• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
snapfade

Golf in 2020

5 posts in this topic

Just curious what you guys thought about what we might be seeing in 2020 as far as technology goes with the equipment. We already have mega-adjustable drivers, dozens of shaft/head combos for irons, the hybrids and so forth. What can they come up with next to give us the longest club they have ever made? I'm stumped. Faces can only be so thin, drivers so long. I suppose by 2020 my 5 iron will be pushing 250yds and off the rack drivers 400 plus.(If your playing Krank drivers then disregard.)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Good idea for a thread! By 2020,probably not much different about the game. I think the biggest things will be gadgets and apps that do cool things. Training aids that help you improve faster, gadgets that analyze your game better, stuff like that. The game and the clubs won't change dramatically in 6 years. I actually think the obsession with distance will fade and manufacturers may focus on forgiveness and consistency. Lessons could change too. As people learn more about the swing and ball flight, and technology let's us do more and more. Maybe we will all have a trackman in our pocket.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Five ball putters!
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

In my opinion fairway woods will almost completely be replaces by hybrids, there may be a driving fairway, possible something like a 2 Wood but 3 woods will be like 5 woods are now. I also see increased advisability even on new clubs.

Manufactures may for a hefty price may sell something like an SLDR but with the option of buying a High launch or low launch model head.

We may also see easier adjusted shafts, something like taylormade shafts that can be removed with screws. Imagine if changing shafts on an iron consisted only of screwing out your old shaft than screwing in the new.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a link to Golf magazines club test for 2006, kind neat to look back and see what has changed in 6 years while we are talking about what to look forward to in 6 years http://www.golf.com/equipment/clubtest-2006-drivers?page=2

Here's a link to The Golf Warehouse circa 2004 courtesy of the Wayback Machine  http://web.archive.org/web/20040727080314/http://www.tgw.com/main.jsp

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Look at Ben Hogan. He played in exactly one Open Championship. Before Arnold Palmer brought it back into the fold as something you should be playing every year it was just too expensive for such a little purse to win. There wasn't much prestige in winning it during that time.  Look at the US open. Since 1993, only 52% of the time a non-US golfer won the US Open. From 1950 till 1993 only 92% of was won by US golfers.   Same with the PGA Championship. Since 1993 the US has only won 56% of them. From the time they went to stroke play (1958) till 1992 the US won 86% of them.  Same with The Masters. Since 1993 the US has won 56% of them. From 1950 till 1992 the US won 77% of them.  It just goes to show you that the influx of non-US golfers to the PGA Tour field of players has made it that much more difficult for US golfers to win a major.  Could I say that it was 30% easier for Jack to win those majors because of the non-US golfers who stayed away from traveling to the US to play?  US Open: 40% less likely US player wins after 1993
      PGA Championship: 30% less likely a US Player wins after 1993
      The Masters: 20% less likely a US Player wins after 1993
       
    • Great golfing quotes
      You're Never a 14 handicap! Hitting balls like that!!! End of round Nice playing with you, you scored net 80, you know you should really stay out of bunkers! Attributed to my fellow members, all of them did any one see that? No I hate golf Probably happens to everyone
    • Nike hyperflight golf balls
      Thanks for the hidden gem!!! Thats encouraging stuff. I really like the ball Ive been playing, but after reading that, Im looking forward to giving them a shot.
    • How Do You Decide Where to Play Golf
      Decision matrix: Course quality, then time available, then cost. dave
    • Longer or More Accurate?
      That doesn't make it a trick question. People aren't so lousy with accuracy that they're off 200 yards, but their tee shots travel 200 yards toward the target fairly often. The 10% thing helps to adjust them to the proper scale. I hit my driver 270, but I don't miss by 1/4 of that distance (67.5 yards). The wildest 100-shooting golfers are about +/- 10°. Their average is about 7°. 80-golfers are around 6°. 70 golfers probably about 5°. PGA Tour pros are around 3.5°. So 10% of those numbers are 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5°, with 0.35° for PGA Tour players. And yet, give each of them a full 1° (or  14% more accuracy for 100-golfers, 17% more accuracy for 80-golfers, 20% more accuracy for 70-golfers, and nearly 30% more accuracy for PGA Tour players… and they still come up short (or, at the PGA Tour level, only begin to break even). This means that the poll is biased, indeed, but in the opposite direction you think, @Marty2019. The poll could have said "would you choose 25% more accuracy or 10% more distance" and everyone (generalized to groups, not individuals) would STILL be better off choosing the distance. The only "trick" is that people value accuracy way, way too much, to the point where many are happy to take only a 10% improvement in accuracy while even a 25% improvement still can't account for the added value of driving the ball an extra 10% farther.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries