Jump to content
IGNORED

Is this new Technology REALLY better?


Note: This thread is 3183 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

[rant mode on]: Okay- personal experience tantrum. In the last few years with all these new trampolining driver faces and soft balls, I have seriously lost about 40-50 yards off the driver. Nothing has really changed in my swing even with the additional 8 years since I started fiddling with various new "high tech" drivers. Even my friends have noticed that I am no longer blasting it past them by 70 yards and and struggling to keep 10 or 20 yards ahead. I can pinpoint the drivers because ANY iron set I've used since 1976 have all been about the same yardage for each one. e.g.: 7 irons have always been around 150 with a normal swing. Except that now-after these shorter drives I'm hitting 5's into greens instead of 7's. Clubhead speed hasn't really changed. I have kept the same swing tempo and have kept myself in decent shape so it isn't a matter of having to swing around my body and losing form. Right up until this new stuff propagated itself into the mainstream, I was regularly hitting 280+ and straight (80%) with the odd bomber out to 300. And that was using the old 90 or 100 comp Titleists (or similar) and either Persimmons or early generation steel drivers. Worst driver yet was a TM Tour Burner that just gobbled up distance like a plague. It would barely get out to 220 on a good hit with these new balls. I miss the of a black # Titleist off the plastic insert and watching it launch out in that rising trajectory and just keep going. Now, even if it FEELS like I crammed it, it's disappointing to watch it just kind of float out there and die at the 225 mark with little or no roll. It is starting to take it's toll on my enjoyment of the game when the frustration kicks in after striping one with gusto and then finding it taking a leisurely walk to 225, instead of an "ass-on-fire" sprint to 280+ IF I win the Lottery, I'm going to make a deal with Titleist to produce a custom ball that replicates the balatas of the 70's and 80's, and cut a deal with some club maker to custom produce a mid 80's steel driver replica. Oh, wait, I may not need that one, since I have a shed full of those in Florida. A few new grips and new steel shafts (Yes, STEEL- never liked the graphite shafts back in the day) with similar properties of originals and I think I'll be fine. [rant mode off]
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well, at least you can still get DG steel shafts, and they're way cheaper than graphite. :-) Does a Tour 100 really go farther than the new balls? I lost a ball of this model type straight down the fairway. I wonder if it went farther than I expected?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You may have a negative angle of attack, too high loft, and spinning the be-jayzuz out of the ball.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You may have a negative angle of attack, too high loft, and spinning the be-jayzuz out of the ball.

Are you addressing the OP or me? If the OP, did the old balls want a lot more spin than the new ones?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Are you addressing the OP or me?

If the OP, did the old balls want a lot more spin than the new ones?


I think it's the OP that has the issues.

He needs to get over it and adapt to the modern game - driver and balls.

You've got to change a few things at address, tee the ball differently, hit up on the ball, etc.

Just have him read some TST threads.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
[rant mode on]:

Okay- personal experience tantrum. In the last few years with all these new trampolining driver faces and soft balls, I have seriously lost about 40-50 yards off the driver. Nothing has really changed in my swing even with the additional 8 years since I started fiddling with various new "high tech" drivers. Even my friends have noticed that I am no longer blasting it past them by 70 yards and and struggling to keep 10 or 20 yards ahead. I can pinpoint the drivers because ANY iron set I've used since 1976 have all been about the same yardage for each one. e.g.: 7 irons have always been around 150 with a normal swing. Except that now-after these shorter drives I'm hitting 5's into greens instead of 7's.

Clubhead speed hasn't really changed. I have kept the same swing tempo and have kept myself in decent shape so it isn't a matter of having to swing around my body and losing form. Right up until this new stuff propagated itself into the mainstream, I was regularly hitting 280+ and straight (80%) with the odd bomber out to 300. And that was using the old 90 or 100 comp Titleists (or similar) and either Persimmons or early generation steel drivers.

Worst driver yet was a TM Tour Burner that just gobbled up distance like a plague. It would barely get out to 220 on a good hit with these new balls. I miss the of a black # Titleist off the plastic insert and watching it launch out in that rising trajectory and just keep going. Now, even if it FEELS like I crammed it, it's disappointing to watch it just kind of float out there and die at the 225 mark with little or no roll. It is starting to take it's toll on my enjoyment of the game when the frustration kicks in after striping one with gusto and then finding it taking a leisurely walk to 225, instead of an "ass-on-fire" sprint to 280+

IF I win the Lottery, I'm going to make a deal with Titleist to produce a custom ball that replicates the balatas of the 70's and 80's, and cut a deal with some club maker to custom produce a mid 80's steel driver replica. Oh, wait, I may not need that one, since I have a shed full of those in Florida. A few new grips and new steel shafts (Yes, STEEL- never liked the graphite shafts back in the day) with similar properties of originals and I think I'll be fine.

[rant mode off]

Have you ever been fit for a driver?

I get that this is a rant but it's very likely your swing speed has changed.

Unless you're still using your '76 irons, you can't pinpoint the driver because iron loft and technology has changed. So if you hit your current 7 iron 150 yards, a club that probably launches higher, has less loft, has a longer and lighter shaft than your '76 7 iron, then something in your swing has changed.

The new balls just flat out go farther than the balata balls of the 70's-90's.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There have been a lot of videos with good ball strikers showing that the old wooden drivers only lose about 15-30 yards per drive if struck perfectly. The catch here is that you have to strike the ball perfectly, that's why modern drivers are so high tech, to force mishits to carry nearly as far as normal drives (of course I only mean mishits as in just barely off the center), and to send shots where you hit them off the toe, or the club face just twists open, straighter with more distance. do the new drivers really outperform old ones? yes. but if you can't hit the new drivers, stick with the old ones, like they say "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have played with the "old drivers" and the new balls. THOSE results are even worse. A kind of "splut" at impact and then a disappointing result. Okay- as for being "fit" for a driver. I have NEVER been fit for a driver... ever. When I sucked as a beginner, when I was as low as an 8 in my late 20's, AND when I could hit them decently long since then. And that was with drivers I would change nearly on a monthly basis by going to a discount store and buying a new one I could afford. I actually had to throttle back my swing a bit when I wanted to improve my accuracy, since I was driving thru doglegs or reaching hazards at local courses. that is the swing I have had the longest. The best driving period involved a $30 driver from a bargain bin. Even after THAT driver (still own it), I could hit those longer drives on a regular basis. So I don't use any 'change of swing' as an excuse. Didn't matter which driver I bought, If I liked it, I could hit it. The swing hasn't changed much at all. I tinkered then and I tinker now. The first "high tech" driver that was a real "name brand" was an TM R7. This was before the current era of low comp balls (maybe just before the Tour Lady/Laddie took the world by storm). Even then I lost a few yards, but not enough to get rid of the improved accuracy it provided so I didn't mind too much because it was still going out there. But since then, EVERY driver has been affected. And as balls got softer, length has dipped. Had swing-speed checked TWO years ago at a golfsmith in Myrtle Beach with my current driver (R11). Numbers were 100-105, with around a 13* launch angle. According to the machine I should have been carrying 240-250. That's on par(get it?) with Zach Johnson's average swing #'s. He's averaging about 280 total. I'm lucky to get it to 230 TOTAL on a good day. Every drive can't be into the wind or land in soft ground to kill distance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have played with the "old drivers" and the new balls. THOSE results are even worse. A kind of "splut" at impact and then a disappointing result.

I played with a persimmon driver on Tuesday from the tips on a 6900-7000 yard layout and the results were great. Lost only 15-20 yards but quite accurate.

And as balls got softer, length has dipped.

There are still plenty of modern balls with higher compression numbers. Pro v1x is around 95-100 compression.

Had swing-speed checked TWO years ago at a golfsmith in Myrtle Beach with my current driver (R11). Numbers were 100-105, with around a 13* launch angle. According to the machine I should have been carrying 240-250. That's on par(get it?) with Zach Johnson's average swing #'s. He's averaging about 280 total. I'm lucky to get it to 230 TOTAL on a good day. Every drive can't be into the wind or land in soft ground to kill distance.

Zach Johnson's average Swingspeed is 107.6mph and he is very efficient. Big difference compared to 100mph and less than ideal launch, slight mishits, etc.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

@RayG :

  • You swing slower now.
  • You have horrible launch conditions.
  • You're using equipment that is NOT well suited for you.

Pick any number of the above (except 0).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3183 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I've been playing a Teardrop td17 F.C. putter for many years and love it. It still putts and feels as good or  better than any of the new putters I've tried and it's in excellent condition except the face has dings in it ever since I bought it used that kind of bother me. I was just wondering if it's possible to have some really shallow horizontal grooves milled into the face on a "roll face" putter. I think I would rather spend some money on it instead of trying to get used to a new putter.  Thanks
    • I agree with @klineka & @DaveP043 above.  When a new member first joins the club they cold be told that they are not eligible for tournaments until they have an established HCP.  As you said, it only takes a few rounds.  If they do not to post HCP that was their choice and choices have consequences.  If playing in the tournament is important to them then they should step up and establish an HCP.  Maybe they miss the 1st tournament, is that a real big deal?  And if it is a "Big Deal" to them then they had the opportunity to establish the HCP. As for not knowing how to report for HCP I assume your club has a pro and they should be able to assist in getting the scores reported and I suspect out of state courses may also have staff that can assist if asked.
    • Wordle 1,013 2/6 🟨⬜⬜🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Thought I was gonna be a big shot today...  🙂    Nice Job!
    • Cool here's my tweak, "If a player’s ball lies in the general area and there is interference from exposed tree roots or exposed rocks that are in the fairway or 1 club length from the fairway the tree roots and exposed rocks are treated as ground under repair. The player may take free relief under Rule 16.1b.[But relief is not allowed if the tree roots only interfere with the player’s stance.]
    • I would never do the extended warranty on the $50 slow cooker.  I also routinely reject the extended service plans on those toys we buy for the grand-kids.  I do consider them on higher cost items and will be more likely to get one if the product has a lot of "Electronic Tech" that is often the problem longer-term.  I also consider my intended length of ownership & usage.  If my thought is it would get replaced in 2-3 years then why bother but if I hope to use it for 10 years then more likely to get the extension. I did buy out a lease about a year ago.  Just prior to the lease end date the tablet locked up and would not function.  I got it repaired under the initial warranty and would not have bought it out if they had not been able to fix it since IMO once electronic issues start in a car they can be hard to track down & fix.  They did fix it but when I bought out the lease I paid up for the extended warranty the would cover electronic failures because my intent is to keep that car for another 8-10 years and I just do not trust the electronics to last.  Last week the touch screen went black and was unresponsive.  It reset on the 2nd time I restarted the car but that is exactly how the last malfunction started.  I fully expect to have a claim on that on repair under the extended warranty.  I do not recall the exact cost to fix last time since I did not pay it but I think it was @ $700-$800 and I suspect that will be higher next time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...