TheSandTrap.com › Golf Forum › The Pro Shop › Clubs, Grips, Shafts, Fitting › Master "Forged vs. Cast" or "Blade vs. Game-Improvement" Iron Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Master "Forged vs. Cast" or "Blade vs. Game-Improvement" Iron Thread - Page 72

post #1279 of 1292
Quote:
Originally Posted by x129 View Post

Well it depends on your definition of cool.

 

Aaayyyyyyyeeeeee!  Just call me "Fonzie".  My bag is pretty much evenly gaped from wedge to driver, and I am pretty consistent with what I have (so far).  None of my gear matches, except the irons.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by mosnas View Post

 In all honesty I don't care what category my clubs are in I hit them and they work thats all that matters to me.

 

 

I am the same.  I could care less what others think about my bag composition.

post #1280 of 1292

i bought MB's to force me to improve my game,....it worked, sort of, its amazing how quickly you get bored of the club vibrating your hands off and learn to hit it off centre

post #1281 of 1292

OK, OK, everybody. Blades, musclebacks, whatever. I still say they are playable for anybody if you stay away from the 2-4. I have some 1998 Hogan Apex's, a set of Red Lines, and a set of Grinds that are each a pure joy. 

post #1282 of 1292

I got a Mizzuno MP-58 6 Iron off ebay to see how I can hit it.  Its got a regular shaft and I usually use stiff.

 

So far, I find that my mishits with the MP58 tend to be MUCH straighter, but shorter and lower, compared to my Burner (2009) irons.  I can hit it further with the burners, but the lofts are a jacked so I don't know that that's a fair comparison.  I would say that the biggest difference is that if I mishit the Burners I still get a lot of distance, but it can fly way right or left which causes more trouble than a straight but short.  I also hit it much higher with the burners.  

 

When I tried to shape it, I could bend it MORE with the Burners, but more predictably with the MP58s.  

 

Is this normal?  It makes me think I might be better off with more of a player's style iron.

post #1283 of 1292

How about we coin a new term: Blayd - any player's iron that has a thin top line, thin sole, small head, minimal offset, and is responsive to the player's swing and provides optimal feedback, regardless of the configuration of the backside?

 

dsc, I think you would enjoy a set of blayds. Come join the Dark Side!

post #1284 of 1292

Blavities?

post #1285 of 1292
Quote:
Originally Posted by moparman426 View Post

Blavities?

 

"Blayd" and "Blavity" are terms for referring to blade-like cavity backs.

post #1286 of 1292

Nice! Or maybe..

 

Muscle cavities?

 

Cavitades?

post #1287 of 1292
Or you could just go with a new word altogether.
post #1288 of 1292

post #1289 of 1292

Gaijan, one person's opinion never really counts as "proof" of anything.

 

He hit clubs with two different designs. MP-53 vs. JPX-800? C'mon.

post #1290 of 1292

i know the difference between cast and forged. and even after reading something, which mentioned placing cast and forged irons in tour players hands without manufacturer names. In the end, feel is really no different. Although my opinion is a bit unbiased. forged irons are softer in coposition, but tend to have a little more "solid" feel even when hit pure. now notice i said solid. NOT "hard". i remember having my first set of cast irons. reasons i gave them to my dad and then bought the forged irons i have now is because i had no idea what i did wrong when i hit the face. slightly off center in either direction (heel-toe) felt like it was hit perfectly. i also couldnt control flight, or even distance very well.

 

with my forged irons i can do the things i struggled with before. i can now lay off of a pitching wedge and the distance actually be less with much better control. when i hit offcenter i can tell. i can even tell before i see the flight if i push or pulled the shot. (mostly pushed shots as the forged cavity back with minimal offset and might be a bit toe weight, does tend to prevent "the big hook"

 

My biggest question is the difference between a carbon cast wedge (8620) and a forged wedge (1018). now i know this can vary. bounce loft and so on.

 

the reason i picked 1018 is because im considering getting a scratch wedge. preference in finding the budget route, seeing scratch sell the 1018 for 179 bucks! WHOA!

 

not many companies actually do forged techniques anymore. its too time consuming and there are other less expensive, faster ways of making a club respond the same. its really all because of the supply and demand. as well as the new grooves rule which i mention next.

 

saying that the 8620 and 1018 have the same bounce/sole grind combination, shaft, shaft flex, and grip. What exactly are the differences? ive been told that 8620 is also being used because it holds up better which is always for tour players given the groove stipulations being enforced.meaning it might feel a bit more solid than a softer forging comparison. its nice that scratch almost gives us the exact version of each type for us to kindve give us the ability to create an opinion.

post #1291 of 1292

Been contemplating the switch to a forged CB or MB iron.  I hit 20 balls each with the Callaway X Forged and Mizuno MP 60 today.  Both had fairly similar results and felt great but I'm not sure which one to get... Ugh!

post #1292 of 1292

A buddy of mine who has honed his game to the mini tour point told me to get a old MB 3 iron and learn how to consistently hit it pure. He says when you can hit that pure every time, you can hit anything.....

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Clubs, Grips, Shafts, Fitting
TheSandTrap.com › Golf Forum › The Pro Shop › Clubs, Grips, Shafts, Fitting › Master "Forged vs. Cast" or "Blade vs. Game-Improvement" Iron Thread