Jump to content
IGNORED

Tour Championship Qualifying


bradford
Note: This thread is 6372 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Did anyone see what Tom Pernice Jr. had to say about the three playoff events leading into next year's Tour Championship? He basically ripped the tour for have three events and not have the fields shrink. I couldn't agree more. I think it would make for much more interesting golf if players were eliminated after each event. Think the players involved would have to be much more focused and as a result we would see much better golf.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
I think it's a concession to the fact that Phil, Tiger, and some of the other big-name players won't play six out of seven weeks straight.

In other words, if Tiger skips a week and is thus ineligible for the Tour Championship or the rest of the playoffs, how exciting would that be?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think the fields should be 144 or whatever the number is for the playoffs. The top 50 or top 75 should get into the playoffs, with the top 30 moving on to The Tour Championship.

Anything close to 100 or over is just too much. That takes a lot of the "special" feeling out of the entire thing. In Nascar there are only 10 guys with a shot to win the Cup in their playoff system. The PGA Tour is different I know, but I'd put a premium on having a great year before the playoff starts rather than a mediocre year.

As it stands right now, I think the field should be cut down every week throughout the playoff like Pernice stated. If it was done the way I suggested, they wouldn't have to do it every week because the fields would already be unique enough.

Then again, Pernice isn't Vijay's henchman for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

How's this for hypothetical scenarios:

Field size over 7 weeks:
144
125
106
87
68
49
30

I would wittle the field down week by week based on their standings within the points system, culminating in the top 30 for the Tour Championship.

Or, if we really want to go outside the box, convert the Tour Championship to a 32-man match play finale. 16 matches on Thursday, 8 matches on Friday, quarters and semis on Saturday and the final match and consolation match on Sunday. While I realize the PGA Tour is pretty much based on stroke play, the hype and intensity could be raised enough among the players to make it a great end to the season.

Just a couple of random thoughts.

Scott Sandlin
ROLL TIDE!

Driver: Taylormade R7 425 10.5 deg, Stiff
Fairway: Taylormade R7 Steel 13 deg, Wilson Deep Red II Distance 18 deg, StiffIrons: Titleist 735.cm 3-PW, DG S300, +1.5", +4 deg upWedge: Titleist Vokey SM 53 deg and 59 degPutter: Scotty Cameron Santa Fe 33"Ball: Titleist...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Greetings

Quote From SSandlin "Or, if we really want to go outside the box, convert the Tour Championship to a 32-man match play finale. 16 matches on Thursday, 8 matches on Friday, quarters and semis on Saturday and the final match and consolation match on Sunday. While I realize the PGA Tour is pretty much based on stroke play, the hype and intensity could be raised enough among the players to make it a great end to the season." Yo, Scott - I had a similar thought. I have imagined what it might have been like if the PGA Tour had conducted the Tour Championship as a match-play "play-off" event from 2003 to 2006. The 32-man field would be the Top 32 on the Money List up to the start of the event. In case of pre-tournament withdrawals, the next available players on the Money List would be selected. And inside the box below - The Rules of the Chase. Brace yourself, as this is really quite a lot of info
None
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Wow, that's pretty much got it covered from nearly every angle. If this was posted somewhere else in the forum, then I do apologize for repeating it. I haven't had a chance to search through all of the posts yet.

While I don't really foresee this happening, what would the tour do if a big name like Tiger, Ernie, Retief or Vijay did not do well? I'm still trying to figure out the specifics of the points system that's being used, but if the big names are all at the bottom, how will that affect the tour? Will they use it to their advantage and promote that any golfer can win, or will they tweak the process to make sure it doesn't happen again?

Quickly, off topic and out of courtesy to Frank, there are only 2 more Saturdays to endure heartache and disappointment. Maybe there is light at the end of the crimson tunnel.

Scott Sandlin
ROLL TIDE!

Driver: Taylormade R7 425 10.5 deg, Stiff
Fairway: Taylormade R7 Steel 13 deg, Wilson Deep Red II Distance 18 deg, StiffIrons: Titleist 735.cm 3-PW, DG S300, +1.5", +4 deg upWedge: Titleist Vokey SM 53 deg and 59 degPutter: Scotty Cameron Santa Fe 33"Ball: Titleist...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


"While I don't really foresee this happening, what would the tour do if a big name like Tiger, Ernie, Retief or Vijay did not do well? I'm still trying to figure out the specifics of the points system that's being used, but if the big names are all at the bottom, how will that affect the tour? Will they use it to their advantage and promote that any golfer can win, or will they tweak the process to make sure it doesn't happen again?" - Scott

Good Point, Scott. I bet the Tour would cringe if the big players didn't make it. I can't really see Tiger losing a lot of match play tourneys though.

I think it would be cool to see the Tour put the big players through the grinder a bit. I think the big players get off way too easy. The not-so-big guys usually work pretty hard, but why not give Tiger, Phil, etc. (excluding Vij) a little challenge?

I remember the old British Am (I'm sure it's changed) was like 36 holes/day over four days. It seems your week-long qualifying would simulate that toughness a little. Why not watch them all sweat a little like the old players used to? I think the quarters, semis, and finals for that would be pretty intense.

Just a thought.

ps - does anyone know the current Brit Am system?
"Hit 'em hard - they'll land somewhere." - Stewart Maiden

In the Bag:

Driver: R480, 10.5*, Graphite5 Wood: R540 XD, 17.5*, GraphiteIrons: Big Bertha 4-10 + GW, SSWedge: 56*, Chrome, SSPutter: White HotBall: HX Hot
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Greetings ...

I have a couple of critisisms about the "X Kupp" deal.

First - I would prefer that the X Kupp Championship be decided with just one event, rather than with four events.

On the flip side, I can partially understand the PGA Tour's reasoning for the 4-event set-up. When you have one player dominating the Tour every year, and not much challenge from several would-be contenders - some talented, many more middle-of-the-pack - it doesn't make for a great season-ending finish. So the Tour has compensated for the would-bees, wanna-bees and not likely to-bees with this wacky 4-event X Kupp Insane-A-Thon. A peculiar rewarding of mediocrity, you might say.

Second - The First three X Kupp playoff events (excluding the finale at the Tour Championship) will be at the same venue (except the roaming BMW Championship) at the same point on the Tour schedule EVERY YEAR - just like the World Goof (pardon, Golf) Championships (WGC's). No other tournaments will be asked to share in the X Kupp Madness -- Again, just like the WGC's.

In effect, non-X Kupp and non-WGC tournaments are getting a treatment from PGA Tour Commish Tim Finchem that, while not like what has happened with LPGA Tour Commish Carolyn Bievens and some of that circuit's events, will not help in attracting high profile players. Why those tournaments, their corporate sponsors, the TV Networks and Ad agencies haven't figured THAT out is beyond me.

Thanx-A-Lot, Frank-0-Sport
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6372 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 119: 4/24/24 Chipping and pitching followed by putting through 50 mm gates.
    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...