• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
wrecker

Trying to hit the draw

20 posts in this topic

Hello guys new member here and this is my first thread.

My question is using the new ball flight laws, i open the club face a couple of degrees and then try to swing a diagonal path into the back of the ball that is more in to out than the club face angle.

So as i set the club face open at address do i have the back of the hand facing target and then coming back to the ball on the diagonal path in to out do i try to get back of hand facing target upon impact.

Reason i ask this is when i am coming into impact because of the diagonal path into the ball my back of left hand seems to want to trace the diagonal path which is opening face even more causing me to push slice.

Thanks for any advice

Martin

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

You want to feel your right hand turn over down through the ball on that same path, assuming you are right handed.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by wrecker

Hello guys new member here and this is my first thread.

My question is using the new ball flight laws, i open the club face a couple of degrees and then try to swing a diagonal path into the back of the ball that is more in to out than the club face angle.

So as i set the club face open at address do i have the back of the hand facing target and then coming back to the ball on the diagonal path in to out do i try to get back of hand facing target upon impact.

Reason i ask this is when i am coming into impact because of the diagonal path into the ball my back of left hand seems to want to trace the diagonal path which is opening face even more causing me to push slice.

Thanks for any advice

Martin

There is no need to open the face at address.  Assuming we are talking about an iron ... you are hitting the ball on the way down, prior to the bottom of the arc of the swing (which is where, theoretically, the club face would square up) so it is going to naturally be slightly open to the target on its own with no need for pre-manipulation.  Go back to a square clubface at address and see what happens.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

or just stop pushing with the right hand   ; )

I don't feel anything different in my wrists and hands when working/emphasizing head path in to out.  I mainly just try to keep my right elbow under control, initiate with my lower body, and swing everything the same - maybe stretching it out a bit on the follow through out to first base a bit.

Any time I've tried to REALLY hit a hook shot and overdo it with wrists/turnover or excessively closed head, or extreme in to out path, I usually hit great practice swings and then tank the actual shot.  So I try to live very much in close proximity to my normal shot (i.e., small adjustments to affect ball flight = good, big adjustments = risky)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

There is no need to open the face at address.  Assuming we are talking about an iron ... you are hitting the ball on the way down, prior to the bottom of the arc of the swing (which is where, theoretically, the club face would square up) so it is going to naturally be slightly open to the target on its own with no need for pre-manipulation.  Go back to a square clubface at address and see what happens.

Interesting you would say that because that is also how they taught my at the 5SK school.  It could be dependant on each persons swing, not sure.  However, at address they had me line the face to the right of the target.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by SloverUT

However, at address they had me line the face to the right of the target.

that's the trick we all need to learn, isn't it?  (getting the face during the strike to equal what we set up at address).

face angle control is the holy grail (IMHO)

once you can kind of assume that - then it's just a matter of getting that face angle aligned to club path (which is much easier to replicate) that gives you the shot you want.  (as you clearly noted you are doing at the start)

I'm always working to that 1 degree open, 3 degrees club path (little push draw).  It's crazy.   I'm 1 degree (+/- 6), and 3 degrees (+/-2)  (on a good day, maybe a great day - so much more variation at impact with face than pretty much any other metric)

but back to the OP:

With that, I'd still go with what G-Dad suggests, leave the face angle alone and see if you are getting an incremental improvement just with the in/out swing work you are trying.  i.e., change one thing at a time.  then adjust the setup once that seems consistent

else - get thee to a Trackman

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Ty the reason i try to open face at address is because i have had a couple of lessons with a stack and tilt instructor and he advocates that at address open the face slightly.

But it does make sense what u say about the face will be slightly open as i hit down with an iron....saying that what would u suggest for a driver.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once I got in the habit of an inside to out swing I started naturally hitting a draw. I think that's a main key to hitting this shot. Focusing on rotating the wrists and things like that tends to exaggerate my ball flight leading to more of a big push draw or duck hook.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by SloverUT

Interesting you would say that because that is also how they taught my at the 5SK school.  It could be dependant on each persons swing, not sure.  However, at address they had me line the face to the right of the target.

It DOESN'T go without saying - so I should probably preface every piece of swing advice I ever try to spew out with it - that I don't know squat. ;)  The real answer, I'm guessing, is probably that everybody is different.  They've never told me to open my club face at address, but I can guess why ... my miss pre-5SK was already a push or push-cut, so they probably felt no need to "enhance" that.  Maybe your miss is a straight draw or pull or something??

In wrecker's case, I was going off of what was given, and I subscribe to the same school of teaching as the doctor from the old joke ...

"Hey doc, it hurts when I move my arm like this, what should I do?"

