Quote:
Originally Posted by
mvmac 
Sorry to hear about all that. I've certainly had my share of similar stories, as have others. If you ever do get into a conversation about swing stuff, just ask questions and don't make statements. You'll find they get stumped by the second or third question.
Haha, I tried that approach, but it was always followed up with some kind of answer... That's why the conversation lasted so long.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mvmac 
No one thinks conceptually about golf. Why does loading into your right create more power? Why do you want to turn the shoulders level? Why do we want to restrict our hip turn? How does rotating our forearms make the ball draw? Or like you said, just stay out of it lol
Or when I was told to reduce my neck tilt. "Look at Adam Scott. His neck is tilted a lot more upward than you." "He changed that actually." "I haven't looked at his swing lately.... He did? Well, no matter, you should stand taller with your neck." "But I can't see the ball." Etc.
Honestly, I may over do the neck tilt thing anyway, and it is something I've thought about, but the change suggested to me went well into the not-enough-neck-tilt zone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mvmac 
Just recently a pro at out club (I don't teach there) took a video of my son and did a little analysis. My son wasn't looking for any instruction, he's just friendly with everyone. Basically the instructor said he loves everything he's doing except needs a straighter back at set-up. The whole stick the butt out, chest puffed out. The guy said will help him turn his shoulders more. If anything my son turns his shoulder too much. My son was really frustrated because it put him in an awkward position, does he just say thanks and does what he knows is right, does he go over the 5-6 reasons you should have curvature in a golf posture? Obviously the right answer is to just down play it, either say nothing or something like, "This posture helps me see the ball better".
The advice the instructor gave him was just advice for advice sake. Nothing to do with helping my son hit it better. Again, not thinking conceptually about the swing.
Yea, I too have an approachable personality. Possibly to a fault. But I certainly don't want to ruffle any feathers, especially when I see these guys literally every time I'm at the range because they literally hit balls every day, all day.
I too was getting suggestions on things that I already over-do. Like, "make a longer swing," for example. That recent video clip I made is of my "short swing." I already know that I need a much, much shorter backswing (and more arm bend at A2 would certainly help that). I was just getting tips that had helped them, with no understanding on their part that I have different problems.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
golfballs01 
I'm not sure how long you've been playing, or where you were before you received help.
I started in May 2008, but was unable to play in 2009 and much of 2010 because of a golf related back injury. 2009 and 2010 were lost seasons and 2008 only consisted of playing a few times over the summer. I was utterly hooked of course, but was unable to play -- that's when I got really active on this forum, trying to absorb as much information as I could so I wouldn't injure my back again.
2011 was a good year, but I only played 30 times or so because of unrelated hand issues derived from CTS, which thankfully, I have learned how to manage. 2012 has really been my first true, dedicated season of golf and practicing, even though I have struggled with over-use injuries to my left hand, forearms, left elbow, left hip flexor, neck, and right foot. All those injuries were managed well, and I stretch every day (both dynamically and statically), and ice any nick at the first sign of anything.
For whatever reason, I am injury prone when it comes to golf, and learning how to stay healthy so I can keep hitting balls has been a challenge I am learning every day how to overcome. I've come a long way as I am healthy right now, and I hope to keep it that way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
golfballs01 
What I see though looks pretty good. I've taught thousands of students and the two main things that individuals struggle with the most is (1) taking a divot, where they are trying to protect their club, their hands, and even the ground itself. By nature, they feel that they need to help the ball into the air, so they scoop or spoon it. By doing this, they don't compress the ball. From what I see in this video, you do quite well.
Thanks for deciding to chime in here, Chuck. Yea, I have no problems taking a divot. Sometimes its too much of one, and sometimes there isn't one, but that obviously stems from not being able to control low point. Thankfully, weight shift has been fairly solidly ingrained in me now, but educated hands have not yet. My low point dispersion has dramatically improved though in the past year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfballs01 
(2) They don't get completely forward in the finish. In otherwords, they don't completely committ to the shot. They seem to try to stop the club after impact, which requires deceleration through the shot, robbing them of the full potential of the ball striking. You seem to get through the shot completely. Someone gave you good instructions. As a suggestion, I would recommend, trying a coup[le waggles prior to beginning the takeaway. This will not only remove the tension from the hands and forearms, it will reassure the hands that the grip is comfortable and the dependancy is on the correct fingers.
