• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
EverythingGolf

Does High hands (2 Plane Swing ) give you a distance advantage?

7 posts in this topic

I have read a few articles and have seen some videos claiming that a 2 plane swing has a distance advantage over a 1 plane swing. Does anyone know if this is true or what is your opinion on this.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Do you mean a swing where your hands end up higher than your shoulder (thus having a different arm plane as opposed to your shoulder plane) to be a "hands high two plane" swing? If so, I would personally disagree with you on your definition of a two plane swing in that most pros with a swing that has higher hands (Adam Scott is a good example of a steeper arm angle than shoulder angle) still only use one plane throughout the swing.

On the contrary, are you talking about a swing (like Jim Furyk's) that has a different swing plane for the backswing and downswing where the hands end up nearly above his head at the top?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Do you mean a swing where your hands end up higher than your shoulder (thus having a different arm plane as opposed to your shoulder plane) to be a "hands high two plane" swing? If so, I would personally disagree with you on your definition of a two plane swing in that most pros with a swing that has higher hands (Adam Scott is a good example of a steeper arm angle than shoulder angle) still only use one plane throughout the swing.

On the contrary, are you talking about a swing (like Jim Furyk's) that has a different swing plane for the backswing and downswing where the hands end up nearly above his head at the top?


Part of the problem with talking about "planes" is that seldom are people on the same page. I happen to think of the plane like this guy describes. I assume you think of the plane as something else.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to me that a 2 plane (using your definition) gets higher at the top but not as deep whereas a 1 plane doesn't get as high but gets a lot deeper so I suspect it all evens out in terms of arc radius and how much speed is created.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Do you mean a swing where your hands end up higher than your shoulder (thus having a different arm plane as opposed to your shoulder plane) to be a "hands high two plane" swing? If so, I would personally disagree with you on your definition of a two plane swing in that most pros with a swing that has higher hands (Adam Scott is a good example of a steeper arm angle than shoulder angle) still only use one plane throughout the swing.

On the contrary, are you talking about a swing (like Jim Furyk's) that has a different swing plane for the backswing and downswing where the hands end up nearly above his head at the top?

Yeah that's the Hardy definition of a one and two plane swing.  One plane has the left arm match the shoulders and two plane is above the shoulders.  One plane is not trying to swing on the same "plane" on the backswing and downswing, that's basically impossible to do and play decent golf.

I have read a few articles and have seen some videos claiming that a 2 plane swing has a distance advantage over a 1 plane swing. Does anyone know if this is true or what is your opinion on this.

I would say there are a lot more things golfers should focus on to improve their distance than worrying about their left arm plane for power. The position of the left arm is just a result of stuff that comes before it, it can be above the shoulders or matching the shoulders and result in a very efficient swing.  Some golfers have a high left arm and hit it short because the pivot pieces are crappy and some guys that bomb it have a high left arm because they "stretch" their right side a lot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Yeah that's the Hardy definition of a one and two plane swing.  One plane has the left arm match the shoulders and two plane is above the shoulders.  One plane is not trying to swing on the same "plane" on the backswing and downswing, that's basically impossible to do and play decent golf.

Oh, ok. I stand corrected then and apologize for any confusion I may have created.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Oh, ok. I stand corrected then and apologize for any confusion I may have created.

No worries, I just assumed it was the Hardy one plane lingo he was using.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Putting Yips
      Ive recently gone from a belly to a 34" putter. Really liked the the belly putter but struggled with distance control. after practicing with the short putter i seem to have more control. Will be keeping the belly though for when i get a older or the back starts to protest!  
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      Broke 90, 1 career eagle.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      No problem.  I'm not tired of responding to sincere and thoughtful posts, like yours, even if it rehashes stuff from before because OF COURSE it is unrealistic to expect people to read 3000 posts before commenting.  In any case I have that quote in a file and it was simple to post it - much simpler and politer than saying "go find it , it's here."  I DO think that one should maybe at least read a smattering of such a big thread before jumping in,   But I have no patience whatsoever with the "I saw Jack play" and "he was nice at a clinic" type posts or posts by people who try to claim some special credibility because of some entirely personal subjective connection.  But that isn't you. As to the rest, you asked for the exact quote and I gave it to you.  If you want to argue with what he said, that is another matter and does not concern me, since my position is that even if we, arguendo, say that the field strengths did NOT get better, Tiger's career was so much more dominant than Jack's that it doesn't matter.  I don't NEED to make a stronger field argument to make the case that Tiger dominated golf in a way and to an extent that no other golfer has ever dominated golf.  And he did it for 15 years (after an absolutely unprecedented career as an amateur) which, IMO, is long enough that it no longevity argument could overcome the sheer dominance advantage his career embodied.   The fact that all that is true in the face of field strength increasing is just icing on the cake.   
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Excellent. Thank you for re-posting that quote. Sorry to hear you're tired of rehashing. Why not just let the thread die then? Is the expectation that folks will read all 272 pages before making a comment? That strikes me as an unrealistic expectation.. I agree the tour is tougher than it used to be. I consider the differences more incremental than astronomical...not the 'order of magnitude' range that seems to come through in some comments. I think Jack is both being accurate in assessing his perception of a shift in quality, but also exaggerating for effect or experiencing present-day myopia at the very least about the money. $100 in 1962 money would be ~ $800 dollars today. Not exactly what I would call bus fare. The 'paltry' $100,000 had the buying power of about $800,000 in today's dollars, which is ~ 60% of today's average purse and ~ 30% of the Players' purse).. Most Americans would happily take an annual salary like that today. They weren't getting ditch digger wages. The prize money even then definitely attracted keen competitive interest. Clearly purses have also grown more than inflation and even journeyman make more in a year than the top 10 in 1962 (below), but it seems about in line with the growth of the population of golfers in the U.S. itself - about triple since Jack's day, Endorsement money has definitely gotten bigger, as the tour and the golf marketplace have developed and expanded over time.   Rank       Player                  1962 $                   2015 $ 1            Arnold Palmer        $81,448                 $639,223 2            Gene Littler           $66,201                 $519,562 3            Jack Nicklaus         $61,869                 $485,563 4            Billy Casper            $61,842                 $485,351 5            Bob Goalby            $46,241                 $362,910 6            Gary Player            $45,838                 $359,748 7            Doug Sanders        $43,340                 $340,143 8            Dave Ragan          $37,327                 $292,951 9            Bobby Nichols       $34,312                 $269,288 10          Phil Rodgers          $32,182                 $252,572  
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      Broke par, Lowest Score Wins. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries