Jump to content
IGNORED

static weight vs. swing weight?


Note: This thread is 4705 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

In trying to decide graphite vs. steel with my new iron set, and the weight is one area I'm trying to understand.

I've learned the difference between static weight and swing weight. As I understand it, static weight is what the shaft actually weighs and swing weight is the feel, or perceived weight during the swing. Correct me if I'm wrong, please.

So, if I understand correctly, as the static weight goes down, the swing weight will go up because the balance of the club is more toward the club head. Is this correct?

If I go with steel, I'm sure I'll want something lightweight. I'm not getting any younger and this investment will have to last for many years. So what is considered lightweight in a regular flex steel shaft?  85gms?

I've already considered the other pros and cons to steel vs. graphite, so this is just about weight. Thanks guys.

Burner 2.0 Graphite 4-AW
09 Burner 10.5*
08 #3 Burner 15*
09 Burner 3H
09 Burner 4H
TM-110 putter

Vokey 56.11
Titleist NXT 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Static weight would be the overall weight of the assembled club.  You are pretty much correct on swingweight.  Ralph Maltby describes swingweight as "the measurement of a golf club's weight about a fulcrum point which is established at a specified distance from the grip end of the club.", which is 14".  In one sense though, swingweight is a static measure of how the weight is distributed.

In most cases, as the static weight of a club goes up as the clubs get shorter (longer clubs = lighter weight, shorter clubs = heavier weight) due to the heads increasing in weight by 7g to 8g each.

Depending on how the clubs are built, the swingweight should be consistent throughout the set, or it will increase.  A set that is built as a swingweight matched set (as all big OEM's do) will generally have the same swingweight from long irons to short irons, and will differ in length by .500" increments. The swingweight will slightly increase in the wedges.  A set that is assembled as an MOI matched set will differ in length by .400", and will increase in swingweight by .5 from the long irons to the short irons.

My irons are built as an MOI matched set, are in .400" length increments, and the swingweights are D2.5 for the 3 iron, and increase .5 points up through the GW which is D6.5.

As for shaft weight, my set uses TT Lite XL shafts.  The 8 iron is built to 37".  The raw, uncut shaft weighed 128.5g, and when tipped and cut to playing length, it weighed 107.7g.  I imagine the average cut to length steel shaft will vary between 80g-120g range depending on the particular shaft.  Xcaliber makes na R flex graphite iron shaft that weighs 75g raw (@ 40"), and will weight less once tipped and cut to length.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Something else to keep in mind.... since graphite is lighter, graphite shafted irons are usually around .250" to .500" longer to keep the swingweight playable and comparable to steel shafted irons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Texas solo

In trying to decide graphite vs. steel with my new iron set, and the weight is one area I'm trying to understand.

I've learned the difference between static weight and swing weight. As I understand it, static weight is what the shaft actually weighs and swing weight is the feel, or perceived weight during the swing. Correct me if I'm wrong, please.

So, if I understand correctly, as the static weight goes down, the swing weight will go up because the balance of the club is more toward the club head. Is this correct?

If I go with steel, I'm sure I'll want something lightweight. I'm not getting any younger and this investment will have to last for many years. So what is considered lightweight in a regular flex steel shaft?  85gms?

Some thoughts:

Swing weight contributes to feel as does the overall weight of the club, flex of the shaft, etc.  Swing weight is more about the balance point of the club than the overall weight, I built two 5 irons with the same grip, head and length but a 105 gm steel shaft in one and a 66 gm graphite shaft in the other.  I added lead to the head of the graphite shafted club so that both irons have the same swing weight, (C-8)  but the graphite shafted club "feels" much lighter to me, and it is 26 gm lighter so that makes sense.

Usually when you lighten the shaft the swing weight goes down.  A club sits in a swing weight scale with 14 inches on one side of the fulcrum and the rest of the club on the other side.  When the shaft weight goes down the weight is reduced on both sides of the fulcrum and the head end actually gets lighter in relation to the grip end.

85 gm is about as light as your going to find in a steel shaft.  I'd call a 85 gm steel shaft a "ultralight", a 100 gm "light" and a 127 gm "standard", but thats just my personal rating system and there are steel shafts available at about every weight between the extremes of 80 to 130 gm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree with the previous poster.  About the lightest "reliable" steel shaft you'll find is between 85 to 90 grams, with most closer to the 90 gram mark.

"The more I practice, the luckier I get" -Ben Hogan

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Higher swingweights in general also mean higher club head speeds which is why graphite shafts produce higher swing speeds then steel shafts in general.

nickent.gif4DX Evolver Driver, ping.gif Rapture 3 Wood, taylormade.gif Burner 08 5 Wood, nickent.gif 3DX RC 3-4 & 5DX 5 Hybrid,
nickent.gif 6-PW 3DX Hybrid Irons, cleveland.gif High Bore 09 GW-SW, touredge.gif 60* Wedge, maxfli.gif Revolution Blade Insert Putter
 
Yes I'm Aware That's 16 Clubs!
Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by LankyLefty

Higher swingweights in general also mean higher club head speeds which is why graphite shafts produce higher swing speeds then steel shafts in general.



Really?  I always thought it was because graphite is lighter than steel.  I also always thought swingweight was pretty much just a "number" that presented the balance of the components used as measured on a fulcrum and had nothing to do with total weight.  All things being equal, i.e. headweight, grip weight and shaft length, I was under the impression that steel shafts would ALWAYS produce higher swingweights that graphite shafts.

Well....since I can make a sledgehammer swingweight to D3 with proper components and a feather light graphite shaft swingweight to D3 by adding weight to the head and lightening the grip, I guess what I always thought was true, is true.

And to take it a step further, I could make the sledgehammer swingweight higher than the feather light graphite club if I so desired.  And if I did so, I can also guarantee you'll swing the club with the feather weight graphite shaft faster than the sledgehammer.

"The more I practice, the luckier I get" -Ben Hogan

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thanks for the replies guys.  I had it right, sort of. Ya'll were able to explain what I was thinking but didn't know how to say.

After swinging different stuff, I went with the graphite shafts. Simply put, they just felt better.  I was taking normal swings with good form and it felt very natural and comfortable. Ball contact was perfect and my speed picked up 4mph.  I wasn't after speed, but comfort. (of course I'll take the speed) At 54 years old with a busted up right leg and a bad left shoulder, the graphites made me feel like I was young again. NO pain, smooth swings, solid contact and good results.  The new Burner 2.0 set should be here Monday.

Thanks again for helping out.

Burner 2.0 Graphite 4-AW
09 Burner 10.5*
08 #3 Burner 15*
09 Burner 3H
09 Burner 4H
TM-110 putter

Vokey 56.11
Titleist NXT 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Swingweights and swing speed are not directly related.  I can build two irons or drivers of widely different gross weights, but identical swingweights.  It's all a matter of weight distribution.  The lighter club will have the ability to be swung faster while retaining control.  Like Shagbag said, "swingweight was pretty much just a "number" that presented the balance of the components used as measured on a fulcrum and had nothing to do with total weight".  Swingweight is all about feel.  Lighter components will result in faster swing speeds.  Most fitters will suggest graphite for just that reason; picking up swing speed that was lost to your experienced years.

Congrats on your new purchase!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4705 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 12: Same as last couple days, but focus was on recentering aspect of flow. When I recenter earlier I make decent contact most swings but if I recenter late or not at all it’s a roll of the dice. 
    • A couple of things.  Some of the clubs in your bag should be dropped immediately.  A 2-iron for example with what obviously seems to be a lower swing speed or possibly not great swing yet is a definite no-no.  To be hitting that 120-140 yards, which I assume includes run, is a sign that you are not getting the ball airborne at the correct angle to maximise distance.  The reason your 3 and 5 hybrid are going the same distance is that your launch angle is better with the 5.  Loft is your friend. Ideally I would suggest going to a golf or sporting store where you can hit golf balls on a simulator without being disturbed to understand your club carry distances and hopefully swing speed.  With that information we can definitely guide you better.
    • Let us be clear, unless you have proof of cheating, you just sound like a case of sour grapes.  In our club we have a guy who won club titles for many years.  Yes, he was a low single digit handicapper, but there have been quite a few others who played at his level.  Yet his mental strength and experience helped him win in many years when he shouldn't have.  Did he sandbag.  DEFINITELY NOT.  Did he just minimize his mistakes and pull out shots as and when needed.  Definitely.
    • Day 111 - Worked on my grip and higher hands in the backswing. Full swings with the PRGR. 
    • First off please forgive me if this is not a proper post or not in the proper location, still learning the ropes around here. Second, it's important that I mention I am very new to the game with only about 10 rounds of golf under my belt, most being 9 holes. Only this year have I started playing 18. That being said, I am hooked, love the game and am very eager to learn and improve. To give you an idea of my skill, the last 2 18 rounds I played were 110 and 105. Not great at all, however I am slowly improving as I learn. Had been having bad slicing issues with the driver and hybrids but after playing some more and hitting the range, I've been able to improve on that quite a bit and have been hitting more straight on average. Irons have always come easier to me as far as hitting straight for some reason. Wedges have needed a lot of improvement, but I practice chipping about 20-30 mins about 3-5 times a week and that's helped a lot. Today I went to the range and started to note down some distance data, mind you I am averaging the distances based off my best guess compared to the distance markers on the range. I do not currently own a range finder or tracker. From reading some similar posts I do understand that filling gaps is ideal, but I am having a some issues figuring out those gaps and understanding which clubs to keep and remove as some gaps are minimal between clubs. Below is an image of the chart I put together showing the clubs and average distances I've been hitting and power applied. For some reason I am hitting my hybrids around the same distances and I am not sure why. Wondering if one of them should be removed. I didn't notice a huge loft difference either. The irons I have are hand me downs from my grandfather and after playing with them a bit, I feel like they're just not giving me what could potentially be there. The feel is a bit hard/harsh and underwhelming if that makes sense and I can't seem to get decent distances from them. Wondering if I should be looking to invest in some more updated irons and if those should be muscle backs or cavity backs? My knowledge here is minimal. I have never played with modern fairway woods, only the classic clubs that are actually wood and much smaller than modern clubs. I recently removed the 4 and 5 woods from my bag as I was never using them and I don't hit them very well or very far. Wondering if I should look into some more modern fairway wood options? I appreciate any feedback or advice anyone is willing to give, please forgive my lack of knowledge. I am eager to learn! Thank you.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...