Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
nevets88

Is there a correlation between steepness of swing plane and swing speed?

15 posts in this topic

I would imagine if Matt Kuchar's swing wasn't flat, he'd probably get more distance? Of course, he'd probably lose the accuracy that won him so much money. But from my little keyhole of experience, it seems many of the longer hitters on the tour and the long drive guys have high hands at the top.

What is the consensus among the experts on this?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Keep in mind that steeper angles of attack impart more spin on the ball. Spin kills distance. Shallower angles impart less spin. So I would say in general shallower swings coming inside out will create greater distance. Obviously not an expert but this is a good question.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Probably no definitive correlation here.  High hands at the top can still "drop into the slot" in the downswing.  Also, a steep swing can produce low spin if the ball is teed up high and in line with the front foot.  Bubba Watson is a tall guy who uses a short driver -- necessitating a steep swing to even hit the ball -- and he leads the tour in driving distance.  But many LD guys like Sadlowski are just the opposite, short in stature but using a longer driver requiring a shallower swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have heard that high hands equal distance, deep hands equal accuracy. there are a couple videos on youtube about it. Bubba has high hands, hits it far, not a lot of accuracy

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have heard that high hands equal distance, deep hands equal accuracy. there are a couple videos on youtube about it. Bubba has high hands, hits it far, not a lot of accuracy


I wouldn't put any stock in that theory. If you stop the swings of different tour players at this point on Kuchar's swing there is very little difference whether they had a high hands vertical swing or low hands rotary swing. Some have the front arm more vertical and some have the front arm extended more toward the ball at that point from a DTL view but even that has little to do with the top of the back swing. JB Holmes at that point would have the front arm angled more toward the ball (and his left arm is high at the top).

Shaft in line with the back forearm at this point is what almost all pros have in common. With a vertical swing the front arm falls more straight down to that point and with a deeper swing it has to come around and down. Neither are swinging straight at the ball from the top of the swing but are getting to this position in different ways. For that reason the position at the top has little to do with the angle of attack into the ball.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that steeper angles of attack impart more spin on the ball. Spin kills distance. Shallower angles impart less spin. So I would say in general shallower swings coming inside out will create greater distance. Obviously not an expert but this is a good question.

Those are gross generalizations. Steeper angles don't typically create more spin and spin doesn't neccesarily kill distance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are gross generalizations. Steeper angles don't typically create more spin and spin doesn't neccesarily kill distance.

Please ellaborate. I don't see how spin could not affect distance. Excessive spin could cause a ball to balloon, a ballooning ball is going to lose distance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Please ellaborate. I don't see how spin could not affect distance. Excessive spin could cause a ball to balloon, a ballooning ball is going to lose distance.

Those are gross generalizations. Steeper angles don't typically create more spin and spin doesn't neccesarily kill distance.


Just my 2 cents. I would say that steeper angles do typically create more spin with all else equal, but would also agree that more spin "doesn't necessarily kill distance." Spin isn't always the enemy of distance. It keeps the ball in the air. Excessive spin for the trajectory and ball speed is the enemy of distance.

P.S. You can also have a "steep" swing that bottoms out before the ball and catches the ball with a positive angle of attack, which changes that whole discussion.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming solid contact is made in my assumptions
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A steeper angle of attack most often results in less dynamic loft as well. The result of that is less spin as compared to a shallow angle of attack with more dynamic loft.

Spin is determined by spin loft(the difference between AoA and dynamic loft). There's lots of reading out there about this if you Google "trackman laws", "trackman ball flight", etc.

Here's one link I found real quick. http://nccga.org/the-science-of-spin-angle-of-attack/

There's plenty of reading about it on this site as well.

I say spin doesn't "necessarily kill distance" because spin is one of those good things(all shots require backspin) but you can have too much of it, to the point where it costs you distance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A steeper angle of attack most often results in less dynamic loft as well. The result of that is less spin as compared to a shallow angle of attack with more dynamic loft.

Actually a steeper angle of attack will not decrease dynamic loft. Most high handicap players will flip the club at the ball, which increases angle of attack and increased dynamic lot. Tour pros have a shallower attack angle, and hands forward at impact. This will deloft (lower dynamic loft) the club.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The Emperor has spoken lol.

:-) Was on my phone.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Actually a steeper angle of attack will not decrease dynamic loft. Most high handicap players will flip the club at the ball, which increases angle of attack and increased dynamic lot. Tour pros have a shallower attack angle, and hands forward at impact. This will deloft (lower dynamic loft) the club.

The Trackman people themselves say that as the angle of attack gets steeper the dynamic loft tends to be reduced along with it. Granted yeah, they're measuring more tour players and decent golfers than high handicappers so you might be right about the high handicappers.

But for people who don't flip at the ball, steepening the angle of attack will in most cases reduce dynamic loft, leading to lower shots without adding spin.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Free towel while you play at a public course?
      Mt. Washington course puts a towel to use in the carts at times. I don't think it is all the time, just rainy days.
    • Jason141 new clubs
      You're not giving us much to go on. What is your current iron set? As for the Nike VR Pro Combo, I'll let others comment on that. As for FT irons... I to follow Callaway and know a bit about their classic irons, but I really don't know anyone who used the FTs. Came out in 2008 along with XForged, X20 Tour and X20. (See note on i-brids) FT had the same shaft length for comparable # irons as the X-family irons of 2008. Stock shafts were the FT Iron Graphite (L, R, S at about 75 grams) and the NS.Pro 100, a 110-gram steel Uniflex. I hit all the X-clubs in spring 2009, but not the FTs. Scattered reviews on the FTs promoted idea that the club got the ball up high without loss of distance. The wide sole looked similar to the circa 2007 Big Bertha irons. As @newtogolf said, you won't know much until you try the two irons models out. I'm worried you'll be wasting time and $$ if you go buy-and-try with assorted iron models. Why not get fitted with newer used offerings?
    • My Swing (cutchemist42)
      Well figured with 1 month under the belt in the golf season I would post an updated video. One thing that sucked is during this session I forgot my shoes, and I lose confidence in my swing wearing slippery shoes. My driver hits have been better since last year, with my big misses being big massive pulls. These pulls dont appear to have much of a fade or draw in them. Upon watching the vdeio, I kinda thought my wrist was hinging more than I see in the video.   Heres my 6i swing. i would say my miss is just the occasional fat shot, maybe 1 out of 15 hits. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHrjhEdGyZI
    • Free towel while you play at a public course?
      Towels in carts, quite a few. BTW, I hope people aren't taking those "free" towels home.  That's not the intent!
    • 2016 DEAN & DELUCA Invitational
      And man, am I looking forward to it! Love me an Oakmont bloodbath! That course can beat people up. The only thing that could screw things up is heavy rain. I was there in '73 when Johnny Miller won with a final round 63. It rained just about all night every night of the championship, but it didn't rain during the day. Just a solid, low overcast. I don't think Oakmont saw a single ray of sunshine the whole tournament! That's because he didn't have to, so he didn't. Which is called smart golf. And there are holes at Oakmont where you don't have to hit driver, and in fact, had better not! One of the things that makes me chuckle is when I hear the mantra that Spieth is "short". I watched him hit an 8 iron 190 today! I saw him hit drivers that carried 290+. He may not be the longest, but he is by no means short! Watching the back 9 at Dean & Deluca made me wonder what this kid might be capable of if he could get his tee game in order. He's an absolute magician around the green! However it goes, the next two weeks are going to be a whole lot of fun!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries