Jump to content
IGNORED

Wood Lie Angles


Note: This thread is 3686 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I notice that almost no one makes woods and hybrids to anything but standard lie angles. Mizuno has made some hybrids which can be adjusted for lie, but that's all I've ever seen.

Trouble is, I'm 3° upright, and most modern woods have a flat sole. This spells trouble. I have resorted to pulling out old persimmon and late 90s steel fairway woods. These are much more reliable, even though they are tiny in comparison, they seem about ten times easier to hit. But they still go right on me, albeit not as much as an improperly fitted wedge (those must go 5-10° right!). Golf companies sell a hundred different models of woods, and they release a new one every few months, but they seem to forget that not everyone fits their "average" size. Not even custom component companies seem to make their woods in differing lie angles!

Does anyone make woods in different lie angles?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Some of of the older ping stuff I thought had the dot system

:callaway: BB Alpha 815 DBD 10.5* Rogue Silver 60 :callaway: x2hot 3deep 14.5* (TBD) :tmade: RSI UDI 20* RIP Tour 90 :bridgestone: J40CB 4-PW Steelfiber i95 :vokey: SM4 50* KBS Tour V :vokey: SM5 54* KBS 610 :vokey: SM5 58* KBS HI-REV 2.0 MannKrafted Handmade Custom

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have the same issues. I am a maroon dot Ping, which is 4.5* upright. Now in time my swing has flattened a good bit and they should be adjusted to probably around 2*. Anyway, back to your post. I think the Bobby Jones clubs have a rounded sole for the reason you describe. I am looking to add a 3W, and a 3 and 4 hybrid to my new bag I'm making up. I have really considered them for that reason (easier to hit on a steeper swing plane). Just a thought, I haven't heard any negatives on the clubs. As for the lie angles, I haven't compared them to standard. I've just been comparing different clubs to my Pings which are a degree or two different from standard on the hybrids.

Updated 2/7/10 - In my Revolver Pro bag:
Driver: G-10 10.5* TFC 129 Stiff flex 3-W: G-10 TFC129 Stiff flex
#2h(17*) Stiff Flex #3(21*) & #4(24*): Hybrid G-10 TFC129 Stiff flex
5-PW: MP32 (DG300)S flex Wedges 52-8, 56-14, and 60-04 Bobby Jones Wedges
Putter: Rossa Monte Carlo 35"Grips:...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have the same issues. I am a maroon dot Ping, which is 4.5* upright. Now in time my swing has flattened a good bit and they should be adjusted to probably around 2*. Anyway, back to your post. I think the Bobby Jones clubs have a rounded sole for the reason you describe. I am looking to add a 3W, and a 3 and 4 hybrid to my new bag I'm making up. I have really considered them for that reason (easier to hit on a steeper swing plane). Just a thought, I haven't heard any negatives on the clubs. As for the lie angles, I haven't compared them to standard. I've just been comparing different clubs to my Pings which are a degree or two different from standard on the hybrids.

I noticed the Bobby Jones clubs had a rounded sole as well. The TM Raylor also has a nice rounded sole. I think in the ping dot system I'm silver, I've hit silver dots and they were just perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Due to the design of bulge and roll in wood faces the lie angle has little effect on shot dispersion. You may need more bulge to increase the "gear effect" that causes side spin thus bringing your ball back in line.

KZG Gemini 9* Aldila Proto By You
Leyland COPlasma 3wd
Golfsmith Q4 19*
Louisville HyLofter 24*
Wishon 770CFEs w/Nippons
Alpha P2 wedges
Louisville EWP putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Due to the design of bulge and roll in wood faces the lie angle has little effect on shot dispersion. You may need more bulge to increase the "gear effect" that causes side spin thus bringing your ball back in line.

My problem is mostly the toe dragging on the turf. Most newer woods are flat bottomed, so the margin for error is not so great. I had my swing measured again today, and it turns out I'm only about 1-2° upright, my last set of clubs were just flat. That makes me feel a lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 4 years later...

I have had troubles getting clubs that fit being a 3.5 to 4 flat player especially woods and drivers.

I will say that i finally found some. Thomas was one company that claimed to and told me they bent my hybrids flat, but they did not. Wishon golf clubs however, are bendable! the 929hs woods can be bent 4 degrees upright or flat the hybrid 775hs can also be bent that much. If you need upright or flat hybrids and woods wishon is the way to go. They also have some bendable drivers! I have a 3 and 5 wood 4 degrees flat and a 4H at 3.5 flat. Those of you that struggle to find drivers,woods,and hybrids that need to be different from standard, there is finally an answer!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


A couple of things you might try. Caution: I don't know if they'll work.

Look at the GolfWorks component heads. The Tricept B3 FWs had sole bars that allowed adjustment of the face angle. (Last appeared in 2012 catalog). http://www.golfworks.com/

If you can find an OEM "tour van" at a local golf expo, see if they can make you a FW that's upright.

One of the advantages of the old persimmon headed woods was that a clubsmith could make you one 3* flat or upright just by how they planed the clubhead.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Funny that now, just a few years later, most OEM woods have fully adjustable lie angles.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3686 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,035 1/6 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Finally. Been waiting for this.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...