• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dfreuter415

Jack vs Tiger (vs. Your Age)

0   31 votes

  1. 1. Very simple, who is the better golfer, Jack or Tiger? Please make sure you click the appropriate age.

    • Tiger Woods (I am 35 years old or younger)
      7
    • Jack Nicklaus (I am 35 years old or younger)
      6
    • Tiger Woods (My age is between 35 - 55 years old)
      7
    • Jack Nicklaus (My age is between 35 - 55 years old)
      3
    • Tiger Woods (I am 55 years old or older)
      4
    • Jack Nicklaus (I am 55 years old or older)
      4

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

12 posts in this topic

There have been a number of polls on "who is better" Jack Nicklaus or Tiger Woods. I have a theory that it is age related. Those under 35 never saw Jack in his prime, and thus would favor Tiger. Those over 55 tend to think that "older is better," and this group would favor Jack. Then there is the in-between group who is probably split.

I'm not asking for much of a response from those of you who respond, because that has been done to the point of overkill, (although a short response is always nice), I'm just looking to see how much of a factor age plays in people's opinion of "Who is Better: Jack or Tiger?"

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Believe it or not, though I'm generally characterized as a Tiger hater, I'm over. 55 and voted for Tiger in the original poll. Of course, there's still time for that to change as time moves on..... ;-)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

By jove, majority again. Damn, gotta start rethinking before I vote in these things.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

While I still believe strongly that we are blessed to have both players, and given their era they were the best ... so I have them as tied ...

However, a tie is not an option ... I am over 55 and vote for Tiger, because I have the ability to look at more than 18 vs 14 ...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I'm in the middle group, but have not voted.  I'm actually quite proud of the fact that I haven't voted in the big thread either ... even though I've made tons of arguments over there.

I just don't know.  I think, if forced, I might still lean towards Jack**, but I also recognize that Tiger's career isn't over yet.  We'll have to wait and see.

Not because 18>14 or any other such nonsense, but because of a much, much more thought out and sophisticated reason:  Just cuz.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I'm in the middle group, but have not voted.  I'm actually quite proud of the fact that I haven't voted in the big thread either ... even though I've made tons of arguments over there.

I just don't know.  I think, if forced, I might still lean towards Jack**, but I also recognize that Tiger's career isn't over yet.  We'll have to wait and see.

Not because 18>14 or any other such nonsense, but because of a much, much more thought out and sophisticated reason:  Just cuz.

So if it is not a 18>14 thing, then what else does Tiger need to do or not do? :-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I don't think the age ranges seem appropriate in the poll... I wouldn't think anyone under 45 would have really seen Jack in his prime. I'm 36, born in '78. I don't think he was in his prime anymore by the time I was even born... Let alone by the time I had a clue who he was
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if it is not a 18>14 thing, then what else does Tiger need to do or not do?  :-)

I dunno. Win 4 more majors maybe. Or win zero more majors. Or maybe just retire so I have the closure of comparing two complete careers. Mostly the last one, I think. ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Believe it or not, though I'm generally characterized as a Tiger hater, I'm over. 55 and voted for Tiger in the original poll.

Of course, there's still time for that to change as time moves on.....

Ha!  I still have six months before I move to the "old fart" part of the poll!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Interesting poll!

I like the idea of comparing age and how or when people took up the game. I'll use my Father in law as an example because he like so many average golfers never played or took up golf until he retired which happened to be right at the height of Tiger's dominance. My Father in law is(not quite as much since the fire hydrant incident) a huge Tiger fan. He never watched or followed golf back in the 60's/70's and although he's plenty old enough, never watched Nicklaus play. So I'm not surprised to see a lot of votes for Tiger from the over 35 crowd, it's who was winning as they got older and had more time/money to get into golf. It's no different in any other sport, the Patriots, Steelers, or Cowboys win 3 or 4 Superbowls and they instantly have fans from coast to coast selling jerseys like crazy!

I'm 48 and voted for Nicklaus, much like the 35 and under voted for Tiger. Nicklaus was who I grew up watching and idolizing like many of the junior players of that era that golf was their primary sport. I know people like to get all fired up about who was the greatest ever but I think it's more relevant to break it down into era's. Not just because the equipment was different but also because the world, travel, logistics, and standards of greatness were all different within each era.

Golf just like the rest of the world has gotten bigger, better(debatable), faster over the last +100 years which equates to each era having a different set of standards as to what was considered greatness! When Nicklaus got to 15 Majors(4 ahead of Hagen) most people that really followed golf thought that might stand for a 100 years. When he added 2 more in 1980 it was thought it may stand forever, yet 34 years later here we are with a guy within 4 that may or may not get there.

