Jump to content
IGNORED

Effects of Shortening a Driver Shaft


Note: This thread is 3551 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I found this video online. My current driver is at about 45.25 inches long. I am thinking about shortening it.

Now shortening a shaft will make it stiffer, but the guy took a shaft from 45.5 inches down to 43.5 inches. Basically it made it 2 cycles stiffer, so basically a cycle per inch.

For that driver and shaft, they needed to at about 15 grams to the clubhead end to get the swing weight back to its original measurement.

What I didn't know is that adding weight to the clubhead lowers the frequency by a full flex, or 10 cycles.

So basically butt cutting the club by an inch will stiffen it by 1/10 of a flex. Adding weight to the end will make it less stiff by a lot more. In the case of the video a whole flex less stiff.

Though I am not sure about the comments on the flex, as per the Mark Crossfield videos the flex doesn't matter as much as people do make it out to be.

Though I do have reservations about tip trimming a driver shaft. Certain shafts are not very good for tip trimming because they might have an extreme bed profile near the tip, and cutting too much off can change the whole dynamic of the shaft.

Not sure if I want to cut down my driver or not. I might just grip down on it for now. I had my Ping G10 driver cut down and it just felt weird afterwards.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Grip down.

The end. :)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I didn't watch the video but that's the head fitter for Don Trahan's (D.J.'s dad) swing method. Don Trahan is the creator of the Peak Performance Golf Swing aka PPGS. It's an extremely vertical swing method, no comment on the method but you might want to keep that in mind as the fitter's advice is likely geared towards people who swing using the PPGS method.

I believe the PPGS driver swing is similar.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I didn't watch the video but that's the head fitter for Don Trahan's (D.J.'s dad) swing method. Don Trahan is the creator of the Peak Performance Golf Swing aka PPGS. It's an extremely vertical swing method, no comment on the method but you might want to keep that in mind as the fitter's advice is likely geared towards people who swing using the PPGS method.

I believe the PPGS driver swing is similar.

Not to sure about that. I would say he was talking in standard golf fitting lingo there. He is correct about swing weight getting lighter, and he fact that you would need to add weight to the clubhead end. If you add weight to a clubhead, then the club would flex more during the swing, hence it would have a frequency that is less stiff.

A frequency machine basically measures the oscillations per time unit. So adding weight to one end should make it oscillations at a slower rate.

My point being, it looks like a hassle to try to get it back to it's original swing weight and/or frequency.

I will go with Erik's advice, just choke down on the driver.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Not to sure about that. I would say he was talking in standard golf fitting lingo there. He is correct about swing weight getting lighter, and he fact that you would need to add weight to the clubhead end. If you add weight to a clubhead, then the club would flex more during the swing, hence it would have a frequency that is less stiff.

A frequency machine basically measures the oscillations per time unit. So adding weight to one end should make it oscillations at a slower rate.

My point being, it looks like a hassle to try to get it back to it's original swing weight and/or frequency.

I will go with Erik's advice, just choke down on the driver.

Yeah, like I said, I didn't watch it. Just thought you should know his background, and again, that doesn't mean the information isn't good, just that you should be aware of where he's coming from because there might be some information that's specific to a vertical swing method.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Buying an after market sleeve, some quick set, tip weights, shaft cutter and decent cheap shaft is easy enough if you want to experiment. I've never found any stock shafts I couldn't live without and sometimes it's nice just to start fresh. Use a swing weight calculator and play around with the numbers. Personally I can't feel a difference between D0 and D4 or whatever most modern drivers spec to, the static weight could still be close depending on what shaft, talking about grams here. I never feel like I have to add so much tip weight it will make the shaft whippy and completely change the way it feels. Though it's easy enough to find a heavier shaft that's stiffer at the tip to minimize how much weight needs to be added, can use lighter grips etc. If you don't like it there will be plenty of buyers on eBay willing to pay enough to break even on the parts for a short driver shaft.

The couple of times I was at a club makers shop he demonstrated how much variance there is in raw stock shafts. He put a couple of pullouts on the frequency machine and deflection board and they weren't dead nuts to specs anyway.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3551 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 113: 4/18/24 Stack training progress check after finishing my 6th program, and 4th Full Speed Spectrum Training session, which is recommended for my next program.     Gained 1 mph with driver, 195 g, 95g. Maintained with 280 g , and gained 2 with 145 g. Lost 1 mph on both lead and trail arm. Felt like I lost distance in my last round…
    • Please forgive the sweaty shirt.  Just got off the treadmill and decided to do my Evolvr drill.  
    • I'd agree that 4w seems like the right play here. I'm not a course designer or anything but that hole looks like it could be so much more fun if everyone played from those front 2 tee boxes that are right outside your shot cone and they cut down most of the trees down that left side of the fairway. That would give risk reward to long hitters who want to try and push it up to that left fairway, allow more players to reach that second fairway, and still allowing it to be perfectly playable for someone who only hits driver like 150yds off the tee.   Yeah it looks like 4iron aimed at that inside edge of the right bunker is the play there, especially if you don't expect a 20mph tailwind again. If it is down wind again, 5iron would be just fine too, it'd still get you inside 150yds for your approach.  Keep in mind tee marker locations too, you measured that one from the back so if those tee markers are moved all the way towards the front of that box then 5 iron is probably best just to be sure that right bunker is never in play. 
    • Day 1: worked on my drill for my arms.
    • Hit my tee shot just into the penalty area and barely found it. Swung hard just in case I hit it. It was slightly downhill with a heavy tailwind. I don't actually hit my 9i 170 yards.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...