• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Se123

Picking up a provisional before original is found

31 posts in this topic

Can you please provide a ruling on the following. Last night I was playing a match and my opponent on the 18th thought he may have hit his tee shot out of bounds. He then hit his provisional to the bottom of the hill and played a second shot with the provisional. This second with the provisional was hit into the long grass just infront of him. Meaning that the ball was still well back from where the original May have been. He then picked up his provisional ball. Following this he then found his original and played it. My understanding is that the idea of a provisional is to save time and should be struck up to the point of where the ball may be found? Does the fact that the provisional was found and picked up effect this? Given that clearly at this point the idea of the provisional is no longer to save time? I would have thought that if the provisional is played a second time it should be continued to be played until the point in which it would be reasonable to look for the original ball? The provisional was not lost and was just picked up as my opponent didn't want to play it. To me this is using the rules both ways by this I mean if you are going to play the provisional a second time to save time (reasonable and allowed) you should play it a third time and not pick it up when you have only hit it a couple of yards in front into a bad lie. As surely this defeats the point of the time and distance rules.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Can you please provide a ruling on the following. Last night I was playing a match and my opponent on the 18th thought he may have hit his tee shot out of bounds. He then hit his provisional to the bottom of the hill and played a second shot with the provisional. This second with the provisional was hit into the long grass just infront of him. Meaning that the ball was still well back from where the original May have been. He then picked up his provisional ball. Following this he then found his original and played it.

My understanding is that the idea of a provisional is to save time and should be struck up to the point of where the ball may be found? Does the fact that the provisional was found and picked up effect this? Given that clearly at this point the idea of the provisional is no longer to save time? I would have thought that if the provisional is played a second time it should be continued to be played until the point in which it would be reasonable to look for the original ball?

The provisional was not lost and was just picked up as my opponent didn't want to play it. To me this is using the rules both ways by this I mean if you are going to play the provisional a second time to save time (reasonable and allowed) you should play it a third time and not pick it up when you have only hit it a couple of yards in front into a bad lie. As surely this defeats the point of the time and distance rules.

Technically he was within the rules, used the provisional as a practice ball for two swings.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I havent researched, but I am guessing that he was fortunate to find his first ball.

If he had not found the first, it probably would have been loss of hole in match play and DQ in stroke play.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Can you please provide a ruling on the following. Last night I was playing a match and my opponent on the 18th thought he may have hit his tee shot out of bounds. He then hit his provisional to the bottom of the hill and played a second shot with the provisional. This second with the provisional was hit into the long grass just infront of him. Meaning that the ball was still well back from where the original May have been. He then picked up his provisional ball. Following this he then found his original and played it.

My understanding is that the idea of a provisional is to save time and should be struck up to the point of where the ball may be found? Does the fact that the provisional was found and picked up effect this? Given that clearly at this point the idea of the provisional is no longer to save time? I would have thought that if the provisional is played a second time it should be continued to be played until the point in which it would be reasonable to look for the original ball?

The provisional was not lost and was just picked up as my opponent didn't want to play it. To me this is using the rules both ways by this I mean if you are going to play the provisional a second time to save time (reasonable and allowed) you should play it a third time and not pick it up when you have only hit it a couple of yards in front into a bad lie. As surely this defeats the point of the time and distance rules.

Once he played the provisional, after not finding his first the provisional is now the ball in play and the first ball is out of play. He broke the rules.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Once he played the provisional, after not finding his first the provisional is now the ball in play and the first ball is out of play. He broke the rules.

Not true, you are allowed to play the provisional as long as you have not passed the original ball. (according to the story, they had not looked for the original yet)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Not true, you are allowed to play the provisional as long as you have not passed the original ball. (according to the story, they had not looked for the original yet)

What? Once the a subsequent shot is taken with the provisional, the original is effectively declared lost.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

What? Once the a subsequent shot is taken with the provisional, the original is effectively declared lost.

once again - you are allowed to play the provisional until you have passed where your original ball is thought to be

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Not true, you are allowed to play the provisional as long as you have not passed the original ball. (according to the story, they had not looked for the original yet)

I stand corrected :whistle:

b. When Provisional Ball Becomes Ball in Play

The player may play a provisional ball until he reaches the place where the original ball is likely to be. If he makes a stroke with the provisional ball from the place where the original ball is likely to be or from a point nearer the holethan that place, the original ball is lost and the provisional ball becomes theball in playunder penalty of stroke and distance (Rule 27-1).

If the original ball is lost outside a water hazard or is out of bounds, theprovisional ball becomes the ball in play, under penalty of stroke and distance (Rule 27-1).

