• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
iacas

TaylorMade Golf Introduces SLDR Mini Driver

67 posts in this topic

TaylorMade Golf Company, makers of the No. 1 played driver in golf, today announced the launch of the SLDR Mini Driver, a 260cc metalwood equipped with a 43.5” shaft, designed to promote distance and accuracy off the tee for players who frequently drive with their 3-wood.

TaylorMade research indicates that a high percentage of golfers, regardless of skill level, hit 3-wood off the tee more often than from the fairway. However, the 3-wood is designed to hit the ball off turf, not a peg. That void between product design and product use led to the development of the SLDR Mini Driver, which is engineered to be longer off the tee than a 3-woood and incredibly accurate.

“Tour pros and betters amateurs often hit their 3-wood off the tee more often than from the fairway,” said Brian Bazzel, TaylorMade’s Senior Director of Metalwood Creation. “We embraced that fact to create a metalwood that’s sized between a 3-wood and driver and is designed to be easy to hit off a tee.”

Like the SLDR driver – the No. 1 driver on the PGA Tour – the SLDR Mini Driver features a low-forward center of gravity (CG) location that reduces spin. From there, most players benefit from playing a higher loft (what TaylorMade calls “lofting up”) by combining a low spin-rate with a high launch angle, which are the launch conditions that promote maximum distance.

The SLDR Mini Driver also incorporates TaylorMade’s Speed Pocket technology, which promotes lower spin on impacts low on the clubface, where the majority of driver mis-hits occur.

And though it’s engineered to be easier to tee off with than a 3-wood, the SLDR Mini Driver is also easy to launch the ball off the turf with, thanks to its smooth sole that’s smaller and offers less resistance than a driver’s.

Aesthetically, the SLDR Mini Driver’s sleek shape and smooth matte silver crown, black clubface and black button-back gives the club an attractive appearance from all angles, especially at address. The contrasting colors also facilitate easy and accurate face alignment.

The first Tour pro to put the SLDR Mini Driver in play was Troy Matteson, who put not one but two in his bag at the Valero Texas Open: one to use off the tee and one to use from the fairway.

“The SLDR Mini Driver is intended to appeal to a wide audience,” added Bazzel. “For the Tour pro or top amateur who places a premium on distance control and accuracy, this club is a fantastic option. It’s also a great choice for those amateurs who struggle with 460cc drivers.”

Two SLDR Mini Driver models are available, standard and TP. The standard model retails for $279 and is equipped with a Fujikura 57 shaft. It is the same shaft used in the SLDR driver, but at 43.5 inches (two inches shorter than the SLDR driver) it promotes tighter dispersion for increased accuracy. The TP model retails for $379 and is equipped with Fujikura’s Motore Speeder 7.3 shaft and is built to a heavier, D5 swingweight for improved control. Lofts in both models range from 12°, 14° and 16°.

Both SLDR Mini Driver models will be available at retail starting on 5/2. Visit TaylorMadeGolf.com for more information.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Sadly its not adjustable. I am curious as to how it performs off the ground though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Good for them. A lot of people will be able to handle that better than the driver they are using.

Since they had pretty much maxed out in the opposite direction of big heads and long shafts (that plenty of people can't hit) I figured they would put out something like that sooner or later.

I've had absolutely no urge to buy a driver for a few years but I will more than likely try one of those.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been playing with a Ping K15 12 degree driver with a 3 wood shaft for a while now as an alternative to 3 wood. I think this is a great idea by TaylorMade.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Driveway! Sort of! (Doesn't look like something I would ever seriously consider buying. I rarely hit my 3-wood off the tee as it is. It's an interesting idea though.)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

These are becoming pretty popular now, with the Driveway and the new Ping Rapture that are similar clubs in the 260-280cc range. The rapture seems very overpriced though compared to the Driveway and this new club by TM. Cool that TM is offering this.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Back about 2001, I considered swapping my driver for a Ping i3 3W with 12* loft. If I remember right, a car repair derailed my plan.

Years before, I had played a persimmon-headed Wilson Staff 2W "brassie" as a driver for several months. It had a 13* loft, and worked quit well. The head had cracked on the set's original driver.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I just can't figure out where something like this fits into the bag.

  1. Do you learn to hit it off the turf as well - even though its only really designed for the tee - and dump the regular 3 wood?
  2. Do you sacrifice a bit of distance off the tee on some holes by replacing your driver with this club?
  3. Do you sacrifice a bit of distance out of the fairway on those reachable par 5's by dumping your regular 3 wood - even though you can't hit this off turf - and sticking with only your 5 wood or hybrid?
  4. Or, do you dump one of your 3 or 4 wedges, thus allowing you to carry a regular 3 wood, this club, AND a regular driver?

I've been struggling with this question since I bought my current 3 wood, a Titleist 910f.  They have been selling the 910fd - similar to this new TM club - and I just couldn't make a decision, but ultimately went with the "traditional" 3 wood for the few times I need to hit it off the turf.  That was, like, 3 years ago and I'm still not sure if it was the right choice.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I just can't figure out where something like this fits into the bag.

Do you learn to hit it off the turf as well - even though its only really designed for the tee - and dump the regular 3 wood?

Do you sacrifice a bit of distance off the tee on some holes by replacing your driver with this club?

Do you sacrifice a bit of distance out of the fairway on those reachable par 5's by dumping your regular 3 wood - even though you can't hit this off turf - and sticking with only your 5 wood or hybrid?

Or, do you dump one of your 3 or 4 wedges, thus allowing you to carry a regular 3 wood, this club, AND a regular driver?

I've been struggling with this question since I bought my current 3 wood, a Titleist 910f.  They have been selling the 910fd - similar to this new TM club - and I just couldn't make a decision, but ultimately went with the "traditional" 3 wood for the few times I need to hit it off the turf.  That was, like, 3 years ago and I'm still not sure if it was the right choice.


A lot of people will replace their driver with this club and not sacrifice any distance at all (because they can't hit a driver anyway). Might even add a few yards to the average if they can hit the club.

I know... all of us think we can hit a driver, because we occasionally hit a good one, but in reality...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a 3 wood! Nothing new there! Just another 3 wood! And not a very versatile one at that! It will sell well due to TM's superb marketing, but it's just another 3 wood, designed for girls to drive with! And even though it looks better than there driver, that kind of money could be spent on better things! To be honest, if this had come out a few years ago, when I drove like a girl, I'd have been interested, but that money could be spent on a quality driver and a lesson!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a 3 wood! Nothing new there! Just another 3 wood! And not a very versatile one at that!

It will sell well due to TM's superb marketing, but it's just another 3 wood, designed for girls to drive with! And even though it looks better than there driver, that kind of money could be spent on better things! To be honest, if this had come out a few years ago, when I drove like a girl, I'd have been interested, but that money could be spent on a quality driver and a lesson!

Wow!

That "guy" that played with us last year that always hit a 3W off of the tee close to 300 yards (because he said he couldn't hit a driver) was a girl? That makes me feel even worse.

Was an exceptionally big strong "girl" though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow!

That "guy" that played with us last year that always hit a 3W off of the tee close to 300 yards (because he said he couldn't hit a driver) was a girl? That makes me feel even worse.

+1

Lot's of people get MOAR distance with a 3W simply because they hit the centre of the face more often. That leads to MOAR confidence which can lead to MOAR speed and that, as we all know, means MOAR distance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

What are the specs on their SLDR 3w. My guess is it's somewhere in the 170cc range. I can see how this would appeal to people. Especially if they don't market it as an SGI "driver". If it makes a convert out of just one guy that sprays driver all over I'm happy, because it will probably make them a faster golfer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

What are the specs on their SLDR 3w. My guess is it's somewhere in the 170cc range. I can see how this would appeal to people. Especially if they don't market it as an SGI "driver". If it makes a convert out of just one guy that sprays driver all over I'm happy, because it will probably make them a faster golfer.


It's 260cc. Until I actually found out how well it does off of the deck I have my normal skepticism for that use but it could be fine.

I am more optimistic about using it as a driver. I have a KZG driver that's somewhere around the same cc that I like pretty well but it has the wrong shaft for me. I would expect the Mini Driver to be a little hotter than that club.

http://taylormadegolf.com/TaylorMade/SLDR-Mini-Driver/DW-WZ039.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 260cc. Until I actually found out how well it does off of the deck I have my normal skepticism for that use but it could be fine.

I am more optimistic about using it as a driver. I have a KZG driver that's somewhere around the same cc that I like pretty well but it has the wrong shaft for me. I would expect the Mini Driver to be a little hotter than that club.

http://taylormadegolf.com/TaylorMade/SLDR-Mini-Driver/DW-WZ039.html


Their regular 3w is 260cc too?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Their regular 3w is 260cc too?

Probably less. Titleist 913 fairway wood is 160cc

Think of it this way. The old Titleist 975D, back in the late 90's was a 260cc driver :-D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Yeah I was thinking 170ish, most are. The mini at 260 is pretty hefty. I was looking at 12* 401cc heads just last week. May even look into a 14* 401cc in the 43" range. I can definitely see the appeal. My 4h and 7w are similar enough I could probably live without the 4h and carry two drivers.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Is this designed to be hit "down" (like a fairway) or "up" (like a driver)?

Related: How high do they recommend you tee it up?  (Link to TM shows a tee height halfway between a driver and a 3 wood.)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • The Most Common Swing Flaw
      I'm sure there will be arguments later but there is one piece of information I think a lot of golfers can benefit from. I hope to save some people from buying the online swing tip scams. The most common flaw I see in swings is rotating the forearms one way or the other. Most people don't realize you don't have to rotate your forearms or hands at all in the golf swing, in fact it's better if you don't. The arms can stay just as square as they are at address. The arms follow the rotation of the shoulders on the plane. The arms slightly trail the body on the through swing, creating some additional lag to hip lag, and then eventually they pass the body much later. The club face can stay as square as it was at impact the whole time, many PGA  pros do this. Hunter Mahan is a good example. The only movement the arms really have to make is an up and down one. There is a popular drill where students are told to pick the club straight up from address, hinge it, and rest it on their right shoulder (for righties), and then turn the shoulders 90 degrees and voila, the top of the backswing. To get to this position people will do all kinds of arm and hand contortions all over the place, which is fine. The only problem is, is on the way down, you don't want to be doing these things, and the law of physics states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so you will likely do going down what you did going up, just in reverse. All you really have to do is rotate your shoulders and let the arms stay connected as they were at address, after all this is why you've spent so much time working on the set up position! The swing is a moving and rotating set up position. Some people actually get to the top perfectly, but then insist on going way beyond parallel, ruining the glorious work! The problem here is, the more your arms lift past your shoulders, the more you have to wait for them to come down, for that huge 1mph arm swing speed boost.  You're of course thinking, why the heck do people do all these things? One reason people do this is because it feels natural, at least that's the reason experienced golfers do it. It feels more repeatable to them, and they like it, it feels good. Power to them. But there are plenty of golfers who do these things that aren't happy with their game, so why do they do it? They do these things because it feels like they can get maximum strength this way. Doing it the efficient way would cost them a lot of power, because their strongest and biggest muscles have not coordinated yet to hit a golf ball. When we do basic things like jumping and lifting, things we've done all our lives, we use the most efficient muscles and most supported ones. But when we have to hit a golf ball, those muscles don't know how to get involved, so we use the smaller, weaker, faster ones, to get the job done with some short term speed. The truth is, we can hit the ball a lot further using the right muscles, but many golfers believe they are hitting it better with whatever move they currently have. They aren't wrong, at the moment they can't hit it with the right muscles, because the right muscles aren't trained. But if they stopped what they are doing and started training the right muscles to support the swing, would they hit it better, faster farther? You bet your ball washer they would. So put down the club, put your arms across your chest like you learned at your very first golf clinic, dig into your hip sockets, and rotate those shoulders. Do away with the crazy arm motions and the bending and unbending at the waist. The 4some behind you will thank you for it.
    • Anybody play golf without keeping score on a regular basis?
      Certainly. Only keep a record of pars in my notebook - nothing else, consequently my index could be anywhere between 16 and 36. Aim is to par every hole on the course at some stage.
    • My Swing (coop6)
      The video you linked of Rory do you see how there is zero club face rotation after the ball?
    • Ball likely in casual water but uncertain
      thanks @ColinL great answer. Question: Are there any times where you can take an unplayable if you can't identify your ball, like if you can't get close enough to read the letters. I thought there were.
    • Ball likely in casual water but uncertain
      Casual water is an abnormal ground condition (AGC).   The idea behind getting free relief from it is that it is considered “abnormal” i.e. not a normal condition you are expected to play from.   In the same way,  an obstruction being by definition an artificial obect,  is not a natural feature of a golf course and so you get free relief from interference by one. in both cases, the relief is available even if you don’t find your ball which you would think reasonable if you knew perfectly well that your ball had gone into a large patch of casual water and disappeared from sight.   A tree, on the other hand is a natural feature of the course and you get no favours if you put your ball up against one or in it: you have to play the ball as it lies.  If it’s in the tree, you don’t have to retrieve it in order to deem it unplayable, but you do have to identify it as yours. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries