• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dbbb

Titleist AP2 with Kbs Tour 90 stiff shaft

11 posts in this topic

Hello,

I just bought a set of ap2s on Ebay (pretty much brand new) with the shaft Kbs Tour 90 stiff.

I was looking for a lighter steel shaft and the tour 90 was very light so I bought it. Looking at the KBS tour shafts here:

http://kbsgolfshafts.com/shafts/kbs-tour-90

One can see that the tour 90 shaft is by far the lightest but also produces a higher launch angle and spin rate. I like that it goes high so this is not a problem. The club is indeed super-light which is very nice but it doesnt feel as stiff as my former proect-x 6.5s.

I usually like to push the clubface a bit in to the ground before I start my swing and I notice that the shaft is very flexible when I do this. I have a look at the torque which is quite high at 2.3 if compared to the KBS shafts most pros use.

I am a 2 hcp player and inspire to be better, is this shaft a crazy choice I made? What is the main reason that not alot of pros are using the kbs tour 90? Can the torque make my shots less straight? Why is the torque so high here? I heard somewhere that torque doesnt matter much in iron shafts as it does in graphite shafts.

Please help as im thinking about selling these again and getting another set of shafts.

thanks,

D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Hello,

I just bought a set of ap2s on Ebay (pretty much brand new) with the shaft Kbs Tour 90 stiff.

I was looking for a lighter steel shaft and the tour 90 was very light so I bought it. Looking at the KBS tour shafts here:

http://kbsgolfshafts.com/shafts/kbs-tour-90

One can see that the tour 90 shaft is by far the lightest but also produces a higher launch angle and spin rate. I like that it goes high so this is not a problem. The club is indeed super-light which is very nice but it doesnt feel as stiff as my former proect-x 6.5s.

I usually like to push the clubface a bit in to the ground before I start my swing and I notice that the shaft is very flexible when I do this. I have a look at the torque which is quite high at 2.3 if compared to the KBS shafts most pros use.

I am a 2 hcp player and inspire to be better, is this shaft a crazy choice I made? What is the main reason that not alot of pros are using the kbs tour 90? Can the torque make my shots less straight? Why is the torque so high here? I heard somewhere that torque doesnt matter much in iron shafts as it does in graphite shafts.

Please help as im thinking about selling these again and getting another set of shafts.

thanks,

D

The KBS Tour 90 is made for slower swing speeds.  My 6 iron is around 80 mph.  My fitter recommended KBS tour 90 or NS Pro 950GH stiff for my swing speed.  It may be just too light a shaft for you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

The KBS Tour 90 is made for slower swing speeds.  My 6 iron is around 80 mph.  My fitter recommended KBS tour 90 or NS Pro 950GH stiff for my swing speed.  It may be just too light a shaft for you.

Not sure what my swing speed is with my irons, I hit my 7-iron about 175 yard carry. How could I tell if the shaft doesnt fit me or if my swing speed is too fast for the shaft?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You hit your 7 iron about 25 yards more than me, so I would say you are a good 5 to 10 mph more than me.  I would say that this flex (KBS Tour 90 stiff) is too light for you.  It is equivalent to Dynamic Gold R300 in flex.  You could be S300 or even X300 with that swing speed.

I wish the shaft sites were more specific about swing speed and their flex.

Check out this site from True Temper and KBS on shaft fitting.

http://www.shaftfit.com

http://kbsgolfshafts.com/fit-system

Also, the PING site has an internet fitting guide that will give you a flex idea.  On the Golfsmith site, some of the shafts will show a recommended swing speed for their flex.  Also, a lot of shaft sites will too, but you may have to dig around on the site.

But, the absolute best way is the get fit by a good fitter.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

@dbbb As a 2 handicap that aspires to improve, I think you owe it to yourself to have a professional with a proper launch monitor assist you in selecting the best shaft for your game.  AP2s are good clubs.  Why not find a good Titleist fitter that does club repairs as well as fitting for new clubs and get his help in making that selection and installing the shafts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you find a Titleist fitter with a Titleist Cart as they are more likely to have the screw in shafts for testing. Or if you have a shop similar to Kool Klubs, et al, or a reputable fitter (tough to find) who knows what they are doing... and a Flightscope or Trackman monitor.

The Tour 90, while a fine shaft, the torque is not bothersome to me, is probably not the shaft for you. It's possible you need a lower launching, lower spin shaft, and KBS has many options.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

@dbbb As a 2 handicap that aspires to improve, I think you owe it to yourself to have a professional with a proper launch monitor assist you in selecting the best shaft for your game.  AP2s are good clubs.  Why not find a good Titleist fitter that does club repairs as well as fitting for new clubs and get his help in making that selection and installing the shafts?

You are absolutely right its just that I already bought these clubs and am not sure if I should change shafts or sell the clubs as they are and buy a whole new set.

I suggest you find a Titleist fitter with a Titleist Cart as they are more likely to have the screw in shafts for testing. Or if you have a shop similar to Kool Klubs, et al, or a reputable fitter (tough to find) who knows what they are doing... and a Flightscope or Trackman monitor.

The Tour 90, while a fine shaft, the torque is not bothersome to me, is probably not the shaft for you. It's possible you need a lower launching, lower spin shaft, and KBS has many options.

Thanks for the answer. What is the main reason why the pros want lower launches / lower spin than the amateurs?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Originally Posted by PirateJim

@dbbb As a 2 handicap that aspires to improve, I think you owe it to yourself to have a professional with a proper launch monitor assist you in selecting the best shaft for your game.  AP2s are good clubs.  Why not find a good Titleist fitter that does club repairs as well as fitting for new clubs and get his help in making that selection and installing the shafts?

You are absolutely right its just that I already bought these clubs and am not sure if I should change shafts or sell the clubs as they are and buy a whole new set.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

I suggest you find a Titleist fitter with a Titleist Cart as they are more likely to have the screw in shafts for testing. Or if you have a shop similar to Kool Klubs, et al, or a reputable fitter (tough to find) who knows what they are doing... and a Flightscope or Trackman monitor.

The Tour 90, while a fine shaft, the torque is not bothersome to me, is probably not the shaft for you. It's possible you need a lower launching, lower spin shaft, and KBS has many options.

Thanks for the answer. What is the main reason why the pros want lower launches / lower spin than the amateurs?

I don't think they want lower spin than an amateur, but because they hit the ball so much more sharply than most amateurs, they naturally get more spin and need a lower spin shaft to control it.  If that isn't an issue for you, then that shaft probably isn't a good fit.

By the way, I play 2010 AP-2 irons with a regular flex steel shaft, and I Iove them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the answer. What is the main reason why the pros want lower launches / lower spin than the amateurs?

Whether you want to purchase a new set depends on you and the $$$ involved in fitting shafts and bending them to your specs.

Fourputt posted my response - the pros or better ams with speed hit the ball in such a way that a lower launching, lower spinning shaft gives them more of an ideal trajectory and more distance. My 18 yr old son (at the time) began with Tour 90, which did not work because of the high launch/spin character, DG Tours were not for him, and he moved to KBS Tour. That was before they made the C Tapers, et al.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

You are absolutely right its just that I already bought these clubs and am not sure if I should change shafts or sell the clubs as they are and buy a whole new set.

Thanks for the answer. What is the main reason why the pros want lower launches / lower spin than the amateurs?

My response was based in no small part on the (perhaps incorrect) assumption that you were getting clubs off Ebay because of financial constraints that would keep you from buying new with a proper fitting.  I think you'd be better off getting the input of a pro fitter than selling off those and going back to Ebay to experiment with another semi-random shaft, but if selling those clubs and getting a proper fitting for new sticks is an option it may be the best.  If you want something light, and the expense isn't a big stumbling block, don't discount the possibility of graphite shafts.  They aren't just for old men's clubs any more, after all, how many steel shafted drivers do you see?  Even some of the pros are going graphite: http://www.brandtsnedeker.com/whats-in-the-bag/ (you'll have to play the short video for the info)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was at the store looking at the same set and interested in buying them if they don't suit you. Sent PM to me if you find it doesn't fit you
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • 2016 TST Initiative: Forward Tees Tournament
      In Lowest Score Wins, we recommend that golfers play from the forward tees in order to experience "breaking 80" for the first time, or shooting 65, or having more birdie putts than they've ever had, or whatever. This year, in 2016, we're taking it one step farther: we're encouraging everyone here to work with the head pro at your home course (or, if you play multiple courses, the head pro at each of them!) and to set up a serious "Forward Tees Tournament." A Forward Tees Tournament (FTT) will be: FUN! Enlightening Unique Challenging I'll give anyone who creates and/or participates in a FTT this year the special achievement/award seen to the left. Anyone with this award will be entered to win a TST prize to be determined at the end of the year (and I'll do my best to make it a fairly good prize, but that shouldn't be the main reason why anyone should do this). You can play: With or without handicaps. With or without brackets/divisions/flights. Stroke play or match play. 18, 27, 36, 54+ holes. One day, two days, three days. Etc. I think golfers will love playing in this type of tournament. I think it will challenge them to think about how they play and score. I think it will result in faster play, more fun, more birdies, more chances to hit 7-iron into par fives and feel like a Tour player for once, and… lower scores (or higher scores for the dumb players!). So there you have it. What can you do from here? Pledge here in this thread to talk to your head pro. Recruit your buddies and local golfers to play in your event. Work with your head pro to make the event a success. Play in the event! Post here after your tournament has been played to claim your super-exclusive award/achievement! I'm in. I'll be doing this, hopefully at multiple courses this year. Are you?
    • Posting old scores
      I haven't had an official handicap for about 15 years because in the past several I've only been able to play 6-8 times per year. This year I joined a club so that I could play in tournaments and since I need five scores to get a handicap, I entered some scores in GHIN from my last few rounds in 2015 (since I play so rarely, I can remember them). When I was doing this, I forgot to change the date when posting a score from August so it defaulted to today and is now my most recent reported score. GHIN won't let me change the entry but says to "contact my club" to fix it, which seems like a hassle for everyone involved. It's not my lowest score but it's close, so it will probably be included in my handicap calculation for quite a while unless the date is changed. How big of a deal is this?
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Another thing is sometimes to 'give up' on par. For example, as a bogey golfer, if I hit a bad tee shot and end up say 220yds from the hold on a par 4 rather than the usual 130yds, play the hole as if bogey is the new par. You've made the hole more difficult for yourself and rather than trying to hit the green with a 3 wood (a green designed to be hit with a mid/short iron), take 2 shots to get on the green and 2 shots to get down. 1 220yd par 4 is an easy hole (could even make birdie (which becomes par and a great save) whereas a 220 yd par 3, not off the tee, is asking for trouble. Not always the best way to play golf (read Lowest Score Wins) but the best way to avoid blowing up.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Find it yourself please. I don't think that would provide much insight. Courses, technology… all very different. Too many differences. People who qualify for the Opens rarely actually compete for them. The winners and top finishers almost always come from those who qualify automatically. I'm not. Very few foreign golfers played on the PGA Tour in the 60s. It's been steadily growing - and travel has made it easier, too - through to now. And even now we're starting to see Asian golfers really take over. The only Asian golfer many could name who competed against Nicklaus was Isao Aoki. Maybe Jumbo Ozaki. I'm just talking about the number of golfers. There are a ton more now. I don't care. I realize perhaps your condition forces you to take everything literally, but I wasn't being literal here. The PGA Tour takes the best 150 players or so out of X. As X grows, the amount of separation between those top 150 players narrows. We're in a very narrow phase right now. When Jack was playing, the gap was significantly wider. No. Tiger was quite a bit more dominant and "above" even MORE highly competitive fields. Both halves of that are true: Tiger won by larger margins and against stronger fields. I agree. And I've said similar things. No…? You don't say? (On page 273 of a thread doing just that…)? You seem to be the only person who regards WGCs as weaker fields that offer a "competitive break." It says a lot about how others should consider your opinions on strength of field. You're assuming or haven't read many of my posts in this thread, because I've said several times that I'd put it within a few points of 50/50. Maybe 55/45. Hardly what I'd call "strong." Of course we're both "estimating." Tiger's record, IMO, against significantly stiffer competition, puts him ahead. Not by a lot. Not really. If only 30 players had a realistic chance to win a tournament, adding players beyond that 30th player does little to affect the strength of the field. The WGCs could add 200 club professionals that would never win and… the strength of field would remain exactly the same. Where have I said this? Because even if I did, it doesn't support whatever you're trying to force it into supporting here. The odds of a club pro beating anyone on the PGA Tour these days are slim to none. They were slightly more likely back when fewer "A" players played the PGA Tour… like in the 60s and 70s. A "C" player's game almost never varies enough - not for four days - to beat even 10 or 15 "A" players. Here's an opinion, but one I could probably back up if I cared enough to take the time (I do not): a modern WGC has a stronger field than many (perhaps all) of the majors Nicklaus won. I've said this before, and will say it again here: In Jack's day, there were maybe 10-15 "A" players, 25 "B" players, and the rest were "C" players. Today there are 100+ A players and the rest B players. I'm also going to request, mostly because of the number of times I've had to repeat myself in this thread, that you not quote or respond to me, @natureboy, in this thread. I'm not keen on repeating myself about something that, ultimately, I don't care that much about. It is what it is, their records are what they are, and they could only beat the guys they played against.
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Never try to hit through trees, always just get back to the fairway.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries