• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tpcollins

Weight transfer in downswing - rotate hips only or slide and rotate?

26 posts in this topic

It finally dawned on me that hitting fat shots on regular occasions is actually the center of my swing being behind the ball is due to a lack of proper weight transfer in the downswing - I think. So if I'm able to make a good weight transfer on my downswing, I may be able to reduce this problem.

So I did a quick search and the first link teaches to slide the hips to be no further than the outside edge of the left foot AND to rotate the left hip kinda all in one motion. From the advice of a previous post and knowing now that all the internet info and what is taught by golf instructors is probably wrong -  what is THEE proper way to get the weight from the right side at the top of the backswing to the left side by impact?  Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

http://thesandtrap.com/t/29616/the-biggest-secret-slide-your-hips Start reading...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by colin007

http://thesandtrap.com/t/29616/the-biggest-secret-slide-your-hips

Start reading...

Pretty sure that's the thread to which he was referring, and I'm not sure why he started a new thread on the topic. I'm tempted to just merge these into that thread.

You can't just spin your hips and transfer any weight.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Thanks for the pics - the photo of Nick Faldo actually confirms what I saw recently.  If you move the yellow line in the rh picture over to the outside of his left foot, his left hip would bump the yellow line - I think I'll work on that "slide a little, rotate a lot" method. Thanks for the help.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by tpcollins

Thanks for the pics - the photo of Nick Faldo actually confirms what I saw recently.  If you move the yellow line in the rh picture over to the outside of his left foot, his left hip would bump the yellow line - I think I'll work on that "slide a little, rotate a lot" method. Thanks for the help.

Virtually everyone rotates plenty. Most people need to slide more.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Try all slide with NO rotation, I'll bet you end up rotating anyway and you'll be a lot closer to where you need to be.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

Try all slide with NO rotation, I'll bet you end up rotating anyway and you'll be a lot closer to where you need to be.

It is funny because I have too much slide and not enough hip rotation and am working on the opposite.  Or at least that is what I am told.  We need a stupid monkey in the "Insert Smiley" function.  But I would say if you are going to do what EJ is suggesting here just do an abbreviated follow though to get the feel for it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

The slide gets the weight to the front while simultaneously creating additional upper axis tilt allowing for a shallower AoA and positive path, just like the other thread topic w/ Leitz.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The slide gets the weight to the front while simultaneously creating additional upper axis tilt allowing for a shallower AoA and positive path, just like the other thread topic w/ Leitz.

You are pretty sure the OP gets this and it will help him?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by cipher

You are pretty sure the OP gets this and it will help him?

I kinda get it - not sure what AoA really means ( angle of approach or attack  maybe ) but I can comprehend the other words around it. Close enough - I'll work on it some more.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Insist on instructors not talking above your level of understanding, dont feel shame in not knowing something, and ask a lot of questions. AoA is angle of attack yes. Or approach. Same thing basically.[quote name="tpcollins" url="/t/68392/weight-transfer-in-downswing-rotate-hips-only-or-slide-and-rotate#post_867361"]I kinda get it. [/quote]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Insist on instructors not talking above your level of understanding, dont feel shame in not knowing something, and ask a lot of questions. AoA is angle of attack yes. Or approach. Same thing basically.

Well said. I think I made my point.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

sorry, I forget not everyone understands the acronyms...but yes, angle of attack. When your hips initiate the downswing with a slight lateral 'slide' or 'bump' it helps create upper body tilt away from the target. Often when golfers simply rotate the hips, the shoulders go with them and pull the club path across the body ( or in Trackman/Flightscope terms negative). When you swing from the inside the attack angle usually gets shallower making it easier to launch the ball higher and much easier to create a flight that's not slicing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by cipher

It is funny because I have too much slide and not enough hip rotation and am working on the opposite.  [...]

There's been a lot written around here about why most people need more slide, and maybe feel less rotation. What are the circumstances in which more conscious rotation would be a benefit?

Obviously, sufficient lateral movement needs to be in place. I'm pretty sure I have that. I've been working on feeling a very exaggerated rotation of the hips through the transition and downswing - and been hitting it great now for a couple of weeks. Previously, I was very prone to big 2-way misses. The more dominant hip turn seems to have taken the hook out of play, and the big push slice. If I work really hard on just turning from the top, I get a pretty reliable push fade.

Intuitively, it feels like the more rotational swing has calmed my hand action and made my release more consistent. Any thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by birlyshirly

There's been a lot written around here about why most people need more slide, and maybe feel less rotation. What are the circumstances in which more conscious rotation would be a benefit?

Obviously, sufficient lateral movement needs to be in place. I'm pretty sure I have that. I've been working on feeling a very exaggerated rotation of the hips through the transition and downswing - and been hitting it great now for a couple of weeks. Previously, I was very prone to big 2-way misses. The more dominant hip turn seems to have taken the hook out of play, and the big push slice. If I work really hard on just turning from the top, I get a pretty reliable push fade.

Intuitively, it feels like the more rotational swing has calmed my hand action and made my release more consistent. Any thoughts?

Too much hip slide generally means too fast I believe.  So if the hips slide to far too fast then you are not using the ground in the manner that you should, you are creating path and face issues because the the arms are not in sync with the rest of the body.  I will let any of the instructors share more if they want on that.  I really don't know a lot more about it at the moment and I kind of treat what I am being taught as someone else's intellectual property in a way.  I also think very few golfers have this issue of sliding too much.  If I had to pick, I would choose sliding too much with not enough rotation over too much static rotation.  Know what I mean?

