Is it because golf technology has peaked? Is it because marketing BS sells better than facts? Is it because there's almost nothing that can be done do to improve a golf iron in the last 15 years? I think so...I mean you can't expect someone to pay $900 for a extra 14 inches in distance with their 8 iron.
I want to see Taylor Made's latest/greatest irons v Ping's latest/greatest irons vs 20 y.o Ping eye 2's etc.
I want to see Nike v Titleist v Bridgestone v TM v Noodle v Top Flite etc. golf ball comparison done by a swing robot.
Instead we get some "Pro" Momo or forum hackier Momo probably on payroll or just a idiot giving us his biased opinions using his far from perfect crappy swing.
I want to see much more maybe even all new product testing done by precision robotic swing machines and not some "pro" or forum geek.
Is there some massive cache of robotic testing i'm not privy to, or cache of YouTube vids showing product comparisons via robot?