Jump to content
IGNORED

Best Swing on PGA Tour?


mackingchicken
Note: This thread is 3697 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Swing I like the best and would copy if I could: Ernie Els

Swing I would be better off trying to copy: Steve Stricker

Link to comment
Share on other sites


lol totally forgot about Mahan, edited my post

Watched him on the range hitting 4 irons for about 20 minutes at Riviera. Obviously all those guys hit it well but Mahan is a notch above most of them. Rarely misses his start lines and curves it the same amount every time, hits it pretty solid too


I think Hunter has one of the most technically sound swings in the game and I would love to emulate it as best I can, I know my swing looks nothing like his but if I were to use samples to go by I think he's the best in the game.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I know it's a boring and obvious opinion, but how can I look farther than Tiger?

Perhaps it's super silly of me to argue anyone on this thread since, well, we're all right in our opinions... but Tiger's swing just looks so violent these days. I know it's always been aggressive, but now I'm wondering if at age 38 he should swing more like he does on the range, which is a considerably slower, more relaxed action.

All this said, he's won 79 times on the PGA Tour, so I think he'd know more than me on this one, but lately, I've wondered about his tempo. I'm not saying he should never step on the gas, but maybe it shouldn't be his stock shot off the tee.

I'm not sure if this is off-topic or not.

Constantine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Perhaps it's super silly of me to argue anyone on this thread since, well, we're all right in our opinions... but Tiger's swing just looks so violent these days. I know it's always been aggressive, but now I'm wondering if at age 38 he should swing more like he does on the range, which is a considerably slower, more relaxed action.

All this said, he's won 79 times on the PGA Tour, so I think he'd know more than me on this one, but lately, I've wondered about his tempo. I'm not saying he should never step on the gas, but maybe it shouldn't be his stock shot off the tee.

I'm not sure if this is off-topic or not.

I kind of agree with what you said and hell, if we're analyzing/discussing PGA swings, I don't see your post as off-topic at all. I do think he looks as though he's putting too much into his swing this year though (and even at times late last year). I'm not sure if that's just our perspective, if he changed something that makes his swing look more aggressive, or what. I still think he's fluid as water though and I'd love to be able to keep my head a 1/10th as still as he does. Watching his slow motion swings looks like some fake, CGI produced clip if you focus on the button on his hat (Fun Fact: The "button" on the top of the hat is called a Squatcho... thanks Wiki Answers... :beer: ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Perhaps it's super silly of me to argue anyone on this thread since, well, we're all right in our opinions... but Tiger's swing just looks so violent these days. I know it's always been aggressive, but now I'm wondering if at age 38 he should swing more like he does on the range, which is a considerably slower, more relaxed action.

All this said, he's won 79 times on the PGA Tour, so I think he'd know more than me on this one, but lately, I've wondered about his tempo. I'm not saying he should never step on the gas, but maybe it shouldn't be his stock shot off the tee.

I'm not sure if this is off-topic or not.

No, I agree. There's no arguing that he's not successful but I'd prefer to have Rory's fluid, balance and "poetic" swing than Tiger's violent thrashing lash but, then again, 5 wins and POY last year so...wadda I know? Squat, apparently.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Haas has a great move, but Adam Scott is the prototypical Harmon swing that I prefer.  Els, Mahon, Louie O., Rory and a host of guys today have very modern and at the same time classic swings.  The lower body is more braced today and swing arcs are more optimized than the great swings of the past, but almost everyone on tour has a great swing.  Perhaps a stranger topic would be who has the weirdest swings on tour and still gets results -- Jim F. is not the only outlier.  We could all name a few swings that maybe only the owner of that swing could make it work for them.  Try naming the Orville Moody types of today.

RC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


(Fun Fact: The "button" on the top of the hat is called a Squatcho... thanks Wiki Answers... ).

Hehe, yea, that's why I thought it was silly of me to even argue my point :-D Although, I do wonder what ^^^ this swing looked like at normal speed... meaning, how hard was he actually swinging here? Still... amazing swing. It's hard to argue with that face on clip.

And going along with your "squatcho" factoid, the plastic/metal covering on the ends of our shoelaces are called " aglet s."

Constantine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

In my mind, 2 guys are 1/1a for different reasons

1. Dustin Johnson - Love the wrist cock at the top of his backswing and the transition downward. A really powerful looking swing

1a. Rory - Great balance all the way through. He has the prettiest and most consistent finish that I see on tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Adam Scott and Louis Oostuizen

:tmade: R1 Driver
:tmade: Burner 18.5 Wood
:tmade: Rocketballz 19 Rescue

:mizuno: MP-59 4-PW Irons
:cleveland: CG16 52, 56
:cleveland: Classic Mallet Putter

:bridgestone: e5 Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It certainly isn't Russell Henley, although he's a precocious talent.  Ernie Els has been killing it for decades and the his fellow South African Louis Oosthuizen has a silky swing.  Adam Scott and Lee Westwood also have swings that you have to admire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Oosthuizen and Schwartzel. No coincidence these guys are from South Africa. In their prime, Goosen and Els had two of the sweetest swings, too. They teach them well there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Is it about the look or the result? Zach Johnson seems to pull the results of keeping it straight down the middle all day long. Driver, wedge, guy rarely misses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3697 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...