• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
iHack

Question for 9 hc.

13 posts in this topic

What are the scores you post to reach that 9.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

What are the scores you post to reach that 9.

All of them......

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Thanks dave! Guess I should be more specific wise ass. What are the average scores a 9 shoots to get the 9. I'm currently 13 hc and want to know what I need to start shooting to get to 9.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on where you play and the course rating at that course and the tees you play off of. There could be a 10+ stroke difference in the rating from course to course and/or from different tee boxes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends entirely on the courses you're playing.  Your hcp index is calculated by taking 96% of average of your lowest 10 of your last 20 differentials.  Differentials are based on the course ratings and slopes of the courses (and tees) that you're playing.  Golfers playing relatively easy courses will have to shoot much lower scores than those playing very difficult courses.

Do you have an actual, established hcp?  If so, then the short answer is take a look at your current differentials......based on the courses you're playing your lowest 10 scores will have to give you a differential right around 10 to get your index down under 10.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Its pretty simple.  If you a 13.8 and want to be a 9.  Then that is 4.8, basically 5 strokes better than what you are shooting.  So you need to find 5 strokes in a round and you will be at a 9.  Each course score will be different like mentioned above depending on the rating/slope of each course.  An easier way to figure it out is say your home course you normally shoot 83-87 and its rated at 70, then you need to shoot 78-82 to be a 9.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My home course is 71.8 slope 136.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My home course is 71.8 slope 136.

In order to reach a 9 index, you need to average 83 for your lowest 10 of your last 20 rounds for that course and tees.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

IHack,

I am borderline at 10.7 right now and I averaged 82.6 in the last 20 rounds on course with ratings and slope around 69 and slopes in the 120 area.  I think you need to start scoring below 80 a few rounds to get to 9.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

ihack, Steven Palmer Golf is a good place to start if you seek a single digit handicap. He talks about recording your statisics to find the weaknesses in your game that specifically need to be worked on. Good luck on your journey!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if you are looking for a math answer -- how to calculate differentials and then your index -- or a sense of the scores answer.

I broke under ten index when I started having a slightly better chance of shooting in the 70's than I did shooting in the 90's. I used to save a ball from every round in the 70's. I'd write the score and the date on the ball and save them. I knew I was heading under 10 to stay when I stopped commemorating my rounds in the 70's. Still thrilled to shoot a 79 but not save-the-ball worthy. I got to my lowest index of 6.1 when I stopped shooting in the 90's and I felt like a bad round was 85 -- anywhere. That lasted half a season. Hope to get back there this season.

BTW, a slope of 136 is a heck of course. Consider moving up a set of tees and learning what it feels like to break 80 more often. You can move back and forth but learning to have birdie putts creates habits that can carry forward.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rusty the last part of your post is great.  I overheard a few people the other day saying they practice from the front tees but still use their drivers and all just to work on scoring more.  They said it translates greatly when your playing from the backs.  BTW the 136 is only playing at 6400.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • 2016 TST Initiative: Forward Tees Tournament
      In Lowest Score Wins, we recommend that golfers play from the forward tees in order to experience "breaking 80" for the first time, or shooting 65, or having more birdie putts than they've ever had, or whatever. This year, in 2016, we're taking it one step farther: we're encouraging everyone here to work with the head pro at your home course (or, if you play multiple courses, the head pro at each of them!) and to set up a serious "Forward Tees Tournament." A Forward Tees Tournament (FTT) will be: FUN! Enlightening Unique Challenging I'll give anyone who creates and/or participates in a FTT this year the special achievement/award seen to the left. Anyone with this award will be entered to win a TST prize to be determined at the end of the year (and I'll do my best to make it a fairly good prize, but that shouldn't be the main reason why anyone should do this). You can play: With or without handicaps. With or without brackets/divisions/flights. Stroke play or match play. 18, 27, 36, 54+ holes. One day, two days, three days. Etc. I think golfers will love playing in this type of tournament. I think it will challenge them to think about how they play and score. I think it will result in faster play, more fun, more birdies, more chances to hit 7-iron into par fives and feel like a Tour player for once, and… lower scores (or higher scores for the dumb players!). So there you have it. What can you do from here? Pledge here in this thread to talk to your head pro. Recruit your buddies and local golfers to play in your event. Work with your head pro to make the event a success. Play in the event! Post here after your tournament has been played to claim your super-exclusive award/achievement! I'm in. I'll be doing this, hopefully at multiple courses this year. Are you?
    • Posting old scores
      I haven't had an official handicap for about 15 years because in the past several I've only been able to play 6-8 times per year. This year I joined a club so that I could play in tournaments and since I need five scores to get a handicap, I entered some scores in GHIN from my last few rounds in 2015 (since I play so rarely, I can remember them). When I was doing this, I forgot to change the date when posting a score from August so it defaulted to today and is now my most recent reported score. GHIN won't let me change the entry but says to "contact my club" to fix it, which seems like a hassle for everyone involved. It's not my lowest score but it's close, so it will probably be included in my handicap calculation for quite a while unless the date is changed. How big of a deal is this?
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Another thing is sometimes to 'give up' on par. For example, as a bogey golfer, if I hit a bad tee shot and end up say 220yds from the hold on a par 4 rather than the usual 130yds, play the hole as if bogey is the new par. You've made the hole more difficult for yourself and rather than trying to hit the green with a 3 wood (a green designed to be hit with a mid/short iron), take 2 shots to get on the green and 2 shots to get down. 1 220yd par 4 is an easy hole (could even make birdie (which becomes par and a great save) whereas a 220 yd par 3, not off the tee, is asking for trouble. Not always the best way to play golf (read Lowest Score Wins) but the best way to avoid blowing up.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Find it yourself please. I don't think that would provide much insight. Courses, technology… all very different. Too many differences. People who qualify for the Opens rarely actually compete for them. The winners and top finishers almost always come from those who qualify automatically. I'm not. Very few foreign golfers played on the PGA Tour in the 60s. It's been steadily growing - and travel has made it easier, too - through to now. And even now we're starting to see Asian golfers really take over. The only Asian golfer many could name who competed against Nicklaus was Isao Aoki. Maybe Jumbo Ozaki. I'm just talking about the number of golfers. There are a ton more now. I don't care. I realize perhaps your condition forces you to take everything literally, but I wasn't being literal here. The PGA Tour takes the best 150 players or so out of X. As X grows, the amount of separation between those top 150 players narrows. We're in a very narrow phase right now. When Jack was playing, the gap was significantly wider. No. Tiger was quite a bit more dominant and "above" even MORE highly competitive fields. Both halves of that are true: Tiger won by larger margins and against stronger fields. I agree. And I've said similar things. No…? You don't say? (On page 273 of a thread doing just that…)? You seem to be the only person who regards WGCs as weaker fields that offer a "competitive break." It says a lot about how others should consider your opinions on strength of field. You're assuming or haven't read many of my posts in this thread, because I've said several times that I'd put it within a few points of 50/50. Maybe 55/45. Hardly what I'd call "strong." Of course we're both "estimating." Tiger's record, IMO, against significantly stiffer competition, puts him ahead. Not by a lot. Not really. If only 30 players had a realistic chance to win a tournament, adding players beyond that 30th player does little to affect the strength of the field. The WGCs could add 200 club professionals that would never win and… the strength of field would remain exactly the same. Where have I said this? Because even if I did, it doesn't support whatever you're trying to force it into supporting here. The odds of a club pro beating anyone on the PGA Tour these days are slim to none. They were slightly more likely back when fewer "A" players played the PGA Tour… like in the 60s and 70s. A "C" player's game almost never varies enough - not for four days - to beat even 10 or 15 "A" players. Here's an opinion, but one I could probably back up if I cared enough to take the time (I do not): a modern WGC has a stronger field than many (perhaps all) of the majors Nicklaus won. I've said this before, and will say it again here: In Jack's day, there were maybe 10-15 "A" players, 25 "B" players, and the rest were "C" players. Today there are 100+ A players and the rest B players. I'm also going to request, mostly because of the number of times I've had to repeat myself in this thread, that you not quote or respond to me, @natureboy, in this thread. I'm not keen on repeating myself about something that, ultimately, I don't care that much about. It is what it is, their records are what they are, and they could only beat the guys they played against.
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Never try to hit through trees, always just get back to the fairway.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries