Jump to content
IGNORED

Minimalist Golf Swing


Note: This thread is 3563 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I don't believe that will be the case Carl! :smartass:   But Tiger did pretty well with a very restricted backswingand a good shoulder turn today!  Actually, that's the whole point.  Kiran's MGS is about pre-setting the basic golfing positions- no big deal just different for people like me who are not Tiger or even you Carl, lol! Kind regards,  Patrick

If this swing can produce more power with less effort, then tour pros could increase their driving distance, no?

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sorry, but that's bullshit. We don't "like" Kiran? Most people here have never talked to her, let alone met her. I have, and it's not a matter of "like" or "dislike." It's a matter of her being able to (or unable to) explain some things. It's a matter of me making an informed decision on her ideas about the golf swing, given my background in the same as well as the sciences.

Also, we are not dealing with opinions here. We are talking about facts. Please locate the "opinions" and you'll discover that they're few and far between - we are here discussing facts - physics, biomechanics, etc. Fact: you hinged your wrists in your golf swing while MGS says not to.

I'd written this up a day or two ago, but now's as good a time as any to post it. It too discusses facts:

Minimalist Golf Swing Tenets

1. Pre-set right side bend, then maintain it so it is there at impact.

2. Do not load the wrists for better timing (???)

3. Minimal torso turn for reasons yet to be made clear.

4. Arm loads up the chest.

Problems, in order:

1. Right side bend exists in all good golf swings using traditional mechanics. It's most often caused by the head remaining relatively steady while the hips go forward a bit.

2. If this were actually done in a swing you'd find an undeniable loss of power. Possibly this improves timing, but the vast majority of players will not take that tradeoff.

3. More loss of power. Perhaps again more control, but again, they will not take that tradeoff.

4. This happens in the traditional swing as well. I suspect it's exaggerated in MGS to help the player hit out (it helps the hands gain depth), but many will throw their hands out at the ball anyway.

Showing us photos of Ben Hogan doing things doesn't matter. Ben Hogan had a traditional swing. You may as well show us photos of Tiger Woods or Phil Mickelson or Bubba Watson, none of whom have much of anything in common with MGS as shown by the creator herself.

Showing us videos where in 30 minutes a student makes one small change (often just closing their shoulders at setup slightly) does not serve as any form of proof of anything. They're still making a "traditional" swing.

Could it be that MGS teaches a traditional swing in a format more easily handled by non-superstars of golf? Could it be that small changes are really important in a golf swing? Could it be you should "live and let live" and not attack different things without really understanding them? "All we are saying...is give peace a chance!" :banana:

Your gimpy buddy,

Patrick

Patrick

MGS Fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Could it be that MGS teaches a traditional swing in a format more easily handled by non-superstars of golf? Could it be that small changes are really important in a golf swing? Could it be you should "live and let live" and not attack different things without really understanding them? "All we are saying...is give peace a chance!" :banana: Your gimpy buddy, Patrick

I believe that @iacas understands the golf swing VERY well.

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
But Tiger did pretty well with a very restricted backswing and a good shoulder turn today!

Tiger's backswing was not restricted. He slid his hips, too. BTW, sliding the hips is how good players create secondary axis tilt. You really can't just create it at setup, because to make a full turn, you're gonna have a heck of a time keeping your hips that far forward.

Could it be that MGS teaches a traditional swing

No.


Could it be that small changes are really important in a golf swing?

Nobody's debating that. But they have to be the right changes. I'm pretty sure I've never seen a good player not hinge his wrists, pre-set super closed, make a 45° torso turn, and swing out to the right 20°.

Not even Kiran can do it without flipping the snot out of it.

Could it be you should "live and let live" and not attack different things without really understanding them?"

I understand things pretty well. This is not an attack. I'm showing you evidence and asking you to comment. You cannot, because you called a member here my "butt boy" and did several other blatantly obnoxious, rude, childish things, and you're spending time in the Penalty Box. But that's no matter, really, because you've never responded to the valid questions and criticisms.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

But Tiger did pretty well with a very restricted backswingand a good shoulder turn today....

Patrick, it's silly statements like this that causes people to think that you're a kook. FWIW, if you can keep away from comments like that, it might help you to establish some credibility. Just my .02 worth....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Patrick, it's silly statements like this that causes people to think that you're a kook. FWIW, if you can keep away from comments like that, it might help you to establish some credibility.

Just my .02 worth....

I agree. If you post something you state is Factual, it better be fact, otherwise you will get called out on it. That goes for anyone here, myself included.. :-D Chill out, and do as David suggested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

WTF is up with her left arm in that pic... This might be off-topic, but I don't really get an instructor hitting an iron off a tee to show something...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I tried this swing with my driver and finally hit it 300!!!!! Now if I can find a 7200 feet course I will be a scratch golfer. On a serious note, if someone has ailments or older and this keeps them in the game I am all for it. But I compare trying to sell it to able body players to me putting better one handed. I have actually had people ask why I don't try it more because I do it pretty well. And my answer is because I think the potential of doing it 2 handed, aka the proper or standard way, is much higher. Even if this swing somehow made me better than what I am today, if I groove a conventional swing I would be better by leaps and bounds than I could be with this swing.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by 14ledo81

I suppose I am similar to you.  I follow MGS but not completely.

Well, Matt if you have any insights to share or think I'm messing up somehow let me know-I was a little dizzy on the greens today after the front 9-it has been a few weeks since touching the sticks still I missed real birdie chances on 1,2, (made 4), 7. 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 real = within 30 feet of the pin.

Kind regards,

Patrick

I guess I meant that I hold a golf club and hit a golf ball (similar to the swing you posted in that regard).

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tiger's backswing was not restricted. He slid his hips, too. BTW, sliding the hips is how good players create secondary axis tilt. You really can't just create it at setup, because to make a full turn, you're gonna have a heck of a time keeping your hips that far forward.

Michelle Wie presets the hip pretty far forward, with good secondary tilt, even head tilted a bit, and doesn't overdo the backswing either. Shoulders at the top are still pointing ahead of the ball, and the club doesn't come near to parallel, and this is either a driver or three wood off the tee. She even has the ball maybe an inch back of where many people are playing that shot.

The three substanital differences I see from what Kiran is teaching are:

1. She obviously shifts her weight into that front heel, and also lifts the back foot well before impact, in order to get the weight forward and get a strong hip turn.  I think Kiran's advice to keep the back foot down as long as possible, while it is used as a "feel" by some golfers to avoid too much sway, is going to be counterproductive for some golfers unless there is something else there ensuring they actually do get the weight forward before impact. This is why I asked Patrick if Kiran taught the step into the left heel; I thought maybe I had missed it somewhere.

2. Obviously, like most of the experienced golfers on Kiran's videos, she doesn't use anything like Kiran's idea of maintaining the wrists uncocked throughout the swing. I've yet to see anyone successfully demonstrate this one in a way that works. Kiran claims this will maintain the width of the swing, which maybe sounded good to her in theory, but in practice it doesn't seem to work for anyone. Even Kiran herself when she attempts this is quite obviously compensating as a result by bending the lead elbow instead, which is likely causing more timing issues, and loss of power and accuracy, in addition to losing width, than would maintaining a natural wrist cock. If you stand naturally with your arms at your side, your wrists will be "cocked". Put something light in your hand, even a club held from the wrong end, so the handle extends, and it will only slope very gradually downward. It's the weight of the clubhead which naturally causes the wrists to want to uncock more than that at the bottom of the swing. So it seems to me a better "minimalist" approach would be to let the left wrist be in it's natural position at the top of the swing, and let it fall naturally into the uncocked position on the downswing--no complex timing needed.

3. She most definitely turns the back shoulder well above the front in the backswing, as is natural.  The shoulders pointing ahead of the ball, which I mentioned above, is a postition Kiran criticizes. This is perhaps another "feel" for Kiran, as even she herself doesn't successfully keep the back shoulder lower, in fact raising it a little above at the top of her swing. But even trying to do this puts Kiran in an awkward position where she is unable to let the arm swing freely down into the ball.  Kiran's model of a restricted hip turn with almost no shoulder turn makes little sense to me. Hogan had a somewhat restriced hip turn (at least in his later "5 lessons" period), but with a full shoulder turn. Mike Austin required less shoulder turn from the torso because he bent the front knee in and pulled the front hip in allowing a fuller hip turn. It seems to me even a minimalist swing likely requires some degree of one or the other, either hip or shoulder turn, to generate acceptable power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Michelle Wie presets the hip pretty far forward, with good secondary tilt, even head tilted a bit, and doesn't overdo the backswing either. Shoulders at the top are still pointing ahead of the ball, and the club doesn't come near to parallel, and this is either a driver or three wood off the tee. She even has the ball maybe an inch back of where many people are playing that shot.

She does. She still moves her hips forward. And either way, MGS says to create tilt by tilting your right side back and good golfers tend to create tilt by moving their hips forward (whether at address, dynamically during the downswing, or like Michelle, a bit of both).

Hips are wide open at impact (over 40°), torso open to the target line (20° or more left). Not so sure about the torso turn, but obviously Michelle has one of the shorter turns. Still quite a bit more than 45° or so that we've seen in MGS videos.

1. She obviously shifts her weight into that front heel, and also lifts the back foot well before impact, in order to get the weight forward and get a strong hip turn.  I think Kiran's advice to keep the back foot down as long as possible, while it is used as a "feel" by some golfers to avoid too much sway, is going to be counterproductive for some golfers unless there is something else there ensuring they actually do get the weight forward before impact. This is why I asked Patrick if Kiran taught the step into the left heel; I thought maybe I had missed it somewhere.

I agree, and disagree with MGS on the weight/pressure information we've seen thus far (and what I've seen from Kanwar herself on The Facebook).

2. Obviously, like most of the experienced golfers on Kiran's videos, she doesn't use anything like Kiran's idea of maintaining the wrists uncocked throughout the swing. I've yet to see anyone successfully demonstrate this one in a way that works. Kiran claims this will maintain the width of the swing, which maybe sounded good to her in theory, but in practice it doesn't seem to work for anyone. Even Kiran herself when she attempts this is quite obviously compensating as a result by bending the lead elbow instead, which is likely causing more timing issues, and loss of power and accuracy, in addition to losing width, than would maintaining a natural wrist cock. If you stand naturally with your arms at your side, your wrists will be "cocked". Put something light in your hand, even a club held from the wrong end, so the handle extends, and it will only slope very gradually downward. It's the weight of the clubhead which naturally causes the wrists to want to uncock more than that at the bottom of the swing. So it seems to me a better "minimalist" approach would be to let the left wrist be in it's natural position at the top of the swing, and let it fall naturally into the uncocked position on the downswing--no complex timing needed.

I skimmed most of that, but on the face of it, I agree.

3. She most definitely turns the back shoulder well above the front in the backswing, as is natural.  The shoulders pointing ahead of the ball, which I mentioned above, is a postition Kiran criticizes. This is perhaps another "feel" for Kiran, as even she herself doesn't successfully keep the back shoulder lower, in fact raising it a little above at the top of her swing. But even trying to do this puts Kiran in an awkward position where she is unable to let the arm swing freely down into the ball.  Kiran's model of a restricted hip turn with almost no shoulder turn makes little sense to me. Hogan had a somewhat restriced hip turn (at least in his later "5 lessons" period), but with a full shoulder turn. Mike Austin required less shoulder turn from the torso because he bent the front knee in and pulled the front hip in allowing a fuller hip turn. It seems to me even a minimalist swing likely requires some degree of one or the other, either hip or shoulder turn, to generate acceptable power.

I don't know about that. Hogan's hips turned a fair amount…

I do agree that I don't like this about MGS.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3563 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • It seems like too much work for me. I'm actually surprised at myself for spending as much time on this as I already have. Shot Scope tells me my shots to finish with a 7i is 0.1 better than with my 50 or 55 so I'm just going to go with it. Actually, I tend to be the complete opposite. I've never faced a shot I'm convinced I can't hit. It leads to great heroics and complete flops. Conservative for me might just be someone else's normal.
    • Tell me you've not seen Bill play without telling me you've not seen Bill play? 😄 Just teasing @billchao. 😄 
    • And like Matt said, and I have hinted at… it's ONE ROUND. Because you have to get hot. Better players than him failed to get through. And… Peaked too soon, perhaps. He could also get injured, get surpassed, lose interest or lose his game… Again, if I trusted y'all to uphold the bet, and if the bet wasn't basically a 15-year proposition… I'd bet y'all. The odds are against him, and heavily so. So… he didn't qualify, and he's playing on a sponsor's exemption. Jordan Spieth was 16 years old when he tied for 16th in a PGA Tour event… and I realize that mentioning Jordan Spieth (who has obviously had a lot of success) seems to argue against my point, but Spieth is the exception and he did better at only a year older than this fella. The odds are strongly against him.
    • He shot -5 with a bogey on the last hole. Those Monday Q events are seriously tough to get through. Lots of very very good players play in those, including normally a fair few tour players who've lost their cards, including past winners. It is a small sample size, but he also just broke one of Tiger's records (youngest ever to be ranked one in AJGA if memory serves). He's the best 15 year old in the world at the moment. He's also pretty small and skinny - if he grows and fills out a bit and gets stronger, he could be a serious force to be reckoned with. He may of course also go off the boil and struggle or his swing may not last his growth or something, so it's not like he's odds on to make it or anything like that. I think it will be interesting to see how he progresses and if (big if granted) he progresses well, then he will be quite the prospect.
    • At a basic level, you can take those strokes gained numbers and if you know what the baseline strokes to hole out is from each distance, you can figure out how many strokes on average you will take to hole out from any given spot on the golf course. Then you can take that shot zone thing from shotscope and put it down there and see what the average is for each club and each target you choose. That's not exactly trivial to do though even with a computer, so the strategy guides (like LSW) use rules of thumb to make those decisions easier for you to make on the fly. Most of the time you'll come up with the optimal strategy and on the odd occasion when you don't, the strategy you come up with will be pretty darn close to optimal. If you're anything like me, then you'll probably wind up being a little too conservative with both club choice and target. Fear of penalty strokes can make you play suboptimally. Basically it's a bad idea to base your strategy on a shot that might pop up less than 1 in 20 times. If you happen to hit that shot, then today just isn't your day, but the 19 times you don't, you'll be in that much better of a spot.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...