Jump to content
IGNORED

18-Hole Playoffs


iacas
Note: This thread is 6489 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Do you like the U.S. Open's 18-hole playoff system?

    • Yes, it's great.
      6
    • No, it should do something like the PGA, British, or Masters.
      6
    • No, but here's how it should be... (explain below)
      1
    • I don't care one way or the other.
      0


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
I like it. I think it's the fairest of any system, and since only true golf fans care who wins anyway, they'll watch or find out while everyone else is off the hook.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I like the sudden death playoffs

I didn't find the LPGA playoff on any channels I have
I don't care to wait another day for results
I'm usually busier on Mondays
I find it's boring - too long, loses excitment (especially when one takes off with a lead)

Sudden death: you still have the energy from the 18th hole finish, not a memory of it, and players have to perform immediately. There's no room for error; every shot is more critical than in any full round. It seems to be the most logical progression off of a round, too.

I suppose the other side might say it's unfair, but there is no true 'fairness' (if such a thing really existed) in any sport, much less golf. If you want to judge a player's ability to perform under pressure, immediatly, where they cannot reason away a bad shot with a half-assed disappointment, an almost mulligan mentality, sudden death style is the more obvious answer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Sudden death: you still have the energy from the 18th hole finish, not a memory of it, and players have to perform immediately. There's no room for error; every shot is more critical than in any full round. It seems to be the most logical progression off of a round, too.

I disagree. I could beat Tiger Woods in one hole of golf (not often, but I could). But over 18 there's no way in hell. Not even if he played left-handed, probably.

So I like 18 because, like Tatum said, "we're trying to identify the best golfer." Not the one who gets the lucky bounce or roll in a hole or two of sudden death.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't like the 18 hole playoff at all. True, it does decide who's the best golfer -- but I think it decides who's the best golfer on that particular Monday. All of the momentum a player has built up on Sunday afternoon can disappear overnight, or it gives a limping horse a chance to catch its breath and regroup. I think that after 72, they should get right back out there and finish up. Not to mention the logistical nightmare for the fans... and let's face it; there are a lot of true golf fans that just can't swing it in their schedules to watch an 18-hole playoff.

I don't agree with sudden death playoffs because it feels like they're nullifying the 72 holes that led up to it. It's like an OT game in the NFL -- whoever wins the coin toss only has to drive it to the 35 to end the game. A lot of the time, it's anticlimatic. Also, say someone goes low in the final round, and has to play the waiting game for all the other players to come in. That guy's momentum has been halted with only one hole to regain it.

But the sudden death playoff still has a place in golf though (see below).

I prefer the three or four hole playoff; it gives the players a chance to continue (or change) momentum. A player can recover from a bogey, a player can still get sloppy on the last hole. There could be multiple lead changes. A three or four hole playoff can be completed in less than one hour. It'd be compelling television, and great for the gallery in attendance.

And should the tournament still not be decided after the three or four hole playoff, THEN go to sudden death.

Then if that doesn't work... chicken with golf carts.

"I played like shit." -Greg Norman after the '96 Masters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm not a big fan of the 18-hole playoff. Like the guy above me said, the tournament should be determined on Sunday (weather and daylight permitting of course).

I don't like the one-hole playoff either. Like Erik said, any golfer can get a lucky bounce and win any given hole.

I like the three-hole playoff or four-hole playoff. They give golfers plenty of chances to hit great shots and plenty of chances to hit bad shots.

It's just better to find out who your champion is an hour after they finish 72 holes instead of having to wait until the next day. And besides, I always have to work on Monday and end up hearing the results before getting the chance to watch it for myself. That sucks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it is the most legitamate way to find the best golfer. But from a viewers standpoint it stinks to have to wait another day to find out who the winner is; especially if I am unable to watch on Monday.

So a 3 or 4 hole playoff that would move to sudden death if still tied would work well enough for me.

However, if things had been a bit different on the 18th of the Men's Open we would have had a Phil - Monty - Ogilvy - Furyk - Harrington match. Now we all know that didn't happen, and the odds against something like that happening are astronomical, but that would have been a hell of a thing to see. I would have called in sick :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites


In a sudden death playoff all you need is one good swing and you win. In an 18 hole playoff it take a few more than one and the best player will eventually win.

What's in my bag
Driver: Taylor Made R7 425 9.5 degrees UST Proforce 65 shaft
3 Wood: Taylor Made V Steel 15 degrees
Taylor Made Rescue Dual 22 degrees (UST IROD shaft)
Irons: Mizuno MP-67 (bent 1 degree upright)Gap Wedge: Mizuno R Series Black Nickle 52 Sand Wedge: Mizuno R Series Black Nickle...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6489 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Watched the whole season of Fallout. Loved it. It's got some warts but they absolutely nailed the feel of the universe. The best series I've watched since The Last of Us. 
    • This topic can be whatever you'd like it to be. If you're working with an instructor, you may have to mention it occasionally, but people will respect that and you can use this as a diary of sorts.
    • Look at Kevin trying to rationalize his small minority vote. 😄 
    • It's all good, man. I appreciate the discussion.   The hole slopes right, towards the penalty area. That's the part just past the cart path that isn't mowed. You can land a ball on the fairway that ends up in it if the ground is firm enough.  Everything that's brown in the satellite image isn't rough. It's fescue, which even during this time of year is tall enough that just finding a ball in it can be hard. Bunkers might as have red stakes around them - I read that in a book, once. So having set that table, here's what the shot cone looks like if I try to play for what you're suggesting: I just don't see that as the optimal play. I need to get out of there with no worse than 5, not try to make 3 and end up with 6 or more. It's a short hole and my strength is in my iron play. I'm actually oddly not much better from 50-100 yards than I am from 100-150 yards. It's like a 4% difference in green success rate and 8' closer in proximity. I don't see that as worth putting trouble into play off the tee for.
    • Day 137 & 138- Forgot to post yesterday but same thing. Slow,  short swings with short practice club. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...