Re: The Stack and Tilt Pattern
Originally Posted by
Avidgolfer999 
Oh no! He switched over!
Sure, for the most part I have. You realize you quoted me from 2007, right?
Originally Posted by
Avidgolfer999 
'bet he deletes this'

I would because it's largely off-topic and troll-y, but I think I can salvage some value by responding to myself. So here goes.
Remember, this post is from 2007...
Originally Posted by
iacas 
I've not really experimented with the "stacked swing" per se yet - I'll wait for the fad to pass and see if it's still being taught. After all, who's the highest ranked player using it? It ain't any of the top five or so.
It's still being taught. And the top five golfers in the world would probably still be the top five golfers in the world if you made them swing like Jeev Milkha Singh or something. Andy and Mike teach a lot of players on Tour - more than possibly anyone else. So there's a little comfort in numbers.
Originally Posted by
iacas 
I've seen it said in other places that people trying this "new swing" and proclaiming it to be super-wonderful may simply be short-circuiting their brain and kind of getting rid of a lot of their old bad habits.
I still think that's largely true for people who try to "adopt" a swing change on the range. It worked for Johnny Miller at the U.S. Open at Oakmont, after all. He short-circuited his brain by opening his stance way up that day.
Originally Posted by
iacas 
To those people, I wonder if they'll still be proclaiming this to be the be-all, end-all swing in three months after their old habits (and some new ones) have started to come back.
And lot of people, without
proper instruction, gave up on the swing. I sought proper instruction.
Originally Posted by
iacas 
Now, that's pretty much what I understand to be common of S&T: it's great for the irons, but for hybrids and particularly the longer fairway woods and drivers, it's tough to get elevation and to avoid the big old hooks.
I was wrong, or rather, what I read from people was wrong.
Originally Posted by
iacas 
It's tough to hit some kinds of shots (like the downhill lie) because the swing is so flat... that sort of stuff.
Also wrong.
Originally Posted by
iacas 
I'm not a fan of stack and tilt, but it's not a reverse pivot.
This quote comes from June of this year, when I was still relatively new in my education. It's a bit disingenous how you cobbled together quotes from several different years as one.
Anyway, change the first part now that I know more and have an education. The second part remains true. And my instructor did a good job of easing me into things.
Originally Posted by
iacas 
Also, more generally, I've been told it was originally designed for beginners because if you stay quite centered it's easier to deliver the club back to the ball fairly consistently.
Also true. But, duh, the same idea applies to skilled golfers too.
Originally Posted by
iacas 
My wife's learning it with my instructor, and it had a great impact very quickly. She's not going to ever (likely) be any better than a bogey golfer or anything like that, so a K.I.S.S. approach to golf will work for her, and S&T is fairly KISS and tends to deliver the club to the ball - not fat or thin - fairly easily.
Also true.
Originally Posted by
iacas 
I've never cared for the stack-and-tilt swing.
Because my opinion was based on misconceptions like:
Originally Posted by
iacas 
I don't like the lower trajectory, I don't like hitting draws, and everything I've seen says there are problems with S&T and the driver. A few of the S&T guys on Tour (Aaron Baddeley for one) are moving away from S&T.
Like all of those things. And apparently Aaron and Mike Weir never really did things properly anyway. Weir was better, but Aaron never could get things right. Even still, both improved their world ranking dramatically, and where's Aaron been since leaving...? His only two wins so far were when he was (quasi-)S&T.