Jump to content
IGNORED

Burner 2.0 new or buy newer technology


Note: This thread is 3643 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, Newbie here on the forums but not new to golf. Looking to upgrade my old TM Rac HT. Recently the TM burner 2.0 has been what looks like closeout prices new for $299. I hit them and liked them in the simulator but just wondering if they are old technology and should look more and obviously pay more for the newer technology TM Rbladez or Speedblade. I like the price point for the burner 2.0 but for $200 more I could get the Rbladez. Thoughts? Scott
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

Welcome to the forum @schach23 .  I personally would go for the Burner for the price.  The new driver may only be slightly better.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Oops. I totally didn't mention ideas looking at iron sets. Still go with the burner 2.0 irons with stock stiff shafts? I just don't want to buy just because they are a good price at $299 but I feel like they are a great set for the money and I am just not sure the new models are that much better. Thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

Same applies to irons.  The newest technology is only slightly better.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

OP, that's what I picked up a few weeks ago. The irons replaced my previous irons which were about 20 years old, copies of some cavity back irons, and less forgiving.

I thought they'd magically improve my game... or at least hoped they would. Nope. My swing is still horriffic but I hadn't played golf in a few years and it is improving with subsequent visits to the driving range.

I don't think the 2.0's are much worse than anything out right now aside from price... if you like them, feel confident in purchasing them.

Chris

I don't play golf, I play at golf. There's a difference.

TM RBZ driver, RBZ Stage 2 Tour 3 wood, RBZ 7 wood, TM Burner 2.0 4-AW, Cleveland CG16 Black Pearl 56* sand wedge, Yes! Golf Valerie putter, Snake Eyes golf balls, TM stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I will also add when I bought my irons the R11 and Rocketballz had just came out and I hit all 3 on a simulator and chose the 2.0 and I was there to buy the newer ones. Just really liked the way it came off the face. YMMV so if you can hit all 3.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Sooo..... since schach23's question seems to be answered to his satisfaction.... and my question is kinda along the same lines as his, but slightly different - i hope he doesn't mind the hijack.   (Mods, please move to a new thread if need be,...thanks)

I've been playing early 90's Lynx Parallax irons since I got them new as demos in 1992 as a 14 yr old and had them re-shafted and re-gripped around 2003 -ish.  I've never kept an official handicap, but don't score as well now as i did in my late teens/early 20s when I was playing multiple times per week.  Back then, I would consistently shoot 84-88 and these days I'm more likely to be around 92-96.  I only get to play about 10-12 times per year now and the bad scores are almost always due to a slow start... i.e. last week, I just shot 49-41 at a course I had only played once before about 4 years ago and probably could have shaved another 2-3 strokes with better course management... but it's always a dumb score like that.... 47-42, 51-40, 50-42 or something... a really bad front than somewhat decent back(for me).

Anywho, back to my question - all things being equal, would/should I (or anyone else that plays sparingly) benefit from going out and dropping $300-$400 on a new set of irons for the "new technology"?  I've been considering the Burner Plus or RocketBladez, the Callaway Razr X,  Adams and a couple others in that price range.  Having not hit anything else yet, I'm pretty darn happy with my irons as-is, and I kinda like the traditional lofts with my PW being a 50* and SW 55*. I tend to hit my irons well and mostly straight, with most of my misses just being dead pulls.  I don't want to just shuffle distance between clubs by moving to newer, more modern lofts and still ending up with the same misses.... but if the newer clubs really are more forgiving, then I should be able to score better, no?

For reference, I currently hit my clubs:

Driver 265-280

3W 235-250

3i -  220

4i - 205

5i - 190

6i  -180

7i  - 165

8i  - 155

9i  - 145

pw - 135

sw -125

56* - 110

60* - 80

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

About a year ago I was in the same boat as a lot of other posters in this thread. Returning to golf after several years off, playing old gear. I decided that I would upgrade and it did make a difference. I went to a demo day to try out irons and discovered just how much more forgiving the current tech is vs. clubs from 15 years ago. Don't hesistate to do yourself the favor of getting new clubs IF you have the cash. You can do it relatively cheap if you're patient and shop around. From eBay, I bought a set of barely used Razr X NG irons for $200 shipped and a new Odyssey Pro putter for $85 shipped. I got a new bag from Dicks on sale, and picked up a pair of X hot fairway woods still wrapped in plastic for $200 from Craigslist. The only thing left is to upgrade my ancient R5 driver, and get a couple new wedges. I'm in no hurry on the driver, so when the SLDRs start showing up used under $200, I'll get one. By piecing it together over a few months, it wasn't too rough on the wallet, and I've learned the new gear each piece at a time. No regrets. Go for it. Just be sure to try out before buying.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3643 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I've played Bali Hai, Bear's Best and Painted Desert. I enjoyed Bali Hai the most--course was in great shape, friendly staff and got paired in a great group. Bear's Best greens were very fast, didn't hold the ball well (I normally have enough spin to stop the ball after 1-2 hops).  The sand was different on many holes. Some were even dark sand (recreation of holes from Hawaii). Unfortunately I was single and paired with a local "member" who only played the front 9.  We were stuck behind a slow 4-some who wouldn't let me through even when the local left. Painted Desert was decent, just a bit far from the Strip where we were staying.
    • Wordle 1,035 3/6 ⬜🟨🟨🟩⬜ 🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Just lipped out that Eagle putt, easy tab-in Birdie
    • Day 106 - Worked on chipping/pitching. Focus was feeling the club fall to the ground as my body rotated through. 
    • Honestly, unless there's something about that rough there that makes it abnormally penal or a lost ball likely, this might be the play. I don't know how the mystrategy cone works, but per LSW, you don't use every shot for your shot zones. In that scatter plot, you have no balls in the bunker, and 1 in the penalty area. The median outcome seems to be a 50 yard pitch. Even if you aren't great from 50 yards, you're better off there than in a fairway bunker or the penalty area on the right of the fairway. It could also be a strategy you keep in your back pocket if you need to make up ground. Maybe this is a higher average score with driver, but better chance at a birdie. Maybe you are hitting your driver well and feel comfortable with letting one rip.  I get not wanting to wait and not wanting to endanger people on the tee, but in a tournament, I think I value playing for score more than waiting. I don't value that over hurting people, but you can always yell fore 😆 Only thing I would say is I'm not sure whether that cone is the best representation of the strategy (see my comment above about LSW's shot zones). To me, it looks like a 4 iron where you're aiming closer to the bunker might be the play. You have a lot of shots out to the right and only a few to the left. Obviously, I don't know where you are aiming (and this is a limitation of MyStrategy), but it seems like most of your 4 iron shots are right. You have 2 in the bunker but aiming a bit closer to the bunker won't bring more of your shots into the bunker. It does bring a few away from the penalty area on the right.  This could also depend on how severe the penalties are for missing the green. Do you need to be closer to avoid issues around the green?  It's not a bad strategy to hit 6 iron off the tee, be in the fairway, and have 150ish in. I'm probably overthinking this.
    • Day 283: Putted on my mat for a while watching an NLU video. Worked on keeping my head still primarily, and then making sure my bead is okay.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...