• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Pave

Define "Release"......

41 posts in this topic

I've been reading this forum and I'm curious as to what you think the term "release" actually means.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Nothing important. Its a term developed by instructors to try to define a feel that varies from player to player. Meaning, it isn't worth your time worrying about unless it comes up on video as something. Yet since most players end up flipping at the ball anyways, why would they ever way to think about releasing the club.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Power accumulator ... I want to say number 3?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Power accumulator ... I want to say number 3?

lol, I did consider making it multiple choice, but alas the answer would have been too obvious once it's there in black and white.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been reading this forum and I'm curious as to what you think the term "release" actually means.

Depends on who you ask.

There's no one definition. Some people, like me, hate the phrase because it's got no definition and is often a word said by a golf instructor as a CYA type of word. It means whatever they want it to mean in that moment.

Some instructors define a "release" for their swing pattern, and that's fine, but at the end of the day those are often instructors with "one swing pattern," and I tend to avoid that as well.

Nothing important. Its a term developed by instructors to try to define a feel that varies from player to player. Meaning, it isn't worth your time worrying about unless it comes up on video as something. Yet since most players end up flipping at the ball anyways, why would they ever way to think about releasing the club.

I've said here "lag happens" and so the sister phrase to that is "release happens."

Power accumulator ... I want to say number 3?

It's probably all of them, truly, if you want to go down the TGM route.

lol, I did consider making it multiple choice, but alas the answer would have been too obvious once it's there in black and white.

I would disagree that there's any "one answer."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I can see why you hate the term Erik and it's why I asked the question, because the term is not understood and has been contorted over time. The fact that you disagree that there is only one answer is proof that the term has been contorted over time, even by instructors. Is the term wrong or are people interpreting the term to suit their own ends?

Release means to "let go" or "let it go". It's that simple. Your "lag happens, release happens" is correct.

I believe the confusion began when people/instructors began trying to define the release or analyse the release with pictures. Problem is that the release is a feeling and you can't take a picture of a feeling.

Think about what the first guy who used the term was trying to describe- it would have been a feeling (of letting it go). Also think about where the term "held off" comes from, he "held off" the release, he didn't let it go.

Here's a little experiment a few of you might want to try that will give you a feeling of release:

Grab a wedge and a big cardboard box, place the box 10-20yds away from you, line up with your wedge like your going to hit a ball straight over the box. From your golf stance THROW YOUR CLUB AT THE BOX HARD with your golf swing.

Obviously you must "release" the club to throw it at the box, what many of you will find is that you "hang onto it" (the club) too long and end up throwing it backwards or way left, because you don't "release" or "let the club go" down the target line.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see why you hate the term Erik and it's why I asked the question, because the term is not understood and has been contorted over time. The fact that you disagree that there is only one answer is proof that the term has been contorted over time, even by instructors. Is the term wrong or are people interpreting the term to suit there own ends?

I don't think you can really argue that point. You can only really tell us what you think the term means, but heck, I'd be more inclined (if I had to pick a term) to pick the TGM definition, because at least it's written in a book that's 60 years old or so, and set a sort of precedent.

I believe the confusion began when people/instructors began trying to define the release or analyse the release with pictures. Problem is that the release is a feeling and you can't take a picture of a feeling.

I think that anything that tries to define a "feeling" is destined to fail. Feels aren't real. Hogan may or may not have felt the same "release" as anyone else, and heck, he may not have felt a "release" at all - he famously said he wishes he had three right hands so he could hit the ball even harder. I'm not sure he felt he "let go" of anything.

Think about what the first guy who used the term was trying to describe- it would have been a feeling (of letting it go). Also think about where the term "held off" comes from, he "held off" the release, he didn't let it go.

We don't know that.

This is all part of the reason why I don't particularly care for the term. I never use it. Virtually every player I teach who wants to draw the ball does. Various students here can attest to the fact that they "release" the club properly without feeling like they're throwing their club at a cardboard box.

Peter Kostis uses "release" a few times in this video (apparently not "releasing" is how you fade the ball?)

How much does Rory "release" this one? This ball drew, btw.

So again, your "throw your club at the box" drill is how you teach and feel "release." That's fine. I haven't seen you teach, and so I can't really comment on it.

But I don't mess with it. I have and use lots of feels with golfers (that's almost all instruction is after you've identified the mechanics you need to improve), but can't recall ever asking someone to "release" the club like this. IMO, it happens automatically if the things before and after are being done properly.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Look man, that's the point of my post. The original and correct meaning of the word/term has been contorted by people trying to describe a feeling. I have no idea how The Golf Machine describes "release", but is it that hard to accept the the meaning of the term comes from the dictionary?

RE: the videos. Of course you can hit a fade with a release, the fact that you've put them there suggests you're thinking a release is something that it's not, a release is not the squaring up of the club through impact. Rory's is a late release with a manipulated body action to delay the release.

I find it difficult to discuss points of view with you Erik, how would you feel if if I told you "feels aren't real" but "I use lots of feels with golfers"?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought "release" just meant getting to that fully extended position in A8/A9.   Or I guess "release" is what you do/feel to cause you to get to that position instead of chicken-winging it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look man, that's the point of my post. The original and correct meaning of the word/term has been contorted by people trying to describe a feeling.

I disagree that there's an "original and correct meaning of the word" (as some golf instructors attempt to use it for the golf swing). And I'm not just saying that to be difficult, or anything of the sort. I simply don't think the word has a true and/or universally (or even close) accepted original definition as it applies to the golf swing.

But… Let's imagine for a second that "originally" some time a long long time ago it meant exactly what you said. If it's become so contorted, then it's time to give up on the word, if it's going to confuse people. The point of communication is to be understood, and if using a word is going to cause confusion because it means ten different things to ten different people, abandon it or find a different word.

In other words, the word "release" is meaningless because it has so many different meanings to so many different people.

RE: the videos. Of course you can hit a fade with a release, the fact that you've put them there suggests you're thinking a release is something that it's not, a release is not the squaring up of the club through impact. Rory's is a late release with a manipulated body action to delay the release.

That's your definition of the word.

You realize you're trying to tell me that "I'm thinking a release is something that it's not" when I've been what I feel is pretty clear that I don't teach or even consider "the release" to be "a thing" in the golf swing. Not once, IIRC, have I ever talked with my golfers about "releasing" the club.

I find it difficult to discuss points of view with you Erik, how would you feel if if I told you "feels aren't real" but "I use lots of feels with golfers"?

I'd either ask what you mean specifically, or take the time to learn what you mean.

I'll start with "feel ain't real." Case in point: a student who takes his putter outside the target line on the backswing might need to feel like he wraps his putter around his right ankle on his backswing (i.e. super arc). Feel: wrap the putter around his right ankle. Real? Nothing of the sort - just a putter gently arcing inward instead of going back outside the target line.

As for "I use lots of feels with golfers" that's because . Feels produce mechanics. So of course I use feels. With the player above, the feel might be "wrap the putter around your right ankle on the backswing." It produces the improved mechanics.

Those statements aren't contradictory. If I'm reading what you wrote correctly, you seem to believe they are.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I absolutely believe there is a definition of release. When you downswing, to get the clubhead to the ball from your lag, you have to release your cocked wrists. The first guy does a full release and follow thru to hit a draw. Wrists roll over. That's what I do. Rory also releases his wrists but "holds on" to the club to prevent it turning over to cause his fade. That's how I fade the ball.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
I disagree that there's an "original and correct meaning of the word" (as some golf instructors attempt to use it for the golf swing). And I'm not just saying that to be difficult, or anything of the sort. I simply don't think the word has a true and/or universally (or even close) accepted original definition as it applies to the golf swing.

I can appreciate how you got to the point of forming this opinion. I don't necessarily agree with your opinion, but I understand it now. Thankyou.

Quote:

I'll start with "feel ain't real." Case in point: a student who takes his putter outside the target line on the backswing might need to feel like he wraps his putter around his right ankle on his backswing (i.e. super arc). Feel: wrap the putter around his right ankle. Real? Nothing of the sort - just a putter gently arcing inward instead of going back outside the target line.

As for "I use lots of feels with golfers" that's because Everyone is a Feel Player . Feels produce mechanics. So of course I use feels. With the player above, the feel might be "wrap the putter around your right ankle on the backswing." It produces the improved mechanics.

Those statements aren't contradictory. If I'm reading what you wrote correctly, you seem to believe they are.

I see where you're coming from, but feels are very real. It's more the students perception that's screwed up. "feel ain't real" is confusing.

There is a place for "release" in teaching, I've seen several swings on here that may benefit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely believe there is a definition of release. When you downswing, to get the clubhead to the ball from your lag, you have to release your cocked wrists. The first guy does a full release and follow thru to hit a draw. Wrists roll over. That's what I do. Rory also releases his wrists but "holds on" to the club to prevent it turning over to cause his fade. That's how I fade the ball.

Yeah, that's as good a definition as any, you're not hanging onto the cocked wrists, you "let it go", mechanics do the rest.

The videos are are little tricky, apparently the first guy hit a fade, clubface would have been open. The second one Rory hit a draw, clubface would have been closed with an in to out path, what makes the second one tricky is the body manipulation. He was try to hit it low. Hard shot and difficult to analyse.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too hate the phrase release, but if forced I would describe it as a sequence of power accumulators such as 4,1,2,5,3, not a single accumulator.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I've been working on impact, speed on impact, rhythm and grip strength recently, (basically my swing) I never got the release bit, I d read about rolling the wrists/hands over, and when you try to purposely do it, bad things happen, I also never understood feel, it's confusing to read and understand about feel? there is too much BS written about golf in general, however it's starting to come together now for me, ( I've felt this way before, but this time it's real! Honest!) for me "release" means the point where my through swing begins, where I loosen or "release" my grip to be as loose as possible allowing the momentum of the club head to power through, my description would be when ya pick ya kids by the hands and twirl them round, your gripping just tight enough to not let go, because you don't wanna crush their hand bones and it gives a better flight, your bodyweight is your anchor, like a kids push swing it swings better tied to the top bar with rope than it would attached with pieces of wood, it like... Oh forget it! I give up, but I know what I mean!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like when you swing ya kids round you grip them tight at first, but once the flight/centrifugal force, or swing is in motion you "release" your grip and the swing takes over ...or takes place! So for me "release" means the point of releasing your grip, or letting go, as pave suggests! There, I've said it as best I can!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You release whn you swing your kids around? Wouldn't they hit the wall? :) I used to be a baseball player. If I wanted to rip a ball down the 3rd baseline, I'd release my wrists and turn the bat over. Normally, I would not release my wrists and slap balls to right field. Kind of like a fade in golf. I hit for average that way. BTW, I know a guy who rolls his wrists consciously. He's very good golfer. I never roll my wrists cosciously. I unhinge my wrists at the ball and follow thru down the line. I drive ther ball pretty well.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely believe there is a definition of release. When you downswing, to get the clubhead to the ball from your lag, you have to release your cocked wrists. The first guy does a full release and follow thru to hit a draw. Wrists roll over. That's what I do. Rory also releases his wrists but "holds on" to the club to prevent it turning over to cause his fade. That's how I fade the ball.

Rolling the wrists have nothing to do with drawing the ball. Check out Myth #7 [CONTENTEMBED=/t/73354/common-golf-myths-that-may-be-hurting-your-game layout=inline]​[/CONTENTEMBED] [quote name="Pave" url="/t/73693/define-release#post_972146"]Yeah, that's as good a definition as any, you're not hanging onto the cocked wrists, you "let it go", mechanics do the rest. The videos are are little tricky, apparently the first guy hit a fade, clubface would have been open. The second one Rory hit a draw, clubface would have been closed with an in to out path, what makes the second one tricky is the body manipulation. He was try to hit it low. Hard shot and difficult to analyse. [/quote] Rory hits draws with the face aimed right of the target at impact, like most players that draw the ball.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • GAME GOLF - Digital Tracking System
      Well, I went ahead and bit. Amazon Warehouse Deals has a few for $86 each. I had a $25 Amazon GC from Christmas, so after tax, it's going to be $66. It says the packaging is damaged, but no mention of problems with the device. Here's hoping it comes in good shape, and that it warms up pretty quickly so I can use it!
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (February 2016)
      The tournament I was supposed to play in was cancelled , so I played in a shotgun start today. The group I was in played at a quicker pace than the group in front and the group behind us, so I had plenty of opportunities for practicing greenside chipping and bunker shots as well as putting.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      While I expect it's largely accurate, I was more interested in a link to the actual quote than your paraphrase. The context of the question and interview plus the exact wording gives a clearer understanding of the statement. I accept deeper field of talent, I don't accept that it's automatically 'a ton' or an order of magnitude greater. What's the average score relative to the field (or % making the cut) in the PGA for the Pros vs. the PGA qualifiers from then to now? That could provide some insight to relative gap between majors field depth then and now. I am certain it's gotten harder for the PGA qualifiers to make it tot he weekend. I am less certain by how much the margin has shifted. The reason I stress the Majors and Opens is that size of field and openness to qualifiers is very important in making the top competitors face many elite players with potential to have a hot run of form. You're comparing apples to oranges there. That was ~ 1.5 million players in the U.S., not the world population of golfers. About 26 million golfers today in the U.S. Worldwide in 1920 who knows? But including Europe, Australia, and other 'commonwealth' countries it was likely double that - maybe triple. Also I can find no credible estimate that supports 100 million current golfers worldwide. Most generous is about 61 million. While there are a lot of clubs world-wide, participation of 'casual' unaffiliated golfers per club is not going to be the same as in the U.S. and that's the only way I get a number close to 100 million based on actual data. U.S. golf population talent base roughly tripled between Jack and Tiger and I expect worldwide it was a similar rate of increase. I think since the 1920's the U.S. has had about half the wold golf population, though that's started to decline of late as Asian participation increases. Jack was head and shoulders above highly competitive fields for nearly a generation similar to Tiger. I don't think human abilities change by orders of magnitude in short spans of time so I expect that Jack was an outlier of similar human ability as Tiger. How close and who has the edge is IMO debatable. Were Tiger's achievements (esp. the 'beat the field' streak) tougher than Jack's because of field depth, yes. How much more I'm not as sure as you. Did a relative 'competitive break' from full field events offered by the WGC's help Tiger there? Don't know but it's possible. Combine Tiger's regular wins and Majors and I have no problem giving him the greatest player of all time nod. I just don't think it's as cut and dried or by as large a margin as you seem to. They didn't play against each other so your confidence isn't any more a fact than my uncertainty. We're both estimating. Size of the field actually competing matters too, not just who wasn't invited to the party. I like the idea of a top player field and enjoy watching the events, but if only the top 50 players are playing they all have a better shot statistically than if the field was open to 156 or more players who are still very 'elite' in skill. As you've said in many posts, golf skill performance is highly variable. I agree and that's why I think size of field is relevant to the comparison, because I think the scoring variability of the top 90 golfers in the world overlaps considerably with the next 90 down and even a bit beyond that. That's why I wondered whether WGC wins are a bit less valuable than a major or a full field PGA tour event that's also open to Monday qualifying. Granted the world ranking system is better than it used to be, but it still weights international events more strongly than they deserve. Some of the reasons I think you may be undervaluing Nicklaus' achievement in comparing across eras.
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (January 2016)
      I managed to complete the January challenge (without missing a day, I believe). It was a great months' work for my game - having to blog every day sure helps to focus each session.
    • Steel vs Graphite generic question
      S300 is one of the lowest launching steel shafts.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries