Jump to content
IGNORED

If money wasn't a problem..


Note: This thread is 4271 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

At over $7 per ball these things better come with a remote control.  My game isn't good enough to risk losing one at that price.  I am holding off playing the Callaway Hex Black Tours I just got at $27.30 / dozen because I am still working on some swing changes and don't want to lose any.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

They're so expensive Mizuno doesn't even mention them on their website.

nike.gif  VR-S Covert 10.5*

nike.gif  SQ2 15*

  Idea Black Hybrid, 19*

mizuno.gif  MP54, 4-PW

vokey.gif SM 50*, 54*, 58*

nike.gif  Method 001

nike.gif  RZN One

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by colin007

Do any tour players even use those?

I doubt it..just one of those obnoxiously expensive ultra high end products for the japanese golf market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Not with my game I wouldn't.  Even if they were the best balls ever I still shoot in the 80s or 90s and a ball, no matter how good, won't magically change that to make me the player that I was 20 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think you guys are overlooking the, "if money wasnt a problem" aspect.  If money were no object, all of my golf gear would be JDM (Japanese domestic market).  Yes, its more expensive but the Japanese market in almost every instance offers equipment that is of higher quality and outperforms what we have available to us here in the states.  The reason for that is because the Japanese are willing to pay a little more for quality.  Thats why you almost never see cast irons and even in the case of drivers you see a lot of drivers with forged faces.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


"If money wasn't a problem", I'm not so sure I wouldn't have the same basic equipment I have right now.  I would probably have the latest equipment, but I wouldn't necessarily change just to change.  I would for sure try out everything new, if it improved my game or felt better I would have it, but I would not have the latest just because it's the latest.  I would probably have a couple sets of irons also, I love forged blades, so I would have a set of Mizuno, Titliest, Miura, Taylormade and whatever else caught my fancy!

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I love my setup right now.  If money weren't a problem I might bet a brand new set of wedges, 50˚, 54˚, 60˚.  But probably I'd use all my new free money and play much more often and at much nicer courses than I can afford right now!

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd buy this

Driver - Cobra S3 9.5* - Mitsubishi Rayon JavlnFX M7 
Fwy - Titleist 904F 18*
Irons - Mizuno MP-14
Wedges - Cleveland 588 54*, Ping Tour 58*
Putter - Ping D66 (iWi)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think you guys are overlooking the, "if money wasnt a problem" aspect.  If money were no object, all of my golf gear would be JDM (Japanese domestic market).  Yes, its more expensive but the Japanese market in almost every instance offers equipment that is of higher quality and outperforms what we have available to us here in the states.  The reason for that is because the Japanese are willing to pay a little more for quality.  Thats why you almost never see cast irons and even in the case of drivers you see a lot of drivers with forged faces.

Gold paint and shiny things are not indications of "quality". There is no difference in quality between JDM stuff and what is available elsewhere. As for "outperforming", again, that is nonsense. Please give one example.

  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The cost of equipment is such a small % of what I spend on golf over the life of that equipment, that the cost of that equipment doesn't even enter into my decision of what to buy. Don't misunderstand, I'm not wealthy, but if a $400 driver lasts me 5 years at 80 rounds per year, my cost is only $1 per round. If the driver I really want costs $600, I'm not going to balk at spending an extra 50 cents per round to get it......

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

I think you guys are overlooking the, "if money wasnt a problem" aspect.  If money were no object, all of my golf gear would be JDM (Japanese domestic market).  Yes, its more expensive but the Japanese market in almost every instance offers equipment that is of higher quality and outperforms what we have available to us here in the states.  The reason for that is because the Japanese are willing to pay a little more for quality.  Thats why you almost never see cast irons and even in the case of drivers you see a lot of drivers with forged faces.

What Shorty says:

Originally Posted by Shorty

Gold paint and shiny things are not indications of "quality".

There is no difference in quality between JDM stuff and what is available elsewhere.

As for "outperforming", again, that is nonsense. Please give one example.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by pixel5

I'd buy this

I was not aware that Batman played golf.  Where does he put the clubs?

If money wasn't an object, the only think I think I'd definitely get is Edel wedges and putter.

Oh, and I'd find out how much Mike or Erik would need for a retainer so I could have them on-call as a "concierge" instructor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

If money weren't a problem I'd have a house in Florida, California, Bandon, Ireland, etc...

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by nevets88

If money weren't a problem I'd have a house in Florida, California, Bandon, Ireland, etc...

I always say that too, and then I remind myself that if money wasn't a problem I could also just stay in the most luxurious hotels in all of the vacation spots, so I think we'd just go for a house in Cali and an apt. in Manhattan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by David in FL

The cost of equipment is such a small % of what I spend on golf over the life of that equipment, that the cost of that equipment doesn't even enter into my decision of what to buy.

Don't misunderstand, I'm not wealthy, but if a $400 driver lasts me 5 years at 80 rounds per year, my cost is only $1 per round. If the driver I really want costs $600, I'm not going to balk at spending an extra 50 cents per round to get it......

If money was no object I'd have one gamer set, one game improvement set (similar but easier to hit), and I'd be using them on courses around the world, rather than thinking about them sitting in the back of my car and writing about them on the internet.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

I think you guys are overlooking the, "if money wasnt a problem" aspect.  If money were no object, all of my golf gear would be JDM (Japanese domestic market).  Yes, its more expensive but the Japanese market in almost every instance offers equipment that is of higher quality and outperforms what we have available to us here in the states.  The reason for that is because the Japanese are willing to pay a little more for quality.  Thats why you almost never see cast irons and even in the case of drivers you see a lot of drivers with forged faces.

Thank you GaijinGolfer..please stick to the topic..yes, I know you guys would get a Gulfstream 6, Piaget Emperador Temple, latest version of the Veyron..blah..blah..blah..but stick to golf..show me something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4271 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...