• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Pave

Is it time to abandon Amateur and Professional status classifications?

0   23 votes

  1. 1. Should we abandon Amateur and Professional status?

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      18

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

36 posts in this topic

It seems to me that golf has matured far beyond what the original amateur/professional status rules were designed for.

Why shouldn't an amateur be able to accept prizemoney in Tournament (obviously no hcp ie off the stick)?

Why shouldn't a "Pro" be able to have a hcp and play in amateur events?

Is it time for the governing bodies of the game to have a rethink?

Discuss

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

It seems to me that golf has matured far beyond what the original amateur/professional status rules were designed for.

Why shouldn't an amateur be able to accept prizemoney in Tournament (obviously no hcp ie off the stick)?

Why shouldn't a "Pro" be able to have a hcp and play in amateur events?

Is it time for the governing bodies of the game to have a rethink?

Discuss

Tell us what's in it for the skilled amateur player who works from 9 to 5 and hits balls during the evening and gets to play at weekends? He gets to compete on an un-level playing field with the professional ... bet he can't wait for that opportunity.

And, you, the pro, wants to play for the amateurs' cheesy trophies?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

Should an am be able to accept prize money? No. They can accept up to $750. Good enough.

A pro can have a handicap. It's not commonly done, but nothing says pros have to play at scratch.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Tell us what's in it for the skilled amateur player who works from 9 to 5 and hits balls during the evening and gets to play at weekends? He gets to compete on an un-level playing field with the professional ... bet he can't wait for that opportunity.

And, you, the pro, wants to play for the amateurs' cheesy trophies?

?????? Who said I want to do that? Oh and by the way, that's what hcps are for- to level the playing field.

No.

Should an am be able to accept prize money? No. They can accept up to $750. Good enough.

A pro can have a handicap. It's not commonly done, but nothing says pros have to play at scratch.

A pro can't have a recognised hcp.

Erik, are you a member of the US PGA?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't think of a good reason why it should change.

I don't know what kinds of amateur tournaments a pro would like to enter but I wouldn't want to see them in something like the State Am taking wins away from college kids and people with regular jobs.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good God, NO!
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

A pro can't have a recognised hcp.

I don't see anything that says I can't have a recognized handicap if I want.

http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Handicap-System-Manual/Handicap-Manual/

http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Handicap-System-Manual/Rule-03/

The word "amateur" doesn't even appear on the page (not counting the menus).

Pros typically don't have handicaps… but nothing's stopping them from having one. I followed a link earlier today that showed the handicaps of several PGA Tour pros. Phil Mickelson, Bubba Watson, etc. They post scores when they play Whisper Rock or wherever, and you can get their handicap.

If I played enough golf I could easily enter my scores just like anyone else, and GHIN would give me a handicap card just like anyone else.

Erik, are you a member of the US PGA?

Yeah.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I think you'll find the reason why you won't find anything is because the USGA is the governing body for the amateurs, so I guess it is assumed it applies to amateurs.

The USGA is the governing body for all of GOLF in the U.S. and Mexico. The PGA Tour, PGA section events, etc. follow USGA rules. We don't have different rules for professionals. The USGA is the governing body for golf.

Ditto the R&A; outside the U.S. and Mexico. Makes no sense to me why they would limit handicaps to amateurs only, but I imagine you're aware that most of the members here are from the U.S.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pave

I think you'll find the reason why you won't find anything is because the USGA is the governing body for the amateurs, so I guess it is assumed it applies to amateurs.

The USGA is the governing body for all of GOLF in the U.S. and Mexico. The PGA Tour, PGA section events, etc. follow USGA rules. We don't have different rules for professionals. The USGA is the governing body for golf.

Ditto the R&A; outside the U.S. and Mexico. Makes no sense to me why they would limit handicaps to amateurs only, but I imagine you're aware that most of the members here are from the U.S.

Perhaps he wishes to play against his members for credits in his Pro Shop. :doh:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll find the reason why you won't find anything is because the USGA is the governing body for the amateurs, so I guess it is assumed it applies to amateurs.

I think the majority of the U.S. Open field would be shocked to hear this, as would whatever fraction of guys on TOUR need a new putter in 20 months or so. ;-) I see where the confusion comes from though. Many big national amateur golf events in the U.S. are run by the USGA, and all (even those that aren't run by them) are under USGA rules. Worth noting: USGA and NCAA have different rules of amateur status for golfers. By the way, even if the USGA official handicap system [i]did[/i] limit itself to amateurs, it's easy enough to compute a handicap from the 20 most recent rounds (or at least approximate it, if they're in a tournament or at Augusta). TST ran [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/b/the_numbers_game/calculating_the_handicap_indeces_of_the_pros]an article[/URL] about this a little over seven years ago, showing just how dominant Tiger was at the time (among other things).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I voted no.  I think it is important to still have an amateur level of the sport.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

It seems to me that golf has matured far beyond what the original amateur/professional status rules were designed for.

Why shouldn't an amateur be able to accept prizemoney in Tournament (obviously no hcp ie off the stick)?

Why shouldn't a "Pro" be able to have a hcp and play in amateur events?

Is it time for the governing bodies of the game to have a rethink?