"Umm, don't move your arm like that"

... What I mean is that he said he was opening the club face at address and the result was a push slice.  It's certainly possible that the clubface is fine and his path is simply nowhere near where he needs it to be, however, while he's working on the path fix, it seems like closing that clubface down, at least as an experiment, is worth a try.

Think of it this way:  If he opens the club face 4* at address and is able to return that club face to that same point, and his path is currently 2* to the right, well then he's going to hit push-cuts.  If he closes that clubface back to square at address he should start hitting draws.  Now, they may be straight draws instead of push draws, but thats ok because now he can open the clubface at address a bit (but less than before) and maybe find the shape he's looking for.

Again, to reiterate to the OP ... I don't know squat, so take all of this with a grain of salt. ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Again, to reiterate to the OP ... I don't know squat, so take all of this with a grain of salt. ;)

I don't know, all you did is recommend he try something, I thought it was a good take.  I tend to come into the ball with the face more open than it was at address, Oh I also tend to come into the ball with it more closed than it was.

OP, Just find the club face address position that produces the least amount of big misses and go from there working on the swing.  If you need to make an adjustment later on you should know it.  This is Key#5 stuff after all.  Pretty tough to be consistent with it, even for good players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Well let me state that I am not saying anyone is right or wrong.  I am a golf newbie to be sure.  I just know Golfingdad and I have both been to the 5SK school and gotten lessons from similar people.  That is why I found it interesting :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Thanks for all your input guys I do appreciate your help....the main question I need answering is if I have face slightly open at address with backnof hand facing target ...do I return it to the same condition at impact with swing path going in to out. I have just read iacas post about the strong grip vs weak and this makes alot of sense to me....as since my lessons I have weakened my grip and my misses are either snap hook or push slice (to much manipulation through impact causing sprayed shots) I think if I can take a strong grip I can swing in to out without manipulation. ....gona try it tomorrow I will let u know how it goes.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by wrecker

the main question I need answering is if I have face slightly open at address ...do I return it to the same condition at impact with swing path going in to out.

Yes.**

You want the face slightly open to the target at impact along with the swing path pointed slightly to the right of that.  Regardless of whatever else goes on ... if those two things are true, then you will hit a push draw of some degree.

** Again, you're swing path doesn't necessarily have to be in-to-out, but rather "in-square-in."  The bottom of the arc is the "square" part and it happens, ideally, 4-6" inches in front of the ball.  That is what creates the outward path at impact.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Ty for your time golfing dad much appreciated
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't hit a draw really today with my first attempt at it. I still had some pushes. But all hits had great ball flight and distance. I did hook a good bit too, but I was purposely over rolling my wrists, probably too early. But I also hit a few really good accurate shots. I am thrilled at the progress made in one large bucket of range balls. Most if my good hits were really smooth and felt great. Can't wait to get out there tomorrow
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no need to open the face at address.  Assuming we are talking about an iron ... you are hitting the ball on the way down, prior to the bottom of the arc of the swing (which is where, theoretically, the club face would square up) so it is going to naturally be slightly open to the target on its own with no need for pre-manipulation.  Go back to a square clubface at address and see what happens.

Yup. Nailed it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Golfingdad ty so much ....today I went to the range and out of about 60 balls I hit 90 percent with a lovely draw focusing on a square club face and a in to out swing path.....what I did find was the more I tried to hit the inside quadrant of the ball the more I automatically pushed hips forward to get to the inside(something I could never get was the feel for pushing hips forward). Also the clubface opens slightly on impact because of trying to hit the inside of the ball...sending the ball out to the right with a little draw to bring it back. felt amazing....my bad shot was a slight push where I think I was ok with swing path but face matched path and resulted in a straight push. Cant wait to try again haha I love golf now ;)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, this is my first post on this site.  Wrecker, I'm a scratch golfer, so I'll try to help you with some input on drawing / fading.  For me, I go through stretches where I naturally hit a draw, and I also go through stages where I naturally hit a fade.  In the case for me, I've found that, during the time when I'm naturally hitting a draw, in order to fade the ball, I make my grip weaker.  What this does is changes the angle of the clubface throughout my swing, with it being more "open" throughout.  By it being open, it allows me to hit a fade.  I also work really hard on my impact position, focusing on holding off on my club release for longer.  On the other hand, the aspect you're trying to accomplish, when I'm in a period where I'm playing a fade naturally, in order to hit a draw, I strengthen my grip.  This "closes" the club face throughout the swing, creating an opposite effect of the "weaker" grip.  In case you don't know what it means to strengthen and weaken your grip, basically there is what is called a "neutral" grip.  This is when you're gripping the club and you can look straight down at your left hand and see 2 knuckles, those of the index finger and the middle finger.  Strengthening your grip is turning you left hand to the right on the club, and creating a visual of more than 2 knuckles.  Weakening your grip is turning your left hand to the left, creating a visual of less than 2 knuckles.  Hope this tip helps.  Something to always remember, no matter if you're trying to hit a draw or fade, you still have to turn through the shot all the way with your body.  Don't think that in order to hit a fade, you have to be "slower" on your turn through the shot, or that by hitting a draw you have to release the club with your hands more.  Either shot still requires you to turn through the shot properly.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I think you seriously underestimate the difference in the level of dominance each had, when you lump them together as standouts of their caliber, because the calibers were not the same at all.  For the years 1997 through 2007 Tiger was the best player for every single year except 1998 and 2004, and for both 1996 and 2008 he was clearly the best player for the portion of the year he was active. You will find it a challenging task to find anything like that number of years for which Jack was the best.  He was always in the top 3 or so, but not that many years where he was the best.  That is why he has so many fewer POY awards and NO Vardons. Not only did Tiger have more years as the best player for the year, his dominance in those years was far beyond anything Jack ever did in HIS best years.  Tiger had winning streaks of 7, 6, and 5.  Jack's longest was 3 (which isn't even as long as Tigers 4 consecutive MAJORS).  There is the consecutive cut record.  The record setting winning margins in various majors.  The record setting margins by which his stroke averages beat his competitors.  
    • How do I organize a charity tournament to be a raging success?
      26 and a stroke? Holy smokes. Very sorry to hear that.  I have no idea how to organize a tournament but I have played in my share. The best ones are scrambles where you can organize your own team. The outcome has rarely ever mattered to us as long as we were well fed. Find a local restaurant (usually a bbq place) that wants to help you out and give a discount for advertising and spend your money there. Everyone will love to come for a good meal. Some nice prizes and maybe a raffle with some local companies offering you something if you are able to convince them it is worth it to give something to the cause.  Another thing I have seen work well is a silent auction at the end with donated items. I donated airline miles of which I have tons and 100,000 miles went for $205. Free gift for me and the cause got $205. 
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Haha - I get a couple of reputation points for a post and then go and have a blow up hole. Good drive, left myself 145 in down hill (8i), aimed #deadcenter, pulled 2 shots 25 yards left out of bounds, made 9 (+5) in a 9 hole round of (+11). A better way to avoid blow up holes - play stableford!
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Come on now, that's a bit uncalled for in Bernies case.  His political ideals might be way left, but he is at least honest and virtuous.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'll have to examine your other post closer. That's a good point to consider about the expansion to Continental Europe. Largely explains the poor showing of UK & Ireland in the 60's with many top tier European players not eligible. But considering the 200 million U.S. population base to 63 million in the U.K. & Ireland at the time, the latter did surprisingly well if population base was all that matters. IMO an established competitive golfing culture matters in producing elite players too. Those same European players excluded from Ryder Cup were always eligible for the Majors. The Ryder Cup is also a limited field event. It concentrates the 12 top players of the European Tour. From what I've read, depth of field is still stronger for the 'typical' PGA event, though some non-major Euro events are now stronger than some of the 'minor' PGA events. That is a significant change in Euro competitiveness from the 60's. To some extent that 30% drop sounds like it could be due to simply more international players occupying slots in the fields. If the period you mention covers when majors started to use OWGR for automatic qualification that has some not insignificant inherent issues in terms of strength of field. Having a guaranteed start rather than having to qualify would certainly make for an easier decision to travel to the event. But I'm not arguing against the policy decision facilitating international competition with a little points boost just trying to point out that field strength may not have been as weak in Jack's day as you seem to think. Compared to his peers, which is really the only thing I think you can do without speculative nuance I agree there's no question he's the best golfer. I'm really just arguing that standouts of their caliber (so many more wins so many more majors) than typical players among already elite fields are so rare, that I expect they both represent near the achievable human pinnacle in golf talent, which I don't think really differs within a few generations. The nuances of comparison across eras is interesting to me so I'll debate relative points, but I'm against arguments undervaluing Jack's achievements against 'weak fields'. They both faced very stiff competition.   I'm not dissing Jack. I think his achievements are amazing. I also think the same of Tiger's record. IMO winning percentage per start in the Majors is a very significant stat and Tiger has that in his favor (they are both top 10 and within ~ 2% of each other's number). That number is not the official one for Jack though, I truncated his Major starts to end at age 47, which I think is a reasonable cutoff for competitiveness. If Tiger competes as long as Jack did his major win % (up to age 47) might stay about the same, increase, or decrease (more likely), but he certainly won't match the 18 Majors if he doesn't get like 22+ more major starts between now and age 47.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries