Jump to content
IGNORED

HDCP drops handicap on 2nd qualification day after a good round. is that fair?


quinnski
Note: This thread is 3121 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Qualifying for C-flight, I shot an 83 where the courses T's were moved up for renovation and construction.  2nd day, the HDCP chairman says he's deducting 2 strokes (reward for excellent play).  What?  Then confers with another member and tells me he's deducting one stroke...

Here are all my Tournament scores for Wilson and Harding:

xmas 1/09/15………………………..105—19..86—-Wilson

Wed   1/21…………………………… 97—18..79—-Harding

a.fool  3/27…………………………… 95—19..76—-H.

Treg   4/25……………………………. 83—19..64-—H.

Barb   7/17……………………………103—14..89—-W.

Cham 8/15……………………………  83—16..67—-H.

Cham 8/16……………………………  91—16..75— W.***

Wow, some sandbagger.  Look at my tournament winnings for 2015 - a total of $120.00 and as for skins, where I really cleaned up, a total of ZERO, not one penny.

So, does the decision make sense and is it fair?  Oh, I've been a member for at least 10 years.  Personally, I would like to invite Rhonda Rousey, UFC champ, to teach our HDCP person a lesson.  Looking forward to an explanation.  It's a matter of integrity.

Thanks,

Quinnski

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Qualifying for C-flight, I shot an 83 where the courses T's were moved up for renovation and construction.  2nd day, the HDCP chairman says he's deducting 2 strokes (reward for excellent play).  What?  Then confers with another member and tells me he's deducting one stroke...

Here are all my Tournament scores for Wilson and Harding:

xmas 1/09/15………………………..105—19..86—-Wilson

Wed   1/21…………………………… 97—18..79—-Harding

a.fool  3/27…………………………… 95—19..76—-H.

Treg   4/25……………………………. 83—19..64-—H.

Barb   7/17……………………………103—14..89—-W.

Cham 8/15……………………………  83—16..67—-H.

Cham 8/16……………………………  91—16..75— W.***

Wow, some sandbagger.  Look at my tournament winnings for 2015 - a total of $120.00 and as for skins, where I really cleaned up, a total of ZERO, not one penny.

So, does the decision make sense and is it fair?  Oh, I've been a member for at least 10 years.  Personally, I would like to invite Rhonda Rousey, UFC champ, to teach our HDCP person a lesson.  Looking forward to an explanation.  It's a matter of integrity.

Thanks,

Quinnski

One stroke doesn't seem too much like punishment, maybe they're just acknowledging that you are improving?

Two 83s on Harding? Nice!

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:
Originally Posted by quinnski View Post

Qualifying for C-flight, I shot an 83 where the courses T's were moved up for renovation and construction.  2nd day, the HDCP chairman says he's deducting 2 strokes (reward for excellent play).  What?  Then confers with another member and tells me he's deducting one stroke...

Here are all my Tournament scores for Wilson and Harding:

xmas 1/09/15………………………..105—19..86—-Wilson

Wed   1/21…………………………… 97—18..79—-Harding

a.fool  3/27…………………………… 95—19..76—-H.

Treg   4/25……………………………. 83—19..64-—H.

Barb   7/17……………………………103—14..89—-W.

Cham 8/15……………………………  83—16..67—-H.

Cham 8/16……………………………  91—16..75— W.***

Wow, some sandbagger.  Look at my tournament winnings for 2015 - a total of $120.00 and as for skins, where I really cleaned up, a total of ZERO, not one penny.

So, does the decision make sense and is it fair?  Oh, I've been a member for at least 10 years.  Personally, I would like to invite Rhonda Rousey, UFC champ, to teach our HDCP person a lesson.  Looking forward to an explanation.  It's a matter of integrity.

Thanks,

Quinnski

First of all, welcome to the site! :beer:

I'm no handicap expert so I just went to the USGA handicap manual and tried to look through their section on reducing handicaps. Section 10-3 says:

Quote:
A player's Handicap Index may be reduced under this procedure when a player has a minimum of two eligible tournament score differentials that are at least 3.0 better than the player's Handicap Index calculated under Section 10-2 .

Based on your list, it looks like the 4/25 (net 64) and 8/15 (net 67) scores might qualify you for this procedure.

To figure out for sure if any strokes could be deducted then we'd need the differentials as well.  But for the sake of exercise, let's assume those 83's have an average differential of 12.  Per the calculations on 10-3 linked above, you subtract that from your handicap of 17.2 to get 5.2.

Then you plug that number into the table shown in 10-3.  Based on the 5.2 number and the fact that you had 7 eligible tournament scores, then it appears as though you'd just miss having to lower your handicap.  Just barely.

If the difference in the average of those two differentials was 5.5 to 5.9, then your handicap would drop by a stroke.

It's entirely possible that they are going by the book, but its impossible to tell without more information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3121 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,032 3/6 🟨⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 LOL!
    • So it's been a bit but things have been busy on my end. I have had a couple of range sessions lately and the first wasn't great but the last went really well. I started concentrating on just getting my shoulder behind the ball and it has made a world of difference. I think prior I had been thinking way too much over the ball but once I get my grip and setup done it's just one thought. My strikes were much more pure and distance despite a strong wind was very good.  I weighed in yesterday at 235. This journey started 2 years ago in May when I stepped on the scale and had 321 staring back at me. My knees feel so much better and feel stronger than I have in years. Not sure what weight I'll land on and try to maintain but I'm really pleased with the progress. 
    • Two things I bring up when it comes to this discussion. One is if you have let's say two towns next to each other, one has a population of 10,000 people and the other has a population of 1,000 people. Let's also say that they never play golf against each other. Only among themselves. In the first town, you have one guy who has won 15 events, then a couple of guys who won 6, a couple who won four and a bunch of people who won three, two and one events. In the second town, you have one guy who won 18 events, then a guy who won 11, a guy who won 9, a guy who won 8, a couple who won 7, a couple who won 3-5 and then a few 2s and a few 1s. Who's the best golfer? It's possible it's the guy who won 18, but it's pretty unlikely. Far more likely to be the guy who won 15 in the much bigger town.  In the same way, I view the fact that there is more parity in the 1990 and onwards world than there was in the pre 1990 world as a plus for Tiger. It's much harder to stand out if the fields are deeper, stronger, better. If there are a handful of players who win all of them, that tends to suggest weakness to me, not strength. The other thing is Ed White. Harvey Penick talked about him in one of his books. Ridiculously good at the game, but no one ever heard of him, because he got a job and didn't play professionally. There was no money in it and he needed security, so he took a job that paid him steadily. No clue how many people there are out there like him, but if he was around today, he'd be playing pro golf for sure. If he had played professionally, Penick sure seemed to think he'd have been one of the best of all time. Fred Haas played him in a college match and got stuffed. 40 years later he walked into Penick's shop and saw Ed White's picture on the wall and, after a full career playing pro golf, he said that Ed White was the best player he ever saw. Those 40 years would presumably have included at least some of Jack. I can see why people might say Jack is the GOAT. I don't agree, but I can at least understand why they say it. IMO there is no argument you can make for anyone other than Tiger to be the BOAT though. At least not yet.
    • A good option is to play the Par 3 courses. after playing an 18 -hole round. The Par 3 courses have 18 holes, we usually played only 9 holes after playing 36 holes on each of the trips we had. You may want to check out Grand National while you're in the middle of Alabama. I enjoyed Oxmoor Valley and Ross Bridge courses which are a short drive north.
    • In August, I am playing the World Am in Myrtle Beach. I do not know which courses yet, but should be a blast. Aside from that, those are the only golf trip plans, unless I play while on vacation in Destin in June.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...