Jump to content
IGNORED

Question About My Draw Flight Pattern


Note: This thread is 5699 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I've unintentionally developed a slight draw with my irons this season. Result of learning to make better contact with the ball and grooving a swing with blades. However, I still want the boring ball flight that I used to have. Now, I know many people like hitting draws, however, I hate not being able to aim exactly where I plan to land the ball. As in, my draw is not a push draw, it leaves the club face straight on line, then slightly draws to the left. So, if I want to play this shot, I have to aim right. Does anyone else have this issue or concern? Is this even a proper draw pattern? Thanks!

Driver:  R11S 10.5°, Fairway Woods:  909 F2 15.5°, Hybrid:  G10 21°

Irons:  Tour Preferred MC 4-P, Wedges:  Vokey SM 52.08, 56.10, 60.04

Putter:  Tei3 Newport II / Circa 62 #3, Ball:  Pro V1X / NXT Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's kind of a mini-hook. You are flipping the club slightly over at impact thus giving you that path. I've got the same issue.

A draw would start right of your intended line and then come back left to your target.
WITB

Driver - Taylormade r7 Quad 10.5˚ Fujijura E360 Stiff
Woods - Sonartec SS 2.5 13˚ HST Penley Tour Stiff
Hybrid - Sonartec HB-001 19˚ HST Penley Tour StiffIrons - Mizuno MP-67 Forged 4-PW, DGS300Wedges - Callaway Forged 50˚ and 54˚, Walter Hagen 60˚Putter - Nike T130 O/S Mallet Ctr Shaft 33"B...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's kind of a mini-hook. You are flipping the club slightly over at impact thus giving you that path. I've got the same issue.

Isn't that semantic? If he expected the intended line to be a little more left, wouldn't that "fix" his "mini-hook"?

It's the same thing. But you might be right; he might be "flipping" the club (I hate that term though; it's so inadequate). In other words, he might be forcing the club through the impact area with his hands, instead of allowing it to release naturally, or he might be releasing it too soon. Another thing that will certainly work is to weaken the grip (turn the club face out a smidge). You may need this adjustment. Ben Hogan needed it. If the release is off, it's better to fix that first though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


So what I gather is that for a traditional "draw" flight, you shouldn't have to make any aiming adjustments because the ball will start out right, and draw back on line? Does that mean I should have a slightly open clubface at impact?

Driver:  R11S 10.5°, Fairway Woods:  909 F2 15.5°, Hybrid:  G10 21°

Irons:  Tour Preferred MC 4-P, Wedges:  Vokey SM 52.08, 56.10, 60.04

Putter:  Tei3 Newport II / Circa 62 #3, Ball:  Pro V1X / NXT Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So what I gather is that for a traditional "draw" flight, you shouldn't have to make any aiming adjustments because the ball will start out right, and draw back on line? Does that mean I should have a slightly open clubface at impact?

Frankly I think he got you all confused. A draw is a mini-hook is a draw, same thing *. You can try several things to alter it if you don't like it. For instance, you can open your club face via weakening your grip, or you can work on a more natural (later) release. You can even hold off on your release, although I don't recommend this because a good swing will allow you to fully release the club.

*The only difference is your expectations. Since you expect your ball to go straight, the draw catches you off guard. If over time you end up expecting the draw, then you'll naturally aim a little right to compensate. Same thing!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


So long as it's 90% consistent does it really matter? No it doesn't. Many years ago I was taught by a former tour player who won many tournaments down here in Australia and who played for quite a lot of years on the PGA tour in the 70's and the first thing he talked to me about was developing a "stock" shot. One where you can stand over the ball and know where it is going to go and what shape it will take getting there. He told me that if it worked out to be a draw or a fade it wasn't the most important thing, the most important thing was that I could repeat the pattern over and over.

I ended up going with a right to left ball flight as it was more natural to me and it has worked out well. I know that I am not going to lose a shot to the right, occasionally I'll block one but it happens so infrequently that I don't even think about it. If the pin is in the middle of the green I just aim at the right edge of the green, if the pin is left edge I can aim at the middle of the green or if the pin is cut right I can aim at it and know I'll be in the middle of the green. If the pin is cut hard left and there is trouble on that side, I can just start it at the middle of the green or the right edge. It's all about what you are used to doing. Similar scenario when driving, I'll generally just start it out at the right edge of the fairway and know that I have 30 or 40 yards to bring it back in to.

I can hit the ball left to right if I want to but I'll only do it if there is a specific reason, otherwise I just stick with what I know is predictable.

So basically I don't think that there is any correct ball flight, a fade is no better than a draw, they both have their advantages and disadvantages in my opinion. The one that IS BEST is the one that is most comfortable to you and you can repeat continuously. Either way if you practice and play often enough then unless you are dumber than dogsh*t you'll work out a way to get yourself around any golf course with either shot pattern. It's when you have no idea which way it's going to go that you'll find yourself in trouble.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


So long as it's 90% consistent does it really matter? No it doesn't. Many years ago I was taught by a former tour player who won many tournaments down here in Australia and who played for quite a lot of years on the PGA tour in the 70's and the first thing he talked to me about was developing a "stock" shot. One where you can stand over the ball and know where it is going to go and what shape it will take getting there. He told me that if it worked out to be a draw or a fade it wasn't the most important thing, the most important thing was that I could repeat the pattern over and over.

Well Said. I agree

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thanks for everyone's input! Let me elaborate a little further on the technical aspect of my swing. Hopefully that will shed some more light.

I have developed a consistent flight pattern of being boring. However, I am encountering a slight draw as I'm trying to add more distance to my mid to long irons. I am adding distance by trying to deliberately hit more down at the ball, and this has created a much more piercing trajectory, thus longer carry. What I feel is happening is that because of the more descending blow, I am hooding the club face at impact with my already inside-out swing plane. So it either starts out online then draws, or could be a slight pull. I am toying with it because it adds around 5-10 yards to my 3-6 irons. This swing is more of a "driving range" swing as I have not used it out on the course. I'm just trying to understand draws better (thus posing the question) before actually using it.

So, here are my follow up questions. Somehow this "hitting down at the ball" strategy works best with mid-long irons, but not as well with short irons or woods (obviously). Is it just me or do you also have different (default) swings for different types of clubs in your bag? Also, how do you develop a proper release of the club?

Driver:  R11S 10.5°, Fairway Woods:  909 F2 15.5°, Hybrid:  G10 21°

Irons:  Tour Preferred MC 4-P, Wedges:  Vokey SM 52.08, 56.10, 60.04

Putter:  Tei3 Newport II / Circa 62 #3, Ball:  Pro V1X / NXT Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well to me it just sounds like maybe a combination of things.

1) Your grip might have grown to be a bit too strong. Since your ball starts on the line your feet and body are on your swing path is pretty good, just your club face is a bit closed to that line.

2) Having the ball closer to the middle of your stance is going to allow you to trap the ball better which gives you a nice piercing ball flight but is also puts on a slight draw spin because you're catching the ball earlier in your swing while your club is going inside to out more then if you hit the ball later in your swing when it is more square or even later when it is a little outside to in.

Maybe reduce one of those things to see if it helps. If you like your grip the way it is then maybe try moving the ball just slightly forward in your stance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I actually have a pretty weak grip with my right hand. The "V" is pointing straight up at my face.

Ball position is definitely one of the factors. I've been tinkering with it lately as well. Too many variables right now, in terms of how upright I stand and how far apart are my feet (used to be too far apart). Everything is open to change for me right now. A little exciting and frustrating at the same time...

Driver:  R11S 10.5°, Fairway Woods:  909 F2 15.5°, Hybrid:  G10 21°

Irons:  Tour Preferred MC 4-P, Wedges:  Vokey SM 52.08, 56.10, 60.04

Putter:  Tei3 Newport II / Circa 62 #3, Ball:  Pro V1X / NXT Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5699 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 4/6* ⬛🟦🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟦 🟧⬛🟧🟧🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 par is good after a double bogey yesterday.
    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...