Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
RJH999

Best and Worst Major Winners Year

13 posts in this topic

I was thinking..What year had the worst major winners. I noticed how Angel Cabrera, Lucas Glover, Stew Cink, and Yang have been playing quite miserably since 2009. However, Cabrera won earlier this year, so I guess that help. I think 2003 might take it with two flukes, but Weir and Furyk balance it out. I might have to go with 2009, I suppose. As for best, I think I'll go with 2000 with just Tiger and Vijay or 2006 with Tiger, Phil, and Geogilvy. Keep in mind I have pretty much no golf memory before 2000, so I'm probably missing some crazy year with Jack & Arnie & Whatnot.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

2009 was definitely the worst of my era. Outside of Cabrera, the rest of those guys were average at best. Cink had a couple nice years but nothing to write home about. Angel's proven himself though winning 2 majors and contending in many others. I actually think the last 2 years you've had some of the more impressive names of recent memory. I don't think you've had a major champion outside of the top 40 since Darren Clarke. All world clad players.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.  Worst Major winner is like saying worst (Superbowl/World Cup/World Series/Stanley Cup/insert other major sporting event) Champion.  They won a major.  It is a tremendous accomplishments.  They may have had to play to their absolute best to achieve it, but it is still a great feat.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hmm.  Worst Major winner is like saying worst (Superbowl/World Cup/World Series/Stanley Cup/insert other major sporting event) Champion.  They won a major.  It is a tremendous accomplishments.  They may have had to play to their absolute best to achieve it, but it is still a great feat.

I think the OP meant the worst slate of major winners in a given year. Still a bit odious, but I have found myself after the PGA Championship ends in a given year, 'Wow, that was an odd mix of winners.'

So I guess we would have to remove any years that Tiger won a major (I assume we don't want to go back before then). That takes out 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2005,2006, 2007 & 2008.

That leaves us 1998, 2003, 2004, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Phil won majors in 3 of those years (2004, 2010, 2013).

Now we're down to 1999, 2003, 2009, 2011, 2012.

Toss out 1999 - Payne Stewart at the US Open.

Toss out 2011 & 2012 - Rory.

You're left with 2003 & 2009.

I would choose 2003 - Weir/Furyk/Curtis/Micheel - none have won another major.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst in the recent era? 2003.

Mike Weir

Jim Furyk

Ben Curtis

Shaun Micheel

No real competition…

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It depends on whether we're talking what the players became or what they were when the won. Because Mike Weir was a top-tier player when he won, as was Jim Furyk. I believe both men were ranked in the top-10 in the world when they won. I don't believe any of the guys were ranked in the top-50 from the class of 2009 when they won, even Cabrera despite his solid play in majors.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on whether we're talking what the players became or what they were when the won. Because Mike Weir was a top-tier player when he won, as was Jim Furyk. I believe both men were ranked in the top-10 in the world when they won. I don't believe any of the guys were ranked in the top-50 from the class of 2009 when they won, even Cabrera despite his solid play in majors.

2009 brought us a guy winning his second major, Tiger being outdueled, and Tom Watson nearly winning. Plus Phil and Duval were in it at Bethpage.

I'm sticking with 2003.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2009 brought us a guy winning his second major, Tiger being outdueled, and Tom Watson nearly winning. Plus Phil and Duval were in it at Bethpage.

I'm sticking with 2003.

If we go by excitement, then yes, 2009 was better than 2003....although this year so far the first 3 majors have not entertained on Sunday. I thought the thread was talking about quality of champions, though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we go by excitement, then yes, 2009 was better than 2003....although this year so far the first 3 majors have not entertained on Sunday. I thought the thread was talking about quality of champions, though.

And even if it's just talking about that, 2009 has a multiple major winner, plus he was in a playoff at the Masters last year too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

And even if it's just talking about that, 2009 has a multiple major winner, plus he was in a playoff at the Masters last year too.

You can make an argument for both years.

I mean 2009 had Cabrera, but 2003 had Furyk and Weir (both of who were among the best in the game that year). 2009 had Glover and Yang while 2003 had Curtis and Micheel (Yang total 2 wins, Glover 3 wins, Curtis 4, Micheel 1).  And then there's Cink in 2009 who just goes in that "Meh" category.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can make an argument for both years.

I could make an argument for 2000 but it wouldn't be a good one.

2003 was worse IMO. I've already made that argument.

You're welcome to make another for 2009, but you've already made it, so what are you doing now?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hmmm... 2003 had Jim Furyk, one of the best players of the generation, and Mike Weir, a solid player who hasn't done much in 7 years. Ben Curtis was a huge fluke who ended up winning, but he's won a couple other tournaments since. Shaun Micheel was just a enormous fluke who hasn't done anything since except get diagnosed with Low T. Angel Cabrera is a bit of an enigma. So much talent, how come he only shows up a couple times of year? He very well could be a 3 time major champion(4 maybe, he had a chance in the Van De Velde major), so that really boosts his argument. I also think he was very happy to finally win a regular tour event earlier lol. Lucas Glover was a pretty decent golfer who had potential to be a T25 golfer, but has disappeared since. He's still young, maybe he'll get healthy and start to play well again. Stew Cink was one of the more solid golfers of the generation..multiple wins, almost won the 2001 US Open, etc...but hasn't done anything since 2009. Ye Yang isn't often mentioned as one of the worst to win a major, probably due to the way he won it, but I believe he should. I think if we're talking about who had the least success after the win, 2009 would win it. 3/4 of those guys are MIA. However, the overall careers in 2003 might be worse as a whole. 2003 does kill 2009 on wins, though thanks to Jim Furyk.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • The BMW PGA Championship at Wentworth.
      I'm enjoying this, but it could really do with a bit more pulling power. Just a shame not to see a few of the top European Tour players like Sergio or Rory not play it.
    • My Swing (b101)
      It's just feeling a little bit more natural than it used to and I'm not stepping on the course with 5 or more swing thoughts, which is nice! I don't think it'll take much work getting back to making progress and I'm definitely seeing that some of the changes I've made have stuck - ball flight is really high compared to what I'm used to and the ball turns right to left about 50% of the time and stays straight for 30%. It's the 20% of rubbish, either duck hooks or generally wayward tee shots that I want to clear up, which is going to be this morning's target on the range. I didn't end up hitting the range yesterday - a mate texted to ask to play a round, so I went for that. What was obvious is that the little 9 hole course, where I don't need anything above a 4 iron, has been great for my iron play, but that the 3 wood, driver and course management need a bit of a refresher course. Shot an 86 with a ridiculous 7 penalty strokes (4 on one tough par 3), which says it all really as I don't normally take any! It is a tight track though and there is OB all over the place, but no excuse for the few 'head off' moments which prevented me scoring well. It was match play as well so I guess that's part of it... In short summary: Driving/3 wood - pretty poor and I'm just not comfortable over the ball with those clubs. On a longer course, I'd have struggled. Long irons - good, bar that atrocity of a par 3, where I think I'll just aim way left next time and take the safe miss. Both of those were actually really nice strikes, but went dead straight rather than drawing like I had expected. Still, my fault entirely for aiming towards the trouble  Mid-short irons - mostly pretty good actually. Put 6/14 approaches from outside 100 yards to (3/4 from within 100) inside 15 yards and bar two long bunker shots, the rest were manageable. Putting - really pleased again; I probably only made one that I wouldn't have expected (birdie on 13), but there's a lot of break on the greens and I thought it was pretty decent for a first time out in a while. http://www.gamegolf.com/player/benpage101/round/930037 Overall, pretty close to where I'd want it to be, but a better decision on 6, some better drives and a bit more luck on odd holes (like 16) and it'd have been a great round. I'd take that for the first time in ages. Should be able to post some video this afternoon.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      And also, "speculation" is what the thread is all about! Sure, I'm placing the Tour guys on a pedestal but they DESERVE it. Yes "Golf is Hard", but those guys are GOOD. Low 60s are very much a possibility in any tournament they tee it up in, let alone on a public course that was designed with the average golfer in mind. Let's give credit where credit is due! If all the players from 75-125 on the money list decided to go out and play a new course (of "moderate difficulty" for amateurs) every week for the next 2 months, course records would be getting smashed all over the place. They might shoot the odd 70 or 72, but you darn well bet there would be a lot of 63's and 64's in there too. Regardless of poor course conditions, lack of course knowledge or anything like that, they are gonna make birdies in droves and they are going to go low!
    • The this math does not compute thread
      I was at a garage sale with my son who was like 10 years old at the time. The seller had a box full of cheap toys with a handwritten sign on the box that read "$1 each, or 2 for $3".  I nudged my son and pointed to the sign with my eyes (because the seller was standing right there). He glanced down at the sign and immediately grinned and shook his head in disbelief. And don't get me going on auctions. People will pay more for used crap than they know they would if purchased brand new, simply because they get caught up in a bidding war. The best part is listening to them try and justify it afterwards.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries