Jump to content
IGNORED

Horrible Bunkers


glk23
Note: This thread is 4642 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

So far this season most of my rounds have been spread out around 6-8 local muni's. Without exception, the bunkers are pretty bad and inconsistent. At best you get a thin dry top layer with wetter sand below; at worst is thin top with hard dirt underneath. Sometimes both kinds at the same course. If this wasn't bad enough, I'm sure I have not had a raked lie yet. The ball usually sits up high with who knows what under it. As you might guess, this makes getting out a chore and getting close unlikely. Yesterday after my playing buddy and I both had our sand issues, I half joked that I wouldn't mind having a "pick, rake and place" rule when we are playing casual rounds. Anyone else having the same frustration with the bunkers at your course(s)?

In my Bagboy cart bag:
Driver: TM R11s 10.5 R-flex 3W: TM 09 Burner 3H: TM 09 Burner Irons: TM Tour Burner 4-PW r-flex
Wedges: Wilson TW9 GW, Ping Eye 2+ SW, Vokey SM 58.08      Putter:TM Rossa Spider Ball: TM TP/Red LDP, TF Gamer v2   Range Finder: GX-I

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by glk23

So far this season most of my rounds have been spread out around 6-8 local muni's. Without exception, the bunkers are pretty bad and inconsistent. At best you get a thin dry top layer with wetter sand below; at worst is thin top with hard dirt underneath. Sometimes both kinds at the same course. If this wasn't bad enough, I'm sure I have not had a raked lie yet. The ball usually sits up high with who knows what under it. As you might guess, this makes getting out a chore and getting close unlikely.

Yesterday after my playing buddy and I both had our sand issues, I half joked that I wouldn't mind having a "pick, rake and place" rule when we are playing casual rounds. Anyone else having the same frustration with the bunkers at your course(s)?

Only one comment.... that's why they are called hazards.  It may be frustrating, but nothing says that a hazard has to be consistent or pristine - quite the opposite.  It would seem to me that it just gives you more incentive to do whatever you can to avoid them (see the recent thread on course management).

By the way, I've played public courses my whole life, so I know where you're coming from.  I just never let it bother me.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

All the time here in Calgary.

Sometimes it is literally impossible to get the club under the ball - blade after blade.

Gets frustrating as hell - if they are truly bad my golf buddies and I will take a drop without penalty out of the bunker in the rough

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This is pretty standard for public courses here in the NW. Exactly as described, with the addition of rocks. I can pick shots out with the 60* some times and hardly even disturb the sand...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It can happen even at a private course. With all the other improvements this year, there was no money left in the budget for more sand. They finally worked their magic and gave us nice fluffy greenside bunkers - only to have it rain at least once a day for weeks to pack it back down.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Its pretty funny because the public course I play at that has the cheapest green fee's in the area has the nicest bunkers.  It also seems like it gets more business than any of the other ones and everyone I talk to there loves it...I wish more courses would realize they might get more business if they dropped their green fee's a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Since they are hazards, why even bother with raking them after I am done? I mean if I am unlucky or unskilled enough to be in one, then being in footprints or worse should add to the hazard.

In my Bagboy cart bag:
Driver: TM R11s 10.5 R-flex 3W: TM 09 Burner 3H: TM 09 Burner Irons: TM Tour Burner 4-PW r-flex
Wedges: Wilson TW9 GW, Ping Eye 2+ SW, Vokey SM 58.08      Putter:TM Rossa Spider Ball: TM TP/Red LDP, TF Gamer v2   Range Finder: GX-I

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You should see the bunkers at my home course. You could easily mistake them for a man-made lake.

Career Bests:

9 Holes--37 @ The Fairways at Arrowhead-Front(+2)

18 Holes--80 @ Carroll Meadows Golf Course(+9)

 

Home Course:

1) The Fairways at Arrowhead

2) Mayfair Country Club

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If the courses you play have really bad hard bunkers, you might want to think about checking your wedges.  The more bounce, the harder its gonna be to get out of a hard packed bunker.  Maybe look into wedges with less bounce if you plan on playing bunkers with really hard sand.  I have actually putted out of bunkers like that in some situations......

Link to comment
Share on other sites


i made this post a while back:

Bunkers are one of the most pricey items to build/maintain on a golf course. Under the most extreme circumstances (that is, setting a course up for tournament conditions all year around) a course would spend hundreds of thousands on labor costs alone to maintain bunkers.

This is obviously an extreme circumstance, so here's something a little more realistic (still pricey, nonetheless).

Cutlip takes maintenance issues into account for new designs and redesigns, such as his recent one at High Mountain Golf Club in New York. The improved look and playability of the bunkers boosted revenue from daily fees at the semi-private course.

So, given that the average course spends $261,500 on course maintenance, and 10-20 percent is on bunkers (we'll say 15% for the sake of argument), roughly $40,000 is spent on bunker maintenance yearly. Pretty pricey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Fourputt

Only one comment.... that's why they are called hazards.  It may be frustrating, but nothing says that a hazard has to be consistent or pristine - quite the opposite.  It would seem to me that it just gives you more incentive to do whatever you can to avoid them (see the recent thread on course management).

By the way, I've played public courses my whole life, so I know where you're coming from.  I just never let it bother me.

I absolutely get what you are saying there but when I get in a bunker that I couldn't get out of with a back hoe This hazard has now destroyed my round.  Luckily my course doesn't have many, because some days it is like hitting off cement.  My ball doesn't even make a line from where it entered to where it is now.  And I think that by raking it I have just made it worse because it leaves groves in the bunker now because it is so hard.  If I could play on those beaches that they do on the PGA I could be a much better bunker player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


we have several courses around here that just turned them into grass bunkers instead of keeping them up.  They are usually pretty severe with deep ruff, and harder to get up/down from than a regular sand bunker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Fourputt

Only one comment.... that's why they are called hazards.  It may be frustrating, but nothing says that a hazard has to be consistent or pristine - quite the opposite.  It would seem to me that it just gives you more incentive to do whatever you can to avoid them (see the recent thread on course management).

By the way, I've played public courses my whole life, so I know where you're coming from.  I just never let it bother me.


Why don't we just not fix ball marks on greens or replace divots while we're at it?  After all, nothing says those two things have to be done, either.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Paradox

Why don't we just not fix ball marks on greens or replace divots while we're at it?  After all, nothing says those two things have to be done, either.

Sorry but your statement is just silly.  There's a big difference between a hazard and a putting green.  If you can't tell the difference then.....


Originally Posted by trackster

I absolutely get what you are saying there but when I get in a bunker that I couldn't get out of with a back hoe This hazard has now destroyed my round.  Luckily my course doesn't have many, because some days it is like hitting off cement.  My ball doesn't even make a line from where it entered to where it is now.  And I think that by raking it I have just made it worse because it leaves groves in the bunker now because it is so hard.  If I could play on those beaches that they do on the PGA I could be a much better bunker player.


I've played courses (Fossil Trace in Golden, CO is one) with what some would call beautiful sand, but they can still be just as punishing as a bunker with little or no sand.  When you have a 50-50 chance of being buried anytime you hit a bunker, I find it far more frustrating.  And being buried on a slope where the ball is likely to be 8"  or more above or below your feet is a nightmare shot.  Give me a bare hardpan bunker any day over that.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I believe the laws of golf state that munis must have a hard pan floor and the front wall be soft enough to stick a ball along with the rocks.

It may also be illegal to rake out foot prints?

Fixing ball marks is defiantly a no-no!

"Quick Dorthy....the oil can!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The bunkers at our club are the same: thin and dry.  It's basically a one-stroke penalty if you hit in one because they are so difficult. I'm learning how to deal with it (had two sandies in a row the other day) but avoidance is definitely the best policy.

In my  bag: 

 Diablo Octane Tour 9.5, 18  -  6DT 19 (3I Hybrid) - 

 Diablo Forged Irons 5-PW -  Tom Watson wedges 52,56,60 - 64 (generic) 

 D.A.R.T. Belly Putter

 B330-RX Balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I understand where you are coming from. A hard packed, thin bunker is one place where having a low bounce wedge helps. If the sand is packed super tight I will typically use my 60* wedge and play it like a normal bunker shot. I do enter the sand closer to the ball than I normally would, but I have to make sure I take a solid, firm swing to make sure I get into the sand with the leading edge.

That shot works most of the time... it still won't compensate for rocks though, lol.

Driver -  909D2 9.5*
3 Wood -  975F 14.5*
5 Wood -  909F 18.5*
3I-PW -  Apex circa 2000
SW -   SM 54.08

LW -   SM 60.04

Putter -   Newport 2

Ball -  Pro V1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4642 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Here's the bet. Assuming the pursuit of a Tour card holds, who wins their first Tour event? Charlie, or this Russell kid? Bet is off if Miles Russell signs with LIV. 
    • It seems like too much work for me. I'm actually surprised at myself for spending as much time on this as I already have. Shot Scope tells me my shots to finish with a 7i is 0.1 better than with my 50 or 55 so I'm just going to go with it. Actually, I tend to be the complete opposite. I've never faced a shot I'm convinced I can't hit. It leads to great heroics and complete flops. Conservative for me might just be someone else's normal.
    • Tell me you've not seen Bill play without telling me you've not seen Bill play? 😄 Just teasing @billchao. 😄 
    • And like Matt said, and I have hinted at… it's ONE ROUND. Because you have to get hot. Better players than him failed to get through. And… Peaked too soon, perhaps. He could also get injured, get surpassed, lose interest or lose his game… Again, if I trusted y'all to uphold the bet, and if the bet wasn't basically a 15-year proposition… I'd bet y'all. The odds are against him, and heavily so. So… he didn't qualify, and he's playing on a sponsor's exemption. Jordan Spieth was 16 years old when he tied for 16th in a PGA Tour event… and I realize that mentioning Jordan Spieth (who has obviously had a lot of success) seems to argue against my point, but Spieth is the exception and he did better at only a year older than this fella. The odds are strongly against him.
    • He shot -5 with a bogey on the last hole. Those Monday Q events are seriously tough to get through. Lots of very very good players play in those, including normally a fair few tour players who've lost their cards, including past winners. It is a small sample size, but he also just broke one of Tiger's records (youngest ever to be ranked one in AJGA if memory serves). He's the best 15 year old in the world at the moment. He's also pretty small and skinny - if he grows and fills out a bit and gets stronger, he could be a serious force to be reckoned with. He may of course also go off the boil and struggle or his swing may not last his growth or something, so it's not like he's odds on to make it or anything like that. I think it will be interesting to see how he progresses and if (big if granted) he progresses well, then he will be quite the prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...