• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dr5093

Looking for a putter

5 posts in this topic

I am new to golf and looking to purchase a putter. I have narrowed my choices down to a few putters. Any idea which of these would be best? Odyssey Metal-X 2 Ball, Odyssey White Ice 2.0 2 Ball, Ping Scottsdale Y-Worry, Ping Scottsdale Mesquite or Ping Scottsdale Hohum? Thanks for any advice

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

@dr5093 ,

In my opinion, the most important this about a putter is whether I can aim it accurately.  When you set the putter down, is it aiming exactly where you intend it.  The length and lie can affect this, so getting a putter fit to your putting style helps.

Second, is the length, lie and loft.  Having these set to your putting style helps.

Third is aesthetics.  The putter has to look nice to me.

I would try the different putters to see if they are comfortable to you in terms of set up.  Try 33 - 35 inch lengths and putt some balls.  After you choice a comfortable length, check aim on them.  You can do this with help from someone. Set the club down and aim at a point 5 to 10 feet away.  Have your friend then line up behind the putter and see if the aim line is on target.  If it doesn't have an aim line, you can set a ruler or square to the face and check it that way.

Most store bought putters are set to a loft and lie for the average putter.  For lie, if the putter is set up correctly, the putter should be close to square to the ground (not toe up or heel up).  Loft determines how the ball starts rolling.  This depends on your putting stroke.

Lastly, you are new to the game, so check out the different types will help.  If you wanted to really find the best putter for you, I would recommend getting fit by a professional.  It will cost a few extra dollars, but a lot of places with reduce the rate if you buy a putter from them.  You don't need to buy a $350 putter either.  Jim Furyk won the Fed Ex with a $39 used putter.  Used putters are also a good way to go.  I bought a used Scotty Cameron for $95 and had it adjusted by a fitter.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Odessy Versa #7 model might be worth a look.  I think it's a great balance of weight, balance and feel.  Within the Versa #7 line, you can go all the way up to $250 (ouch!) and down to less than $100 on a 'last year's model' that isn't painted.

Putters are a real 'feel' buying decision.  Either it feels great or it quickly finds its way back onto the rack.  Give the Versa #$7 model a try.  There's a good reason more than several tour players use this model.

dave

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Odyssey tank putters. More players need heavier putter heads, and a bit more counterbalance. If you want to fine tune it more. Rip of the grip, put your own on and go by some counterbalance weights you can self install.

That or get fitted for an Edel putter :-D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Odyssey tank putters. More players need heavier putter heads, and a bit more counterbalance. If you want to fine tune it more. Rip of the grip, put your own on and go by some counterbalance weights you can self install.

That or get fitted for an Edel putter

Another great option are Yes! putters. Their heads typically weight in at ~350-360 grams, which is perfect for me.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • GAME GOLF - Digital Tracking System
      Well, I went ahead and bit. Amazon Warehouse Deals has a few for $86 each. I had a $25 Amazon GC from Christmas, so after tax, it's going to be $66. It says the packaging is damaged, but no mention of problems with the device. Here's hoping it comes in good shape, and that it warms up pretty quickly so I can use it!
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (February 2016)
      The tournament I was supposed to play in was cancelled , so I played in a shotgun start today. The group I was in played at a quicker pace than the group in front and the group behind us, so I had plenty of opportunities for practicing greenside chipping and bunker shots as well as putting.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      While I expect it's largely accurate, I was more interested in a link to the actual quote than your paraphrase. The context of the question and interview plus the exact wording gives a clearer understanding of the statement. I accept deeper field of talent, I don't accept that it's automatically 'a ton' or an order of magnitude greater. What's the average score relative to the field (or % making the cut) in the PGA for the Pros vs. the PGA qualifiers from then to now? That could provide some insight to relative gap between majors field depth then and now. I am certain it's gotten harder for the PGA qualifiers to make it tot he weekend. I am less certain by how much the margin has shifted. The reason I stress the Majors and Opens is that size of field and openness to qualifiers is very important in making the top competitors face many elite players with potential to have a hot run of form. You're comparing apples to oranges there. That was ~ 1.5 million players in the U.S., not the world population of golfers. About 26 million golfers today in the U.S. Worldwide in 1920 who knows? But including Europe, Australia, and other 'commonwealth' countries it was likely double that - maybe triple. Also I can find no credible estimate that supports 100 million current golfers worldwide. Most generous is about 61 million. While there are a lot of clubs world-wide, participation of 'casual' unaffiliated golfers per club is not going to be the same as in the U.S. and that's the only way I get a number close to 100 million based on actual data. U.S. golf population talent base roughly tripled between Jack and Tiger and I expect worldwide it was a similar rate of increase. I think since the 1920's the U.S. has had about half the wold golf population, though that's started to decline of late as Asian participation increases. Jack was head and shoulders above highly competitive fields for nearly a generation similar to Tiger. I don't think human abilities change by orders of magnitude in short spans of time so I expect that Jack was an outlier of similar human ability as Tiger. How close and who has the edge is IMO debatable. Were Tiger's achievements (esp. the 'beat the field' streak) tougher than Jack's because of field depth, yes. How much more I'm not as sure as you. Did a relative 'competitive break' from full field events offered by the WGC's help Tiger there? Don't know but it's possible. Combine Tiger's regular wins and Majors and I have no problem giving him the greatest player of all time nod. I just don't think it's as cut and dried or by as large a margin as you seem to. They didn't play against each other so your confidence isn't any more a fact than my uncertainty. We're both estimating. Size of the field actually competing matters too, not just who wasn't invited to the party. I like the idea of a top player field and enjoy watching the events, but if only the top 50 players are playing they all have a better shot statistically than if the field was open to 156 or more players who are still very 'elite' in skill. As you've said in many posts, golf skill performance is highly variable. I agree and that's why I think size of field is relevant to the comparison, because I think the scoring variability of the top 90 golfers in the world overlaps considerably with the next 90 down and even a bit beyond that. That's why I wondered whether WGC wins are a bit less valuable than a major or a full field PGA tour event that's also open to Monday qualifying. Granted the world ranking system is better than it used to be, but it still weights international events more strongly than they deserve. Some of the reasons I think you may be undervaluing Nicklaus' achievement in comparing across eras.
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (January 2016)
      I managed to complete the January challenge (without missing a day, I believe). It was a great months' work for my game - having to blog every day sure helps to focus each session.
    • Steel vs Graphite generic question
      S300 is one of the lowest launching steel shafts.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries