesting bunny slope is a very easy, short 9 hole course. If that's so, what does that have to do with non-conforming clubs.

BTW, non-conforming clubs will probably have a huge market, there are a lot of people who fall for gimmicks all the time, especially in the world of golf. The percentage of golfers who will commit themselves to the point of regularly visiting and posting to a golf forum are probably very small in comparison to all recreational golfers out there, so of course on TST, the idea is not going to go over big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm obviously missing something relative to the long putter controversy. I thought that the governing bodies of golf were finally enforcing the concept of the free swing of the club as the rule.

Guys like Kuchar that use a longer putter, but still move/swing both hands during the unanchored stroke will be allowed to continue unaffected by the ruling. The equipment is still legal; it's the creation of the pivot that's being disallowed. I've never understood how they were used in that manner in competition all this time. It's not a swing...it's an assisted pendulum.

The only thing that I ever viewed as vaguely positive about them is that it makes it easier to find in your bag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Screw it. As long as they're marked as non-conforming/training clubs and they're not used in club competitions or handicap rounds, then let someone learn the game however they want to. I think of it as being similar to the PerfectShot arm gimmick that came out when I was in high school. It teaches you the ideal line to shoot a basketball, but no one is going to use it in a game.

Let people have their bunnyslope clubs and learn the game, then graduate to some real sticks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Not sure if there is a real market for non-conforming clubs.  Callaway's ERC driver wasn't exactly a success story, even though Arnold Palmer liked it.

If the clubs are cheap, maybe some will buy them as a novelty.  I can't see many golfers dropping serious cash on such equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by newtogolf

I doubt they would mark them as non-conforming (since products like Hammer don't either) but would just have a separate product line for them.

Separate product line...  TraylorMade :)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The non conforming heads are out there, and not easy to spot.  I have a friend who is an amateur clubmaker. He put a nonconforming TM japanese issue head on a 52" shaft for us to play around with.  None of us have taken it to a golf course yet, but one of my buddies got booted from a local range for hitting too many balls out through the back fence.  Clearly, the shaft is easy to spot.....  But the high COR head is not marked in ANY way.  Just an older model TM driver head.  And I fear that these 'new' non conforming clubs will be hard to spot, also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Eh... kind of disappointed by this. What's the point of playing the game if your going to do it with clubs that are against the rules. Obviously a lot of people don't care but, still, I don't like it. It seems like TaylorMade is just pressing the issue and trying to get under the skin of the USGA.

The "bunny slope" idea is somewhat appealing if the game is going to appeal to more people. In archery, there are recurve and compound bow divisions for tournaments. The compound bow is very expensive and, generally, the more money you pour into it the better your performance. In recurve archery, there is very little that actually changed, due to FITA regulations. It is a more pure sport. This is why recurve is an Olympic sport and compound archery is not. However, there are two divisions, or more, where recurve has been more or less skill limited, and in the compound divisions equipment limited. The top 100 archers in recurve division hit a quarter sized target About 98% of the time and the top 100 compound archers hit a dime size target more than 99.5% of the time with really expensive equipment. Also, compound people practice 1/5 the amount, of their recurve counterparts. In this case, maybe having more divisions is good for the sport? Handicaps might be adjusted, or something?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would assume these types of clubs would be a stepping stone like most of us use game improvement irons as a stepping stone. Eventually, as your game progresses you move to more traditional clubs. I know I want to eventually move to blade irons if I ever get consistent enough with my swing and ball striking to allow for it. I actually feel like the ridiculously sized heads of drivers are worse than someone using an anchored putting stroke.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

In other news:

-Nike manufactures "bunny slope" basketball shoes with tiny pogo sticks glued to the bottom of each one.

-Head Tennis attaches laser sights to their new "bunny slope" racquet collection.

-Bauer Hockey sells 6'x4' piece of sheet metal with a handle attached to it for beginning goaltenders.

-UnderArmour now making wide receiver gloves that automatically excrete industrial grade adhesives when exposed to pigskin.



You know the old saying... "If you can't beat 'em, cheat."

taylormade.gif Burner Superfast 1.0: 10.5* Driver, 15* 3-wood

adams.gif a5OS Hybrid/Irons Set: 3h-5h, 6-PW

adams.gif "Tom Watson Classic" Wedges: 52*, 56*, 60*
taylormade.gif Est 79 TM-770 Putter, "Fontana" Pattern

 xFIXx

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There are already plenty f non conforming clubs out there. They are all well marked as such so that they can't be missed. I dunno what TM's will look like, bu why should anyone care as long as nobody is using them foranything but their own enjoyment.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm in favour of this. How many folk here have wondered how the XR-03 or XR-05 would compare if it was still in production... imagne XR-11S Or XR-RBZ Yeah, that gives me a smile. Also look at the Callaway McDaddy Grooved wedges. It's a sad day when these are no longer allowed in the amateurs bag because nothing makes you smile like a wedge that bites when the owner barks. All in all I'm excited.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have two thoughts.

First, I don't see this as a problem for the players who aren't interested in it.  I play in rec softball leagues and they limit how hot a bat can be.  Bats are made that exceed the limit and some bats, though legal when made, once "broken in" become hotter to the point that they are illegal.  The ASA puts out a list of banned bats and umpires check the bats before a game.  It really isn't any different than the change to the groove rules--some clubs will exist that are illegal.

Second, I don't see a market for it.  I agree that generally, things that make the game easier could find a market, and maybe belly putters are one of those things.  But if you're in the category of people looking for help through illegal clubs, you're probably a terrible golfer.  Box grooves and bigger driver heads aren't going to make any difference. Maybe belly putters.  But if that's all we're talking about then nobody should care.  Its not like you're going to get cheated by a guy who anchors without you knowing.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I've played Bali Hai, Bear's Best and Painted Desert. I enjoyed Bali Hai the most--course was in great shape, friendly staff and got paired in a great group. Bear's Best greens were very fast, didn't hold the ball well (I normally have enough spin to stop the ball after 1-2 hops).  The sand was different on many holes. Some were even dark sand (recreation of holes from Hawaii). Unfortunately I was single and paired with a local "member" who only played the front 9.  We were stuck behind a slow 4-some who wouldn't let me through even when the local left. Painted Desert was decent, just a bit far from the Strip where we were staying.
    • Wordle 1,035 3/6 ⬜🟨🟨🟩⬜ 🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Just lipped out that Eagle putt, easy tab-in Birdie
    • Day 106 - Worked on chipping/pitching. Focus was feeling the club fall to the ground as my body rotated through. 
    • Honestly, unless there's something about that rough there that makes it abnormally penal or a lost ball likely, this might be the play. I don't know how the mystrategy cone works, but per LSW, you don't use every shot for your shot zones. In that scatter plot, you have no balls in the bunker, and 1 in the penalty area. The median outcome seems to be a 50 yard pitch. Even if you aren't great from 50 yards, you're better off there than in a fairway bunker or the penalty area on the right of the fairway. It could also be a strategy you keep in your back pocket if you need to make up ground. Maybe this is a higher average score with driver, but better chance at a birdie. Maybe you are hitting your driver well and feel comfortable with letting one rip.  I get not wanting to wait and not wanting to endanger people on the tee, but in a tournament, I think I value playing for score more than waiting. I don't value that over hurting people, but you can always yell fore 😆 Only thing I would say is I'm not sure whether that cone is the best representation of the strategy (see my comment above about LSW's shot zones). To me, it looks like a 4 iron where you're aiming closer to the bunker might be the play. You have a lot of shots out to the right and only a few to the left. Obviously, I don't know where you are aiming (and this is a limitation of MyStrategy), but it seems like most of your 4 iron shots are right. You have 2 in the bunker but aiming a bit closer to the bunker won't bring more of your shots into the bunker. It does bring a few away from the penalty area on the right.  This could also depend on how severe the penalties are for missing the green. Do you need to be closer to avoid issues around the green?  It's not a bad strategy to hit 6 iron off the tee, be in the fairway, and have 150ish in. I'm probably overthinking this.
    • Day 283: Putted on my mat for a while watching an NLU video. Worked on keeping my head still primarily, and then making sure my bead is okay.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...