Jump to content
IGNORED

Frank Deford - Scorekeepers for golf


nevets88
Note: This thread is 3944 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

From the article:

"Because major golf tournaments continue to maintain a 19th century pose and require golfers to keep their own score, instead of having a paid scorekeeper with a 21st century, electronic device — as is the case with every other big-time sport — golf loves to pretend that this somehow makes the sport more noble."

"Look, golf may be a fine game. But nothing is more irritating than to hear this con that its players are pure and chivalrous while all other athletes are immoral scoundrels. "

http://www.npr.org/2013/06/05/188630711/take-golf-out-of-the-rough-into-the-21st-century

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I disagree, and the author makes several factual mistakes, including stating that adding up your score is required.

At the end of the day you'll always have a pencil handy, and a scorecard is pretty much immune to dead batteries, hacking, bugs, or other technical issues. What if someone is paired with a scorekeeper who hates them? Or really likes them? You don't think there'd be a controversy? And nowhere NEAR "every" golf stroke is captured by television, and that certainly isn't true at every level of the game.

Additionally, virtually every other game features people trying to cheat as much as they can legally get away with, so

Never mind the simple practical reasons - signing your scorecard creates a definitive point in time in which you attest to your score, and despite his claims to the contrary, I think there's still something to be said for signing to say "this is what I shot today." Only you might know if your ball moved a little or you double-hit a shot out of the trees somewhere.

Keeping a scorecard is not that difficult. The upside is tremendous, and the practical reasons for a scorecard outweigh doing it electronically.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's the type of drivel I've come to expect from Frank Deford.  Frank should write for soap operas where drama and scandal are appreciated.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

And pencils work in the rain.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

His point is more about golf stubbornly clinging to ancient traditions instead of moving into the 21st or even 20th century. I have no issue with keeping score on a scorecard as it's familiar but requiring the pro's to do this when there are scores of officials following them is anachronistic.

In regards to you and I, how many times have we played in the rain while walking and without going to extraordinary measures, found our scorecards unreadable at the end of the round? Granted, whipping out a smartphone to record your score is even more hassle in these conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I think the way it works now is fine but I wonder if you score electronically, how that would affect Tiger Woods's last two drops or anyone else's for that matter. I guess the scorer can write a number based on a golfer's actions and can verify with the caddie, so scoring electronically wouldn't mitigate the Augusta drop situation at all.

I get so annoyed when announcers and writers gush when they mention someone calling a penalty on him/herself. When a tennis player overrules a call that goes his/her way, announcers don't make a big deal of how "honest" the player was.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The only time that every stroke is electronically recorded on TV is when the US Open goes to a Monday playoff. To suggest that the practice of keeping one's own score is a shibboleth is preposterous, ludicrous, and asinine.

  • Upvote 1

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Big Tour 15.5*| Rad Tour 18.5*  | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | Vice Pro Plus  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
Originally Posted by MSchott

His point is more about golf stubbornly clinging to ancient traditions instead of moving into the 21st or even 20th century. I have no issue with keeping score on a scorecard as it's familiar but requiring the pro's to do this when there are scores of officials following them is anachronistic.

In regards to you and I, how many times have we played in the rain while walking and without going to extraordinary measures, found our scorecards unreadable at the end of the round? Granted, whipping out a smartphone to record your score is even more hassle in these conditions.

Or washed your shorts after the round with the scorecard in the back pocket!  Did that on Monday.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by MSchott

I have no issue with keeping score on a scorecard as it's familiar but requiring the pro's to do this when there are scores of officials following them is anachronistic.

As we've seen, even in majors with small fields (The Masters), there are NOT "scores of officials" following the players.

Yes, they have volunteers oftentimes following players to help with ShotLink and things like that, but if you watch ShotLink, you'd quickly see how often they screw up.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

Yes, they have volunteers oftentimes following players to help with ShotLink and things like that, but if you watch ShotLink, you'd quickly see how often they screw up.

Just go to any PGA Tournament and watch the volunteers in action. Bottom line, they are volunteers so you get what you pay for. Some are really sharp and some are just there doing their best.

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Big Tour 15.5*| Rad Tour 18.5*  | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | Vice Pro Plus  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I got no problem with players keeping their own score, but I think the draconian measures for signing an 'incorrect scorecard' should be done away with. The most famous example was, of course, the 1968 Masters when the entire world saw DeVicenzo make a 3 on 17 but he signed for a 4. No reason to just simply 'correct the math,' so to speak instead of either making the higher score stand or DQ if the score was lower. The assumption is cheating in the case of the lower score; that's quite a penalty on what simply could have been bad math or carelessness.

Yes, I get the nobility & accountability of signing a card - it's like a contract. But...have you ever read every word of a contract before you signed it?

Just inject some common sense into the process. All I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


only in golf could you sign a card for wrong score, have it accepted - lose championship AND have so many people think it is a great system, we use technology from the 1600's and are proud of it to monitor the billion $ industry that is professional golf..but we take phone calls from some clown watching in HD slow motion to see if a dimple moved...and think it is good.

golf rules are crazy.

Driver- Callaway Razor somthing or other
3W- Taylor Made R11S
3H Rocketballz
4I-PW- MP-59
Gap- Vokey 54

Lob- Cleveland 60

Putter- Rife

Skycaddie SG5  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by zipazoid

I got no problem with players keeping their own score, but I think the draconian measures for signing an 'incorrect scorecard' should be done away with. The most famous example was, of course, the 1968 Masters when the entire world saw DeVicenzo make a 3 on 17 but he signed for a 4. No reason to just simply 'correct the math,' so to speak instead of either making the higher score stand or DQ if the score was lower. The assumption is cheating in the case of the lower score; that's quite a penalty on what simply could have been bad math or carelessness.

Yes, I get the nobility & accountability of signing a card - it's like a contract. But...have you ever read every word of a contract before you signed it?

Just inject some common sense into the process. All I'm saying.

Unless you treat counting as the math, math has nothing to do with it.  Players are not responsible for the addition of the hole scores, only the hole scores themselves.

And the rules are made to apply to all situations, not just the ones that are covered by TV.  And frankly I feel a lot worse for a player who incurs an inadvertent and unknowing penalty, signs a wrong scorecard, and gets DQed than I do for a guy who can't be bothered to check to see if his score was recorded correctly when there were no such complications.  Roberto's own characterization of his actions was spot on, IMO.  A pro who is "simply . . . careless" about his score deserves what he gets.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by turtleback

A pro who is "simply . . . careless" about his score deserves what he gets.

So disagree.

So with this logic, if say, Carmelo Anthony thinks he scored 32 points but he really scored 34, he should get credit for 32?

They're there to play golf to its highest level, not add. Let someone else do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by zipazoid

So disagree.

So with this logic, if say, Carmelo Anthony thinks he scored 32 points but he really scored 34, he should get credit for 32?

They're there to play golf to its highest level, not add. Let someone else do that.

You really want to compare basketball where the action is high speed and chaotic to golf?  If a pro golfer and their caddie can't keep track of how many shots he/she took during a hole then there's some serious issues there.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by zipazoid

So disagree.

So with this logic, if say, Carmelo Anthony thinks he scored 32 points but he really scored 34, he should get credit for 32?

They're there to play golf to its highest level, not add. Let someone else do that.

YET AGAIN, they do not need to add, all they need to do is get the hole scores correct.  And comparing golf to basketball is simply ludicrous.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

They do have to add...at least the number of strokes for any given hole. But you never know if a scorer will be in place to catch Kevin Na's numerous whiffs and chops out of the trees. So it's usually simple, can be occasionally complex, and difficult to fully oversee when you have 70 individual games going on simultaneously. I do agree with the notion that an honest error which can be easily corrected on the scoreboard shouldn't disqualify someone.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by turtleback

YET AGAIN, they do not need to add, all they need to do is get the hole scores correct.  And comparing golf to basketball is simply ludicrous.

Yes they do need to add, and if their math is wrong, they get DQ'd. There's 18 numbers on that card that need tallied, which doesn't sound like a big deal, and 99 percent of the time will be tallied correctly. But only in golf, if in that one percent where they are tallied incorrectly does the player get credited with the erroneous score (if it's higher) or DQ's (if it's lower).

Re comparing basketball to golf, don't miss my point. All I'm saying is, in other sports the players aren't obligated and required to keep the score, and further, if should the player come up with a different number than reality, that number doesn't become fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3944 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟨 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...