• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Lnus

Players performance impact on the score. (help me with a class)

18 posts in this topic

hey, I have a class in school where I have chosen to provide statistics on how player behavior affects the score.
Now, during the PGA Championship, I would be so happy if you could help me, if a player swears or throws a club from Friday to Sunday.
Please write day / player / holes / what he did.
thank you very much!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

No problem dude have a relaxing weekend and I'll have your reports ready Sunday night.  Take it easy.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by TJBam

No problem dude have a relaxing weekend and I'll have your reports ready Sunday night.  Take it easy.

That would be to so much help, will look as much as possible.
Have a nice weekend!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the sort of thing you want?.....

Player x

5th hole

Frowned after poor drive.

Made a putt for birdie

This would prove that frowning leads to birdies, right?

How are you going to account for good behaviour?

This is absurd. Even if it is primary school project.

There is not one single statistic that you could possibly come up with.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Player x 5th hole Frowned after poor drive. Made a putt for birdie

Angel Cabrera Holes 1-18 Did you know his son caddies for him? Missed putt for double bogey.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Perhaps his son was misbehaving.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lnus, good luck with this....I won't see much this weekend, so I can't help...but do hope you get some decent data for the project......and by the way, don't pay any attention to the BS from shorty and jamo above....they are either ignorant about what is the true value of the project, or they are just asshol*s....either way, best to ignore.

Cheers.......

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by BallStriker

, don't pay any attention to the BS from shorty and jamo above....they are either ignorant about what is the true value of the project, or they are just asshol*s....either way, best to ignore.

Cheers.......

Oh really? Ignorant, eh?

Please enlighten us about the "true value" of this project.

There is no possible way to assess any "data" at all.

First of all, you won't see any club throwing and if you did, how could you assess its impact upon the score?

And, as previously mentioned, how would you account for good behaviour? Where can you draw ANY correlations.

"True value" indeed............

Any teacher who accepted this projected as being worthwhile is a fool.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience, a player's score affects their behavior much more than the inverse...... :-D
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by David in FL

In my experience, a player's score affects their behavior much more than the inverse......

Well put. That is probably the experience of most.

But, of course Ballstriker is very keen to see the results of this important research which the OP wants others to do.

I saw Tiger muttering after a poor drive this morning. That is probably vital research. I think he one putted for par.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Players are individuals. For some getting mad after bad shots (and then getting it back together before the next) is their nature. Tiger and (from what I've read) Bobby Jones are examples of that. Although the rules require those players to at least keep some level of control over their actions it's not a big deal when they show anger over a poor shot.

Others stay on a more even keel throughout the tournament and it's hard to tell from body language whether they have just hit a good shot or a bad shot. Jason Dufner and Retief Goosen are examples of that.

Most people are somewhere between the extremes.

I reckon acting out of character would be a red flag but other than that I would say it means very little.

Of course when everything is going perfectly everybody has good body language. If I turn on the TV and Phil is walking to the 16th tee and is smiling and high fiving the crowd I figure he's on a roll.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Lnus

hey, I have a class in school where I have chosen to provide statistics on how player behavior affects the score.

Now, during the PGA Championship, I would be so happy if you could help me, if a player swears or throws a club from Friday to Sunday.

Please write day / player / holes / what he did.

thank you very much!


Here is an idea.  Why don't YOU watch it on TV and YOU compile the data.  And then YOU can explain to the professor why selective data (since they do not show every shot on TV) which has to be subjectively interpreted in the first place could possible have any validity at all?

If the prof has anything on the ball he will have already earmarked your project for an F based on premise alone.  And I say that as someone who was a practicing applied mathematician (an actuary) for over 20 years.  You would do better to stand by a crosswalk and see if the color of someone's hair has any correlation with whether they step off the curb with their right foot or their left foot.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Hi, simple! Therefore I DON'T have the possibility to see all days.
I was just asking for help, and if someone does it I would be so happy, but if you can't help why do you even put your energy in it?
You can get the ball location by Shotlink, and by that see where the ball end up, and compare how different players react on different lies.
If I get an F I have learned from my mistakes, and had funny on the way.
Peace.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Lnus

Hi, simple! Therefore I DON'T have the possibility to see all days.

I was just asking for help, and if someone does it I would be so happy, but if you can't help why do you even put your energy in it?

You can get the ball location by Shotlink, and by that see where the ball end up, and compare how different players react on different lies.

If I get an F I have learned from my mistakes, and had funny on the way.

Peace.

You are asking for help for something that can't be done.

Your assignment makes zero sense and is a waste of time.

As mentioned, you may as well judge scores by the colour of shirts.

If your "professor" accepts this he/she is a moron.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Lnus

Hi, simple! Therefore I DON'T have the possibility to see all days.

I was just asking for help, and if someone does it I would be so happy, but if you can't help why do you even put your energy in it?

You can get the ball location by Shotlink, and by that see where the ball end up, and compare how different players react on different lies.

If I get an F I have learned from my mistakes, and had funny on the way.

Peace.


Because some things are just so foolish they cry out to be mocked.  Which is evident, in your case, by the fact that you did not get ONE serious answer.  Because your premise and your request are equally ludicrous.

I mean seriously. "I'll do a project that is dependent on data ( which I cannot clearly and objectively define in the first place ) which I cannot collect myself, so I'll get perfect strangers that I have never talked to before gather the data ( again, which I cannot define objectively ) and report it to me, in a situation where I have no ability at all to check on the accuracy and reliability of the data ( what if 2 people interpret the instructions differently?  How can you combine their data? ) and then I will do some kind of statistical analysis on the data and come to some conclusion."  Seriously?  The whole thing violates just about every premise of statistics and the scientific method.  I cannot imagine any class you could take and think that this is in any way a reasonable project.  Either your professor is a dunce or you are.

Did you even THINK about the PRACTICABILITY of your project before deciding upon it?  Did you even THINK about doing something where you could collect the data yourself so at least you would know it had all been collected in a consistent manner?  Did you even THINK about doing your project on something where at least the data was objectively measurable?  Did you THINK THIS THROUGH at all?

The purpose of education is not to "have funny on the way" it is to learn something.  Yes we learn from our mistakes, but we should also learn from our class work, as that encapsulates the learned lessons from all the mistakes that came before.  Learning from your mistakes, when so simple and puerile, is a foolish thing to base an education on.  No classwork in the world could have led someone to come up with the project design (and I use that term loosely) you have described.  Unless, as I said, your professor is a dunce.  In which case you should be demanding a refund of your tuition money.

Sorry if I sound harsh, but as a teacher I am OFFENDED by what passes for education these days.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

If I get an F I have learned from my mistakes, and had funny on the way.    Peace.

What's better: learning from your mistakes, or knowing enough to not make the mistakes in the first place? (I'll take option B.)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by Lnus

That would be to so much help, will look as much as possible.

Have a nice weekend!

Hey, sorry about not doing any of your work for you last weekend.  My bad.

Ask your professor for an extension, I'll get it done this time, I swear.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lnus, I suspect your real project is to see how many msg. board reactions you could get to a fake project. Well played. .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • 2016 TST Initiative: Forward Tees Tournament
      In Lowest Score Wins, we recommend that golfers play from the forward tees in order to experience "breaking 80" for the first time, or shooting 65, or having more birdie putts than they've ever had, or whatever. This year, in 2016, we're taking it one step farther: we're encouraging everyone here to work with the head pro at your home course (or, if you play multiple courses, the head pro at each of them!) and to set up a serious "Forward Tees Tournament." A Forward Tees Tournament (FTT) will be: FUN! Enlightening Unique Challenging I'll give anyone who creates and/or participates in a FTT this year the special achievement/award seen to the left. Anyone with this award will be entered to win a TST prize to be determined at the end of the year (and I'll do my best to make it a fairly good prize, but that shouldn't be the main reason why anyone should do this). You can play: With or without handicaps. With or without brackets/divisions/flights. Stroke play or match play. 18, 27, 36, 54+ holes. One day, two days, three days. Etc. I think golfers will love playing in this type of tournament. I think it will challenge them to think about how they play and score. I think it will result in faster play, more fun, more birdies, more chances to hit 7-iron into par fives and feel like a Tour player for once, and… lower scores (or higher scores for the dumb players!). So there you have it. What can you do from here? Pledge here in this thread to talk to your head pro. Recruit your buddies and local golfers to play in your event. Work with your head pro to make the event a success. Play in the event! Post here after your tournament has been played to claim your super-exclusive award/achievement! I'm in. I'll be doing this, hopefully at multiple courses this year. Are you?
    • Posting old scores
      I haven't had an official handicap for about 15 years because in the past several I've only been able to play 6-8 times per year. This year I joined a club so that I could play in tournaments and since I need five scores to get a handicap, I entered some scores in GHIN from my last few rounds in 2015 (since I play so rarely, I can remember them). When I was doing this, I forgot to change the date when posting a score from August so it defaulted to today and is now my most recent reported score. GHIN won't let me change the entry but says to "contact my club" to fix it, which seems like a hassle for everyone involved. It's not my lowest score but it's close, so it will probably be included in my handicap calculation for quite a while unless the date is changed. How big of a deal is this?
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Another thing is sometimes to 'give up' on par. For example, as a bogey golfer, if I hit a bad tee shot and end up say 220yds from the hold on a par 4 rather than the usual 130yds, play the hole as if bogey is the new par. You've made the hole more difficult for yourself and rather than trying to hit the green with a 3 wood (a green designed to be hit with a mid/short iron), take 2 shots to get on the green and 2 shots to get down. 1 220yd par 4 is an easy hole (could even make birdie (which becomes par and a great save) whereas a 220 yd par 3, not off the tee, is asking for trouble. Not always the best way to play golf (read Lowest Score Wins) but the best way to avoid blowing up.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Find it yourself please. I don't think that would provide much insight. Courses, technology… all very different. Too many differences. People who qualify for the Opens rarely actually compete for them. The winners and top finishers almost always come from those who qualify automatically. I'm not. Very few foreign golfers played on the PGA Tour in the 60s. It's been steadily growing - and travel has made it easier, too - through to now. And even now we're starting to see Asian golfers really take over. The only Asian golfer many could name who competed against Nicklaus was Isao Aoki. Maybe Jumbo Ozaki. I'm just talking about the number of golfers. There are a ton more now. I don't care. I realize perhaps your condition forces you to take everything literally, but I wasn't being literal here. The PGA Tour takes the best 150 players or so out of X. As X grows, the amount of separation between those top 150 players narrows. We're in a very narrow phase right now. When Jack was playing, the gap was significantly wider. No. Tiger was quite a bit more dominant and "above" even MORE highly competitive fields. Both halves of that are true: Tiger won by larger margins and against stronger fields. I agree. And I've said similar things. No…? You don't say? (On page 273 of a thread doing just that…)? You seem to be the only person who regards WGCs as weaker fields that offer a "competitive break." It says a lot about how others should consider your opinions on strength of field. You're assuming or haven't read many of my posts in this thread, because I've said several times that I'd put it within a few points of 50/50. Maybe 55/45. Hardly what I'd call "strong." Of course we're both "estimating." Tiger's record, IMO, against significantly stiffer competition, puts him ahead. Not by a lot. Not really. If only 30 players had a realistic chance to win a tournament, adding players beyond that 30th player does little to affect the strength of the field. The WGCs could add 200 club professionals that would never win and… the strength of field would remain exactly the same. Where have I said this? Because even if I did, it doesn't support whatever you're trying to force it into supporting here. The odds of a club pro beating anyone on the PGA Tour these days are slim to none. They were slightly more likely back when fewer "A" players played the PGA Tour… like in the 60s and 70s. A "C" player's game almost never varies enough - not for four days - to beat even 10 or 15 "A" players. Here's an opinion, but one I could probably back up if I cared enough to take the time (I do not): a modern WGC has a stronger field than many (perhaps all) of the majors Nicklaus won. I've said this before, and will say it again here: In Jack's day, there were maybe 10-15 "A" players, 25 "B" players, and the rest were "C" players. Today there are 100+ A players and the rest B players. I'm also going to request, mostly because of the number of times I've had to repeat myself in this thread, that you not quote or respond to me, @natureboy, in this thread. I'm not keen on repeating myself about something that, ultimately, I don't care that much about. It is what it is, their records are what they are, and they could only beat the guys they played against.
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Never try to hit through trees, always just get back to the fairway.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries