• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
wingback

dynamic transition

11 posts in this topic

hi all, great tip that's working a treat for me at the moment, ensure the takeaway is wide and slow, now the key move, just before the completion of the backswing nudge the legs forward, this does a few positive things for the swing, it prevents the dreaded over the top move, it transfers the weight and it creates great lag, timing the move will take a bit of work, it has to be done rhythmically.The best way to mentally visualise the whole swing thought is either the cracking of a whip or the casting of a fishing line.Hope this helps at least somebody.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

1) Wide takeaway is a feel, and may or may not happen. Too wide can cause too much lateral movement, which is not a good thing.

2) Do you know you are nudging the leg forward, or is it just a feel? Cause if it is just a feel, it could be just a sequencing feel, and not really happening. Might want to take a look on camera on that. Maybe a video of the golf swing with a nudge and one with out. See if there is actually a difference in the golf swing motion.

3) Lag isn't really that big of a deal. If you have a good swing lag happens pretty much automatically.

4) cracking of a whip is a feel action, not actually a reliable thing for people to just try.

Basically general visuals are "feels" that may or may not work for everyone. If it works for you that is fine. Everyone has to develop their own feels. The best way is using a mirror or video camera, knowing the range of positions the club needs to be in the golf swing and going form there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

1) Wide takeaway is a feel, and may or may not happen. Too wide can cause too much lateral movement, which is not a good thing.

I have to second that from experience... I used to want to do the same thing and basically what ended up happening is at A3 I had an angle of like 140* instead of the 90* that you would usually see with tour pro's..

Because of this thought I just wasn't hinging my wrists fast enough, because the people giving you these tips make you think that it is a good thing to delay the hinge as long as possible so that you get more power.

What I ended up with was basically a slight lateral move, but even worst a huge over swing because of the extreme delay I had in the wrist hinge..

That's my experience with this tip anyway!  Maybe, I just took it to extreme when I tried to implement, but then again implementing tips like this with out supervision makes the results unpredictable at best!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

the width helps because if your narrow the club will cast from the top of the backswing, I think having a mental image of the swing ie cracking the whip is important, im sure it may help people understand how the swing should work, far too many golfers cast from the top robbing the motion of power and accuracy, picturing how the shaft should flex is also a great way of making people understand the downswing action.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the width helps because if your narrow the club will cast from the top of the backswing, I think having a mental image of the swing ie cracking the whip is important, im sure it may help people understand how the swing should work, far too many golfers cast from the top robbing the motion of power and accuracy, picturing how the shaft should flex is also a great way of making people understand the downswing action.

That isn't necessarily true. I would bet  most amateurs don't lack width. They lack proper depth with the hands. Meaning that their hands are not deep enough inside due to improper hip rotation. What you are describing can cause improper hip rotation, poor hand depth, can cause the club to get inside the hands, and cause later body movement away from the target.

The whole whip things isn't important because the swing doesn't work that way. The amount of lag is totally based on individual ability. Someone like Sadlowski from the long drive competition has absurd lag. Another example is Sergio. Yet you have other golfers who don't nearly have that amount of lag. So cracking a whip isn't applicable to everyone. Hence it is a feel move just for your own game, not a general tip that would work for everyone else. Given the swing does work from the ground up. Yet how a player gets that movement is all on how they individually feel the swing happen. Best way is through video, golf instruction or mirror work.

For example, I have to feel like my arms drop before my hips move. This is totally opposite of what you are describing. I know my arms don't actually do this, but this is what I need to do to get the club on a better downswing path, and sequence. My body clears way to fast for me. To obtain my hands in the proper position at impact they need to get there faster.

Once again, that is what works for you. It isn't what works for everyone. This doesn't mean its wrong, just mean it isn't a requirement for everyone. Everyone visualizes and feels the swing differently. You are describing feels, not actualities.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

yes totally agree just posted to give some golfers a tip that may work for them, thanks for your feed back anyway all your comments I take on board.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all, great tip that's working a treat for me at the moment, ensure the takeaway is wide and slow, now the key move, just before the completion of the backswing nudge the legs forward, this does a few positive things for the swing, it prevents the dreaded over the top move, it transfers the weight and it creates great lag, timing the move will take a bit of work, it has to be done rhythmically.The best way to mentally visualise the whole swing thought is either the cracking of a whip or the casting of a fishing line.Hope this helps at least somebody.

If this lower body move is what you are talking about I thought most people do it (or at least try).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah that's the one, im sure most people understand that the legs should start the downswing, I just thought that telling them to start the action a fraction before the the backswing completes will ensure that the swing remains fluid and prevent the hands and right shoulder snatching from the top.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah that's the one, im sure most people understand that the legs should start the downswing, I just thought that telling them to start the action a fraction before the the backswing completes will ensure that the swing remains fluid and prevent the hands and right shoulder snatching from the top.


I agree with you. :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers ms256 for your feedback

hope that cold snaps not as bad this time for you americans

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For example, I have to feel like my arms drop before my hips move. This is totally opposite of what you are describing. I know my arms don't actually do this, but this is what I need to do to get the club on a better downswing path, and sequence. My body clears way to fast for me. To obtain my hands in the proper position at impact they need to get there faster.

I have the same feeling as you.  From the top I need to move my right forearm and shoulder at the ball together with the hip slide.  From the video, I have no casting or losing the angle of the right wrist and the hip is moving forward.  This has bother me for somethime since all has claimed moving the hip is the first move, using the ground...  but I need to do both (arm and hip together) otherwise  sometimes my arm not move at fast to impact resulting open face to the right.  If you move the shoulder diagonally to the ball the hip has to move forward.  So, can both come down together as the first move?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • Iron Game Suffers when Driver Going Well
      For high handicappers myself included, this is typical.   I think it is b/c we don't have the same swing for irons and longer clubs.  If we get them both right in the same round, it is probably by pure luck or coincidence.  Grin and bear, and enjoy the journey.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      The topic title is the question who is the greatest golfer, the poll is the question who was the best. Two different things in my opinion. There's no doubt to me Tiger was a better golfer. How could he not? Spieth, McIlroy, Day but even guys like Wiesberger, Luiten and Donaldson play better golf than Jack. The game evolved so much over the years, and got so much more professional. If Jack would have been around in this era he would benefit from all that as well and be a better golfer than he was (and probably top those guys I just mentioned). But who was the greatest. How do you measure that (can you)? Tiger was dominant in a stronger field, winning more titles than you can count. Jack was the first of a kind, winning the biggest titles (majors) over an enourmous span and having the most of them. Isn't it mostly a matter of personal who you find 'greater'? For me Johan Cruyff is the greatest Dutch football player of time, but I have no doubt that Dennis Bergkamp and Arjen Robben were/are better because the game evolved. 
    • Making a Murderer Discussion Thread (Spoilers Likely)
      Obvisously... she took his case about a month ago. On one hand I hope Avery is guilty as hell, on the other hand it would be an amazing story and twist if turns out to be set up and she can prove that. I think that chance is less than 1%, but still..... Possibly, good point. Should be quite some blood though since they found 'drops', meaning it was dripping from (in this theory) his glove. Exactly my point. I don't think the blood was freely flowing, because than there should be a lot more blood in the car. They found blood consisting with bloody hair. Seems to me, and I know I'm not an expert, that she was already dead when she was in the car, because that would explain the little amount of blood found (no pumping of the heart, no flow of blood) and the place it was found (in the back). One can easily argue that he killed in the garage, moved her to the car, and only then got the plan to burn her instead and moved her again; to the pit. But the 'problem' is that that's not what the DA said what happenend. In my opinion that blood in the car contradicts the story (or truth) he wants us and the jury to believe, and contradicts also with the story of Dassey which is the only thing that links Dassey to the case: his own words. That doesn't mean Avery is innocent, but it might raise some doubt. The DA should stick with the facts, not filling in the blanks with guessing. If he can't prove exact chronologically he shouldn't state it as 'fact'.   Absolutely. I'm not convinced in anything, not in my opinion, not in yours, not at all in the people who made the documentary. Also not a fan of conspiracy theory's. I don't think the murder was planted on him, but I do think some mistakes were made by the justice system. Mistakes that possibly should have lead to his and maybe even more Dassey's release, even though there's a big chance he did it. That's for me perhaps the most interesting part in this case and in the discussion. If we want a justice system where the chance is close to 0% that we convict someone innocent, and the prosecution and police need to follow the rules, it means sometimes the guilty walk free. I think everything they found on the compount while Manitowoc detectives were present should have been excluded. I think the DNA on the blood of the bullet should have been excluded. I think the 'confession' of Dassey should have been excluded. I think Dassey should have given at least a new trial, but that was denied by the same judge which handled his initial case (?!).
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      A long time ago, by Tiger's own admission,  said a golfer's career is measured by "majors won" . So if Woody does not break Jack's major record, then according to Woody, his career will be second to Jack's. Now Jack has said that he expects (expected) Woody to break his major record. So Jack is saying he expects Woody will have the better career.  These are the only two guys who would know who had the best career.   Neither one is going to be the GOAT. They will just be a GOTE. 
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Nope, you blindly worship Jack.  It is obvious that you have not read much, if any, of the thread.  But hey, you saw Jack.  In person, yet.  So what.  I did too.  I saw him win his last USGA championship at Cherry Hills.  I saw Tiger play as well - although in person I only saw practice rounds.  So what.  That does not make my assessment of their respective careers more or less credible.  Geee, I never saw Hogan play so I guess we cannot count him in the discussion.   You think Jack was better.  That is fine.  You are entitled to your opinion.  Just don't spoil it with specious reasons or arguments.  Because those we will slice apart like one of Klinger's salamis.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries