• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
georgeshot

Anyone Playing Higher Lofted Hybrids

7 posts in this topic

Anyone playing higher lofted hybrids? I replace my 4 iron with a PING 20 4-hybrid (23°) and was thinking about getting the 5-hybrid (27°). They go as high as 31° to replace the 6 iron as well. I've hit the Taylor Made Rescue RBZs and have a set "in waiting" 19°, 22°, 25° just because a got a screaming good deal, but right now I am hitting the PING distance clubs really well and they really feel comfortable and smooth.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

The longest iron in my bag is a #6.  The only time I use the 6-iron would be on a par-3.  My current set includes 4 and 5 hybrids which can be used from anywhere on the course--rough, fairway, par-3 shots, etc. For me, they are an advantage over a 4 or 5-iron.  More solid contact; better flight; more consistent distance; higher degree of success. At some point, I may consider replacing my 6-iron with another hybrid.

I'm always in favor of moving from long irons to the easier to hit hybrids.  Have been using hybrids for years with better success compared to long irons.

dave.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will admit to having three different, 27 degree "5 irons". One that matches the rest of my iron set (Wishon 560MC/KBS Tour), one spring-face SGI iron (Wishon 870Ti/UST Recoil Proto) and one full-on hybrid (Wishon 775HS/Accra Tour-Z).

Tend to rotate them according to which I am currently hitting least badly. :no:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The longest iron in my bag is a #6.  The only time I use the 6-iron would be on a par-3.  My current set includes 4 and 5 hybrids which can be used from anywhere on the course--rough, fairway, par-3 shots, etc. For me, they are an advantage over a 4 or 5-iron.  More solid contact; better flight; more consistent distance; higher degree of success. At some point, I may consider replacing my 6-iron with another hybrid.

I'm always in favor of moving from long irons to the easier to hit hybrids.  Have been using hybrids for years with better success compared to long irons.

dave.


Hey dave s,

Thanks for sharing. Do you find that you are getting more distance from the RBZ2 hybrids than your standard 4 or 5 irons? And do you find the same to be true with the RBZ2 fairway clubs? The design of the Taylor Made clubs are truly visually appealing and I know that can inspire confidence as well, but I was just curious. Like I stated I found a set of first RBZs (19, 22, 25) for a "can't pass up" price and I tested them at my range with good results, but I also have not course tested them out yet like I have with the PING G25 4-hybrid. Thanks again as your thoughts are appreciated.

~George.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stretch for sharing. It's crazy with equipment these day and actually there are incredible deals to be had on excellent clubs if you look hard enough. Like I stated I found a set of the RBZs (3H, 4H, 5H) for a super deal and could not let them go and the RBZ 5-hybrid (25°) was easy so easy to hit. So I'm thinking that the PING G25 5-hybrid (27°) may be the wave of the future for my bag to match up with the G25 4-hybrid (23°) that I already have. I'm in the PING mode I guess right now and I'm hitting the 4-wood and 7-wood like nobody's business, especially the 4-wood. Seems it can do no wrong (keep your finger crossed for me).

~ George.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been playing the the pro black 26* and 23* hybrids recently(went back to them after trying the rbz's, too big for my taste) and I doubt I'll ever game a 5 iron again. The key is to have a versatile sole(low bounce or even slight scoop) to increase your range of shots. Most players always find a gap between there longest iron and shortest hybrid so being able to grip down slightly and open the face a bit without ending up with too much bounce is what helps close that gap. When hybrids get too big they're really just short heavy headed woods with flat bottoms. The concept of the Heaven Wood and Divine Nine will most likely make a comeback at some point because of this. "Hybrids" should remain more iron size if that's what there replacing. Seems to me that a lot of them are knockoffs of the Perfect club. )

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey dave s,

Thanks for sharing. Do you find that you are getting more distance from the RBZ2 hybrids than your standard 4 or 5 irons? And do you find the same to be true with the RBZ2 fairway clubs? The design of the Taylor Made clubs are truly visually appealing and I know that can inspire confidence as well, but I was just curious. Like I stated I found a set of first RBZs (19, 22, 25) for a "can't pass up" price and I tested them at my range with good results, but I also have not course tested them out yet like I have with the PING G25 4-hybrid. Thanks again as your thoughts are appreciated.

~George.

Hi George:

The hybrids deliver more consistent results than irons would for me now.  I can tee up a 4-hybrid, hit it solid and have a chance at par on a 175-yard par-3.  I'd be extremely lucky to hit a 4-iron solid and anywhere near 175 yards on a regular basis.

As for the Taylormade clubs, they replaced my Adams hybrids.  The TM clubs just seemed to work better for me, have more consistent yardage and (for me) work better than the Adams clubs.

The TM 3-wood (its the high-launch model) is used when I need 200 yards off the tee.  I've hit it a few times from the fairway but only if I have an uphill lie.  For me, it's pretty tough to generate enough club head speed to launch a 3w off the deck anymore!  For next season, I'll have the 5-wood HL model as well.  I'm expecting to be able to get that club up and flying and eat up more distance on longer par-5s.

dave

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How long should my ball test be?
      Just wanted some thoughts on how long I should test each ball Im considerring. What is a good sample size. 9 holes, 18 or even longer?
    • Question on Twitter: Easiest Way to Shoot Lower Scores in a Week
      What I have learned as I have improved and keep reading about in Bob Rotella's books is that the best way to shoot the score of your life is to focus on practicing the short game, but mostly developing confidence in your putting. Since most of our strokes consist of the short game, by getting just a percentage better there it will translate to more overall success than anywhere else.
    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      @Golfer2223 what does forearm rotation have to do with the shoulders?-They are not connected. Forearms can rotate regardless of what the shoulders are doing.
    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      Correct. For example: He also says that the forearms rotate during the backswing. Which we know that they do, and quite a bit. How much is too much? On the left, below in both images, is his depiction of zero rotation: On the right, in both images, he demonstrates nearly 90° of turning at the wrist. based on what I know, little of this comes from the upper arm - the majority of it comes from the forearm. Do you disagree with any of that, @Golfer2223? Notice one thing, then, too please. On the left, the plane of the left wrist is pretty much parallel to the sagittal plane. On the right images, it's perpendicular to it. What do we find at the top of the backswing of the game's best players? The issue now appears to be simply trying to determine what in the world you mean by the bold above, particularly because there's really nothing "natural" about the golf swing. What feels natural to you, or seems natural to you, is definitely not natural to all or possibly even the majority of golfers. in my experience I've learned that you can't really talk about the golf swing in terms of what's "natural" or not. The truth of the matter is that for golfers who do this the right amount "naturally" then it simply isn't something we talk about in a lesson. For golfers who do it an improper amount, it may or may not be their priority. Here's a wrist graph from AMM for a very, very good golfer. Note that the wrist (blue line, top left) starts with 50° of supination. It pronates, relative to the upper arm, to a position of 16° pronation at the top. That's a pronation from 50° on one side of the zero mark to 16° on the other side - a pronation of 66°. This doesn't even account for how much the upper arm rotates - the forearm has rotated 66° from the setup position. (Note that above when I said 25° or 32°, that was relative to totally neutral, not to the setup position. The forearms rotated quite a bit more than the 25-32° cited, because they started somewhat supinated.) This graph and these numbers are not unusual. Look, @Golfer2223, it's somewhat incumbent upon you to be clear in what you're saying. It's far from ideal to say things like how you expect to see "zero forearm rotation" (or whatever) but then to claim that it's "relative to the natural shoulder motion" (obviously both paraphrased). Nobody has a clue what you mean by the "natural shoulder" whatever, and many would disagree that anything in this topic area is "natural" to begin with. So, please clarify what you're saying, and be precise and use specific words, or at least define them, provide examples, or both.
    • Best Shot of the Week
      Teeing of on Northdale #7 a short par four 336 from white tees. There is a pond water hazard about 235 or 240 ahead covering a lot of right hand side. Left hand is a small area and high trees to carry. Hit driver and blasted it, carried trees on left hand side and must have gotten a good cart path bounce. When we drove up was 50 yards from center of green. That's a loooong drive for me. Longest yet. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries