Quote:
Originally Posted by
logman 
Hey JF, Aint no thang!.
You mentioned LPG, yeah, yeah, I know
. But I'm just thinking about the Downfalls of LPG in comparison to your more classic action. And one thing I've realized, having experimented with a couple of styles is how superior the conventional swing is regarding translating what your mind percieves as the right weight to swing the club to hit the target and then the transfer of that feel into the right swing weight. The LPG swing punches the club at the ball in a quickish sort of jab. The conventional swing seems more pendulummy(if you know what I mean). The conventional swing feels like you can dial in the correct weight feel.....during the swing.
So your swing looks powerful enough to back off on the "hitting" and concentrate on feeling the pendulummy transfer of power.
Anyway, I think if you back off the power a bit without losing your natural rhythm then not only will your sideways dispersion reduce but also your length dispersion
PS; pendulummy..wtf that!
Yea, you know, what you say intrigues me because honestly any style can work. I've put a good amount of time into my swing over the past year, and even still it frustrates the hell out of me. LPG can definitely work, but just remembering your swing thread, the one thing that stuck out to me was the weight transfer. I think if you can get the weight more forward consistently, you will get more power and less curve. But take it from me, and I'm sure you'll agree, that changing things can be really difficult. I've suffered quite a bit of this as I seem to be always working on swing changes. I'm just never satisfied really with where I'm at, so I never have a range session where it's just about warming up. I'm always fixing something. In the long run, I think that's been a good thing, but in the short term, it can really bite me in the ass.
For the longest time, feeling pressure in my front foot -- throughout the entire swing -- really helped me learn how to slide my hips in order to get the weight transfer I more or less wanted. Even still, my right foot doesn't bank onto its instep the way I want it to. But over time, I've been able to drift away from that as Mvmac has me feeling a weight transfer into my back foot. Honestly, a year ago, I don't think I could have pulled that off. But now, with so many range sessions ingraining a hip slide, I can shift back now and get back onto my front side consistently. Its a slippery slope because you can see on this thread what constant front foot pressure can do to you. It can move the location of the pivot too far forward, with the shoulder turn not going far enough "back." Now that I understand that, its done wonders for understanding the foot pressures -- and their locations during the swing -- a lot better.
With my swing, I fight a hook and a push. I can even hit the draw equivalent of a slice where the ball pushes way out to the right and then suddenly draws well back to the middle of the fairway -- it's an annoying shot to hit because of how much distance I lose. So my swing certainly has its fair share of issues too.
And frankly, learning anything new is just riddled with constant tests of patience and humility. I've had I don't know how many sessions where I've looked like a 30 handicap out there. Sometimes, I look like a pro too, and I've been mistaken for a pro by other pros, but there have been just so many times where I've hit the ball fat, thin, left, right -- pretty much anywhere except where I'm aiming.
I think if you applied some of the LPG principles that you really like with some of the stuff on this site that you are intrigued by too, you could end up with a swing pattern you'd really be excited about. I know evolvr is really flexible about merging swing philosophies. Granted, the practice I put in to engrain the changes Mike wants does require dedication. They've really gotten me to understand the limitations of the S&T instruction I had received. And, man, was I dedicated to S&T when I started with them. People call 5SK Stack and Tilt, but they couldn't be more wrong. 5SK respects S&T, and they know how to teach it, but what separates them is that they know where the over-doing of the S&T pieces occur, and how to fix them. So for me, it is a perfect marriage. It's pretty much like they're better at teaching S&T than S&T! 
All that said, reading the S&T book was the most enlightening experience I've ever had reading a golf book -- even if I'm drifting away from it now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jamo 
JetFan, you're still working with the S&T guys right? Well looky here, someone just called S&T "conventional."

In the private forums, you know how I feel about what's been going with S&T. I'm working exclusively with Mvmac now. I see the S&T people all the time though as I practice at the range where they all teach at and hold clinics. I know them well enough now that they don't mind that I attend clinics without paying -- just to observe their teaching methods. It's been really cool, and they're all super nice to me. They know I can speak the TGM language and that I understand the pattern pretty well, so I guess I'm fairly enjoyable to be around as far as students go.
But I've been looking more "conventional" ever since I started working with evolvr, since they got me to understand just how much "back" my shoulder turn needed to go. Of course, now I have to work on my arms -- which in a lot of ways scares me because that's been the least natural movement for me. But also, I think I've gotten to the point where I've gotten so fed up with this problem, that I'm going to overdo the solution so much the next time I practice that Mvmac will have to send me a video telling me to stop doing it so much 
I think the most Stack and Tilty look of my swing is the hip slide. I've practiced it so much in the past couple seasons that I know exactly what I need to feel in order to get that picture.
I still have two lessons that I've paid for with two S&T teachers. I'm not sure when I'll use them, but I paid for them months ago. It'll be interesting to work with them again now that I'm armed with more information as to where I would like them to focus on fixing me. And also, I'm intrigued to hear what they think my priority piece is right now based on what I know from evolvr. I think I'd laugh if they didn't match. It would spark an interesting discussion.
Here are some of the differences between evolvr and S&T:
1) S&T teachers keep telling me to keep my arms straight on the back swing. Evolvr tells me to fold the right arm early and a lot in the backswing. Total disconnect there. I'm going with what evolvr tells me because they've convinced me why this is important whereas S&T has not.
2) S&T wants me to palmar flex more when I lose the flying wedge, but evolvr wants me to release the no.4 power accumulator better. I'm leaning towards evolvr because their explanation makes more sense to me, even if I still have a very profound respect for palmar flexion, especially when I'm flipping.
3) Evolvr has explained the foot pressures to me better.
4) S&T doesn't want my lead knee to track inward, but evolvr does. I like the evolvr way better because its easier to make a centered pivot.
5) Evolvr wants me to reduce feet flare out where S&T has never mentioned that to me. Evolvr's explanation why I should do this makes more sense to me, even though I do have a strong respect for flaring out the feet (see Sam Snead. He does it perfectly).
Edited by JetFan1983 - 2/8/13 at 4:08am