Discuss

A resounding NO from me too.  No amateur I know wants to be competing in a club tournament against all of the local pros.  Handicaps are a necessity for the game, but they are a less than perfect leveling tool.  The wider the disparity in handicap, the less perfect they become.  I have no issue with pros carrying a handicap, nor with them playing in their own division in a tournament, but I draw the line at competing against them for the same purse.  With a properly run amateur tournament, the bragging rights for winning or placing high is at least as important as whatever little prize might be associated with such success, but I don't want that token gift card or whatever it may be going to someone who makes golf his career.  There are plenty of tournaments where local (and not so local) pros are welcomed, and where they compete straight up against each other.  The pros at my home course play in several each year.

In the US, a pro can apply to the USGA to leave the professional ranks and have his amateur status reinstated.  If he wants to compete in my Men's Club, then that's what he's going to have to do.  We are an amateur tournament club, chartered by the Colorado Golf Association, which like many state associations is an associate member of the USGA.  We play USGA Rules, we maintain our members' handicaps under the USGA GHIN system, and we adhere to the USGA requirements for amateurs.  That's how we like it and if that should change the way you want to do it, I'd probably quit playing competition golf.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that golf is the only major sport that differentiates between amateurs and professionals.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that golf is the only major sport that differentiates between amateurs and professionals.

It's the only one that has any reason to.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

It's the only one that has any reason to.

I can only imagine what a pro-am would look like with the NFL.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

It's the only one that has any reason to.


^^^ :beer:

Yeah it's not like we can "enter" an NFL, MLB, or NBA game so that pretty much takes care of itself...and keeps us from getting killed. :-D

Although the local banker playing middle linebacker, ducking 100mph fastballs or drawing a charge against Labron James might be good entertainment.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the only one that has any reason to.

What's special about golf that doesn't apply to tennis, soccer or rugby?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How do I organize a charity tournament to be a raging success?
      26 and a stroke? Holy smokes. Very sorry to hear that.  I have no idea how to organize a tournament but I have played in my share. The best ones are scrambles where you can organize your own team. The outcome has rarely ever mattered to us as long as we were well fed. Find a local restaurant (usually a bbq place) that wants to help you out and give a discount for advertising and spend your money there. Everyone will love to come for a good meal. Some nice prizes and maybe a raffle with some local companies offering you something if you are able to convince them it is worth it to give something to the cause.  Another thing I have seen work well is a silent auction at the end with donated items. I donated airline miles of which I have tons and 100,000 miles went for $205. Free gift for me and the cause got $205. 
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Haha - I get a couple of reputation points for a post and then go and have a blow up hole. Good drive, left myself 145 in down hill (8i), aimed #deadcenter, pulled 2 shots 25 yards left out of bounds, made 9 (+5) in a 9 hole round of (+11). A better way to avoid blow up holes - play stableford!
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Come on now, that's a bit uncalled for in Bernies case.  His political ideals might be way left, but he is at least honest and virtuous.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'll have to examine your other post closer. That's a good point to consider about the expansion to Continental Europe. Largely explains the poor showing of UK & Ireland in the 60's with many top tier European players not eligible. But considering the 200 million U.S. population base to 63 million in the U.K. & Ireland at the time, the latter did surprisingly well if population base was all that matters. IMO an established competitive golfing culture matters in producing elite players too. Those same European players excluded from Ryder Cup were always eligible for the Majors. The Ryder Cup is also a limited field event. It concentrates the 12 top players of the European Tour. From what I've read, depth of field is still stronger for the 'typical' PGA event, though some non-major Euro events are now stronger than some of the 'minor' PGA events. That is a significant change in Euro competitiveness from the 60's. To some extent that 30% drop sounds like it could be due to simply more international players occupying slots in the fields. If the period you mention covers when majors started to use OWGR for automatic qualification that has some not insignificant inherent issues in terms of strength of field. Having a guaranteed start rather than having to qualify would certainly make for an easier decision to travel to the event. But I'm not arguing against the policy decision facilitating international competition with a little points boost just trying to point out that field strength may not have been as weak in Jack's day as you seem to think. Compared to his peers, which is really the only thing I think you can do without speculative nuance I agree there's no question he's the best golfer. I'm really just arguing that standouts of their caliber (so many more wins so many more majors) than typical players among already elite fields are so rare, that I expect they both represent near the achievable human pinnacle in golf talent, which I don't think really differs within a few generations. The nuances of comparison across eras is interesting to me so I'll debate relative points, but I'm against arguments undervaluing Jack's achievements against 'weak fields'. They both faced very stiff competition.   I'm not dissing Jack. I think his achievements are amazing. I also think the same of Tiger's record. IMO winning percentage per start in the Majors is a very significant stat and Tiger has that in his favor (they are both top 10 and within ~ 2% of each other's number). That number is not the official one for Jack though, I truncated his Major starts to end at age 47, which I think is a reasonable cutoff for competitiveness. If Tiger competes as long as Jack did his major win % (up to age 47) might stay about the same, increase, or decrease (more likely), but he certainly won't match the 18 Majors if he doesn't get like 22+ more major starts between now and age 47.
    • Wedges, Bounce, and Ground Conditions
      Typically more bounce (or a "healthy" amount of bounce) helps in any condition.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries