But I truly think that breaking Snead's career wins record will be a more impressive accomplishment than breaking Jack's record. Tiger plays a dozen or so events a year that have stronger fields than any of the majors Jack won before 1975. How in the world can anyone claim to be serious about golf, and then completely ignore 50+ strong wins when evaluating Tiger's career?
This thread has a pretty specific title. Perhaps that's how or at least why they're not talking about them here?