Yea, in that recent swing clip, I am intentionally stopping my swing earlier in order to a) control what I'm doing prior to impact and b) (this is hard for me to describe) but gain more speed. Erik and Mike can probably better describe this, but controlling one's finish can contribute to a faster swing if done correctly.
And I actually do waggle the club, but I edited that out of the swing clip for the sake of the video being smaller for download purposes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfballs01 
Basically, the grip is a 3-2 combination. The forward hand is the three finger portion which include the middle finger, next to pinkie, and pinkie finger itself. Those are the controlling fingers of the forward hand.
I agree. I could be wrong, but I agree. Honestly, I, like most amateurs, probably grip it too tightly. And I probably have too much tension in my swing overall. I'm hoping though that in time, these kinds of things will work themselves out, as I am constantly learning every time I go to the golf course. I do make notes in my notebooks to reduce tension when I remember to, or when I feel it creeping in.
And the more I play with others, especially great players, the more I am learning how to deal with that feeling of chemicals rushing into my brain that produce nerves. Its just something we all have to get used to eventually.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
golfballs01 
Then the two fingers of the rear hand would be the middle and next to pinkey fingers. If you take the club in each hand independently, using just those fingers, you'll get the feeling of the correct grip. Be sure that the club is in the fingers and not in the palm. This makes it easy to release the club in a natural motion.
So far, my grip has gone from weak (pre-lessons), to very strong (1st day of lessons), to strong. I haven't made a grip change in about a year, and so far, no instructor who has watched me swing has griped about my grip, and this includes a number of them -- close to 30 or 40 -- whom I've been lucky to meet in the past few months. And I do grip it in the fingers for sure -- except the putter of course, where I use the reverse overlap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfballs01 
If you can get your hands on the Ben Hogan book, (FIVE LESSONS), you'll see a great demonstration of this. When the club is in the fingers, forward hand first, the hand will lay on the club with the thumb doun the shaft, slightly towards the rear hand. Then with the rear hand placed on the club in the two fingers mentioned, the rear palm will comfortably lay over the thumb of the forward hand, and it should fall righ on the lifeline of the rear hand. This will line the two Vs up and the hands will be aligned and not fight each other for direction when being released. It's like the hinges of a door. If they're not aligned, you can open the door but before long, the door casing will crack. You want the hands to work together. The reason I mentioned this is it appeared that the rear hand looked like it was trying to dominate in the swing.
I own and have read the book many times, yes. My grip is stronger than Hogan's because I've been taught to push-draw the ball.
My right hand does overtake the left at times, but when this happens, its usually related to my head "coming off the wall" on the downswing, and my body sensing that I will miss the ball if I don't extend the arc. If I time it, the ball is hooked, hit well, or pushed. If I don't time it, anything can happen -- but usually the result is fat or thin.
And a little palmar flexion or bowing of the lead wrist can often help me as well control the low point, but I only go to that feeling if my head is staying stable and I am hitting pushes that don't draw.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
golfballs01 
It also looked as though you didn't look relaxed.
Like I said, tension is something I do fight. I do need to relax a bit. That said, a disgusting player was manning the camera for me when I made that swing, and I was a little nervous hitting balls with him. He missed final stage of Q-School by a shot or two, and is easily the best player I've ever practiced with. He's friends with Ricky Fowler and Sara Brown from Big Break, and hits the ball ridiculously well.
He's the one who gave me that steady head drill -- where I have that alignment aid stuck in the ground pointing at my head. He said everyone thinks that he's just trying to keep the handle lower when doing it, but its to help him keep his head in place. If you dip forward or rise up, you can clearly see the stake getting closer or farther from your head. The same thing is true on the downswing if you swing slowly enough. He said Al Geiberger gave him that drill.
But sadly, this guy said he was leaving this range because he couldn't stand the other tour pros there -- for the same reason I'm starting to get annoyed. It's sad that such a good and smart player is leaving. I could've learned a lot from this guy. Oh well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
golfballs01 
I completely agree with you on the cramming of advice. The problem with many instructors is that they're taught to position people in a mold or model, which the only way to be successful is to fit into the mold.
I guess it depends on the mold or model. I honestly don't mind being crammed with advice -- as long as its relevant advice to me. I welcome good information from anywhere I can get it.
I think Mike Bennett and Andy Plummer speak well on why certain models can work, as long as they presented in the correct way:
Quote:
Changing Your Swing
A lot is made of golfers changing their swings, especially successful ones. Jim McLean said this about Rickie Fowler, “I haven’t helped Rickie with his swing, but I offered him one bit of advice when I met him a couple of years ago. I told him to never, ever let anyone change his swing.” The question we pose is, “What constitutes a swing change?” The fact is that golfers of all abilities routinely change their swings. They experiment daily with different swing thoughts or procedures to addres
s new problems or reoccurring errors. Does this qualify as a swing change? If so, this process happens all the time, but is not always noticeable to anyone but the golfer or the closest observers.
In our world, form is function. Therefore, the recommendations we make have specific functions. In other words, if one is satisfied with the predictability in command over the ball, then one should keep doing the procedure they have adopted. However, when one does need assistance, there should be some logical, systematic way for golfers to address the problems they are having.
Some like to make a big deal of whether they should or should not “convert” to the Stack & Tilt® swing, as if they are crossing over an imaginary line to the dark side. The implication being that one must make some radical shift in one’s technique or understanding of the way they play golf. We say maybe, maybe not. It depends on your definition of what radical and the state of your game. For instance, would taking hand path inward a little more be radical? The problem we see is that masses of golfers make the same errors over and over again and do not recognize the problem and, therefore, do not change their swing to alleviate the issues. This is harmful in that it discourages the golfer from playing and practicing. We think learning and practicing golf is fun, not a burden. Improving, whether at golf or in life, is fun and part of the spirit of the game, with the goal being to do a little better the next time. Part of our success to the extent we have had lies in large part to the fact that players who are learning enjoy practicing and enjoy the process of getting better, therefore succeed. A well known coach on the PGA Tour told a player who had won tournaments before that it would take 18 months to reconstruct their swing. We do not operate that way.
The point of this is that we do not necessarily change everything about every student’s swing to fit some preconceived notion about the swing we may have. Steve Elkington made a comment about us saying, “Mike and Andy can fix most guys in two swings.” The point is that we do establish some order to the process and help players find a predictable pattern for playing golf, which ultimately takes less time. Sometimes players have taken what they want from the system and move on. That is fine with us. There are many other models and capable instructors other than us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfballs01 
I am a Master Teaching Professional myself, and have taught thousands of students over the last 40 years. I myself have taken bogus lessons, doing things wrong on purpose, just to see how the instructor spotted, and fixed the faults. My intentions were that if they had a better way than I did, I too would learn something. A better way! I was rather disappointed with the results. That's not to say that there aren't many awesome instructors though. Some individuals read material out of a book, then suddenly they're an expert. There's the cookie cutter mentality, and there's the realistic mentality. I believe in the latter of the two. I witnessed one student getting frustrated with his lesson, and the instructor was worse. It ended up with the instructor telling the student to keep their money and find another sport. Shortly after, I approached the individual, and he shared the problem with me. Come to find out, the student had a prior injury which prevented him from making certain motions. He was being asked to make moves that he couldn't make. After five minutes of talking and explaining a few basic fundamentals, we figured a way around the injury, and he was hitting the ball nicely. I believe that everyone deserves to enjoy the game and true teachers, instructors, and mentors should be skilled in recognizing the needs of people, and have the versatility to make things work.
Christopher Warner
Master Teaching Professional
Certified Examiner
Yea, bad lessons are brutal. I've been there.
If an instructor can get his student to hit the ball better, or understand the game better, and it shows results, then I don't care what method they use.
Getting someone to play better around an injury must be quite the challenge. Good work there, Chuck!
Thanks for replies, BTW.