Jump to content
IGNORED

I would like the PGA Tour to have easier courses


dnaygs
Note: This thread is 3577 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I would like to see the pros play on easier courses.  I get bored watching them make pars and bogeys on extremely difficult courses.  I can't really appreciate how hard the course is by watching it on TV.  To me it's much more exciting when they're making a lot of birdies and eagles.  I'd like to see a tournament on a simple, relatively short course, with relatively flat greens which aren't super fast and easy pin placements.  I apologize if this has been discussed before.  I'm not talking about pros having to play in our normal public crappy conditions with roots and holes all over the course.  Just everything in good shape and easy.  It's not like the tournament would be easy to win just because the course is easy, you still have to play better than everyone else.  Maybe the winner would be 30 or 40 under, maybe more.  I think it would be more exciting, what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I don't have any interest in watching people do easy things... even if that thing would be difficult for me.

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would like to see the pros play on easier courses.  I get bored watching them make pars and bogeys on extremely difficult courses.  I can't really appreciate how hard the course is by watching it on TV.  To me it's much more exciting when they're making a lot of birdies and eagles.  I'd like to see a tournament on a simple, relatively short course, with relatively flat greens which aren't super fast and easy pin placements.  I apologize if this has been discussed before.  I'm not talking about pros having to play in our normal public crappy conditions with roots and holes all over the course.  Just everything in good shape and easy.  It's not like the tournament would be easy to win just because the course is easy, you still have to play better than everyone else.  Maybe the winner would be 30 or 40 under, maybe more.  I think it would be more exciting, what do you think?

All you have to do then is watch the Humana Challenge.  The cut after 3 days there (because they play 3 different course) is well under par.  Not the leader ... THE CUT.  The winner usually pushes -25 or -30 by the end of it.

I think people in general find that more boring than watching them grind on tougher courses.  I like a mix of both.  Birdie fests are fun some weeks, and tough tests like the US Open or Doral this year are fun other weeks.

To each his own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't have any interest in watching people do easy things... even if that thing would be difficult for me.


I wouldn't say it's easy to shoot -40 or better over 4 days on any course, for any person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


eas·y

[ee-zee]  Show IPA

adjective, eas·i·er, eas·i·est.

1.

not hard or difficult; requiring no great labor or effort: a book that is easy to read; an easy victory.

2.

free from pain, discomfort, worry, or care: He led an easy life.

3.

providing or conducive to ease or comfort; comfortable: an easy stance; an easy relationship.

4.

fond of or given to ease; easygoing: an easy disposition.

5.

not harsh or strict; lenient: an easy master.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dnaygs

I wouldn't say it's easy to shoot -40 or better over 4 days on any course, for any person.

The final score is irrelevant.  Your original idea suggested an easy course for the pros.  I would find that boring to watch.

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I still see plenty of birdies being made week after week on tour. Most winning scores are in the double digits. I'm watching the first round of The Players and the lead is currently -7, at a tough course.

Making the courses difficult separates the great players from the average players. If all the courses were shorter, pins were in the middle of greens, greens were flat, Brian Gay (nothing against him) might be the #1 player in the world. It would basically become a wedge and putting contest. Making a course easy (to the extent the OP mentioned) doesn't highlight how good these guys really are and devalues the PGA Tour brand.

It would be like if baseball started having pitchers throw the ball slower to give guys a better chance of getting more hits and home runs.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I still see plenty of birdies being made week after week on tour. Most winning scores are in the double digits. I'm watching the first round of The Players and the lead is currently -7, at a tough course.

Making the courses difficult separates the great players from the average players. If all the courses were shorter, pins were in the middle of greens, greens were flat, Brian Gay (nothing against him) might be the #1 player in the world. It would basically become a wedge and putting contest. Making a course easy (to the extent the OP mentioned) doesn't highlight how good these guys really are and devalues the PGA Tour brand.

It would be like if baseball started having pitchers throw the ball slower to give guys a better chance of getting more hits and home runs.

Agreed. I am not really awed by 250 yard drives on 350 yard par 4s.

There is already such a small variation in skill level in top players that making the courses easier would just make for a whole lot of 60s scores and you would need to play more rounds to separate them.

Wouldn't it make more sense that the pro courses should be even harder so that there is more differentiation in the field?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think there would be differentiation no matter how difficult or easy the course may be.  But I agree you would be testing different things.  A PGA pro might look at an easy course and say, that's easy, I could probably shoot -10 four days in a row.  But what if someone else is -11?  Then suddenly they have to be -12, which isn't easy no matter how easy the course is.  (I don't know about the actual numbers, maybe it would be -18, the point is you have to play better than 70 or so other guys who are all good).  I really don't think everyone would shoot -18 all four days and then there would be indefinite playoffs.  Length would still be an issue because there would be a lot of driveable par 4s.  I think it sounds fun to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think there would be differentiation no matter how difficult or easy the course may be.  But I agree you would be testing different things.  A PGA pro might look at an easy course and say, that's easy, I could probably shoot -10 four days in a row.  But what if someone else is -11?  Then suddenly they have to be -12, which isn't easy no matter how easy the course is.  (I don't know about the actual numbers, maybe it would be -18, the point is you have to play better than 70 or so other guys who are all good).  I really don't think everyone would shoot -18 all four days and then there would be indefinite playoffs.  Length would still be an issue because there would be a lot of driveable par 4s.  I think it sounds fun to watch.


At some point it will be asymptotic, because at least half the shots will be short game or putting as someone else mentioned in an earlier post.

If they made the courses shorter and put tons of obstacles in the way, I can see that making it harder maybe? It would be more of a distance control and accuracy game?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The most boring type of golf to watch is when good players are playing well, in some regards. It doesn't show their skills off 100%

You want to see variety - recovery shots and long shots into greens with hazards around them and risk/reward holes.

A couple of years ago I watched Adam Scott and Geoff Ogilvy play together. They both had 66 or 67, neither missed a fairway or green and it was B  O   R   I  N  G.

Not saying I would find it boring if I played that way.

But the shots you remember guys like Phil playing are the crazy risky ones.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


No thank you.  I enjoy seeing the best players in the world challenged to show us why they're the best.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Wouldn't it make more sense that the pro courses should be even harder so that there is more differentiation in the field?


They are already pretty hard IMO. You want it to be challenging but also reward/make it fair for players that are able to hit quality shots. US Open conditions every week wouldn't be great either.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

The most boring type of golf to watch is when good players are playing well, in some regards. It doesn't show their skills off 100%

You want to see variety - recovery shots and long shots into greens with hazards around them and risk/reward holes.

A couple of years ago I watched Adam Scott and Geoff Ogilvy play together. They both had 66 or 67, neither missed a fairway or green and it was B  O   R   I  N  G.

Not saying I would find it boring if I played that way.

But the shots you remember guys like Phil playing are the crazy risky ones.

No, YOU want to see variety, I want to see birdies and eagles.  An amazing risky shot can be entertaining to me sometimes.  But I'm more amused when someone sticks it to 2 feet from the middle of the fairway.  I don't even really care about a good putt most of the time.  I rarely watch golf live so I can fast forward through all the stuff I find boring (like putting and saving par or bogey), not that other people can't enjoy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


No, YOU want to see variety, I want to see birdies and eagles.  An amazing risky shot can be entertaining to me sometimes.  But I'm more amused when someone sticks it to 2 feet from the middle of the fairway.  I don't even really care about a good putt most of the time.  I rarely watch golf live so I can fast forward through all the stuff I find boring (like putting and saving par or bogey), not that other people can't enjoy it.

You make it sound as if you don't really like watching golf all that much... I'm with the majority here. I like seeing top players playing top courses. Watching the greatest players in the world struggling to make pars at Carnoustie when the wind is blowing, all that stuff. Just seeing people playing target golf under easy conditions sounds desperately dull.

The more I practise, the luckier I hope to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


No thank you.  I enjoy seeing the best players in the world challenged to show us why they're the best.

[quote name="krupa" url="/t/74421/i-would-like-the-pga-tour-to-have-easier-courses#post_987450"]I don't have any interest in watching people do easy things... even if that thing would be difficult for me.  [/quote] I agree with the above, conversely winning scores of -22 or greater I found uneventfull and yes boring

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by David in FL

No thank you.  I enjoy seeing the best players in the world challenged to show us why they're the best.

If someone is -49 and you have to shoot -50 to win, that's a challenge.

Quote:

Originally Posted by krupa

I don't have any interest in watching people do easy things... even if that thing would be difficult for me.

I don't think shooting -50 on even the easiest course in the world over 4 days would generally be considered easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Completely disagree. I want to see the best players in the world challenged to the limit. If you want to watch birdie fests, the Golf Channel shows the Nationwide Tour every week.

I don't think the Masters would be as popular if guys were in the -20s. I don't think the US Open would have an "identity" if -30 was the winning score. What makes these tournaments what they are is the difficulty that professionals must face and how they handle those tough conditions and tough setups. I personally find events like the Humana where the winning score is 30-under par boring as can be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I totally get that most people seem to find it boring (although I don't).  All I'm saying is that there would still be a challenge.  Instead of the course presenting the challenge, the players would be challenging each other.  Like I said before, even on a super easy course, if someone shoots -49 over four days and you have to shoot -50, that's still a challenge.

It's like bowling.  It's very easy for a professional to throw a strike.  But if the guy next to you just had 11 in a row and you have to have 12 to win, that's when it gets tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3577 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
    • If you've only had to adjust retroactively one time in 8 years and have around 5 people each year without handicaps, that's like 40-50 people total so it sounds like you're doing a pretty good job. I think your questions give enough to go off of. This might be a good way to get new people to actually post a few scores during the 6 weeks leading into the first event. Something like "New members will be eligible for tournament money once they have at least 3 posted rounds in GHIN" or something like that. If they can get 3 rounds in prior to their first event, then they're eligible. If not, they'll soon become eligible after an event or two assuming they play a little bit outside of events.
    • This is a loooooong winded narrative so if you don't like long stories, move on. 😉 Our senior club typically gets about 25 new members each year. We lose about 25 members each year for various reasons (moved to FL/AZ, disabled, dead, too expensive). Of the new members, usually 20 have an active GHIN handicap. About 5 each year do not have a GHIN handicap. When they join our club, we give each member a state association membership that includes GHIN handicapping services. We play a series of handicapped tournaments over the summer. When we sign up a new member who does not have a GHIN handicap, we attempt to give them an estimated index until they have sufficient scores posted to have an actual GHIN index.  Our first event typically is around May 15 so, in theory, a new member has about 6 weeks to post a few scores. Posting season in the Mitten starts April 1. Inevitably, several of the unhandicapped individuals seem  to either not play until the first tournament or can't figure out how to enter scores (hey, they are seniors). That situation then leads to my contacting the new member and asking a series of questions: a. Did you ever have a GHIN handicap? If yes, which State and do you recall what it was? b. Do you have an alternate handicap through a non-GHIN handicap service or a league? c. What do you think your average score was last year (for 9 or 18) d. What was your best score last year? Where did you play and which tee was used? e. What do you consider a very good score for yourself? Based on their responses I attempt to give them an index that makes them competitive in the first couple events BUT does not allow them to win their flight in the first couple events. We don't want the new members to finish last and at the same time, we don't want someone with a "20" playing handicap to win the third flight with a net 57. In the event some new member did shoot a net 57, we also advise everyone that we can and will adjust handicaps retroactively when it is clear to us that a member's handicap does not accurately reflect their potential. We don't like to adjust things retroactively and in the 8 years I have chaired the Handicap Committee, we have only done it once. So here are the questions to the mob: Any ideas how to do this better? Any questions one might ask an unhandicapped individual to better estimate their index/handicap? Would it be reasonable to have a new player play once (or more?) without being eligible to place in the money?
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Awesome! I got that a while back with my start word! Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...