• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
colin007

2013 Barclay's Championship Discussion Thread

186 posts in this topic

Gotta be honest... Not terribly interested because I thought Tiger was going to win a major, and he and I both agree that everything else, like this tournament, doesn't really matter a while lot... Disappointing year for the two of us. But oh well... GO TIGS!!!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I'm going to predict Henrik Stenson with the win this weekend. I get excited with any tournament that has the best players in the world. Should be entertaining!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's hard to get excited about the course, that's for sure. You'd think that after being essentially given a blank check, the designers of Liberty National could have built something better than a passable resort course. The Barclays had rotated around a few great tournament venues in recent years, so going back to a course that only has a nice view of the Manhattan skyline to offer is more than a little underwhelming. Remember the last the Barclays was held here, in 2009; the quality of the golf was pretty poor, and Heath Slocum (the 124th player in a field of 125) somehow finished ahead of Woods, Els, Harrington, and Stricker.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I loved the comment from a caddy the last time they played here.  "They ruined a perfectly good landfill."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

When the Golf Channel is telling you that the players are preparing for "long, narrow fairways" you know the course doesn't have many interesting attributes.

I would've never guessed that the guys on tour would be playing fairways that are both long AND narrow. I mean, this must be a brand new concept or something to be so noteworthy as to prepare specifically for it. You're trying to tell me that now they need to hit with distance AND accuracy off the tee? What is this blasphemy?

But on the plus side, we might see some low scores with a course like this. Doesn't appear to be too much there to worry about unless they really grew out the native grass or cut the fairway all the way down the slopes to all the water hazards. That would be interesting to see, but not much fun to play admittedly since a missed green on the wrong side of a hole with water would automatically mean you would have to take a drop. Perhaps just cutting it so that the last foot or two is rough would be better, so that it doesn't go in but you don't get a choice lie or stance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Lee Westwood 5 over through 8???? Sheesh. Queue the Sean Foley haters.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scoring sponsored by CDW?  Are writeable CD's making a comeback?  Burn me a mix disc, baby.

Edit: Ooops different company.  Anywho.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by 460CompMark

anyone got a live stream link?

It's on Live@ - they are in a rain delay at the moment, probably won't resume play for at least a 1/2 hour.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Westwood switched to X100's this week. Wonder if it had anything to do with his slow start?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where the heck has this Camilo Villegas been lately? Great round today by Spider-Man.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could there be two more opposite looking golfers than Villegas and Stadler? Geez, Kevin, mix in a salad every one in a while.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by colin007

Could there be two more opposite looking golfers than Villegas and Stadler? Geez, Kevin, mix in a salad every one in a while.

Yeah, but Baby Stads is ranked way ahead of Villegas........  I say better golf through red meat and scotch whiskey!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Lol "Baby Stads" - I'm picturing a Baby Gap type of store except all they sell is cheeseburgers and milkshakes... And pants that don't fit...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by colin007

Lol "Baby Stads" - I'm picturing a Baby Gap type of store except all they sell is cheeseburgers and milkshakes... And pants that don't fit...

I think he's wearing his dad's hand-me-downs!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I think he's wearing his dad's hand-me-downs!

Seriously, I've seen poor fat people find clothes that fit better... I know it has to be tough for fatties to find stuff that is flattering, but dude is rich, should be easy for him...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      No problem.  I'm not tired of responding to sincere and thoughtful posts, like yours, even if it rehashes stuff from before because OF COURSE it is unrealistic to expect people to read 3000 posts before commenting.  In any case I have that quote in a file and it was simple to post it - much simpler and politer than saying "go find it , it's here."  I DO think that one should maybe at least read a smattering of such a big thread before jumping in,   But I have no patience whatsoever with the "I saw Jack play" and "he was nice at a clinic" type posts or posts by people who try to claim some special credibility because of some entirely personal subjective connection.  But that isn't you. As to the rest, you asked for the exact quote and I gave it to you.  If you want to argue with what he said, that is another matter and does not concern me, since my position is that even if we, arguendo, say that the field strengths did NOT get better, Tiger's career was so much more dominant than Jack's that it doesn't matter.  I don't NEED to make a stronger field argument to make the case that Tiger dominated golf in a way and to an extent that no other golfer has ever dominated golf.  And he did it for 15 years (after an absolutely unprecedented career as an amateur) which, IMO, is long enough that it no longevity argument could overcome the sheer dominance advantage his career embodied.   The fact that all that is true in the face of field strength increasing is just icing on the cake.   
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Excellent. Thank you for re-posting that quote. Sorry to hear you're tired of rehashing. Why not just let the thread die then? Is the expectation that folks will read all 272 pages before making a comment? That strikes me as an unrealistic expectation.. I agree the tour is tougher than it used to be. I consider the differences more incremental than astronomical...not the 'order of magnitude' range that seems to come through in some comments. I think Jack is both being accurate in assessing his perception of a shift in quality, but also exaggerating for effect or experiencing present-day myopia at the very least about the money. $100 in 1962 money would be ~ $800 dollars today. Not exactly what I would call bus fare. The 'paltry' $100,000 had the buying power of about $800,000 in today's dollars, which is ~ 60% of today's average purse and ~ 30% of the Players' purse).. Most Americans would happily take an annual salary like that today. They weren't getting ditch digger wages. The prize money even then definitely attracted keen competitive interest. Clearly purses have also grown more than inflation and even journeyman make more in a year than the top 10 in 1962 (below), but it seems about in line with the growth of the population of golfers in the U.S. itself - about triple since Jack's day, Endorsement money has definitely gotten bigger, as the tour and the golf marketplace have developed and expanded over time.   Rank       Player                  1962 $                   2015 $ 1            Arnold Palmer        $81,448                 $639,223 2            Gene Littler           $66,201                 $519,562 3            Jack Nicklaus         $61,869                 $485,563 4            Billy Casper            $61,842                 $485,351 5            Bob Goalby            $46,241                 $362,910 6            Gary Player            $45,838                 $359,748 7            Doug Sanders        $43,340                 $340,143 8            Dave Ragan          $37,327                 $292,951 9            Bobby Nichols       $34,312                 $269,288 10          Phil Rodgers          $32,182                 $252,572  
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      Broke par, Lowest Score Wins. 
    • Disadvantage of too stiff a flex?
      I've often thought about going with an X flex driver shaft.  I may get an adapter from My Titleist 910 and experiment.
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      I'd like to claim the "Broke 80" award, as I managed this for the first time December 28th last year.   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 OUT Gross 5 4 4 5 5 3 5 5 5 41(41) Par 4 4 3 5 4 3 4 4 5 36 Distance 353 357 168 465 312 142 389 339 492 3017 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 IN TOTAL 5 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 4 38(38) 79 (79) 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 35 71 479 356 323 355 396 185 309 136 365 2904 5921               Thanks!        
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries