<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Official: USGA Proposing Groove, Club Adjustability Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesandtrap.com/rules/its_official_usga_proposing_groove_club_adjustability_rules/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesandtrap.com/extras/rules/its_official_usga_proposing_groove_club_adjustability_rules</link>
	<description>Golf News, Reviews, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:05:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Waddell</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/extras/rules/its_official_usga_proposing_groove_club_adjustability_rules#comment-4535</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Waddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/extras/rules/its_official_usga_proposing_groove_club_adjustability_rules#comment-4535</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;4525&quot;]Interesting to see what club designers will come up with to take advantage of the new adjustibility rule.[/quote]
And that&#039;s indeed an interesting point. It would seem the proposed adjustibility rule may be something of a compromise or quid pro quo offer by the USGA to club makers.

On the one hand, they&#039;re saying to manufacturers, &quot;you&#039;re going to have to change your tooling and manufacturing process at great expense&quot; and on the other hand saying, &quot;this new adjustability rule would let you dream up all kinds of nifty ways to design and sell new products.&quot;

It&#039;s going to be extremely interesting to see the industry&#039;s reaction to these proposals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://thesandtrap.com/extras/rules/its_official_usga_proposing_groove_club_adjustability_rules#comment-4525">Donald MacKenzie said</a> on February 28, 2007:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://thesandtrap.com/extras/rules/its_official_usga_proposing_groove_club_adjustability_rules#comment-4525"><p>
Interesting to see what club designers will come up with to take advantage of the new adjustibility rule.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And that's indeed an interesting point. It would seem the proposed adjustibility rule may be something of a compromise or quid pro quo offer by the USGA to club makers.</p>
<p>On the one hand, they're saying to manufacturers, "you're going to have to change your tooling and manufacturing process at great expense" and on the other hand saying, "this new adjustability rule would let you dream up all kinds of nifty ways to design and sell new products."</p>
<p>It's going to be extremely interesting to see the industry's reaction to these proposals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald MacKenzie</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/extras/rules/its_official_usga_proposing_groove_club_adjustability_rules#comment-4525</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald MacKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/extras/rules/its_official_usga_proposing_groove_club_adjustability_rules#comment-4525</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see what club designers will come up with to take advantage of the new adjustibility rule. As for the grooves, this is actually a pretty good way to make a change that will impact highly skilled players (eg, the Tour) without hurting average players (who can&#039;t control or generate that much spin out of hte rough anyway).

I&#039;d much rather see them change the grooves than roll back the ball or impose more limits on drivers. Maybe this will put a little more of a premium on accuracy off the tee (or maybe not).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see what club designers will come up with to take advantage of the new adjustibility rule. As for the grooves, this is actually a pretty good way to make a change that will impact highly skilled players (eg, the Tour) without hurting average players (who can't control or generate that much spin out of hte rough anyway).</p>
<p>I'd much rather see them change the grooves than roll back the ball or impose more limits on drivers. Maybe this will put a little more of a premium on accuracy off the tee (or maybe not).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
