Jump to content
IGNORED

Forest Area Marked as Lateral Hazard


boogielicious
Note: This thread is 3773 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

This came up in the divot thread.  Below is the par 4 seventh at Merrimack Valley Golf Course.  The areas with red lines are marked with red stakes.  There is a marshy area between the fairway and forest that will be very wet in the spring and early summer, but playable when it is dry or in the fall.  The forest area above the marshy area at the top can be wet at times, but should it be marked a lateral hazard?

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am not sure if I got the full picture but the definition of a Water Hazard if pretty clear and it does not include occationally wet areas such as low-land forests or swamps. If that marshy/swampy area really is impracticle to play from it might be an idea to make it out of bounds, or if there are any future prospects to dry it then a GUR with a dropping zone could be used.

So to answer your question and more, none of those areas marked in the picture with red lines should be marked as Lateral Water Hazard as they are not by definition. The dark spot beside the green seems to be a WH and to be marked as LWH.

Looks like a pretty challenging hole all in all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Water Hazard

A “ water hazard ’’ is any sea, lake, pond, river, ditch, surface drainage ditch or other open water course (whether or not containing water) and anything of a similar nature on the course . All ground and water within the margin of a water hazard are part of the water hazard .

When the margin of a water hazard is defined by stakes, the stakes are inside the water hazard , and the margin of the hazard is defined by the nearest outside points of the stakes at ground level. When both stakes and lines are used to indicate a water hazard , the stakes identify the hazard and the lines define the hazard margin. When the margin of a water hazard is defined by a line on the ground, the line itself is in the water hazard . The margin of a water hazard extends vertically upwards and downwards.

A ball is in a water hazard when it lies in or any part of it touches the water hazard .

Stakes used to define the margin of or identify a water hazard are obstructions .

Note 1: Stakes or lines used to define the margin of or identify a water hazard must be yellow.

Note 2: The Committee may make a Local Rule prohibiting play from an environmentally-sensitive area defined as a water hazard .

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Here's how I'd mark it. The lime green lines mean removal of the red stakes in that area.

So you would mark both the marshy area and the swamp as LWH? On what grounds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by rogolf

Here's how I'd mark it. The lime green lines mean removal of the red stakes in that area.

So you would mark both the marshy area and the swamp as LWH? On what grounds?

Surely, they both satisfy the requirements for a lateral water hazard, don't they?

"Age improves with wine."
 
Wishon 919THI 11*
Wishon 925HL 4w
Wishon 335HL 3h & 4h
Wishon 755pc 5i, 6i, 7i, 8i & 9i
Tad Moore 485 PW
Callaway X 54*
Ping G2 Anser C
Callaway SuperSoft
Titleist StaDry
Kangaroo Hillcrest AB
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Imo, they meet the definition of water hazard.

It is not very fruitful to discuss this specific case without having seen the area in question so maybe we should take this on a general level. So let us start, just for the general interest as well as for passing the time.

Rogolf, which part of the definition of a WH does a marshy area or a swamp meet? On those areas there may be ponds, ditches, even lakes, but how do you justify the entire area to be a WH?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It is not very fruitful to discuss this specific case without having seen the area in question so maybe we should take this on a general level. So let us start, just for the general interest as well as for passing the time. Rogolf, which part of the definition of a WH does a marshy area or a swamp meet? On those areas there may be ponds, ditches, even lakes, but how do you justify the entire area to be a WH?

Any part you choose, "and anything of a similar nature". The margins are then marked where the ground breaks down(wards) to form the depression containing the water (if water is present). I've added the parts in parentheses to the language in Decision 33-2a/4. I agree that it's not possible to be 100% correct without being on site, but I am proceeding on the original post's use of "swamp" and "marshy area", words that, to me, describe an area that most likely meets the definition of a water hazard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignorant

It is not very fruitful to discuss this specific case without having seen the area in question so maybe we should take this on a general level. So let us start, just for the general interest as well as for passing the time.

Rogolf, which part of the definition of a WH does a marshy area or a swamp meet? On those areas there may be ponds, ditches, even lakes, but how do you justify the entire area to be a WH?

Any part you choose, "and anything of a similar nature". The margins are then marked where the ground breaks down(wards) to form the depression containing the water (if water is present). I've added the parts in parentheses to the language in Decision 33-2a/4.

I agree that it's not possible to be 100% correct without being on site, but I am proceeding on the original post's use of "swamp" and "marshy area", words that, to me, describe an area that most likely meets the definition of a water hazard.

I used to collect butterflies when I was young and we used to visit some swamps for the species living in that very habitat. None of those had any specific margins, not to mention any 'grounds breaking downwards'. I would have an extremely hard time in defining the margins of those kinds of 'water hazards'.

However, to be certain, I would have to see the area in question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by rogolf

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignorant

It is not very fruitful to discuss this specific case without having seen the area in question so maybe we should take this on a general level. So let us start, just for the general interest as well as for passing the time.

Rogolf, which part of the definition of a WH does a marshy area or a swamp meet? On those areas there may be ponds, ditches, even lakes, but how do you justify the entire area to be a WH?

Any part you choose, "and anything of a similar nature". The margins are then marked where the ground breaks down(wards) to form the depression containing the water (if water is present). I've added the parts in parentheses to the language in Decision 33-2a/4.

I agree that it's not possible to be 100% correct without being on site, but I am proceeding on the original post's use of "swamp" and "marshy area", words that, to me, describe an area that most likely meets the definition of a water hazard.

I used to collect butterflies when I was young and we used to visit some swamps for the species living in that very habitat. None of those had any specific margins, not to mention any 'grounds breaking downwards'. I would have an extremely hard time in defining the margins of those kinds of 'water hazards'.

However, to be certain, I would have to see the area in question.

A water hazard, or lateral water hazard, doesn't need a specifically delineated margin to qualify - that is why they are required to be marked with stakes or lines.  It must be an area of the course which holds water during some times of the year (or possibly only during wet years), whether naturally or artificially created.  These swampy areas would certainly seem to fit the bill as wetlands, and I've played many courses with wetland hazards which don't hold water year round.  Many of those which I've played are designated as environmentally sensitive with a prohibition against playing from them, or in some cases even entering them to retrieve the ball.

Imo, they meet the definition of water hazard.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignorant

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogolf

Here's how I'd mark it. The lime green lines mean removal of the red stakes in that area.

So you would mark both the marshy area and the swamp as LWH? On what grounds?

Surely, they both satisfy the requirements for a lateral water hazard, don't they?

I agree.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A water hazard, or lateral water hazard, doesn't need a specifically delineated margin to qualify - that is why they are required to be marked with stakes or lines.  It must be an area of the course which holds water during some times of the year (or possibly only during wet years), whether naturally or artificially created.  These swampy areas would certainly seem to fit the bill as wetlands, and I've played many courses with wetland hazards which don't hold water year round.  Many of those which I've played are designated as environmentally sensitive with a prohibition against playing from them, or in some cases even entering them to retrieve the ball.

I believe that an area can only be designated an environmentally sensitive area under the rules if that designation is made by a governmental agency of some kind, not just at the discretion of the Committee.  That is my interpretation of the definition of ESA in Appendix 1.

“I. Definition

An environmentally-sensitive area (ESA) is an area so declared by an appropriate authority, entry into and/or play from which is prohibited for environmental reasons. These areas may be defined as ground under repair, a water hazard, a lateral water hazard or out of bounds at the discretion of the Committee, provided that in the case of an ESA that has been defined as a water hazard or a lateral water hazard, the area is, by definition, a water hazard.

Note: The Committee may not declare an area to be environmentally-sensitive.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Maybe.  But cannot the  course management simply proclaim a certain area as 'Entry Forbidden' without ESA classification?

They can but why would they want to in this case? There doesn't seem to be any suggestion that the land needs any protection and part are possibly playable even when other parts are wet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

A water hazard, or lateral water hazard, doesn't need a specifically delineated margin to qualify - that is why they are required to be marked with stakes or lines.  It must be an area of the course which holds water during some times of the year (or possibly only during wet years), whether naturally or artificially created.  These swampy areas would certainly seem to fit the bill as wetlands, and I've played many courses with wetland hazards which don't hold water year round.  Many of those which I've played are designated as environmentally sensitive with a prohibition against playing from them, or in some cases even entering them to retrieve the ball.

I believe that an area can only be designated an environmentally sensitive area under the rules if that designation is made by a governmental agency of some kind, not just at the discretion of the Committee.  That is my interpretation of the definition of ESA in Appendix 1.

Quote:

“I. Definition

An environmentally-sensitive area (ESA) is an area so declared by an appropriate authority, entry into and/or play from which is prohibited for environmental reasons. These areas may be defined as ground under repair, a water hazard, a lateral water hazard or out of bounds at the discretion of the Committee, provided that in the case of an ESA that has been defined as a water hazard or a lateral water hazard, the area is, by definition, a water hazard.

Note: The Committee may not declare an area to be environmentally-sensitive.

I wasn't suggesting that the marshy areas in the OP's case needed such designation.  I was simply using that to reinforce my feeling that the areas he described fit the definition of a water hazard, because I have played so many courses with similar hazards.  It isn't required that they show a clear slope near the water as Ignorant suggested in his post, or even that they have an extent of open water.  In the Colorado mountains, many courses are built partially or wholly on valley floors, and most of those can have extensive flooding almost to the edge of the fairways during the spring/early summer runoff from the higher peaks.  Once the snow has mostly melted off, they start to dry out and the actual water recedes, sometimes as much as 40 or 50 yards, and they can be bone dry by the end of July aside from maybe a 4 foot wide creek running down the middle. The hazard lines don't move in and out to compensate for the change in wetness.  The Keystone, Grand Elk, Pole Creek, and Breckenridge courses all have lateral water hazards like this.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

The marshy area is usually played as casual water when needed.  Otherwise, it is bog-like.  You can play out of it, but you almost need to play it like a fairway bunker to prevent hitting fat.  They have another area like this right where the "earth" is in the lower right of the picture.

My concern was really the forest area being designated a lateral hazard improperly.  There may be a small creek that runs just inside the tree line, but it is dry most of the time.  There was discussion in the Divot GUR thread about improperly marked lateral hazards.

BTW, I hate this hole.  In addition to the odd landing area, the green is the worst saddle-back green I have ever seen.  There are only two small, maybe 50 sq ft areas on the green that are less than 4% grade.  The green also slopes away and to the right of the fairway, so getting a GIR is very difficult.  You need to hit the very middle-left of the green to hope to stay on and not pitch off right and long.  Usually, I am trying to get an up&down; to par.

I have never parred this hole (the only one on the course).  From the back tees, it is a driver for me to try to get the 150 marker (220 yards).  If I get roll out, it goes long and down a  slope to the cart part.  If I use a 3w or 3h, my approach shot could be 180+.  Any fade off the tee gives you a long second shot.  A hook into the marshy area may get you blocked out due to the trees.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The marshy area is usually played as casual water when needed.  Otherwise, it is bog-like.  You can play out of it, but you almost need to play it like a fairway bunker to prevent hitting fat.  They have another area like this right where the "earth" is in the lower right of the picture. My concern was really the forest area being designated a lateral hazard improperly.  There may be a small creek that runs just inside the tree line, but it is dry most of the time.  There was discussion in the Divot GUR thread about improperly marked lateral hazards. BTW, I hate this hole.  In addition to the odd landing area, the green is the worst saddle-back green I have ever seen.  There are only two small, maybe 50 sq ft areas on the green that are less than 4% grade.  The green also slopes away and to the right of the fairway, so getting a GIR is very difficult.  You need to hit the very middle-left of the green to hope to stay on and not pitch off right and long.  Usually, I am trying to get an up&down; to par.   I have never parred this hole (the only one on the course).  From the back tees, it is a driver for me to try to get the 150 marker (220 yards).  If I get roll out, it goes long and down a  slope to the cart part.  If I use a 3w or 3h, my approach shot could be 180+.  Any fade off the tee gives you a long second shot.  A hook into the marshy area may get you blocked out due to the trees.

I don't understand "usually played as casual water when needed"? How is relief taken "when needed"? If the marshy area was marked as a LWH, the ball can still be played. When a course doesn't want people entering an area, a very effective method is to put up a sign "Caution: Snakes in this area." :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3773 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • You all are right, its not that big of an issue, I'll leave it alone, especially after looking at that picture of Tigers beat up putter. But I also noticed the small circle worn on the sweet-spot where he hits it every time, I definitely don't have one of those. Thanks for the replies   
    • Committing to one brand of ball this year - Snell MTB Prime X, the 5 doz. pack. Like how they perform for me. At $18/doz., can live with cover scuffing. Iron regripping with GolfPrice MCC+4 Teams std. in red/navy. May be retiring Odyssey Dual Force after 30 yrs. Seems like I can't get it to the hole anymore. Kind of light and has lots of toe hang. My reg. group's hounding finally wore me down.    From Callaway preowned - trying out the Odyssey Tri-Hot 5K in double wide (less toe hang) and triple wide (face balanced). Both also noticeably heavier...we shall see.  
    • WOW, it looks like he has been hitting stones with that putter to put all of those nicks into it.  I can't see how a ball would cause many those dings.
    • I'm fighting a knee as well as a foot so I "Feel your pain".  Luckily for me the PT is helping at this time and I am hoping knee surgery is not imminent.  Best of luck to you.
    • I would guess putting grooves in it might make it non-conforming. I am not sure how stringent the USGA is on restoring golf clubs.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...