Jump to content
IGNORED

Putting Help - Down the line stroke vs. arc stroke


mmoan2
Note: This thread is 3817 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Interesting that I just saw another young lad asking for putting help as I logged on to ask for some myself...

Anyway, my putting used to be the strength of my game, but as other parts have caught up, I'm wondering if it's time for me to reconsider my putting technique and ingrain a new one to add the consistency I want.

Question - I've always used the "down-the-line" stroke espoused by Dave Pelz because it made sense to me and it has worked relatively well. I'm pretty good from 10 feet and under, and my ability to judge speed is generally pretty good as well, so I rarely three putt from less than 30 feet. Even over 30 I do ok. However, lag putting with a down-the-line stroke seems unnatural and difficult, and I've read several times now that an arc stroke (whatever the official term is) is much better for lag putting. I think even Pelz himself has changed his opinion of what he wrote in his Putting Bible back in the day. I've started using that stroke from 40 feet+ because I feel very stiff when trying to maintain a DTL pendulum motion for long putts.

Is it worth scrapping a DTL stroke for an arc stroke, or am I just trying to create more of a headache than I need? Are both viable options, or is one distinctly superior to the other?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

If you do a search through the forums, you'll find that most people feel that straight back, straight through putting is nonsense. It may be something you feel but aren't actually doing.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Theres no such thing as a, "down the line" stroke.  When you swing something around a fixed point, it has to move in an arc.  That simple physics.  Unless you are going to bend over to the point where your back is parallel to the ground, DTL is not possible.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You can have a down the line putting stroke, if you manipulate your hands and shoulder angles. Basically to cover the club head coming inside, by forcing the hands outward the same amount you can achieve a down the line putting stroke, straight back straight through. Though you are adding in a ton of extra movements..

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So, in all seriousness, is Dave Pelz nuts? He has an entire book dedicated to that stroke technique and has claimed that some of the greatest putters in history have used it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Even one of Pelz best students, Mickelson says that SBST is manipulative, but in theory it makes good sense. Michelson prefers a slight arc in his stroke accordingly in his DVD instruction.

For me after 20 putts in a round I prefer to start out with an arcing stroke and then find it easier to "straight out my putting stroke" then to go the other way, start off straight then figure out a way to" curve my putt" though I can see there is many different ways to putt and no way is wrong.

Hell ,If you stick the putter  in your ass and make putts then Im okay with that but the USGA will find a way to make that illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would never advocate a straight back putting stroke. The putting stroke should have minimal moving parts, you need accuracy and feel. Moving the arms away from the body, or adjusting the hands just adds some extra compensation to the stroke. I get what Pelz wants to say, but he's advocating the opposite of his intent.

Honestly it doesn't matter if the follow through is arc in, straight, or arc out, because the ball is already rolling. All the follow through does is create a consistent feel for how you want the ball to start.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For me, and many other golfers I believe, putting is very much about feel.  I'm still struggling with identifying what feels good!  However, I think the strength of the SBST "feel" is if, for the individual, the sensation is that they are making that move and it makes sinking putts easier.

I subscribe to the belief that it is pretty much impossible to make that SBST move without a lot of extra wrist manipulation, and that makes me crazy.  So for me, just allowing the putter to arc somewhat is liberating.  I'm currently fiddling with allowing more wrist hinge to creep into my stroke (there's a nearby thread on Snedeker's putting style).  I'm finding that to also relieve some stresses.  Less stresses in a putting stroke should, I currently believe, be a worthy goal that I hope will result in more consistent results.

Driver: Titleist 913 D2 10.5*, Aldila RIP Phenom 50

Fairway 1: Titleist 913F, 17*, Titleist Bassara W55

Fairway 2: Titleist 913F, 21*, Titleist Bassara W55

Irons: Titleist AP1 714 5-PW, Aerotech Steelfiber i95

Wedges: SCOR 4161 48/52/56/60, Genius 9

Grips: GolfPride New Decade Red Mid-size on all of the above.

Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 - Super Stroke Slim 3.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Even one of Pelz best students, Mickelson says that SBST is manipulative, but in theory it makes good sense. Michelson prefers a slight arc in his stroke accordingly in his DVD instruction.

For me after 20 putts in a round I prefer to start out with an arcing stroke and then find it easier to "straight out my putting stroke" then to go the other way, start off straight then figure out a way to" curve my putt" though I can see there is many different ways to putt and no way is wrong.

Hell ,If you stick the putter  in your ass and make putts then Im okay with that but the USGA will find a way to make that illegal.

Maybe I need to stick the putter in my ass! I just won't use a long putter with a jumbo grip... :bugout:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Maybe I need to stick the putter in my ass! I just won't use a long putter with a jumbo grip... :bugout:

Probably still anchoring, anyways.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Isn't it a matter of degrees? I agree there is no actual SBST stroke but there are strokes, mine for instance, that open/closes to a lesser degree than true arc paths. I have been fit twice at Ping and had nominal movement (2-4 degrees) where I was told the average arc is more like 7-9 degrees and extreme arcs 11+ degrees. I am not saying one is better than another just that differences exist. It is also my understanding that if you are attempting to putt SBST you should use at least a face balanced putter and even a center shafted putter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I can get onboard with the notion of different putting strokes have different degrees of arc, however, there is no such thing as a true SBST.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I can get onboard with the notion of different putting strokes have different degrees of arc, however, there is no such thing as a true SBST.

I agree. All I am saying is those thought of as SBST are simply putting is a much smaller arc. The Ping TR putter I was fitted for and the ones in that series are available in three versions, Straight, Slight Arc and Strong Arc. Maybe using the terms Slight Arc, Standard Arc and Strong Arc would have been more accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree. All I am saying is those thought of as SBST are simply putting is a much smaller arc. The Ping TR putter I was fitted for and the ones in that series are available in three versions, Straight, Slight Arc and Strong Arc. Maybe using the terms Slight Arc, Standard Arc and Strong Arc would have been more accurate.


I agree.  If its a slight arc, its still an arc and not SBST.  If people are going to understand each other and discuss ideas, we need to get the terminology right.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Oh god, were going to start nit picking about the name 'SBST', seriously.

We all know SBST is not an optimal way of putting, no need to get all bent out of shape on the fact it's named as such. What if they were never talking about what the putter actually does, but what a golfer feels like he's doing. Then it fits, because its an ambiguous definition based on a person's own golf game, now what the putter is actually doing.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well, I'm sure that my stroke arcs, and I'm also pretty convinced that SBST as Pelz prescribes feels awkward and contrived to me. I'm also pretty convinced that most of Pelz' tour pro students, not just Mickelson, did not putt SBST.

However, if I'm working on my putting, I'm thinking posture, rhythm, touch, tempo, aiming, and reading (though not necessarily in that order). Hell, I'd invest a couple of hours adding and removing lead tape and testing the results for touch before I started worrying about whether I was SBST or arcing.

So, in answer to the OP, no I don't think it's worth "scrapping" the SBST to work on a more arcing stroke - but nor would I do anything to "preserve" a SBST path. I'd work directly on the things that I think matter much more  - and in the process accept whatever consequences there might be for my stroke path.

The funny thing is, I think even the factual information presented in Pelz' Putting Bible doesn't add up to a convincing case for SBST, or indeed worrying about stroke path of whatever shape.  Stroke path is probably the least important factor in putting, barring possibly the colour of your putter's face insert. Pelz' own data seems to point in that direction - and yet he labours the SBST thing beyond all reasonable justification.

I think there's some good stuff in Pelz' books - but I'm quite wary of the stroke mechanics he advocates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hi mmoan,

I'm on board with you likewise using the DTL method of putting.

My normal setup is having the putter slightly behind the ball for less than 20 footers.

I find on long putts, addressing the ball position with a 3" distance behind the ball at setup helps on longer putts.

I currently use the Odyssey Backstryke - Cyclone.

Club Rat

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3817 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Thanks for the feedback. @StuM, we are a "club without real estate" so no facilities or pro. We have a membership of around 185 players and we only play together as a group at our tournaments, which are held at public access courses. A group of us setup the tournaments, collect the money and dole out the prizes.
    • In general, granting free relief anywhere on the course isn't recommended.  Similarly, when marking GUR, the VSGA and MAPGA generally don't mark areas that are well away from the intended playing lines, no matter how poor the conditions.  If you hit it far enough offline, you don't necessarily deserve free relief.  And you don't have to damage clubs, take unplayable relief, take the stroke, and drop the ball in a better spot.
    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
    • I get trying to limit relief to the fairway, but how many roots do you typically find in the fairway? Our local rule allows for relief from roots & rocks anywhere on the course (that is in play). My home course has quite a few 100 year old oaks that separate the fairways. Lift and move the ball no closer to the hole. None of us want to damage clubs.
    • Hello, I've been playing a Teardrop td17 F.C. putter for many years and love it. It still putts and feels as good or  better than any of the new putters I've tried and it's in excellent condition except the face has dings in it ever since I bought it used that kind of bother me. I was just wondering if it's possible to have some really shallow horizontal grooves milled into the face on a "roll face" putter. I think I would rather spend some money on it instead of trying to get used to a new putter.  Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...