Jump to content
IGNORED

hi tech golf lessons


flopdarock
Note: This thread is 5542 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

so both of my brothers are taking hi tech golf lessons...
one is going to golftec and the other is going to clubgolf...
i on the other hand have been going old school and just have my local pro put me thru my paces...
basically my brothers are being filmed with ultra slow mo camera's like the ones they show on tv... a pro breaks down their swings with a computer almost frame by frame... the views are from front and right... they also put them side by side with a pro players video and compare the two... everything is analyzed on a launch monitor at the same time with data being shown during the swing... its pretty incredible and they are showing huge leaps in improvement...
the only drawback i see from this... is its really expensive...
if i had the money id definately do this... plus nobody in my area does this so id have to travel... im really competitive with my brothers and i feel this is going to put me behind... hahaha

does anyone here do this? or would anyone shell out the cash if this was available to you?
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I live in Georgia and we have the PGA Superstore where they give lessons, it's 200 for 6 one hour lessons. It sounds very similar to what you have described with cameras, pro comparisons, launch angles, club head speed, ball speed etc. I went for a lesson this week and it helped tremendously. It's amazing to see what you look like while swinging. Often, what you think you're doing and what you are doing are completely different. In addition, it's amazing what a camera can see that a pro on the range can't. I would definitely spring for them if you can find them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


200 bucks is a steal... as compared to 750 for 10 lessons... heck my pro charges 40 bucks per... if we had a pga store here... id jump on that deal in a heartbeat...
i saw a vid of my bro's swing pre lesson... and with my eyes i couldnt see too many flaws until i saw the pro's breakdown of his swing... i mean you can really see whats going on during the breakdown...
one brother is a single digit hcp and the other is about my level... now i feel i have to step up my game just to compete
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Wow $200 for 6 is a great price. I took about 10 lessons with the film and all. I loved it. Found it extremely helpful. I some ways I think it depends on if you're a feel or technical player. Mine ran about $90 for an hour session.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm not sure these are considered high tech golf lessons since they are almost the norm now.

I use 2 camera software to get video from 2 angles to see what is going on. I only use this to see how the shaft and clubhead travel because you can see how the arms and body work without the need for a camera.

in the winter I conduct my lessons in a simulator (aboutgolf) which gives us great info, ie: ball speed, clubhead speed, launch angle and spin rates.

I think the 'really' high tech stuff comes with a 3D analysis (zenolink.com) and the use of the balance system, which analyzes the pressure under your feet.

For the majority of players, a camera and 3D and ground force plates are not necessary as there are things that can be improved prior to taking this route. Depending on the players' learning style, a camera may be what it takes for the golfer to see what they are doing to get a better mental image of what they are currently doing and what the 'new feel' actually looks like. Remember.. what you feel is not real.

Even with all this high tech golf equipment and the million training aids that are out there, we are still seeing instructors work on the effect, not the cause. If your pro is identifying WHY you are doing something, and tackle THAT issue, then the club and shaft will respond and travel down better lines and paths. Root causes could be body limitations, muscle imbalances, or the simple fact that you have never performed the correct movement before. This is the easy part.... If the root cause is something neurological then more discussion is needed and less hitting golf balls. For instance, maybe the player that is coming over the top thinks that he needs to get the clubhead moving fast Right away, leading to throwaway and losing all leverage angles. In this case, the neurological issue is simply the Wrong idea on how to swing the club. Once this player understands the proper procedure and gets the right information, then the swing changes.

you can't change you swing from day to day but you can change you ideas
Link to comment
Share on other sites


When I was searching for a pro I did a walk-through of a Golf-Tec store, while I was impressed with what they offered, I decided it was not how I wanted to learn to swing the club.

Always thinking about or knowing certain numbers relating to degrees of hip turn, degrees of spine angle, using beeps to make sure you are getting to the right ammount of turn or in the right positions definately has advantages but there is a down side as well.

For my personality, knowing the numbers would probably hinder more than help. It would put something into my head that is only marginally relevent. I am an engineer so I can easily focus on the numbers and forget all about feel.

I have put my trust into a PGA pro that uses video as a minor aid. We look at the video 1-2 times per hour lesson, only when it helps the swing explaination.

I think the biggest thing that has driven my improvement is trusting the pro and practicing what he was offering and only that. If it takes high tech for someone to focus on the pro's recommendations, then go for the tech.

Regards,
-E

In my Grom bag:

Driver........... Burner 9.5* S-Flex
3-Wood......... Burner 15* S-Flex
5-Wood......... Ovation 18* S-FlexIrons............. Pro Combos 3,5-PW Rifle 6.0Wedges......... CG12 52.10, 56.14, 60.10Putter............ 33" VP1 Milled PutterBall................ e6+ or B330-SRangefinder.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


When I was searching for a pro I did a walk-through of a Golf-Tec store, while I was impressed with what they offered, I decided it was not how I wanted to learn to swing the club.

my brother(the low hcp one) is also an engineer... he also didnt like the golftec deal... but his complaint wasnt the hi tech gear... it was more against the actual pro's teaching there... seems they are stuck to a script... so he goes to clubgolf... he's all about the hi tech... he's just a nerd like that... hahaha

my other brother(military guy) likes golftec and is sticking with them
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Always thinking about or knowing certain numbers relating to degrees of hip turn, degrees of spine angle, using beeps to make sure you are getting to the right ammount of turn or in the right positions definately has advantages but there is a down side as well.

you're right. its completely irrelevant to YOUR learning. Angles are related to body structure and all players are different.

As an engineer, it seems you can learn easily with angles, geometry, and physics. Have you heard of the Golfing Machine? I loved math and science and this is the way that my brain works. I can't talk to my players this way but for me.. it makes sense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


you're right. its completely irrelevant to YOUR learning. Angles are related to body structure and all players are different.

I suppose you are right. If I did not easily understand the geometry and physics of the swing I would probably be slightly more focused on it. That part comes easily to me.

I guess I struggle more with the feel portion, that I perceive as more important on the course because there the only feedback you get is your result and how the swing feels. What I was trying to get at is that if you are overly tech focused on your swing it can cloud your mind on the course unless you find a way to trust it and do it by feel to some degree. The core of math and science has little use for trust and there is a tendency to measure, analyse, over analyse, state error, find standard deviation... This in my opinion can lead to poor results on the course if there is not balance with trust of what you learned from all the tech. By no means I am trying to dissuade anyone from using tech to improve your swing, just playing the other side of the coin.

In my Grom bag:

Driver........... Burner 9.5* S-Flex
3-Wood......... Burner 15* S-Flex
5-Wood......... Ovation 18* S-FlexIrons............. Pro Combos 3,5-PW Rifle 6.0Wedges......... CG12 52.10, 56.14, 60.10Putter............ 33" VP1 Milled PutterBall................ e6+ or B330-SRangefinder.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


... I perceive as more important on the course because there the only feedback you get is your result and how the swing feels.

For sure. its all about feel for the majority of players.

As a competitive player, I can speak more about the feel than the mechanics because I have been feeling it for longer than I have been analyzing it. As a player, its your job to search for the feel and I think that the instructor should be able to analyze the science...... but only in their head. When a pro starts talking about science, they are enjoying the sound of their own voice. I love to talk science but only with those that can talk back. Otherwise, it only confuses. Has anyone been through a 3D swing analysis? I think the most common tools is the Kvest
Link to comment
Share on other sites


For sure. its all about feel for the majority of players.

ima full blown nerd and just love anything techy...

feel to me is a tough translation... for me feel comes after i understand mechanics and actually "get it"... because what "felt" good was not right... i was topping everything when it felt right... ive been told by pros that if you make a swing change it should feel unnatural to you and until you get that muscle memory to become second nature... feel is the last thing you should trust even if the result seems good... im not knocking guys who are feel players cuz i have a friend that is just a natural athlete... he could care less about the how's and why's as long as his ball goes where he wants it... i would love to check out some 3d swing analysis... but i bet the cost would be astronomical... how cool would it be to have an avatar that looked just like you on twgolf on the playstation... hahaha
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing
Link to comment
Share on other sites


feel to me is a tough translation... for me feel comes after i understand mechanics and actually "get it"... because what "felt" good was not right...

There's a fine line between learning the mechanics from feel or learning the feel through mechanics . Everyone is different, that's why an instructor should be dynamic and be able to coach from different viewpoints. The best mechanical instruction guide is the golfing machine but I think it's taboo on this site... which may not be the worst idea. Most players get confused by what is really going on. From my playing days, I always had a little bend to my left arm, but it didn't really matter too much. I could still compete. People who thought they knew how to teach told me to keep my left arm straight. That doesn't work for me. Applying pressure to my left thumb through force in my right palm extended my left arm to give an onlooker the appearance of a straight arm. I have always wondered what part of 'pop' golf instruction came from what an onlooker wants to see and what a player wants to accomplish. My favorite is "keep your head still". A golfer thinking "keep my head still" will feel very tight and it may stay very still... in relation to his shoulders and neck, but an onlooker will see it move. For this onlooker to see a 'stationary head' the player may feel like it has to move a little to give this appearance. This should make you think of every tip you have even received... who is trying to accomplish something here??? the coach or the player. When the coach gives a player advice on how to do something that also gives the coach what he's looking for... then you get results.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


im going to have to google the golfing machine... i think i remember seeing it somewhere... but im not sure if its what youre talking about... i dont think they have any around here... but ive always been curious about any kind of gadgets... even if its not golf related... you should see my kitchen... hahaha
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5542 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    • Ah ok I misunderstood. But you did bring to light an oversight on my part.
    • I was agreeing with you/jumping off from there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...