Jump to content
IGNORED

Non Conforming Drivers 2008


Wood
Note: This thread is 5558 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Looks like Taylor Made is taking a hit here .....

Sorry if this is old news...
In The Bag
Ping Rapture 10.5* Aldila Proto 65-S
Sonartec SS 3.5 19* 5W Fuji Tour Platform Stiff
Mizuno MP-30 3-PW
Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54.10*, 60.04*Odyssey White Hot 2 BallTitleist Pro V1x
Link to comment
Share on other sites


What exactly is it that makes a driver non-conforming? I compared conforming and non-conforming drivers side by side and couldn't tell the difference. Also, does it only apply to drivers or are there also non-conforming fairway woods, irons, putters, etc.?

In myBagBoy Revolver: HiBore XL 10.5° ⢠HiBore 3W ⢠Halo 2i, 3i & 4i
MX900 5-PW ⢠MP-R 52-07° & 58-10° ⢠Studio Select Squareback 1

Carl Spackler: This is a hybrid. This is a cross of Kentucky Bluegrass, Featherbed Bent, and Northern California Sensemilia. The amazing stuff...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How do I know that my Hibore XL is conforming/ nonconforming? The Hibore XL stands on both lists..

I both mine from www.rockbottomgolf.com Can somebody help me?

Laws of golf :
LAW 3: Brand new golf balls are water-magnetic. Though this cannot be proven in the lab, it is a known fact that the more expensive the golf ball, the greater its attraction to water.

LAW 8: Topping a 3-iron is the most painful torture known to man.
In my stand bag:Driver: HiBore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I was looking over the list of non-conforming drivers and had a question arise. Is it possible that in a couple years, my driver will be non-conforming? Or is it more of a, "once it works, it always works" type of thing?

What's In My Slingshot OSS Bag.

Driver: Sasquatch 460
Fairway: Sasquatch 3-wood
Irons: Idea A2 OS 3-PWWedge: Vokey Spin Milled Sand WedgePutter: Melbourne II

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 year later...
I See that several players stated that they can find no difference in performance between thier conforming and non-conforming clubs....
Wow! Really? I have recorded great differences between my conforming clubs(cobra F-speed, Taylor Made R7, Krank El-Diablo) and my Non-conforming Taylor Made R7 (COR .865) and Yamaha Inpres GRX(COR.880).
To make a long story short My max swing speed is 147 mph and my average tee box swing speed is 126 mph. My max speed is only attainable at the range when I have been working on my timing for hours at a time.
The last time I tested all my drivers side by side I hit 20 balls with each club and only recorded the 10 fastest swing speeds with each. I used pinnacle exceptions with all clubs. I used a radar swing sensor for clubhead speeds and a Garmin Golf Logix for distances. I found that my Conforming clubs performed as follows:
R-7 averaged 297 yards at 227 mph swing
Cobra F-Speed 291 yards at 225 mph swing but much more accurrate
Krank El Diablo 296 yards average but my swings never got over 226 mph with an average of 222 mph.

Non-conforming clubs performed as follows:

Taylor Made R-7 COR .865 averaged 319 yards at 226 mph average swing speed.
Yamaha GRX Inpres .880 COR averaged 333 yards at 227 mph average swing.

This test needs to be performed again and under a variety of conditions but the results are pretty amazing.
The difference between my shortest club and longhest club was 42 yards! Is that a 14% increase? My math sucks... But still, pretty darned noticable!
I think the key to getting results from a Non-conforming club is to get your club head speed up there!
Cheers,
BigBallSmasher
Link to comment
Share on other sites


220+ mph swing speeds? Hmmmm. A club swung at that kind of speed would not be conforming after impact. It would be "broken."

RC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How many Ping drivers made the list...oh, that's right. None.

Ping respects the game over greed and profit.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How many Ping drivers made the list...oh, that's right. None.

Actually the more logical and sensible interpretation of the data is that PING is not willing to push the limits in research and technology and their clubs perform well under the factor thresholds that determine whether a club is conforming or non-conforming.

I don't see how greed and profit come into play here.
Taylormade R9 TP 9.5*w/ Diamana Kai'li 70 S (SST PURE)
Callaway FT 3 Wood
Adams Pro Black Hybrid 20* w/ Voodoo NV8 S
MP-68 3-PW irons w/ KBS Tour X-flex (softstepped 1x)
Cleveland CG-12 52.10Cleveland CG-15 DSG 56.08 Vokey Limited Edition 60-V w/ KBS black nickel S-FlexCircle T Beached Center Shaft...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Actually the more logical and sensible interpretation of the data is that PING is not willing to push the limits in research and technology and their clubs perform well under the factor thresholds that determine whether a club is conforming or non-conforming.

or not. The v.p. and C.E.O. of Ping (the creator of the company's son) had this to say...(a few years ago), but it still holds value.

"Someone took advantage of a slight difference between the R&A; and the USGA to market their clubs,'' said John Solheim, chairman and CEO of Ping Golf. " It's too bad they had to sacrifice the game for financial goals .'' from: http://www.golftoday.co.uk/news/year.../callaway.html

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Actually the more logical and sensible interpretation of the data is that PING is not willing to push the limits in research and technology and their clubs perform well under the factor thresholds that determine whether a club is conforming or non-conforming.

No, but they're willing to sue the USGA over grooves... I don't think Ping's the saint their lack of "non-conforming drivers" implies.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No, but they're willing to sue the USGA over grooves... I don't think Ping's the saint their lack of "non-conforming drivers" implies.

Ping is not

making (for sale) the grooves-within-grooves clubs yet. They are not putting them out there against the rules, then waiting for a reaction. They are testing the USGA with their design ideas to see if they will be approved. They are not boldly in the face of the USGA. If they produced the clubs and sold them after the USGA/R&A; declared them nonconforming – THEN they would be hypocritical – but as it is - they are just testing the waters (on paper ).

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Ping is not

Are you relatively new to the game? I was referring to 1990.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Are you relatively new to the game? I was referring to 1990.

No.

Are you referring to the Ping Eye 2 Square groove issue? Ping sued beacuse the USGA declared the grooves illegal and banned them from USGA play after years of them being perfectly legal. They reached a settlement and the ban on the "illegal" groves was lifted, without the USGA admitting to vilolating anti-trust laws, but the clubs were grandfathered back in. Ping never went around any USGA rule or blatantly ignored any rule to try to sell more clubs. They just defended what was legal in the first place.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Are you referring to the Ping Eye 2 Square groove issue?

This is off-topic, so I'll keep it short. Obviously I was referring to that, I know what went down, and I lost respect for Ping because of it. I thought they handled it poorly.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5558 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    • Ah ok I misunderstood. But you did bring to light an oversight on my part.
    • I was agreeing with you/jumping off from there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...