As far as Jack v.s. Tiger I will say Tiger had a huge advantage over Jack in popularity because Jack had to follow and dethrone "The King" Arnold Palmer. When I got into golf as a kid Jack was at his height and many people my fathers age were still huge Palmer fans and didn't give Jack a lot of love for taking down their guy! As for Tiger, there was no "Big Dog" to take down when he turned pro but he did spawn a whole generation of young guns that are now lighting it up, which outside of whether Tiger catches Jack or not may be Tiger's greatest legacy. He took golf into the era we are in now and earned his spot at the table as one of the greatest ever!

I guess it's fun to debate the greatest ever but I like to enjoy the accomplishments of each era so for myself it's a 5-way tie between Young Tom Morris, Walter Hagen, Ben Hogan, Jack Nicklaus, and Tiger Woods.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although Tiger was probably better in his best years, I voted for Jack because of his longevity.  I really think that Tiger is washed up at 37, while Jack kept his game well into his 40's.  I'd love Tiger to prove me wrong, but he hasn't yet done so.  Run this poll 10 years from now and I may or may not have a different opinion.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm under 35 years of age and I think Jack is/was the better golfer stat wise. golfers today, including Tiger cant hit fairways as well as they did in the past. They really dont need to with the advances in golf equipment. Todays equipment makes it easier to hit farther, straighter and to get out of trouble. However Tigers approach to  the game far exceeded Jacks. who is all around better...matter of opinion I guess. Tiger has more wins (there is also more tournaments to play these days with more money to be won therefore one can pick and choose a prime schedule) Jack has more majors (todays group of golfers seem to be more competitive thus making it harder to win). As i said given the equipment and the stats I think the edge goes to Jack!

Great poll by the way!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Putting Yips
      Ive recently gone from a belly to a 34" putter. Really liked the the belly putter but struggled with distance control. after practicing with the short putter i seem to have more control. Will be keeping the belly though for when i get a older or the back starts to protest!  
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      Broke 90, 1 career eagle.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      No problem.  I'm not tired of responding to sincere and thoughtful posts, like yours, even if it rehashes stuff from before because OF COURSE it is unrealistic to expect people to read 3000 posts before commenting.  In any case I have that quote in a file and it was simple to post it - much simpler and politer than saying "go find it , it's here."  I DO think that one should maybe at least read a smattering of such a big thread before jumping in,   But I have no patience whatsoever with the "I saw Jack play" and "he was nice at a clinic" type posts or posts by people who try to claim some special credibility because of some entirely personal subjective connection.  But that isn't you. As to the rest, you asked for the exact quote and I gave it to you.  If you want to argue with what he said, that is another matter and does not concern me, since my position is that even if we, arguendo, say that the field strengths did NOT get better, Tiger's career was so much more dominant than Jack's that it doesn't matter.  I don't NEED to make a stronger field argument to make the case that Tiger dominated golf in a way and to an extent that no other golfer has ever dominated golf.  And he did it for 15 years (after an absolutely unprecedented career as an amateur) which, IMO, is long enough that it no longevity argument could overcome the sheer dominance advantage his career embodied.   The fact that all that is true in the face of field strength increasing is just icing on the cake.   
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Excellent. Thank you for re-posting that quote. Sorry to hear you're tired of rehashing. Why not just let the thread die then? Is the expectation that folks will read all 272 pages before making a comment? That strikes me as an unrealistic expectation.. I agree the tour is tougher than it used to be. I consider the differences more incremental than astronomical...not the 'order of magnitude' range that seems to come through in some comments. I think Jack is both being accurate in assessing his perception of a shift in quality, but also exaggerating for effect or experiencing present-day myopia at the very least about the money. $100 in 1962 money would be ~ $800 dollars today. Not exactly what I would call bus fare. The 'paltry' $100,000 had the buying power of about $800,000 in today's dollars, which is ~ 60% of today's average purse and ~ 30% of the Players' purse).. Most Americans would happily take an annual salary like that today. They weren't getting ditch digger wages. The prize money even then definitely attracted keen competitive interest. Clearly purses have also grown more than inflation and even journeyman make more in a year than the top 10 in 1962 (below), but it seems about in line with the growth of the population of golfers in the U.S. itself - about triple since Jack's day, Endorsement money has definitely gotten bigger, as the tour and the golf marketplace have developed and expanded over time.   Rank       Player                  1962 $                   2015 $ 1            Arnold Palmer        $81,448                 $639,223 2            Gene Littler           $66,201                 $519,562 3            Jack Nicklaus         $61,869                 $485,563 4            Billy Casper            $61,842                 $485,351 5            Bob Goalby            $46,241                 $362,910 6            Gary Player            $45,838                 $359,748 7            Doug Sanders        $43,340                 $340,143 8            Dave Ragan          $37,327                 $292,951 9            Bobby Nichols       $34,312                 $269,288 10          Phil Rodgers          $32,182                 $252,572  
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      Broke par, Lowest Score Wins. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries