• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
muskegman

Irons for an improving high handicapper

8 posts in this topic

I'm planning on speding some time with this crazy game and wondered if you folks would have any suggestions regarding the kind of iron that would benefit me now as a high handicapper but would still be worth keeping as my scores decrease and I hopefully become a mid-handicapper. Should I be looking at a forged game improvement iron such as Mizuno's MX-33 or something else?

Should I take the game in phases by sticking with my current bargain set until I can appreciate and play a better iron set later?

I would find any ideas helpful and interesting.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

IMHO, I think a lot of it depends on where you're at right now. If you can hit the ball straight, consistantly make solid contact, are comfortable with long irons, and have been able to translate driving range performance to the course, I'd say you're ready for a high quality iron you can grow with. If not, I'd say spend the money on some lessons from a reputable PGA pro, balls at the driving range, and practice rounds at the local course.

Of course if you have spare $$ to burn, why not spend it on a nice set of irons. They'll last a long time and as an added bonus if you go forged, I doubt there will be any revolutionary advances in technology such as in drivers.

For a high handicapper looking to lower their scores, I'd suggest a forged cavity back or one of the newer forged muscle/cavity back combo sets. Models to check out include Titleist 690 CB , Nike Forged Pro Combo , Mizuno MX-30 , Ben Hogan Apex FXT Forged Combo . In a cast blade style cavity back with a nice thin topline look at PING S59 .

For me, moving to forged blades really helped me improve my ball striking simply because there's no two ways hit them. You either do it correctly or pay a pretty severe penalty in accuracy and distance.

Forged cavity backs would be a nice way to go since they provide some forgiveness but still give you good feedback on off center hits. As you get better they will definatley allow you to learn how to work the ball since most of them are identical to muscle back models with different weighting.

I really like the idea of the new forged combo sets with muscle backs in PW-7I, and cavity backs in 6I-3I. Even most higher handicapers should be able to accurately hit muscle backs in the lower irons since their high lofts reduce side spin. Having forged cavity backs in the longer irons allows for some forgiveness and the lower center of gravity helps in getting the ball nice and high in the air.

Whatever you decide don't rush into it or get pressured into a deal. Hit a lot of different models and see which one suits your game best. Also find a place willing to fit you, it's vital to your progressing in the sport.

Just my $.02 hope it helps.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a self proposed Taylor Made fan, I surprised you didn't mention the TM RACs? A coworker at the course here is sponsored by TM and she not only uses them, but highly recommends them. Especially for "improving high handicappers."
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a self proposed Taylor Made fan, I surprised you didn't mention the TM RACs? A coworker at the course here is sponsored by TM and she not only uses them, but highly recommends them. Especially for "improving high handicappers."

Are you talking about any TM iron in particular like the RAC LT or the RAC CGB? The LT promotes a lower ball flight which could be bad for the "high-handicap" part of my game

. They might grow with me though.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Beats me man, I didn't know they were two sets. I just know the RACs are what this girl pushes. Since you've done the research about ball flight and what not, I'll say, yeah, the CGBs !

Can't go wrong with a nice set of Ping Eye 2s either. Things are timeless. Amateurs and pros alike use them with great success to this day.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a huge fan of TM irons. They only have one forged model, and that's a cavity back. I really didn't like the feel of them compared to Titleist and Mizuno especially since they're all at the same price point. Irons (like all golf equipment) are such a personal choice I don't think any manufacturer should be ruled out until demoed.

I am a big fan of TM drivers (which is my favorite club in my bag), but I don't like the way they're constantly adding new clubs daily (R five-hundred series ---> R7 ----> R5 ---> R7HT). Every month the company seems to introduce a new one, and to play with the models the pros use you have to pay big $$$$. I wish they were more like titleist who introduces the same basic product as the pros get and sticks with it for a while.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every month the company seems to introduce a new one, and to play with the models the pros use you have to pay big $$$$. I wish they were more like titleist who introduces the same basic product as the pros get and sticks with it for a while.

I hear that. Working in the industry I've come to learn that that's TM's business plan. Pump out new equipment each period every year and let the customer keep up. It's the reason why I won't play TM stuff anymore. (Used to have a Bubble Burner, and those cooky ICW irons) By the time I'm willing to pay for their stuff, and new model is already out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know your swing or your handicap, but you have three options. You can go straight forgiving cavity back, slightly harder to hit cavity back, or a more difficult club like the Mizuno MP 30's. Here is what I suggest. If you are only going to work on your game a little bit, like hit the range only a few times a month, go with the Mizuno MX 23's. They'll give you enough forgiveness to keep the game fun.

However, if you are willing to practice, I highly recommend the clubs TaylorMadeFan suggested. That is, Titleist 690 CB, Nike Forged Pro Combo, Mizuno MP 30, and the Ben Hogan Apex FXT Forged Combo. These are all very well made clubs, and very accurate. They are also lacking in the forgiveness department. At first you might have trouble. But, if you are willing to take some lessons, and dilligently practice those lessons, your scores will drop with these clubs. The reason for this is because these clubs will force you to groove a consistent, proper swing. They won't let you get away with a garbage swing like the RAC's will. No, go with something that will force you to get better.

If you have anymore specific questions pertaining to this subject or these club models, just let me know!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How long should my ball test be?
      Just wanted some thoughts on how long I should test each ball Im considerring. What is a good sample size. 9 holes, 18 or even longer?
    • Question on Twitter: Easiest Way to Shoot Lower Scores in a Week
      What I have learned as I have improved and keep reading about in Bob Rotella's books is that the best way to shoot the score of your life is to focus on practicing the short game, but mostly developing confidence in your putting. Since most of our strokes consist of the short game, by getting just a percentage better there it will translate to more overall success than anywhere else.
    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      @Golfer2223 what does forearm rotation have to do with the shoulders?-They are not connected. Forearms can rotate regardless of what the shoulders are doing.
    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      Correct. For example: He also says that the forearms rotate during the backswing. Which we know that they do, and quite a bit. How much is too much? On the left, below in both images, is his depiction of zero rotation: On the right, in both images, he demonstrates nearly 90° of turning at the wrist. based on what I know, little of this comes from the upper arm - the majority of it comes from the forearm. Do you disagree with any of that, @Golfer2223? Notice one thing, then, too please. On the left, the plane of the left wrist is pretty much parallel to the sagittal plane. On the right images, it's perpendicular to it. What do we find at the top of the backswing of the game's best players? The issue now appears to be simply trying to determine what in the world you mean by the bold above, particularly because there's really nothing "natural" about the golf swing. What feels natural to you, or seems natural to you, is definitely not natural to all or possibly even the majority of golfers. in my experience I've learned that you can't really talk about the golf swing in terms of what's "natural" or not. The truth of the matter is that for golfers who do this the right amount "naturally" then it simply isn't something we talk about in a lesson. For golfers who do it an improper amount, it may or may not be their priority. Here's a wrist graph from AMM for a very, very good golfer. Note that the wrist (blue line, top left) starts with 50° of supination. It pronates, relative to the upper arm, to a position of 16° pronation at the top. That's a pronation from 50° on one side of the zero mark to 16° on the other side - a pronation of 66°. This doesn't even account for how much the upper arm rotates - the forearm has rotated 66° from the setup position. (Note that above when I said 25° or 32°, that was relative to totally neutral, not to the setup position. The forearms rotated quite a bit more than the 25-32° cited, because they started somewhat supinated.) This graph and these numbers are not unusual. Look, @Golfer2223, it's somewhat incumbent upon you to be clear in what you're saying. It's far from ideal to say things like how you expect to see "zero forearm rotation" (or whatever) but then to claim that it's "relative to the natural shoulder motion" (obviously both paraphrased). Nobody has a clue what you mean by the "natural shoulder" whatever, and many would disagree that anything in this topic area is "natural" to begin with. So, please clarify what you're saying, and be precise and use specific words, or at least define them, provide examples, or both.
    • Best Shot of the Week
      Teeing of on Northdale #7 a short par four 336 from white tees. There is a pond water hazard about 235 or 240 ahead covering a lot of right hand side. Left hand is a small area and high trees to carry. Hit driver and blasted it, carried trees on left hand side and must have gotten a good cart path bounce. When we drove up was 50 yards from center of green. That's a loooong drive for me. Longest yet. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries