Scotty Cameron Putters--I don't get it
Clearly there is something here, because every other guy on tour uses one, and they seem to be in almost every bag of premier equipment you see at your local club on the weekends. But I just don't get the Scotty Cameron putters.
Back in the 80s, Ping putters (anser, mostly), Bulls Eye, and Wilson 8802 were in everyone's bag.
In the 90s, it was still mostly Ping--but Odyssey reigned for a while late in that decade.
Now, it's all Cameron. Putters used to cost about $75, and the price gap between a top-of-the-line and the others was maybe 40-50%. In the 2000s, most putters were about $100-$125, and Cameron was the only one (of the mainstream brands) charging crazy $200+ prices. Now, the Camerons are in the $250-$350 range, and an Oddyssey or Ping costs you about $160--but you can still get a Wilson blade for $99.
It's still just a putter. Remember that crazy football-sized thing that Nicklaus used in the '86 masters? Ben Crenshaw used an 8802 style putter most of his career, and he's one of the best putters of all time.
Someone please explain why we need to pay over $300 for a putter, when the only technical specs that matter are a square, flat face and steady hands.