Jump to content
IGNORED

Grain/Break


Note: This thread is 3936 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by phan52

The grain on those greens is confounding, something the best players in the world could never figure out.

The grain was not "confounding" or confusing or in any way a real issue at all. C'mon.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

The grain was not "confounding" or confusing or in any way a real issue at all. C'mon.

Yeah, it was. Getting the speed and line at the same time was very difficult. I never saw so many missed 5-6 footers, and anything over 10 feet was a mystery.

Hugh Wilson is the architect of record, but William Flynn is really responsible for the greens. Flynn greens are subtly diabolical, and add in the new grasses like the creeping bentgrass that have variable grain patterns and you have confounding greens. You could have a 10 foot putt that has two different grain patterns. If you are thirty feet away, you are guaranteed different grain patterns.

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by phan52

Yeah, it was. Getting the speed and line at the same time was very difficult. I never saw so many missed 5-6 footers, and anything over 10 feet was a mystery.

You missed my point. It's got nothing to do with grain. And even if the greens did have "grain," they wouldn't affect the amount of break. Science.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

You missed my point. It's got nothing to do with grain. And even if the greens did have "grain," they wouldn't affect the amount of break. Science.

Grain doesn't affect the amount of break? You're kidding, right?

Science, indeed.

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by phan52

Grain doesn't affect the amount of break? You're kidding, right?

Science, indeed.

It is science, the only thing grain does is effect the speed of the putt. This in turn will effect break just as would if the greens were faster or slower normally. If you have a straight putt, flat slope, and the grain was from left to right or right to left, there would be no break in the ball going in that direction. Here's the reason why. Its called gravity. If everything is flat, the ball can not break. There is no magical force forcing the ball left or right. Break is all bound by gravity. the ball will travel were gravity takes it. The only thing that effects it otherwise is speed of the greens.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by phan52

Grain doesn't affect the amount of break? You're kidding, right?

Science, indeed.

Yep. I'm right on this. See the "AimPoint" thing in my certifications in my sig? That's how, and I've done my own testing too.

Grain affects speed, but it doesn't do anything to change the amount of break outside of changing speed. The absolute grainiest green s on the PGA Tour will vary by ONE foot on the stimp when you have a putt directly into the grain (i.e. uphill) and down grain (downhill). This can affect the read because on an uphill putt you have to hit the ball harder, so the ball has less time for gravity to make the ball break, but again: it's affecting the stimp +/- 1 on the grainiest greens on the PGA Tour .

Not the greens at Merion. Not even close.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

Yep. I'm right on this. See the "AimPoint" thing in my certifications in my sig? That's how, and I've done my own testing too.

So, you are saying that if you are putting east to west across some grain that is going north to south, or into the grain on an uphill putt, the grain will have zero affect on the break of the putt? I mean, really, I've peen putting on bent greens for years and I don't need certification to know that the grain will affect the putt without the proper speed. And I do my own testing every time I play golf on bent greens, especially the newer courses in the area like Militia Hill at Philadelphia Cricket Club. Even the A caddies who have been there since it's opened haven't fully figured the greens out, and they don't have anywhere near the character of Merion's greens.

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by phan52

So, you are saying that if you are putting east to west across some grain that is going north to south, or into the grain on an uphill putt, the grain will have zero affect on the break of the putt? I mean, really, I've peen putting on bent greens for years and I don't need certification to know that the grain will affect the putt without the proper speed. And I do my own testing every time I play golf on bent greens, especially the newer courses in the area like Militia Hill at Philadelphia Cricket Club. Even the A caddies who have been there since it's opened haven't fully figured the greens out, and they don't have anywhere near the character of Merion's greens.

It's off topic for this thread, but grain does not affect the break of a putt. And I'm sorry, but your experience doesn't count as "testing" or science or proof. Map greens to a millimeter, determine the amount of break, compare them to the computer models, and so on and then we can talk. That's what Mark Sweeney's done, and I've seen the data. That's evidence. There are other threads about this, though, so that's enough for now.

The greens at Merion are beguiling, but you know what makes for the most beguiling greens? Relatively flat slopes (1% or so - minimal grades for drainage). People miss more putts on relatively flat sections of the green than anywhere else.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Seems like the grain/break argument is largely one of semantics.

If

Originally Posted by iacas

Grain affects speed

and

Speed affects break (by giving gravity more or less time to act)

then

Grain (indirectly) affects break.

Can everyone live with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by phan52

So, you are saying that if you are putting east to west across some grain that is going north to south, or into the grain on an uphill putt, the grain will have zero affect on the break of the putt? I mean, really, I've peen putting on bent greens for years and I don't need certification to know that the grain will affect the putt without the proper speed. And I do my own testing every time I play golf on bent greens, especially the newer courses in the area like Militia Hill at Philadelphia Cricket Club. Even the A caddies who have been there since it's opened haven't fully figured the greens out, and they don't have anywhere near the character of Merion's greens.

this is not going to end well Phan... some on here will argue the finest detail to last letter.

the grain is left to right - so it is faster left to right - so it breaks more left to right...but if YOU SAY the putt breaks more left to right because the grain that would be totally incorrect - and you are stupid because you look at the obvious and don't care about the definition. obviously reasonable people would admit the the putt moves more left to right because the grain...but not on here buddy - it doesn't work that way at all.

Words matter - and for godsake next time you have a driver in your hand don't ever stay behind the ball!!! you will fall over LOL.

Driver- Callaway Razor somthing or other
3W- Taylor Made R11S
3H Rocketballz
4I-PW- MP-59
Gap- Vokey 54

Lob- Cleveland 60

Putter- Rife

Skycaddie SG5  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Originally Posted by France46

Seems like the grain/break argument is largely one of semantics.

If

and

Speed affects break (by giving gravity more or less time to act)

then

Grain (indirectly) affects break.

Can everyone live with that?

No. That's not how it works. It marginally affects putts that are INTO the grain or DOWN grain. It doesn't affect putts that are largely across the grain.

Putts that are INTO the grain or DOWN grain tend to be the putts that are very close to straight, so they don't vary in how much they break.

Originally Posted by Lefty-Golfer

the grain is left to right - so it is faster left to right - so it breaks more left to right...

A putt across the grain is not affected by speed or break. It does not break more "left to right." It breaks almost exactly the same amount as a putt with no grain at all. It breaks almost exactly the same amount as the mathematical model predicts.

Originally Posted by Lefty-Golfer

if YOU SAY the putt breaks more left to right because the grain that would be totally incorrect - and you are stupid because you look at the obvious and don't care about the definition. obviously reasonable people would admit the the putt moves more left to right because the grain...but not on here buddy - it doesn't work that way at all.

I'll make this very clear for you, since you're still pissed off that you were called on saying "the weight was fully back and transferred fully forward" at the same time: the putt does not break more left to right.

And the "grain" at Merion is not anywhere NEAR prominent enough to have an effect.


Real world example:

- Stimp 13, a green with no grain or the model, and a putt 90° to the side on 2% slope from 10 feet: breaks 16 inches.

- Stimp 13, the grainiest green in the world , same putt: breaks 16.2 inches.

Stimp 13, a green with no grain or the model, and a putt 30° up the same 2% slope 2% from 10 feet: breaks 6 inches.

Stimp 13, the grainiest green in the world , same putt: breaks 5.7 inches because it has a bit less time (~ half a second) to break due to the grain.

And again, that's the grainiest green the players play in the world, and it basically doesn't affect break. It affects it so negligibly that it's not even worth considering when you put it into practice.


Simply put: it's an old wive's tale or a fib or whatever you want to call it that grain affects the break of a putt.

----

This thread was moved here because it's off topic for the Merion thread.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A putt that is into the grain is not going to break more than a putt with the grain...same with a put that is 90 degrees to the grain. However, a put that is not perfectly parallel or adjacent to the grain is going to be affected by it. Its simple science. More friction on one side of the ball is going to push the ball further than the break would dictate.

I don't care what some nerd with a computer model says.

R7

 Edge 3-SW with Apex4 Steel shafts

 Burner 2.0 AW

  Putter

 Street Shoes

 Glove

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have a related, but slightly off the topic of the argument, question:  What kinds of grass have the most prominent grain?

Phan seems to be suggesting that bent greens do, however, I always thought that the greens we have out here (in California) are mostly bent, and I've never paid any attention to, or noticed, any grain on them.  (I could be wrong about both - maybe they do have a lot of grain, or perhaps they aren't even bent :))

I've always been under the impression that bermuda (like in Florida, I believe, and I think Hawaii??) greens are the ones that have the most grain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by mvarley84

A putt that is into the grain is not going to break more than a putt with the grain...

Because downhill putts are hit slower and break more, and grain grows downhill.

A putt into the grain will not break much more or less than the same exact putt with the grain magically removed.


Originally Posted by mvarley84

However, a put that is not perfectly parallel or adjacent to the grain is going to be affected by it. Its simple science. More friction on one side of the ball is going to push the ball further than the break would dictate.

I don't care what some nerd with a computer model says.

What you're saying is not science. The science - what the "nerd with the computer model" - tells you the opposite - that grain barely affects the amount a golf ball breaks. Sorry. You may have heard things, you may think you've seen situations where the grain "makes" the ball break more, but you really haven't.

This one can be filed under the same heading as the old ball flight laws. Yes, some players FEEL like if they swing more in some direction the ball will start there, but we know the ball starts more where the face is pointing than the path.

So believe what you want. At the end of the day, I couldn't care less about "being right" or "being wrong" - I have this site, and I'm an instructor, and I share the information I know because I enjoy helping people. I want to help people. I'm telling you something I believe and in fact know to be true. If you want to ignore it, so be it. But it doesn't matter to me what you do in the end, except that I hope for your sake you absorb the information I'm sharing and use it to better your game. It's not like I win a prize if I'm right about grain, I just get some people to say "thanks, that thing you said about X or Y or Z really helped me."


GD, bent greens don't really have grain, especially bent grains with poa. The grass will "creep" (it's "creeping bent" in many places) and have a "grain" pattern, but it doesn't act like Bermuda. It doesn't really have a "grain" it doesn't really always grow downhill. We don't worry about grain in the northeast.

And greens stimping at 13 or so are cut so low that even the Bermuda greens don't have much of an effect on the speed (and so even less than the virtually negligible amount of effect on break). If you play a Bermuda green that's stimping at 9 or maybe 10 on the super grainy greens, then you'll want to pay attention to grain, and when you're about 30° or less, you'll want to go up or down one chart (down for into the grain, up for down-grain) for your reads. Again, just for putts from 0 to about 30°.

And newer blends of Bermuda like some of the Tiff-Eagle and other kinds are very, very low-grain. So the changes to the speed are even minimal at slower green speeds.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3936 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
    • If you've only had to adjust retroactively one time in 8 years and have around 5 people each year without handicaps, that's like 40-50 people total so it sounds like you're doing a pretty good job. I think your questions give enough to go off of. This might be a good way to get new people to actually post a few scores during the 6 weeks leading into the first event. Something like "New members will be eligible for tournament money once they have at least 3 posted rounds in GHIN" or something like that. If they can get 3 rounds in prior to their first event, then they're eligible. If not, they'll soon become eligible after an event or two assuming they play a little bit outside of events.
    • This is a loooooong winded narrative so if you don't like long stories, move on. 😉 Our senior club typically gets about 25 new members each year. We lose about 25 members each year for various reasons (moved to FL/AZ, disabled, dead, too expensive). Of the new members, usually 20 have an active GHIN handicap. About 5 each year do not have a GHIN handicap. When they join our club, we give each member a state association membership that includes GHIN handicapping services. We play a series of handicapped tournaments over the summer. When we sign up a new member who does not have a GHIN handicap, we attempt to give them an estimated index until they have sufficient scores posted to have an actual GHIN index.  Our first event typically is around May 15 so, in theory, a new member has about 6 weeks to post a few scores. Posting season in the Mitten starts April 1. Inevitably, several of the unhandicapped individuals seem  to either not play until the first tournament or can't figure out how to enter scores (hey, they are seniors). That situation then leads to my contacting the new member and asking a series of questions: a. Did you ever have a GHIN handicap? If yes, which State and do you recall what it was? b. Do you have an alternate handicap through a non-GHIN handicap service or a league? c. What do you think your average score was last year (for 9 or 18) d. What was your best score last year? Where did you play and which tee was used? e. What do you consider a very good score for yourself? Based on their responses I attempt to give them an index that makes them competitive in the first couple events BUT does not allow them to win their flight in the first couple events. We don't want the new members to finish last and at the same time, we don't want someone with a "20" playing handicap to win the third flight with a net 57. In the event some new member did shoot a net 57, we also advise everyone that we can and will adjust handicaps retroactively when it is clear to us that a member's handicap does not accurately reflect their potential. We don't like to adjust things retroactively and in the 8 years I have chaired the Handicap Committee, we have only done it once. So here are the questions to the mob: Any ideas how to do this better? Any questions one might ask an unhandicapped individual to better estimate their index/handicap? Would it be reasonable to have a new player play once (or more?) without being eligible to place in the money?
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Awesome! I got that a while back with my start word! Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...