For me or anyone to fix too much slide,  I don't if the thought would be "more conscious rotation".  I am not sure but it seems like that could cause over rotation issues in the upper part of the body and possibly throwing the club head out.  I have a drill for what I need to do to fix it and it is working without actually thinking about rotation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I am not sure what to call it, but (for me) hip slide is initiated at top of back swing with the feeling of bumping my hips forward and sort of falling into a slot. I feel the hip bump followed by the resultant lowering of the club, creating an angle of approach and hopefully some lag. Its not exactly a conscious movement, but more of a "key or trigger". It is definitely a lateral movement to some degree, but not a sway..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Hacker James

I am not sure what to call it, but (for me) hip slide is initiated at top of back swing with the feeling of bumping my hips forward and sort of falling into a slot. I feel the hip bump followed by the resultant lowering of the club, creating an angle of approach and hopefully some lag.

That seems about what I'm trying to accomplish but I'm still trying to understand the exact sequence of events. At some point in time you have to have:

hip slide

transfer of weight

hip rotation

I'm thinking the hip slide promotes the transfer of weight which allows for an easier rotation of the hips. But don't you begin the initial hip slide with a push off from the right foot?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by tpcollins

That seems about what I'm trying to accomplish but I'm still trying to understand the exact sequence of events. At some point in time you have to have:

hip slide

transfer of weight

hip rotation

I'm thinking the hip slide promotes the transfer of weight which allows for an easier rotation of the hips. But don't you begin the initial hip slide with a push off from the right foot?

I really don't know. For some maybe. That may be exactly what I am doing, but it is not what I am feeling. I really do feel the hips bumping. For me, if I thought about pushing off with right foot it would result in excessive slide or out of sync rotation. I watched a video of Tom Lehman a few times, and it seems he exemplifies the bump action. He also has a little delay in shoulder turn at the top. When everything falls into place, the club seems to "drop into the slot" as I stated.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • Iron Game Suffers when Driver Going Well
      For high handicappers myself included, this is typical.   I think it is b/c we don't have the same swing for irons and longer clubs.  If we get them both right in the same round, it is probably by pure luck or coincidence.  Grin and bear, and enjoy the journey.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      The topic title is the question who is the greatest golfer, the poll is the question who was the best. Two different things in my opinion. There's no doubt to me Tiger was a better golfer. How could he not? Spieth, McIlroy, Day but even guys like Wiesberger, Luiten and Donaldson play better golf than Jack. The game evolved so much over the years, and got so much more professional. If Jack would have been around in this era he would benefit from all that as well and be a better golfer than he was (and probably top those guys I just mentioned). But who was the greatest. How do you measure that (can you)? Tiger was dominant in a stronger field, winning more titles than you can count. Jack was the first of a kind, winning the biggest titles (majors) over an enourmous span and having the most of them. Isn't it mostly a matter of personal who you find 'greater'? For me Johan Cruyff is the greatest Dutch football player of time, but I have no doubt that Dennis Bergkamp and Arjen Robben were/are better because the game evolved. 
    • Making a Murderer Discussion Thread (Spoilers Likely)
      Obvisously... she took his case about a month ago. On one hand I hope Avery is guilty as hell, on the other hand it would be an amazing story and twist if turns out to be set up and she can prove that. I think that chance is less than 1%, but still..... Possibly, good point. Should be quite some blood though since they found 'drops', meaning it was dripping from (in this theory) his glove. Exactly my point. I don't think the blood was freely flowing, because than there should be a lot more blood in the car. They found blood consisting with bloody hair. Seems to me, and I know I'm not an expert, that she was already dead when she was in the car, because that would explain the little amount of blood found (no pumping of the heart, no flow of blood) and the place it was found (in the back). One can easily argue that he killed in the garage, moved her to the car, and only then got the plan to burn her instead and moved her again; to the pit. But the 'problem' is that that's not what the DA said what happenend. In my opinion that blood in the car contradicts the story (or truth) he wants us and the jury to believe, and contradicts also with the story of Dassey which is the only thing that links Dassey to the case: his own words. That doesn't mean Avery is innocent, but it might raise some doubt. The DA should stick with the facts, not filling in the blanks with guessing. If he can't prove exact chronologically he shouldn't state it as 'fact'.   Absolutely. I'm not convinced in anything, not in my opinion, not in yours, not at all in the people who made the documentary. Also not a fan of conspiracy theory's. I don't think the murder was planted on him, but I do think some mistakes were made by the justice system. Mistakes that possibly should have lead to his and maybe even more Dassey's release, even though there's a big chance he did it. That's for me perhaps the most interesting part in this case and in the discussion. If we want a justice system where the chance is close to 0% that we convict someone innocent, and the prosecution and police need to follow the rules, it means sometimes the guilty walk free. I think everything they found on the compount while Manitowoc detectives were present should have been excluded. I think the DNA on the blood of the bullet should have been excluded. I think the 'confession' of Dassey should have been excluded. I think Dassey should have given at least a new trial, but that was denied by the same judge which handled his initial case (?!).
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      A long time ago, by Tiger's own admission,  said a golfer's career is measured by "majors won" . So if Woody does not break Jack's major record, then according to Woody, his career will be second to Jack's. Now Jack has said that he expects (expected) Woody to break his major record. So Jack is saying he expects Woody will have the better career.  These are the only two guys who would know who had the best career.   Neither one is going to be the GOAT. They will just be a GOTE. 
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Nope, you blindly worship Jack.  It is obvious that you have not read much, if any, of the thread.  But hey, you saw Jack.  In person, yet.  So what.  I did too.  I saw him win his last USGA championship at Cherry Hills.  I saw Tiger play as well - although in person I only saw practice rounds.  So what.  That does not make my assessment of their respective careers more or less credible.  Geee, I never saw Hogan play so I guess we cannot count him in the discussion.   You think Jack was better.  That is fine.  You are entitled to your opinion.  Just don't spoil it with specious reasons or arguments.  Because those we will slice apart like one of Klinger's salamis.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries