Jump to content
IGNORED

Should I get new clubs?


tuffluck
Note: This thread is 4196 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I shoot in the low 90s usually. Worst is low 100s. I strike the ball well. I putt well outside of 5 feet. I chip well with a good lie. I lose 80% of my strokes on bad chips due to unfamiliar lies, and putts less than 5 feet. Time to laugh at me. I actually play similar scores on the tips vs gold because I hit decently long. I am old school and have a 7 wood, and a 5 too. I drive 260 average, 3 wood is 250, but my r9 4 iron is only 200 at best. Which is strange because the 8 iron is about 160. Anyway, I would like to play tips more since I have the distance...I think...but my irons just don't go long enough. The i20s I'm in love with and I hit each club about 15 yards further than my r9s. Ultimately my short game needs a ton of work, but IMO as long as I strike the ball well, I may as well play my distance capability. Most par 4s I drive or use a 3 wood and then <6 iron. But on par 5s, the 4 iron or even the 7 wood is never enough to get me on the green in two. I don't want to be a golf dick that can afford clubs but shoots terribly, but the quality of iron may allow my short game to be less needed. Thoughts?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


If your losing most of your strokes with your short game than i dont think you should get new clubs. And you say you strike the ball well anyway so clearly your irons arent the problem. Short game is where its at. Practice practice practice. If you have an unfamiliar lie put the wedge away and hit a 8 iron or something similar and run it up there. Much easier to make solid contact on a crappy ass lie with an iron over a wedge.

Originally Posted by tuffluck

I shoot in the low 90s usually. Worst is low 100s.

I strike the ball well. I putt well outside of 5 feet. I chip well with a good lie. I lose 80% of my strokes on bad chips due to unfamiliar lies, and putts less than 5 feet. Time to laugh at me.

I actually play similar scores on the tips vs gold because I hit decently long. I am old school and have a 7 wood, and a 5 too. I drive 260 average, 3 wood is 250, but my r9 4 iron is only 200 at best. Which is strange because the 8 iron is about 160.

Anyway, I would like to play tips more since I have the distance...I think...but my irons just don't go long enough. The i20s I'm in love with and I hit each club about 15 yards further than my r9s.

Ultimately my short game needs a ton of work, but IMO as long as I strike the ball well, I may as well play my distance capability. Most par 4s I drive or use a 3 wood and then <6 iron. But on par 5s, the 4 iron or even the 7 wood is never enough to get me on the green in two. I don't want to be a golf dick that can afford clubs but shoots terribly, but the quality of iron may allow my short game to be less needed.

Thoughts?

So you own r9's but are looking at the i20s? Correct?

Also on the par 5's you say your long iron or wood is never enough to get you there. Since your having trouble with your chipping id just lay up and give yourself a full 8/9 iron into the green.

909 D2 10.5* Aldila NVS Reg 65g

Baffler T-Rail 16*

R7 19*

Fli-Hi 21*

FP 5-PW

52* 56* 60* Vokey Spin Milled

Flat Stick

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hey tuffluck,

By no means am I an expert but have you thought about bagging a 4hybrid?  I just recently started doing this, I feel like my 5i is the longest iron I have that i can hit well more then i can hit poorly.  With good contact I send my 5i around 185/190, my 4h is a good 205/210 club.  My problem with a 4i is that I seem to hit it more 5i distance most of the time, unless I catch it crisp.

What is your 5i distance compared to your 4i?  And what is your 7w distance?  I guess a 7w is about a 3i replacement.

As far as you new clubs question, I think what you're asking is should you go for the i20's to get the added distance and be able to go a club less on most of your iron shots.  I would say yes if you don't mind parting with the $$$.  If you consistantly hit i20's 10-15 yards further (each club) your going about one club lower on every approach, sounds like a good upgrade to me.

Also, I agree with the above post, if your on a Par 5 and you can't reach it in two a layup to 9i/PW distance is probably more effective then trying to get up towards the green but coming up 50 yards short.  I'm more comfortable with a full swing then anything inside the 100 yard mark, I try and constantly remind myself this when I'm playing longer holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


i have a recurring problem chipping,in that i never seem to hit it hard enough,i feel as though it will shoot over the green,so usually end up shy,chipping is all about feel and

if you become proficient at it i see your low 90s beconming low 80s,and your handicap halving in time,as for buying new clubs,its up to you,if you can easily afford them,or are relatively affluent then why not

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Two thoughts. First, don't think about new clubs to fix your problems, except maybe a wedge if you have a very old one---that *might* affect your ability to chip out of crappy lies, but even that's a long shot. (If you want new clubs just for their own sake, by all means go for it, but don't expect them to improve your scores.) As was said above, the weaknesses you have really can only be fixed with practice.

Second, I wouldn't be worrying about moving back to the tips just because you can hit that range. While it may not feel like the distance is hurting you, it is. Except in very, very unusual situations, you are more accurate on shorter shots. Even if the tips are only 20 yards longer on a hole, that adds 20 yards to your approach, which makes you that much more likely to miss the green and need to hit a chip. If you're playing in the 90s, I don't think it's time to move back, except maybe to play the same tees as your group. I'm in the same situation as you, though a bit shorter off the tee. I find that I shoot the same scores from most tees, but I still don't go past the white (middle) tees, and often play the forward tees if my dad is playing them. Until I get down into the low 80s consistently, I'm not going to worry about needing to play longer tees.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Spend lots of time on your short game and puitting. Get lessons and practice. These shots are not as simple as the seem.

Of course you should get new clubs. Doing that every few years is part of the fun of golf. Remember, though, that new clubs aren't the biggest part of the answer. At some point, it's the singer, not the song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would not get new clubs if I were you. Save the cash. Buy a new Putter and/or Wedge if anything if that is the worst part of your game right now and work backwards. Practice your putting, chipping and pitching. I used to be stuck at nearly a 25 hc because I only focused on my long irons and driver (I was younger and naive). I started working backwards with the advice of my dad in my head, when watching him get away with Par after duffing a tee shot, or going OB, etc. His short game is deadly and I wanted to nail putts like him and chip within a 5 foot radius like him, so I practiced and practiced hard on chipping and finally surpassed him.

In short, I think chipping and putting are the most important aspects of score. I'm not talking about statistics or anything 100% factual, I'm just stressing my own personal opinion based on my game. Chips and putts have saved me more Pars than any other shot in my arsenal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I shoot in the low 90s usually. Worst is low 100s.

{...}

But on par 5s, the 4 iron or even the 7 wood is never enough to get me on the green in two...

You are not supposed to be able to get on par 5's in two. You shoot in the 90's and sometimes the 100's. You would score better if you hit a wedge into par 5's in three every time. I can't get to two of the five par 5's on my home course ever and I play the third set of tees up from the back. The other three holes take great drives, good wind, a good lie in the fairway, and a terrific second shot -- a rare combo indeed. And I have not shot over 100 in years. Getting on a par 5 in two is a big deal for most everyone and especially anyone with a handicap over 10.

Spend your next $200 on lessons. Find a pro you like and trust. Ask that pro if your clubs FIT the swing you should be making. If they fit your swing (lie and length) then you should be able to learn to hit them straight with the help of your new pro. You are long enough, and if you become straight, you'll start breaking 90. No one I've ever played with who is long and straight has a short game so bad that they shoot 100.

If your clubs do not fit you, either bend and re-shaft them, or buy different ones. FIT MATTERS MOST.

160 yard 8-iron is nice I guess. Being long or getting longer is not the key to your never shooting over 100 again. Knowing how long each shot will go is closer to the key.

And, as most will tell you, if you want to shoot lower scores instead of longer 8-irons, work on your short game.

Lastly, move up not back. Just because you can hit the ball far does not mean you should play from back tees. Obviously something other than putting is keeping your scores higher than people who should play the tips. Learn to hit a lot of greens in regulation from whatever tees it takes. Then start moving back.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 month later...
Quote:
I shoot in the low 90s usually. Worst is low 100s.
{...}
But on par 5s, the 4 iron or even the 7 wood is never enough to get me on the green in two...

You are not supposed to be able to get on par 5's in two. You shoot in the 90's and sometimes the 100's. You would score better if you hit a wedge into par 5's in three every time. I can't get to two of the five par 5's on my home course ever and I play the third set of tees up from the back. The other three holes take great drives, good wind, a good lie in the fairway, and a terrific second shot -- a rare combo indeed. And I have not shot over 100 in years. Getting on a par 5 in two is a big deal for most everyone and especially anyone with a handicap over 10.

Spend your next $200 on lessons. Find a pro you like and trust. Ask that pro if your clubs FIT the swing you should be making. If they fit your swing (lie and length) then you should be able to learn to hit them straight with the help of your new pro. You are long enough, and if you become straight, you'll start breaking 90. No one I've ever played with who is long and straight has a short game so bad that they shoot 100.

If your clubs do not fit you, either bend and re-shaft them, or buy different ones. FIT MATTERS MOST.

160 yard 8-iron is nice I guess. Being long or getting longer is not the key to your never shooting over 100 again. Knowing how long each shot will go is closer to the key.

And, as most will tell you, if you want to shoot lower scores instead of longer 8-irons, work on your short game.

Lastly, move up not back. Just because you can hit the ball far does not mean you should play from back tees. Obviously something other than putting is keeping your scores higher than people who should play the tips. Learn to hit a lot of greens in regulation from whatever tees it takes. Then start moving back.

Good advice. I shot a 98 from the tips last weekend. 3 lost drives (6 strokes), 5 putts within 3ft I missed. That's 11 strokes I should easily should have gotten 8 or more back from. This is pretty much a textbook round for me. Short putts and lost drives is always 10 strokes of my rounds. My chipping game is actually an 8/10 because my irons are so unfitted for me that I miss most greens right and get a lot of practice with the wedge. I 2 putt almost every hole, whether I am 65 feet away or obviously, 3 feet away. If I had better fitted irons that were a bit more predictable, I figure I can eliminate at least 30% of my chipping game. That would be good for about 5 strokes I figure. And that is why I got fit for i20s today :) Sorry for the old post revival, I don't check this website enough! Thanks for the responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4196 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Two things I bring up when it comes to this discussion. One is if you have let's say two towns next to each other, one has a population of 10,000 people and the other has a population of 1,000 people. Let's also say that they never play golf against each other. Only among themselves. In the first town, you have one guy who has won 15 events, then a couple of guys who won 6, a couple who won four and a bunch of people who won three, two and one events. In the second town, you have one guy who won 18 events, then a guy who won 11, a guy who won 9, a guy who won 8, a couple who won 7, a couple who won 3-5 and then a few 2s and a few 1s. Who's the best golfer? It's possible it's the guy who won 18, but it's pretty unlikely. Far more likely to be the guy who won 15 in the much bigger town.  In the same way, I view the fact that there is more parity in the 1990 and onwards world than there was in the pre 1990 world as a plus for Tiger. It's much harder to stand out if the fields are deeper, stronger, better. If there are a handful of players who win all of them, that tends to suggest weakness to me, not strength. The other thing is Ed White. Harvey Penick talked about him in one of his books. Ridiculously good at the game, but no one ever heard of him, because he got a job and didn't play professionally. There was no money in it and he needed security, so he took a job that paid him steadily. No clue how many people there are out there like him, but if he was around today, he'd be playing pro golf for sure. If he had played professionally, Penick sure seemed to think he'd have been one of the best of all time. Fred Haas played him in a college match and got stuffed. 40 years later he walked into Penick's shop and saw Ed White's picture on the wall and, after a full career playing pro golf, he said that Ed White was the best player he ever saw. Those 40 years would presumably have included at least some of Jack. I can see why people might say Jack is the GOAT. I don't agree, but I can at least understand why they say it. IMO there is no argument you can make for anyone other than Tiger to be the BOAT though. At least not yet.
    • A good option is to play the Par 3 courses. after playing an 18 -hole round. The Par 3 courses have 18 holes, we usually played only 9 holes after playing 36 holes on each of the trips we had. You may want to check out Grand National while you're in the middle of Alabama. I enjoyed Oxmoor Valley and Ross Bridge courses which are a short drive north.
    • In August, I am playing the World Am in Myrtle Beach. I do not know which courses yet, but should be a blast. Aside from that, those are the only golf trip plans, unless I play while on vacation in Destin in June.
    • Even on a perfect center hit I was receiving at most 1.48 smash factor. 10 days ago on the warming up for a round my Driver made a weird sound, I checked the bottom and it was cracked. Don't know for how long it was cracked but at least this time the crack was easy visible. Maybe it was already cracked before but with a more subtle crack?.. don't know. I'm waiting for TaylorMade to approve the warranty and send me a new head. I was using the Stealth Plus, I will take the opportunity and upgrade it to the Qi10 LS paying the difference.  On Sunday with my old Titleist 915 and softer balls I was reaching 1.5, even 1.51 on center hits. Test didn't went well. Only gained 2..3 miles, not worth pursuing. Figured out that with a ball and with a target, my path was way to in to out with this new idea, so in order to move the club in the correct path I needed to slow down to redirect the club on the downswing or aim more to the right, close the face a play a big hook.. not possible. I already play a big draw with Driver, more curvature is unplayable. Yesterday at home, with no ball messed around with a more neutral path, even swinging a little out to in. It felt a lot more in sync with the body. With a big in to out path it feels like my hands are working right, away from the body, when the body is working to rotate to the left. With the path to the left is was easier to apply force thru the hitting zone.  As always tested 10 swings with my current swing (A), and 10 with this little out to in path(B).  The difference was huge, like 12 miles faster with swing (B). I knew something wasn't right. The fact was that the PRGR was aligned more in line with the (B) path so it of course was giving higher speeds. I proceeded to align it with the (A) path and tested again 5 more swings each. Again (B) was faster but only by 5 miles. (Made a tiny experiment moving the PRGR to a more extreme in to out path and the swings register 25/30% slower for both swings, so it wasn't reading properly at that angle) Finally I moved the PRGR in the middle of both paths, and this time (B) won by 9 miles. Off course, this was without a ball and a target so.. I will be hitting the range tomorrow to see the real difference.            
    • Wordle 1,032 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 😲
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...