Exception: If it is known or virtually certain that the original ball, that has not been found, has been moved by an outside agency (Rule 18-1), or is in anobstruction (Rule 24-3) or an abnormal ground condition (Rule 25-1c), the player may proceed under the applicable Rule.

Though I will say this, the guy who picked up his provisional ball because he hit it into the weeds is playing with fire. Because, if he didn't find his first ball then the provisional ball would be in play. This means that he picked up a ball in play. Which would be a penalty and he would have to go back to the tall grass and return his ball and play it from there. At least I believe so.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

once again - you are allowed to play the provisional until you have passed where your original ball is thought to be

Wow, I've been playing that wrong all this time! Interesting, thanks for the information.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I stand corrected

Though I will say this, the guy who picked up his provisional ball because he hit it into the weeds is playing with fire. Because, if he didn't find his first ball then the provisional ball would be in play. This means that he picked up a ball in play. Which would be a penalty and he would have to go back to the tall grass and return his ball and play it from there. At least I believe so.

This is correct.  1PS and he would have to replace his provisional from where he picked it up.

No limit as to the number of times you may play your provisional provided it is not played from where, or a point closer to the hole than, the place where the first ball is likely to be.  Key point is "likely", which doesn't necessarily mean where it actually is.

27-2b/4

Provisional Ball Played from Beyond Where Original Ball Likely to Be But Not Beyond Where Original Ball Found

Q.A player, believing his tee shot might be lost or in a road defined as out of bounds, played a provisional ball. He searched for his original ball but did not find it. He went forward and played his provisional ball. Then he went farther forward and found his original ball in bounds. The original ball must have bounced down the road and then come back into bounds, because it was found much farther from the tee than anticipated. Was the original ball still the ball in play?

A.No. The player played a stroke with the provisional ball from a point nearer the hole than the place where the original ball was likely to be. When he did so, the provisional ball became the ball in play and the original ball was lost (Rule 27-2b ).

The place where the original ball in fact lay was irrelevant.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@meenman is correct. He was very lucky that his original was found. I suspect he knew it was findable when he picked up his provisional.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Quote:

Originally Posted by meenman

Not true, you are allowed to play the provisional as long as you have not passed the original ball. (according to the story, they had not looked for the original yet)

What? Once the a subsequent shot is taken with the provisional, the original is effectively declared lost.

No it isn't.  The provisional ball is still just provisional until the original ball is lost, found out of bounds, or the provisional ball is played from a point at or closer to the hole than where the original ball is thought to lie.

If the original ball had not been found in bounds after the player picked up the provisional, he would have simply been required to replace the provisional ball and take one more penalty stroke for moving it in breach of Rule 18.  Since the original ball was found, he was correct to play on with that ball.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it isn't.  The provisional ball is still just provisional until the original ball is lost, found out of bounds, or the provisional ball is played from a point at or closer to the hole than where the original ball is thought to lie. If the original ball had not been found in bounds after the player picked up the provisional, he would have simply been required to replace the provisional ball and take one more penalty stroke for moving it in breach of Rule 18.  Since the original ball was found, he was correct to play on with that ball.

Thanks for the explanation. I'm not all that surprised that I learned the wrong information. I need to really study the rulebook objectively, without making assumptions that I know certain rules already.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Can you please provide a ruling on the following. Last night I was playing a match and my opponent on the 18th thought he may have hit his tee shot out of bounds. He then hit his provisional to the bottom of the hill and played a second shot with the provisional. This second with the provisional was hit into the long grass just infront of him. Meaning that the ball was still well back from where the original May have been. He then picked up his provisional ball. Following this he then found his original and played it.

My understanding is that the idea of a provisional is to save time and should be struck up to the point of where the ball may be found? Does the fact that the provisional was found and picked up effect this? Given that clearly at this point the idea of the provisional is no longer to save time? I would have thought that if the provisional is played a second time it should be continued to be played until the point in which it would be reasonable to look for the original ball?

The provisional was not lost and was just picked up as my opponent didn't want to play it. To me this is using the rules both ways by this I mean if you are going to play the provisional a second time to save time (reasonable and allowed) you should play it a third time and not pick it up when you have only hit it a couple of yards in front into a bad lie. As surely this defeats the point of the time and distance rules.

Playing a provisional ball is optional.

Playing a provisional ball up to the point where your ball is likely to be is optional.

Playing a provisional ball out of junk is optional.  (The player may have figured that he lies 4 in deep grass and will lose the hole anyway unless he finds the original.)

I'm guessing that you lost the hole and are grasping at straws to find a way to change the result.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Playing a provisional ball is optional.

Playing a provisional ball up to the point where your ball is likely to be is optional.

Playing a provisional ball out of junk is optional.  (The player may have figured that he lies 4 in deep grass and will lose the hole anyway unless he finds the original.)

I'm guessing that you lost the hole and are grasping at straws to find a way to change the result.

Or he just didn't know the full extend of the rules. Why must a person have a hidden agenda?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

My guess is your wrong. Irrespective I was looking for the answer so I know what to do should this occur again as I didnt know the rule and it seemed unfair to me. However this has now been clarified. Thanks for your response and as a matter of point I'm not sure you can retrospectively change a match play result once the match has been finished and at no point have I suggested this. This is a section on a forum about rules so i cant see why you would take offence to someone asking for clarification.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Saevel25. And you are correct! I didnt know the rules and was seeking clarification. Strange that Edward would use that as an opportunity to insult someone on a forum! Each to their own and thanks for clarifying this. Clearly others were confused to and hopefully cleared up for us that didnt know.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Saevel25. And you are correct! I didnt know the rules and was seeking clarification. Strange that Edward would use that as an opportunity to insult someone on a forum! Each to their own and thanks for clarifying this. Clearly others were confused to and hopefully cleared up for us that didnt know.

Just ignore responses like that @Se123 .  There will always be cranky posters.  And thanks for asking the question.  I was not clear on this either.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How do I organize a charity tournament to be a raging success?
      26 and a stroke? Holy smokes. Very sorry to hear that.  I have no idea how to organize a tournament but I have played in my share. The best ones are scrambles where you can organize your own team. The outcome has rarely ever mattered to us as long as we were well fed. Find a local restaurant (usually a bbq place) that wants to help you out and give a discount for advertising and spend your money there. Everyone will love to come for a good meal. Some nice prizes and maybe a raffle with some local companies offering you something if you are able to convince them it is worth it to give something to the cause.  Another thing I have seen work well is a silent auction at the end with donated items. I donated airline miles of which I have tons and 100,000 miles went for $205. Free gift for me and the cause got $205. 
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Haha - I get a couple of reputation points for a post and then go and have a blow up hole. Good drive, left myself 145 in down hill (8i), aimed #deadcenter, pulled 2 shots 25 yards left out of bounds, made 9 (+5) in a 9 hole round of (+11). A better way to avoid blow up holes - play stableford!
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Come on now, that's a bit uncalled for in Bernies case.  His political ideals might be way left, but he is at least honest and virtuous.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'll have to examine your other post closer. That's a good point to consider about the expansion to Continental Europe. Largely explains the poor showing of UK & Ireland in the 60's with many top tier European players not eligible. But considering the 200 million U.S. population base to 63 million in the U.K. & Ireland at the time, the latter did surprisingly well if population base was all that matters. IMO an established competitive golfing culture matters in producing elite players too. Those same European players excluded from Ryder Cup were always eligible for the Majors. The Ryder Cup is also a limited field event. It concentrates the 12 top players of the European Tour. From what I've read, depth of field is still stronger for the 'typical' PGA event, though some non-major Euro events are now stronger than some of the 'minor' PGA events. That is a significant change in Euro competitiveness from the 60's. To some extent that 30% drop sounds like it could be due to simply more international players occupying slots in the fields. If the period you mention covers when majors started to use OWGR for automatic qualification that has some not insignificant inherent issues in terms of strength of field. Having a guaranteed start rather than having to qualify would certainly make for an easier decision to travel to the event. But I'm not arguing against the policy decision facilitating international competition with a little points boost just trying to point out that field strength may not have been as weak in Jack's day as you seem to think. Compared to his peers, which is really the only thing I think you can do without speculative nuance I agree there's no question he's the best golfer. I'm really just arguing that standouts of their caliber (so many more wins so many more majors) than typical players among already elite fields are so rare, that I expect they both represent near the achievable human pinnacle in golf talent, which I don't think really differs within a few generations. The nuances of comparison across eras is interesting to me so I'll debate relative points, but I'm against arguments undervaluing Jack's achievements against 'weak fields'. They both faced very stiff competition.   I'm not dissing Jack. I think his achievements are amazing. I also think the same of Tiger's record. IMO winning percentage per start in the Majors is a very significant stat and Tiger has that in his favor (they are both top 10 and within ~ 2% of each other's number). That number is not the official one for Jack though, I truncated his Major starts to end at age 47, which I think is a reasonable cutoff for competitiveness. If Tiger competes as long as Jack did his major win % (up to age 47) might stay about the same, increase, or decrease (more likely), but he certainly won't match the 18 Majors if he doesn't get like 22+ more major starts between now and age 47.
    • Wedges, Bounce, and Ground Conditions
      Typically more bounce (or a "healthy" amount of bounce) helps in any condition.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries